36C10F18R0651-020.docx
DOCX document 92 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C10F18R0651
About this file
36C10F18R0651 PPQ.docx
View the file
Other files
Show all 18
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
National Cemetery of the Alleghenies- Construction
Past Performance Questionnaire
Contractor Project
Company Official Providing Performance Evaluation Phone Email
A/E’s Contracted Delivery Date for Const. Docs A/E’s Actual Const. Docs. Delivery Date A/E’s Design to Amount: Construction Award Amount:
Part 1 - Provide a rating of Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory, or Unknown for each of the following questions. How would you rate:
Question E G S M U Un Comments
1. Contractor’s ability to comply with contract requirements?
2. Contractor’s ability to effectively manage the cost of the project?
3. Contractor’s ability to effectively manage the schedule of the project?
4. Contractor’s ability to effectively manage risk on the project?
5. Contractor’s ability to deliver a biddable and buildable design and set of construction documents?
6. Contractor’s ability to manage and coordinate the sub-contractor team?
7. Contractor’s ability to work cooperatively with regulatory and permitting agencies having jurisdiction?
8. Contractor’s responsiveness to addressing Owner’s comments and concerns during design.
9. Contractor’s construction administration capabilities?
10. Your overall satisfaction with the end product?
11. Your overall satisfaction with the Contractor’s performance?
Part 2 – In answering the following questions, please provide insights on how the construction project has progressed over the course of the performance period, Contractor’s management approach and capabilities, and compliance with project requirements.
| Question |
| Comment |
1. Is/has the project progressed in a timely manner consistent with the delivery schedule?
2. Have critical milestones been successfully met? If not, why?
3. Is/has the project stayed within budget? If not, is it over or under budget and by how much?
4. Are there any open or anticipated financial actions, such as requests for equitable adjustments or claims?
5. Has the scope of the project changed over the course of design? If so, were these changes Owner or Contractor initiated?
6. Did the Contractor present any value engineering proposal(s)? If so, did the Owner accept the proposal(s)?
7. Was the Contractor cooperative in resolving issues?
8. Were there any significant risks involved in performance of this effort?
9. Did the company appear to apply sufficient resources (personnel and facilities) to the effort?
10. Were there any changes in the Contractor’s key personnel over the course of the design? If so, how often and why?
11. Did subcontractors perform the bulk of the effort or just add depth on particular technical areas?
12. What are the Company’s strong points?
13. What are the Company’s weak points?
14. Do you have any reservations about recommending a future contract award to this Company?
15. Do you know of anyone else who might have past performance information on the Company?
File details come from the government source that posted it.