Attachment F - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 29 KB Posted

Attached to
Y1DA--652-21-102 Replace Nurse Call System Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
36C24625B0010
Issued by
Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Veterans Integrated Service Network 6

About this file

The document is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) for a VA project to replace the nurse call system at Central Virginia VA Health Care System. The questionnaire is designed to collect performance data from previous project references, evaluating contractors across five key areas: quality, timely performance, management effectiveness, compliance with safety standards, and overall performance. Each evaluation area contains multiple sub-criteria rated on a scale from "Substantial Confidence" to "No Confidence".

The related federal contract opportunity (Solicitation Number: 36C24625B0010) is a pre-solicitation for a construction project valued between $5-10 million, exclusively set aside for Service-Disabled Veteran Owned Small Businesses (SDVOSB). The project involves replacing the existing nurse call/code blue system at the Central Virginia VA Health Care System, including demolition, electrical, telecommunications, and healthcare technology systems upgrades. The solicitation is anticipated to be issued on January 9, 2025, with sealed bids due approximately 30 days thereafter. Bidders must be registered in SAM, verified in the SBA's VetCert database, and comply with specific registration requirements.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Y1DA--652-21-102 Replace Nurse Call System, newest first.
File Type Posted
AMENDMENT 36C24625R0047 0006 - RFIs.docx DOCX document
SOLICITATION RFIs RESPONSES - 0006 - NURSE CALL.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
S02 SOLICITATION RFIs RESPONSES - 0005 - NURSE CALL.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
SOLICITATION RFIs RESPONSES - 0005 - NURSE CALL.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
WAGE DETERMINATION VA20250007 REVISION DATED 03-28-2025.pdf PDF
SOLICITATION RFIs RESPONSES - 0005 - NURSE CALL.docx DOCX document
AMENDMENT 36C24625R0047 0005 - RFIs.docx DOCX document
AMENDMENT 36C24625R0047 0004-Nurse Call RFIs.docx DOCX document
SOLICITATION RFIs RESPONSES - 0004 - NURSE CALL.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
SOLICITATION RFIs RESPONSES - 0003 - NURSE CALL.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Solicitation Amendment 36C24625R0047 0003-Nurse Call RFIs Responses.docx DOCX document
AMENDMENT 36C24625R0047 0002-Nurse Call RFIs.docx DOCX document
SOLICITATION RFIs RESPONSES - NURSE CALL.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
36C24625R0047 0001.docx DOCX document
Sign-in Sheet_36C24625R0047_Replace Nurse Call.pdf PDF
652-21-102 Drawings 20241014.pdf PDF
Attachment A - PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE.docx DOCX document
Attachment E - RFI Form R0047.doc DOC document
Copy of Attachment B - COST BREAKDOWN NURSE CALL SYSTEM.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
652-21-102 Specs 100pct CD 20250612.pdf PDF
Attachment D - SITE VISIT LOCATION MAP - 2nd Floor.pdf PDF
Attachment C - REQUIREMENTS FOR COMMUNICATIONS INSTALLATIONS.pdf PDF
36C24625R0047_RFP.docx DOCX document
36C24625B0010.docx DOCX document
Show all 24

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

EXHIBIT A : PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRRE REQUEST LETTER

FROM:

[Insert Company Official Name, Title, and Company Name]

SUBJECT: Request for Past/Present Performance Information

[Insert Company Name] is currently responding to VHA Network Contracting Office 6 and Richmond VA Medical Center, regarding a request for proposal for Project 652-21-102, Replace Nurse Call System at Central VA Health Care System (CVVHS). This Request for proposal requires respondents to identify customers and solicit their response regarding [Insert Company Name] performance.

[Insert Company Name] is providing past performance data to VHA Network Contracting Office 6 relating to our performance on contract [Insert contract name/number] and have identified [Insert name of reference] as the point of contact for this contract.

The request for proposal instructs that respondents provide customers with the attached questionnaire. Please have respondent complete the questionnaire (Sections B and C) and return it by no later than the proposal due date with PART II of your proposal. Return the completed AND SIGNED questionnaire via email to the Government Contracting Officer, Madeline Lucena-Pulst at madeline.lucena-pulst@va.gov and Contract Specialist, Moses Deng at moses.deng@va.gov . ***NOTE: Unsigned PPQs may be rejected and impact Part II of the evaluation. ***

Past Performance Questionnaire

SECTION A.1: Contractor and Project Information (to be completed by the contractor (offeror) prior to sending to references.

A. Contractor’s name and address: _________________________________________

B. Project Owner -POC: _________________________________________

C. Phone:_________________________________________
D. Email Address:_________________________________________

D. Contract Number: _________________________________________ E. Project Title/Desc of Work: _________________________________________

_________________________________________
F. Contract Type:_________________________________________
G. Project Award Date: ______________Scheduled Completion Date: ________________

Current/Final Completion Date: ________________

H. Project Award Amount: ____________ Current/Final Project Amount: ________________

I. Contractor being evaluated performed as the: Prime Contractor Subcontractor Supplier

A.2: EVALUATED BY: (to be completed by Project Owner)

(Signature) (Date)

_____________________________________ Address: _____________________________ (Typed or Printed Name) _____________________________________ (Title)

(Phone/Fax/Email)

A
B
C
D

NA

Substantial Confidence
Satisfactory Confidence
Limited Confidence
No

Confidence

Unknown Confidence

Based on the offeror’s performance record, there is a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform.
Based on the offeror’s performance record, there is an expectation that the offeror will successfully perform.
Based on the offeror’s performance record, there is low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform.
Based on the offeror’s performance record, there is no expectation that the offeror will successfully perform.

No performance record is identifiable, or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no rating can be reasonably assigned.

EVALUATION AREAS

I. Quality A B C D NA

1.
Contractor provided effective quality control and inspection procedures that resulted in a quality-finished project.
□
□
□
□
2.
Contractor developed and submitted realistic progress schedules.
□
□
□
□
3.
Contractor provided well researched and clearly identified submittals that matched contract requirements.
□
□
□
□
4.
Contractor completed all work with good workmanship and in conformance with the specifications, resulting in minor, if any, punchlist items.
□
□
□
□
5.
Contractor thoroughly reviewed design package proposals for accuracy, completeness, and compliance with contract requirements.
□
□
□
□
6.
Contractor designs were all concise, accurate and captured all details of the site visit.
□
□
□
□

II. Timely Performance A B C D NA

1.
Contractor met established project schedules to complete the project on time.
□
□
□
□
2.
Contractor performed all work without the issuance of a cure notice or show cause letter. (If a notice was issued, please describe the circumstances on a separate sheet of paper and identify if liquidated damages were assessed.)
□
□
□
□
3.
Contractor provided timely cost/design proposals.
□
□
□
□
4.
Contractor submitted the progress schedule and interim progress reports as required in a timely manner and the schedule was approved prior to actual construction.
□
□
□
□
5.
Contractor provided submittals on time as required.
□
□
□
□
6.
Contractor provided payrolls for both their firm and their subcontractor’s employees as required and scheduled
□
□
□
□
7.
Contractor provided timely resolution of all punchlist items.
□
□
□
□

III. Management Effectiveness A B C D NA

1.
Contractor provided experienced qualified managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
□
□
□
□
2.
Contractor hired quality subcontractors and effectively managed and coordinated their work.
□
□
□
□
3.
Contractor hired, maintained, and replaces as necessary, qualified personnel and subcontractors/suppliers.
□
□
□
□
4.
Contractor ensured the site manager had sufficient authority to make decisions and take actions during project performance to keep the project on schedule.
□
□
□
□
5.
Contractor provided timely and satisfactory response to warranty issues after project completion.
□
□
□
□
6.
Contractor paid employees/subcontractors/suppliers as required.
□
□
□
□
7.
Contractor cooperated to resolve problems, attended meetings and maintained communication to assure satisfactory resolution.
□
□
□
□

IV. Compliance with Safety Standards A B C D NA

1.
Adequacy of Safety Plan
□
□
□
□
2.
Implementation of Safety Plan
□
□
□
□

V. Overall Performance A B C D NA

1.
Please rate the contractor’s overall performance
□
□
□
□
2.
Contractor met acquisition regulatory compliance with little to no difficulty.
□
□
□
□

Additional Information:

(1) Identify the contractor's overall strengths and weaknesses.

(2) Given the choice, would you award to this contractor again?

(3) Are you aware of any other contracted efforts performed by this contractor similar in nature to this contract? Please identify contract/program and point of contact.

(4) Is there anyone else we should send this questionnaire to? Please identify by name, organization, and phone number.

(If more comment space is needed, please attach pages.)

Thank you for taking the time to complete this questionnaire.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .