SOW 36C26024Q0296.pdf

STATEMENT OF WORK

Correct Campus Security Deficiencies

Assessment and Evaluation Report

Project Number 653-26-101

A. Scope of Work: This scope of work will assist the Roseburg VA Medical Center in enhancing the protective posture of its campus and assets (People, Information, Physical

Assets and Building Infrastructure) through a comprehensive Threat, Vulnerability and

Risk Assessment. Per the PSRDM 1.8, Requirements for Subject Matter Specialists In order to meet the physical security and resiliency requirements of this manual, as appropriate to the scope of the project, the design team must include: (1) a certified physical security specialist with an emphasis on risk and vulnerability assessments, physical security design and CPTED, and anti-terrorism force protection. Additionally, the results of this risk assessment will then be used as the campus security master plan, per PSRDM 2.2, thus enabling the VA Station to seek funding (via SCIP, etc.) per the

DUSHOM 28 July 2015 Directive regarding implementation.

Project Scope and Objectives: The project objectives of the VA are but not limited to as follows:

1) Preparing a risk assessment is to identify the assets and people that need to be protected.

2) Threat/hazard analysis is performed to identify and define the threats and hazards that could cause harm to a building and its occupants. Threats and hazards must be measured against the overall facility and each Critical function and system it contains or supports.

3) Assets are identified, a vulnerability analysis is performed to identify weaknesses.

4) Consequences to the mission that would result from a hazard event or a successfully executed threat are defined.

5) Using the results of the asset’s threat/hazard, vulnerability, and consequences analyses, risk is determined.

6) See Chapter 2 Direction on Using the Physical Security and Resiliency Design

Manual for additional information.

7) Conduct site visits after award in order.

8) Generate a threat assessment report to point of contact at the facility.

See flow chart below for Deviation/Equivalency Process by Project Specific Risk

Assessment.

B. Cost Estimate:

C. Contract Period: 270 Days

D. References:

The following criteria shall be used to develop the design (including but not limited to):

Physical Security and Resiliency Design Manual PG-1-238

Technical Information Library http://www.cfm.va.gov/TIL/

Master Construction Specifications PG-18-1

Design & Construction Procedures PG-18-3

CAD: National CAD Standard, VHA Application

Guide and Standard Details PG-18-4

Equipment Guide List PG-18-5

Space Planning Criteria, and VA SEPS PG-18-9

Design Manuals PG-18-10

Design Guides PG-18-12

Accessibility and Barrier Free Design Guide PG-18-13

Room Finishes, Door, and Hardware Schedules PG-18-14

A/E Design Submission Instructions PG-18-15, Volume B

Environmental compliance Manual PG-18-17

Hardware (Equipment) Symbols H-08-6

VAMC Approved Hardware Locking Standards H-08-6

Seismic Design Handbook H-18-8

Cultural Resource Management Procedures H-7545

Space Planning Criteria H-7610

(All related Chapters)

VA HVAC Design Criteria

VA Signage Standards M-00-2

VA Interior Finish Standards Mem. 138.13

Evaluation Factors

• Price

• Firm’s Specialized Experience and Technical Competence: Describe your firm’s specialized experience and technical competence required to complete work under this project. Please see Factor 3 for the past performance information required.

• Past Performance: Provide a narrative describing successful completion of two contracts with government agencies or private firms, similar in size and scope to this project, performed in the last 5 years. This is separate from the requirements under Factor 2. The narrative shall indicate if your firm was the prime contractor or subcontractor and http://www.cfm.va.gov/TIL/ describe successful completion in terms of cost control, quality of work, and compliance with the established schedule. Each narrative shall be limited to one page and must include a point of contact (POC) (name, email address, & telephone number) for the company/agency/organization the project was for that can be contacted for verification if the VA determines necessary. The Government may also review CPARS records, if available, for the firm. The evaluator(s) may also consider personal experience from projects performed by the contractor and/or recommendations by others involved in projects performed by the contractor in their evaluation that are not included in CPARS records (i.e., project is not completed or did not require CPARS). Any firms without relevant past performance or the information is not available will be rated neutrally as per the evaluation criteria.