P09 Final Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 24 KB Posted

Attached to
V226--VA IHCS Paratransit Transportation Services Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
36C25025R0037
Issued by
Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Veterans Integrated Service Network 10

About this file

This is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) template for solicitation number 36C25025C0037 for Paratransit/Special Needs Transportation Services at the VA. The questionnaire must be submitted to Andrea.Roach2@va.gov by January 31, 2025 at 10:00 AM ET.

The PPQ template includes sections for contract and evaluator information, followed by performance ratings on a 4-point scale (Outstanding, Acceptable, Marginal, Unacceptable). Key evaluation areas include quality of workmanship, contract compliance, cooperation, timeliness of paperwork, subcontractor management, regulatory compliance, and patient safety incidents. The form also includes narrative sections for contractor strengths/weaknesses, future recommendation considerations, and overall performance rating. This is a standard evaluation template that does not contain specific details about services required or pricing terms.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to V226--VA IHCS Paratransit Transportation Services, newest first.
File Type Posted
36C25025R0037 0002.docx DOCX document
36C25025R0037 0001.docx DOCX document
36C25025R0037.docx DOCX document
36C25025R0037_1.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Solicitation Number: 36C25025C0037 Paratransit/Special Needs Transportation Services

MESSAGE TO THE EVALUATOR: Your assistance is requested by the below Contract Specialist with Network Contracting Office (NCO) 10, to assist with establishing the performance history for the Company (Offeror) named below. In efforts to expedite receipt of the requested information, the Contract Specialist respectively requests you do not mail hard copies.

Instead, please email the complete past performance questionnaire(s) to: Andrea.Roach2@va.gov by 01/31/2025 at 10:00 AM, Eastern Time.

If enough space is not provided, please attach additional information to this questionnaire.

PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

Part I

a. Contractor:

b. Contract number:

c. Contract type:

d. Was this a competitive contract? Yes ☐ No ☐

e. Period of performance:

f. Initial contract price: $____________________________

g. Current/final contract price: $____________________________

CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

a. Customer or agency name: ________________________________________________________

b. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

c. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other commands: ____________________________________________________________________

EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

a. Evaluator’s name:

b. Evaluator’s title:

c. Evaluator’s phone:

d. Evaluator’s email: _________________________________

e. Number of year’s evaluator worked on subject contract:

Part II Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by circling the appropriate number using the scale provided. This scale is defined as follows:

Performance Assessment

Rating
Description
Outstanding (O) / High Confidence (HC)
The Offeror’s performance met contractual requirements and exceeded many requirements to the client’s/agency’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the offeror were highly effective.
Acceptable (A) / Confidence (C)
The Offeror’s performance met contractual requirements and exceeded some requirements to the client’s/agency’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the offeror were effective.
Marginal (M) / Little Confidence (LC)
The Offeror’s performance somewhat met contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained problems for which corrective action was taken by the offer and the actions appeared to be resolved marginally.
Unacceptable (U) / No Confidence (NC)
Performance did not meet contractual requirements. The contractual requirements reflected a serious problem for which the offeror has yet to identify corrective actions, or the offeror proposed actions that were not fully implemented.

PERFORMANCE

P1. Was the contractor’s work performed in a skillful and good workmanship like manner?

U ☐ M ☐ A ☐ O ☐

P2. Did the contractor conform to the terms and conditions of the contract?

U ☐ M ☐ A ☐ O ☐

P3. Was the contractor reasonable and cooperative during and after contract performance?

U ☐ M ☐ A ☐ O ☐

P4. Did the contractor submit paperwork timely and completely?

U ☐ M ☐ A ☐ O ☐

P5. Did the contractor coordinate and keep control of the subcontractors?

U ☐ M ☐ A ☐ O ☐

P6. Did the contractor comply with laws, regulations, and facility rules?

U ☐ M ☐ A ☐ O ☐

P7. Evaluate the Contractor’s overall quality of work under the contract?

U ☐ M ☐ A ☐ O ☐

P8. Has the contractor encountered any patient safety incidents that involved other moving/parked vehicles, or fixed object?

U ☐ M ☐ A ☐ O ☐

If yes, please state if the incident was reported to the appropriate authorities.

P9. Has the contractor encountered any patient safety incidents that were caused by negligence?

U ☐ M ☐ A ☐ O ☐

If yes, please state if the incident resulted in the patient needing medical attention.

Provide any explanation you may feel is required to clarify any of the above responses:

Part III Narrative Summary

a. What were the contractor’s greatest strengths in the performance of the contract?

b. What were the contractor’s greatest weaknesses in the performance of the contract?

c. Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

d. Are there any other issues not covered you feel important to note about performance of this contractor?

Part IV Government contracts only: Has/was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes ☐ : Default ☐ Convenience ☐ Pending Terminations ☐ or NO ☐

If yes, explain (e.g., inability to meet price, performance, or delivery schedules, etc.)

Considering all the information provided above, please rate the contractor’s performance overall.

U M A O

Evaluator’s Signature Date

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .