Att 14- Phase I Tech Questions responses - 554-21-700P2 CO.pdf
PDF 117 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C77625R0084
About this file
This document is a Technical Questions and Responses Tracking Sheet for Solicitation #36C77625R0084, relating to a Design-Build EHRM Infrastructure Upgrades project for additional FCUs (Fan Coil Units) in Aurora, Colorado. The tracking sheet contains three key contractor questions and corresponding VA responses, focusing on proposal submission requirements and past performance guidelines.
The key points include: (1) previously completed Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQs) are acceptable for submission, (2) the government will consider past performance examples from proposed Architecture/Engineering (A/E) subcontractors, and the A/E firm does not need to have been the prime contractor on previous projects, and (3) for joint venture (JV) submissions, it is acceptable for the "Project Experience" section to reflect the past performance of only one JV member, provided that member has extensive experience with projects of similar scope, size, and complexity as described in the solicitation. A Subcontractor Consent Form or Letter of Commitment is required at the time of proposal submission, with no specific format preference.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| S06- 36C77625R0084 0001.pdf | ||
| Att 4- 10.MH.104.pdf | ||
| Att 2- 10.MH.102.pdf | ||
| Att 6- 10.MP.103.pdf | ||
| Att 11 - Division Cost Breakdown.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Att 13- DBA Rates - Adams County - 09.15.25.pdf | ||
| Att 7 - 10.MP.104.pdf | ||
| Att 3- 10.MH.103.pdf | ||
| Att 1- SOW 554-21-700P2 EHRM Infra Upgrades.pdf | ||
| 36C77625R0084.pdf | ||
| Att 8 - PEQ.docx | DOCX document | |
| Att 10 - Limitations on Subcontracting - Construction.docx | DOCX document | |
| Att 5 - 10.MP.102.pdf | ||
| Att 12- Service Rates - Adams County 09.15.25.pdf | ||
| Att 9 - PPQ.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 15
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
TECHNICAL QUESTIONS AND SOLICITATION #: 36C77625R0084
RESPONSES TRACKING SHEET PROJECT TITLE: 554-21-700P2 Design-Build EHRM Infrastructure Upgrades ( Additional FCU’s)- Aurora-CO
# RECEIVED ANSWERED CONTRACTOR QUESTION VA RESPONSE
1 Is it acceptable to submit previously completed PPQs from past projects, or do new PPQs need to be submitted?
Previously completed PPQs are acceptable for submission.
2 Will the Government consider past performance examples from a proposed A/E firm acting as our subcontractor, provided the projects meet the stated relevance criteria.
a. If so, does that A/E firm need to have acted as prime on the presented projects?
b. Also, if subcontractor past performance is permitted, is a Subcontractor Consent Form or Letter of Commitment required at the time of proposal submission? If so, is there a specific format or template the Government prefers?
Yes, the Government will consider past performance examples from a proposed A/E acting as a subcontractor.
a. No, A/E does not need to have acted as Prime.
b. Yes, a Subcontractor Consent Form or Letter of
Commitment required at the time of proposal. We don’t have preference for specific format or template.
3 Would it be acceptable for the Phase I “Project Experience” section to reflect the past performance and project history of only one JV member, provided that the member possesses extensive experience with projects of similar scope, size, and complexity as those described in the solicitation.
Yes, it is acceptable if one entity within a JV is able to meet relevancy requirements.
| ANSWERED |
| RECEIVED |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .