36C25522R0092 0002.docx

DOCX document 26 KB Posted

Attached to
Z2DA--Modernize Basement Kitchen and Morgue PN: 589A4-20-157
Solicitation number
36C25522R0092
Issued by

About this file

This document is an amendment to a solicitation for a construction project to modernize a basement kitchen and morgue at a Department of Veterans Affairs facility. The solicitation seeks offers for Project 589A4-20-157 to modernize the kitchen and morgue located at a VA medical center overseen by Veterans Integrated Service Network 15. The amendment provides clarification that offerors should submit relevant past performance evaluations from the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System rather than the Past Performance Information Retrieval System. It also includes an attachment with a past performance questionnaire for offerors to distribute to references. Offers for the project are due by August 15, 2022 at 2:00 PM Central Time.

The amendment makes minor corrections and clarifications to the solicitation language regarding evaluation of past performance information. It does not otherwise alter the scope, schedule or terms of the underlying solicitation for the construction project to modernize the kitchen and morgue facilities.

View the file

Other files

Show all 13

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

CON 215: Intermediate Contracting for Mission Support Solicitation No. 36C25522R0092

5. PROJECT NUMBER (if applicable)

CODE

7. ADMINISTERED BY

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER

CODE

6. ISSUED BY

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NUMBER

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED

PAGE OF PAGES

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED

BPA NO.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

FACILITY CODE

CODE

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers

E. IMPORTANT:

is extended,

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning __________ copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

(REV. 11/2016)

is required to sign this document and return ___________ copies to the issuing office.

is not, A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

15C. DATE SIGNED

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER

Contractor

16C. DATE SIGNED

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

STANDARD FORM 30

PREVIOUS EDITION NOT USABLE

Prescribed by GSA - FAR (48 CFR) 53.243 (Type or print) (Type or print) (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

(Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (If other than Item 6) (Specify type of modification and authority) (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.)

(If required)

(SEE ITEM 11)

(SEE ITEM 13)

(X)

CHECK

ONE

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer) 589A4-20-157 36C255 Department of Veterans Affairs Network Contracting Office (NCO) 15 3450 S 4th Street Trafficway Leavenworth

KS

66048 36C255 Department of Veterans Affairs Network Contracting Office (NCO) 15 3450 S 4th Street Trafficway Leavenworth

KS

66048 To all Offerors/Bidders

36C25522R0092 07-22-2022

X X X

August 15, 2022 by 2:00 PM CTD Modernize Kitchen and Morgue, 589A4-20-157

a. This amendment corrects the following:

Factor 4 changing PPIRS to CPARS.

Provides Attachment 5 Past Performance Questionnaire.

b. All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

CONTINUATION PAGE

FACTOR 4: RELEVANT PAST PERFORMANCE OF PRIME CONTRACTOR

To be evaluated under this factor, Prime Contractor shall provide current and relevant information regarding the Prime Contractor’s actions under previously awarded contracts referenced under Factor 1, “RELEVANT EXPERIENCE OF THE PRIME CONTRACTOR”. If a completed past performance evaluation is available in CPARS, it shall be submitted with the proposal for each project referenced in Factor 1, “RELEVANT EXPERIENCE OF THE PRIME CONTRACTOR”. If there is not a completed past performance evaluation available in CPARS, then the Prime Contractor shall submit Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) (reference ATTACHMENT 5) for each project referenced in Factor 1, Construction Experience. The Prime Contractor shall notify their client that the PPQ shall be submitted by the reference via email to the Government’s point of contact jeanette.mathena@va.gov. If the Prime Contractor is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the Prime Contractor shall complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). The Government may make reasonable attempts to contact the client noted for that project(s) to obtain the PPQ information. However, Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to help ensure timely submittal of questionnaires.

The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information.

SPECIAL NOTE 1: For Prime Contractors That May Lack Past Performance Information: In accordance with FAR Part 15.305(a)(2), in the case of a Prime Contractor that is without a record of relevant past performance, or for whom information on past performance is not available, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. Such offerors may submit relevant past performance information regarding predecessor companies; key personnel who have relevant experience; or subcontractors that will be performing major or critical aspects of this requirement, provided that such information is relevant to the construction in this solicitation.

SPECIAL NOTE 2: For Prime Contractors that have Past Performance: Prime Contractors may provide information on problems encountered on the identified contracts and the offeror’s corrective actions. The government also reserves the right to consider past performance information from all available sources, in addition to any information submitted by offerors.

ATTACHMENT 5 - PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

1. Contractor Information

Firm Name:

Address:

Phone Number:

Point of Contact:

Contact Phone Number:

DUNs Number:

2. Work Performed as: |_| Prime Contractor |_| Sub Contractor |_| Joint Venture |_| Other

Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: |_| Firm Fixed Price |_| Cost Reimbursement |_| Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Project Description:

Complexity of Work |_| High |_| Med |_| Routine Award Date (mm/dd/yyyy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yyyy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yyyy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

Rating: Please evaluate the past performance using only the following ratings without variation. DO NOT RATE ON A “+” OR “- “SCALE. If a “+” or “- “is used, the rating without the "+" or "-" will be applied. In addition to the ratings, please provide a short narrative in the appropriate block or in the remarks section of this form.

“O”
Outstanding
The Offeror’s performance met contractual requirements and exceeded many requirements to the Client’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the offeror were highly effective.
“A”
Above Average
The Offeror’s performance met contractual requirements and exceeded some requirements to the Client’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the offeror were effective.
“S”
Satisfactory
The Offeror’s performance met contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the offeror were satisfactory.
“M”
Marginal
Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. Performance indicated that there are some potential risks associated with the quality products, timeliness of service, and contract performance.
“U”
Unacceptable
Performance did not meet contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflected a serious problem for which the offeror has yet to identify corrective actions or the offeror’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Please rate and provide any supporting information/comments for the following:

1. The quality of the working relationship with the client (the tenant and/ or owner).
O A S M U
2. The professionalism and integrity with which offeror conducted business.
O A S M U

3. The responsiveness to the client’s needs and expectations.

O A S M U

4. The Offeror’s ability to successfully management and perform the project.
O A S M U
5. The offeror’s level of communication.
O A S M U
6. The quality control of the project.
O A S M U

7. Any Value added to the project as the result of cost savings, favorable financing, positive asset management, etc.

Yes No

8. Would you award another contact to the party being evaluated? If no, please explain.
Yes No
9. The delivery of the project within the budget and on schedule.
O A S M U

10. Other relevant aspects in the management of a project development for the client.

11. Overall rating for this firm:
O A S M U

Signature of Evaluator

Date

Modernize Kitchen & Morgue Amendment 2 Source Selection Sensitive (See FAR 3.104) © Management Concepts Incorporated 35 Page 1 of

Source Selection Sensitive 36 © Management Concepts Incorporated Page 1 of

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .