36C25619R0073-0001003.docx

All proposals submitted on time and in accordance with provision 52.215-1 will be evaluated for the conformance to all requirements of this solicitation. Any proposal that fails to conform to the requirements of this solicitation will be rejected as nonresponsive.

BASIS FOR CONTRACT AWARD:

SOURCE SELECTION USING THE LOWEST PRICE TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE PROCESS (LPTA): This is a competitive Request for Proposal (RFP) that represents the best value to the Government conducted under FAR Part 15, Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) source selection process. Award will be made on the basis of the lowest evaluated price of proposals meeting or exceeding the acceptability standards for non-cost factors.

The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions. Therefore, the offeror’s initial proposal shall contain the offeror’s best terms from a price and technical standpoint. Offerors are cautioned to submit sufficient information and, in the format, specified in the instructions to offerors section of this solicitation. Communication conducted to resolve minor or clerical errors would not constitute discussions and the Contracting Officer reserves the right to award a contract without the opportunity for proposal revisions. There will be no public bid opening.

Award will be made to the responsible, lowest price technically acceptable offeror that meets or exceeds the acceptability standards for all non-cost factors. Lowest price offer will be determined by the Government by comparison method of all offers received. A single award will be made as described in the Price Offer Schedule that is most advantageous to the Government.

EVALUATION OVERVIEW:

Proposals will be evaluated and ranked according to price, from lowest to highest. The Government reserves the right to evaluate only the technical proposal of the lowest price offeror. Other technical proposals may not be evaluated unless the Government determines the lowest priced offeror to be unacceptable. In the event the Government determines the lowest priced offeror to be unacceptable, the technical proposal of the next lowest price offeror will be evaluated. This process will continue until a technical proposal is determined to be acceptable. The lowest offeror deemed acceptable in all non-cost factors shall be the apparent awardee.

PRICE EVALUATION:

Price proposals will be evaluated and ranked according to price, from lowest to highest. Price will not be evaluated other than to ensure price reasonableness. The Government may use various price analysis techniques and procedures to make a price reasonableness determination. Note: Offers that are not technically acceptable cannot be selected, regardless of price. Offerors submitting price proposals in response to this solicitation do so with the complete and full understanding that the Government reserves the right to publicly announce the total contract award amount.

PAST PERFORMANCE:

Past performance will be rated in accordance with FAR 15.305 utilizing the Past Performance Questionnaire attached to this solicitation. In addition, pursuant to FAR 9.103 prescribing that purchases shall be made from, and contracts shall be awarded to, responsible prospective contractors only, the Government will perform the determination of responsibility on the apparently lowest offeror whose proposal is deemed technically acceptable. The Government’s determination of responsibility will be performed in accordance with FAR 9.1 and will include but not be limited to the review of all federal excluded or debarred lists from different U.S. departments, and from the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), available at www.ppirs.gov. Since this solicitation is set aside 100% for Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB), the Government will refer the matter to the Small Business Administration which will decide whether to issue a Certificate of Competency if the Government deems a potential SDVOSB awardee non-responsible.

TECHNICAL EVALUATION:

The Technical evaluation factors consist of two separate elements: Experience and Performance Schedule. Technical proposals will be judged on a ‘pass/fail’ basis. Each element must receive a ‘pass’ in order for the proposal to be deemed technically acceptable.

I. EXPERIENCE – Offers shall address the following three (3) sub-factors in narrative form. Offers that do not describe each topic in enough detail or provide the requested documentation will be rated as ‘fail’ and be considered technically unacceptable.

1. Provide documentation of specific projects (minimum of three) relating to the construction of expanding and renovating inpatient clinics within a hospital environment, successfully completed or in progress, that was coordinated and performed by the general contractor and/or subcontractor in the last five (5) years, from the date this solicitation was issued, of similar scope and complexity. Provide the following information for each contract/project submitted for evaluation:

a. Company Name/Address Phone number/Email Address

b. Project Title

c. Contracting Office/Government Agency

d. Contract Number

e. Total Contract Amount

f. Period of Performance

g. Contracting Officer (CO) name, Phone Number and Email

h. Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) Name, Phone number, and email address

i. Brief Description of the Project /Requirements and number of personnel assigned to the project.

2. Provide the names of the general contractor’s proposed project Site Superintendent, Project Manager, and Quality Control Manager with a description of the individual’s experience to include, at a minimum, one successfully completed hospital expansion project of similar scope and complexity within the last five (5) years from the date this solicitation was issued.

3. Provide a list of sub-contractors that your firm intends to use for this solicitation’s proposed project and include the subcontractor’s company name, and the number of years’ experience with hospital expansions. Minimal experience required for the civil, structural, medgas, and erector subcontractors is three years from the date this solicitation was issued.

II. PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE – Offers shall include the general contractor’s project schedule for this solicitation’s proposed project to showcase, at a minimum, completing the project within the mandatory timeframe of 730 calendar days.

III. PAST PERFORMANCE – Submit a completed Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) for all projects your firm listed in its response to Evaluation Factor #1, Experience. To meet the minimum standard, the completed PPQs must be rated as Satisfactory or better for each question. Please note: the references shall submit the PPQ to the Contract Specialist as specified in the PPQ. Offerors are not permitted to submit the PPQ as these will not be considered. The PPQ that shall be used is attached to this solicitation.