36C10F18R0651-019.docx
DOCX document 157 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C10F18R0651
About this file
36C10F18R0651 36C10F18R0651_5.docx
View the file
Other files
Show all 18
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
36C10F18R0581
1. SOLICITATION NUMBER
2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION
3. DATE ISSUED
PAGE OF PAGES
4. CONTRACT NUMBER
5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NUMBER
6. PROJECT NUMBER
7. ISSUED BY
CODE
8. ADDRESS OFFER TO
a. NAME
b. TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)
10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS (Title, identifying number, date) 12a. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?
(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)
12b. CALENDAR DAYS
13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:
STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 8/2014)
STANDARD FORM 1442
Prescribed by GSA-FAR (48 CFR) 52.236-1(d)
SOLICITATION, OFFER,
AND AWARD
(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)
SOLICITATION
SOLICITATION
IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.
9. FOR INFORMATION
CALL:
NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".
SEALED BID (IFB)
NEGOTIATED (RFP)
11. The Contractor shall begin performance within ____________ calendar days and complete it within calendar days after receiving award, notice to proceed. This performance period is mandatory negotiable. (See _____________________________).
YES
NO
a.
Sealed offers in original and ___________________copies to perform the work required are due at the place specified in Item 8 by _____________ (hour) local time _____________________ (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time. Sealed envelopes containing offers shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, the date and time offers are due.
b.
An offer guarantee is, is not required.
c.
All offers are subject to the (1) work requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.
d.
Offers providing less than _______________________ calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due will not be considered and will be rejected.
36C10F18R0651 X 08-29-2018
925PC20006
Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Construction and Facilities Management (003C4B) 425 I St., NW (6E-505L) Washington
DC
20001 Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Construction and Facilities Management (003C4B) 425 I St., NW Room 6E-505L Washington
DC
20001 Mary Case 202-632-5025 The Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Construction & Facilities Management, anticipates awarding a Firm Fixed Priced contract in support of the National Cemetery of the Alleghenies Phase 3 Grave Site Development, Project No. 925CM2006, located at 1158 Morgan Road, Bridgeville, PA 15017.The Contractor shall provide all labor, materials, equipment and supervision for the construction as shown on the plans and specifications and in accordance to the Statement of Work (attached).
This procurement is total set-aside for Small Business. The early turn-over is 300 calendar days from Notice to Proceed. The applicable North American Industry Classification System NAICS CODE: 237990 (size standard $36.5M).
The magnitude of construction cost for this project is between $20,000,000 and $50,000,000.
*Pre- bid walk through on Tuesday 9/25/2018 11:00a.m. to 1:00p.m.(ET) Cemetery Administration Bldg. Conference Room.
*Presentation to be held at 1158 Morgan Rd. Bridgeville, PA 15017 followed by a site walk-through.
*Deadline to receive RFI (Questions) is Friday 10/01/2018 no later than 2:00P.M. ET) Email RFIs to mary.case2@va.gov.
*VA responses will be posted to FBO on or about Wednesday 08/29/2018.
*Proposals due Wednesday 10/25/2018 by 2:00PM ET. 425 I St NW, RM 6E-505L Washingon, DC 20001
X X 52.211-10 X 2:00p ET 09-12-2018 X
14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR
15. TELEPHONE NUMBER
16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS
CODE
FACILITY CODE
17. The offeror agrees to perform the work required at the prices specified below in strict accordance with the terms of the solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in writing within __________ calendar days after the date offers are due.
AMOUNTS
18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.
19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS
AMENDMENT
NUMBER
DATE.
20a. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN OFFER 20b. SIGNATURE 20c. OFFER DATE
21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:
22. AMOUNT
23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA
24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN
ITEM
25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO
10 U.S.C. 2304(c)( 41 U.S.C. 3304(a) (
26. ADMINISTERED BY
27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY
PHONE:
FAX:
28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT
29. AWARD
Your Contractor agrees offer on this solicitation is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This to furnish and deliver all items or perform all work requirements identified award consummates the contract, which consists of (a) the Government on this form and any continuation sheets for the consideration stated in solicitation and your offer, and (b) this contract award. No further cont-this contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract ractual document is necessary.
shall be governed by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certifications, and specifications incorporated by reference in or attached to this contract.
30a. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31a. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER
TO SIGN
30b. SIGNATURE 30c. DATE 31b. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31c. AWARD DATE
BY
OFFER
AWARD
STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 8/2014) BACK
(Include ZIP Code) (Include area code) (Include only if different than Item 14.)
(Insert any number equal to or greater than the minimum requirement stated in Item 13d. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13d.)
(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each) (Type or print) (4 copies unless otherwise specified) (Type or print) (Type or print) (Contractor is required to sign this document and return _______ copies to issuing office.)
(Contractor is not required to sign this document.)
(Must be fully completed by offeror) (To be completed by Government)
CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE
101F Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Construction and Facilities Management (00CFM3B1) 811 Vermont AVE, NW Washington
DC
20420 Department of Veterans Affairs
FMS-VA-2(101)
Financial Services Center PO Box 149971 Austin
TX
78714-9971
Table of Contents
| PART I - THE SCHEDULE | 1 | |
| SECTION A - SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM | 1 | |
| SF 1442 SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (Construction, Alteration, or Repair) | 1 | |
| INFORMATION REGARDING BIDDING MATERIAL, BID GUARANTEE AND BONDS | 5 | |
| INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND OTHER STATEMENTS TO BIDDERS/OFFERORS | 9 | |
| 1.0 | Project Background: | 9 |
| 2.0 | Program Requirements: | 9 |
| 3.0 | Scope of Work: | 9 |
| 2.1 52.216-1 TYPE OF CONTRACT (APR 1984) | 24 | |
| 2.2 52.252-1 SOLICITATION PROVISIONS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (FEB 1998) | 24 | |
| 2.3 52.252-2 CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (FEB 1998) | 24 | |
| 2.4 52.222-5 CONSTRUCTION WAGE RATE REQUIREMENTS—SECONDARY SITE OF THE WORK (MAY 2014) | 24 | |
| 2.5 52.211-18 VARIATION IN ESTIMATED QUANTITY (APR 1984) | 25 | |
| 2.6 52.228-1 BID GUARANTEE (SEP 1996) | 25 | |
| 2.7 52.233-2 SERVICE OF PROTEST (SEP 2006) | 26 | |
| 2.8 52.236-27 SITE VISIT (CONSTRUCTION) (FEB 1995) ALTERNATE I (FEB 1995) | 26 | |
| 2.9 VAAR 852.215-70 SERVICE-DISABLED VETERAN-OWNED AND VETERAN-OWNED SMALL BUSINESS EVALUATION FACTORS (JUL 2016)(DEVIATION) | 27 | |
| 2.10 VAAR 852.228-72 ASSISTING SERVICE-DISABLED VETERAN-OWNED AND VETERAN-OWNED SMALL BUSINESSES IN OBTAINING BONDS (DEC 2009) | 27 | |
| 2.11 VAAR 852.233-70 PROTEST CONTENT/ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (JAN 2008) | 28 | |
| 2.12 VAAR 852.233-71 ALTERNATE PROTEST PROCEDURE (JAN 1998) | 28 | |
| 2.13 VAAR 852.270-1 REPRESENTATIVES OF CONTRACTING OFFICERS (JAN 2008) | 29 | |
| REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS | 30 | |
| 3.1 52.204-8 ANNUAL REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS (JAN 2018) | 30 | |
| 3.2 52.209-7 INFORMATION REGARDING RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS (JUL 2013) | 33 | |
| 3.3 52.209-13 VIOLATION OF ARMS CONTROLS TREATIES OR AGREEMENTS—CERTIFICATION (JUN 2018) | 34 | |
| GENERAL CONDITIONS | 37 | |
| 4.1 52.204-19 INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE OF REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS (DEC 2014) | 37 | |
| 4.2 52.209-9 UPDATES OF PUBLICLY AVAILABLE INFORMATION REGARDING RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS (JUL 2013) | 37 | |
| 4.3 VAAR 852.236-71 SPECIFICATIONS AND DRAWINGS FOR CONSTRUCTION (JUL 2002) | 38 | |
| 4.4 52.211-12 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES—CONSTRUCTION (SEPT 2000) | 38 | |
| 4.5 52.219-28 POST-AWARD SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAM REREPRESENTATION (JUL 2013) | 39 | |
| 4.6 52.222-35 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY FOR VETERANS (OCT 2015) | 40 | |
| 4.7 52.222-40 NOTIFICATION OF EMPLOYEE RIGHTS UNDER THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS ACT (DEC 2010) | 40 | |
| 4.8 SUPPLEMENTAL INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS | 42 | |
| 4.9 52.236-21 SPECIFICATIONS AND DRAWINGS FOR CONSTRUCTION (FEB 1997) ALTERNATE II (APR 1984) | 42 | |
| 4.10 52.222-36 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY FOR WORKERS WITH DISABILITIES (JUL 2014) | 44 | |
| 4.11 52.222-23 NOTICE OF REQUIREMENT FOR AFFIRMATIVE ACTION TO ENSURE EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY FOR CONSTRUCTION (FEB 1999) | 46 | |
| 4.12 VAAR 852.203-70 COMMERCIAL ADVERTISING (MAY 2018) | 47 | |
| 4.13 VAAR 852.211-74 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES (JAN 2008) | 47 | |
| 4.14 VAAR 852.211-75 PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS (JAN 2008) | 48 | |
| 4.15 VAAR 852.215-71 EVALUATION FACTOR COMMITMENTS (DEC 2009) | 48 | |
| 4.16 VAAR 852.228-70 BOND PREMIUM ADJUSTMENT (JAN 2008) | 48 | |
| 4.17 VAAR 852.232-72 ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION OF PAYMENT REQUESTS (NOV 2012) | 48 | |
| 4.18 VAAR 852.236-74 INSPECTION OF CONSTRUCTION (JUL 2002) | 49 | |
| 4.19 VAAR 852.236-76 CORRESPONDENCE (APR 1984) | 50 | |
| 4.20 VAAR 852.236-77 REFERENCE TO "STANDARDS" (JUL 2002) | 50 | |
| 4.21 VAAR 852.236-78 GOVERNMENT SUPERVISION (APR 1984) | 50 | |
| 4.22 VAAR 852.236-79 DAILY REPORT OF WORKERS AND MATERIAL (APR 1984) | 50 | |
| 4.23 VAAR 852.236-80 SUBCONTRACTS AND WORK COORDINATION (APR 1984) | 50 | |
| 4.24 VAAR 852.236-83 PAYMENTS UNDER FIXED-PRICE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS (INCLUDING NAS) (JUL 2002) | 51 | |
| ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR BAR CHART SCHEDULE | 54 | |
| 4.25 VAAR 852.236-85 SUPPLEMENTARY LABOR STANDARDS PROVISIONS (APR 1984) | 54 | |
| 4.26 VAAR 852.236-86 WORKER'S COMPENSATION (JAN 2008) | 55 | |
| 4.27 VAAR 852.236-87 ACCIDENT PREVENTION (SEP 1993) | 55 | |
| 4.28 VAAR 852.236-88 CONTRACT CHANGES--SUPPLEMENT (JUL 2002) | 55 | |
| 4.29 VAAR 852.236-91 SPECIAL NOTES (JUL 2002) | 57 | |
| 4.30 VAAR 852.246-74 SPECIAL WARRANTIES (JAN 2008) | 58 | |
| 4.31 VAAR 852.246-70 GUARANTEE (JAN 2008) | 58 | |
| 4.32 LIMITATIONS ON SUBCONTRACTING-- MONITORING AND COMPLIANCE (JUN 2011) | 58 | |
| 4.33 SUBCONTRACTING COMMITMENTS--MONITORING AND COMPLIANCE (JUN 2011) | 59 | |
| 4.34 MANDATORY WRITTEN DISCLOSURES | 59 | |
| 4.35 IT CONTRACT SECURITY | 61 |
INFORMATION REGARDING BIDDING MATERIAL, BID GUARANTEE AND BONDS
(a) Bidding materials consisting of drawings, specifications and contract forms may be obtained by qualified General (Prime) Contractors interested in submitting bids direct to the Department of Veterans Affairs. A maximum of 0 sets may be issued when requested. Up to 0 sets of drawings and specifications will be furnished upon request to subcontractors for their use in preparing subbids for General (Prime) Contractors. Suppliers and subcontractors listed above shall show in their requests the work or equipment for which they intend to prepare subbids.
(b) One set of drawings and specifications may be obtained by Builders Exchanges, Chambers of Commerce, Quantity Surveyors, trade and microfilming organizations.
(c) Bidding materials may be obtained only upon written application to the issuing office. Bidders should allow 5 working days after receipt of their request by the issuing office for reproduction, in addition to mail delivery time when requesting bidding material.
(d) Subcontractors, material firms and others interested in preparing subbids may, upon application to the issuing office, obtain a list of organizations, such as Builders Exchanges, Chambers of Commerce, Contractors and others, who have received bidding materials.
(e) While no deposit will be necessary, return of the bidding material, postage prepaid, to the issuing office within 10 days after date of opening bids will be required. In case no bid is to be submitted, the return of the bidding material, as soon as this fact has been determined and before the date of opening bids, is requested. If you decide not to bid on this project, please advise the issuing office of your reasons (the contracting officer should modify accordingly if a deposit is required).
(f) A bid guarantee is required in an amount not less than 20 percent of the bid price but shall not exceed $3,000,000. Failure to furnish the required bid guarantee in the proper form and amount, by the time set for opening of bids, will require rejection of the bid in all cases except those listed in FAR 28.101-4, and may be cause for rejection even then.
(g) If the contract will exceed $150,000 (see FAR 28.102-1 for lesser amount), the bidder to whom award is made will be required to furnish two bonds, a Payment Bond, SF 25A, and a Performance Bond, SF 25, each in the penal sum as noted in the General Conditions of the Specification. Copies of SFs 25 and 25A may be obtained upon application to the issuing office.
DESCRIPTION OF WORK: See Block 10 of SF1442, Page 1.
Cost Range: $20,000,000.00 to $50,000,000.00.
INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND OTHER STATEMENTS TO BIDDERS/OFFERORS
PART I - GENERAL
1. Gender: Whenever the masculine gender is used in this solicitation and contract documents, it shall be considered to include feminine.
2. The Government makes no guarantee as to the accuracy of the electronic copies of drawings.
3. Federal Acquisition Regulations require that federal contractors register in the System for Award Management (SAM) database at http://www.sam.gov and enter all mandatory information into the system. Award cannot be made until the contractor has registered. Offerors are encouraged to ensure that they are registered in SAM prior to submitting their proposal.
4. Mailing List: Offerors are encouraged to enter their contact information in the FedBizOpps website at www.fedbizopps.gov.
5. Amendments: Amendments to Solicitation No.36C10F18R0581will be posted at http://www.fedbizopps.gov. Paper copies of the amendments will NOT be individually mailed. By registering to Receive Notification list at http://www.fedbizopps.gov, you will be notified by e-mail of any new amendments that have been issued and posted. No other notification of amendments will be provided. Potential Offerors are advised that they are responsible for obtaining and acknowledging any amendments to the solicitation. Failure to acknowledge an amendment may result in your proposal being considered non-responsive.
6. A public bid opening will not occur under this RFP solicitation.
8. VETS 100: Title 38, USC Section 4212(d) and Public Law 105-339, requires that federal contractors report, at least annually, the number and category of veterans who are within their workforce. Submission of the VETS 100 reporting information can be done electronically at: http://www.dol.gov/vets/programs/fcp/main.htm. For procurement awards in excess of $25,000, this report must be completed and accepted prior to any Federal contract award. Therefore, all potential contractors are encouraged to file every year.
9. Required registration with contractor performance assessment reporting system (CPARS)
(a) As prescribed in Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 42.15, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) evaluates contractor past performance on all contracts that exceed $700,000, and shares those evaluations with other Federal Government contract specialists and procurement officials. The FAR requires that the contractor be provided an opportunity to comment on past performance evaluations prior to each report closing. To fulfill this requirement, VA uses online databases located at the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) website; to include the Construction Contractor Appraisal Support System (CCASS), the Architect-Engineer Contract Administration Support System (ACASS), and the Federal Awardee Performance & Integrity Information Retrieval System (FAPPIS). This site is maintained by the Naval Sea Logistics Center. The CPARS database information is shared with the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) database, which is available to all Federal agencies.
(b) Each contractor whose contract award is estimated to exceed $700,000 is required to register with the CPARS database at the following web address: http://www.cpars.csd.disa.mil/accessforms/userforms.htm (Corporate Senior Contractor Representative). Help in registering can be obtained by contacting CPARS Support E-mail (webptsmh@navy.mil) or by calling (207) 438-1690. Registration should occur no later than thirty days after contract award, and must be kept current should there be any change to the contractor’s registered representative.
(c) For contracts with a period of one year or less, the contracting officer will perform a single evaluation when the contract is complete. For contracts exceeding one year, the contracting officer will evaluate the contractor’s performance annually. Interim reports will be filed each year until the last year of the contract, when the final report will be completed. The report shall be assigned in CPARS to the contractor’s designated representative for comment. The contractor representative will have thirty days to submit any comments and reassign the report to the VA contracting officer.
(d) Failure to have a current registration with the CPARS database, or to reassign the report to the VA contracting officer within those thirty days, will result in the Government’s evaluation being placed on file in the database with a statement that the contractor failed to respond.
Project Labor Agreement Offerors may submit proposals with or without a Project Labor Agreement (PLA.) The PLA shall fully conform to the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 22.5 Project Labor Agreement for Federal Construction Projects. No additional points or weight will be assigned to proposals submitted with a PLA. PLA proposals will not be given additional weight towards their technical proposals or towards selection of a proposal for award. Offerors who chose to provide a proposal including a PLA shall do so in compliance with FAR 52.222-33 and FAR 25.222-34 Pre-Submission Inquiries Submit inquiries, questions electronically to the Government's Point of Contact (POC). All requests for information or clarification must be submitted via email to:mary.case2@va.gov and Cc david.martino@va.gov by October 1, 2018 at 2:00p p.m. Eastern Time, email subject line shall include National Cemetery of the Alleghenies, RFP #: 36C10F18R0651. Unless the question deals with issues of a proprietary nature, responses to questions or comments will be posted to www.FBO.gov under National Cemetery of the Alleghenies RFP #: 36C10F18R0651. No hard copy replies will be issued. Regardless of the manner you choose to deliver your package; it is the Offeror’s responsibility to make sure it is received before the submission deadline.
Date, Time & Place of Submission Proposals shall be received at 425 I Street NW Washington Room 6E-505L DC 20001, on or before October 25, 2:00 p.m. ET, by the Government's POC. Late submissions will not be accepted. All submitted materials will become the property of the Government and will not be returned.
Regardless of the manner you choose to deliver your package; it is the Offeror’s responsibility to make sure it is received before the submission deadline.
INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND OTHER STATEMENTS TO BIDDERS/OFFERORS
NATIONAL CEMETERY OF THE ALLEGHENIES
PHASE III GRAVESITE DEVELOPMENT
STATEMENT OF WORK
The purpose of this Contract is to secure the services of a General Contracting firm, hereinafter referred to as the Contractor, to provide construction services for development of the project entitled, “National Cemetery of the Alleghenies Phase III Gravesite Development (925CM2006),” located at 1158 Morgan Road, Bridgeville, PA 15017.
This Statement of Work (SOW) describes the work required necessary to the project for the VA Office of Construction and Facilities Management (CFM), 425 I Street NW, Washington, DC 20001.
1.0 Project Background:
Located in Washington County, just south of Pittsburgh, the National Cemetery of the Alleghenies serves Veterans of the greater Pittsburgh metropolitan area, northwestern West Virginia, and southeastern Ohio. This proposed development will provide an additional 10 years of continued burial service to an estimated Veteran population of approximately 258,300 who has been served by this national cemetery since it opened in August 2005.
2.0 Program Requirements:
This investment will develop approximately 40 acres of undeveloped land to provide approximately 12,300 gravesites, including both casket and cremation sites in new burial sections. This project will require a grade separated connector drive to access future southern burial sections across Morgan Road. Within the developed northern acreage, this project will provide for irrigation improvements and some possible gravesite expansion areas (before expanding into the southern parcel). Since the cemetery is less than 15 years old, only nominal repairs/ improvements/ security enhancements will be performed to existing cemetery buildings. As needed, unsuitable rock/coal will be excavated from burial areas and removed from the cemetery. This project will also include retrofitting/incorporating Guiding Principles for High Performance and Sustainable Buildings MOU and Renewable Energy Initiatives as required. Additionally, FCA condition D or F corrections will be incorporated onto this project.
This project will be competitive bid using a best value procedure resulting in a firm fixed price contract.
3.0 Scope of Work:
The Contractor shall provide all labor, materials, equipment and supervision for the construction as shown on the plans and specifications including the following improvements:
(a) Interment Areas (Burial Sections, including Early Turn Over area):
Casketed Remains:
· approximately 5,800 pre-placed crypt full casket gravesites.
Oversized/ Private Vault Casket Burial Section:
· approximately 650 oversized pre-placed crypt full casket gravesites .
· approximately 650 in-ground traditional full casket gravesites (to accommodate private vaults) with headstone support system.
Cremated Remains:
· approximately 2,200 garden niche, or terrace sites.
· approximately 3,000 columbarium niches.
| (b) | Rock/ coal excavation and disposal, as required. |
| (c) | Access Roads, Roadway System and Parking: |
· Entrance into adjacent land parcel, across Morgan Road.
· Repair/reconstruct existing cemetery road system, as shown.
· Connector drive to southern parcel near maintenance area.
· Expand honor guard parking at Committal Shelters 1 and 2 to accommodate 8-10 cars at each location.
(d) Upgrades to the Administration/Maintenance Complex, including:
· Add storage mezzanine at Maintenance Building.
· Enclose walkway between Maintenance & Administration Facility, non-climate controlled.
| (e) | Site furnishings, trash receptacles, flower vase stations, Signage for new site and replace existing site furnishings and signage for uniformity throughout cemetery (spigots to be HAWS, all site signage throughout entire cemetery to comply with NCA Signage Guide, all vase/trash stations to meet NCA standards). |
| (f) | Grading, drainage, landscaping, as shown. |
| (g) | Irrigation system, including upgrades to the existing cemetery system, as shown. |
| (h) | Retrofit/incorporate Guiding Principles for High Performance and Sustainable Buildings MOU and Renewable Energy Initiatives. |
| (i) | Security upgrades to all cemetery facilities according to the most current NCA Physical Security Design Standards. |
| (j) | Correct infrastructure deficiencies identified D & F. |
| (k) | Protected habitat and wetland preservation. |
| (l) | Geographic Information System (GIS) site integration. |
- END -
The government will award a contract resulting from the solicitation to the responsible Offeror whose offer conforms to the solicitation requirements and will provide the best value to the government considering both technical and pricing factors.
A Technical Evaluation Board (TEB) shall evaluate the Offeror’s technical proposal using the following technical factors:
| Factor1 | Past Performance, | |
| Factor 2 | Relevant Experience, | |
| Sub-Factor 2.1, Relevant Team Experience |
Sub-Factor 2.2, Key Personnel
| Factor 3 | Technical Approach, |
| Factor 4 | Construction/Project Management, |
Sub-Factor 4.1, Project Organizational Chart and Narrative Sub-factor 4.2, Capacity to Perform the Work Sub-factor 4.3, Quality Control Plan Sub-factor 4.4, Safety Plan Sub-factor 4.5, Schedule Factor 5 Veteran Involvement Technical factors are equal in importance and sub-factors within factors are equal in importance. When combined, Technical factors (Factor 1, Factor 2, Factor 3, and Factor 4 Factor 5 Veteran Involvement) are significantly more important than price.
SELECTION CRITERIA AND WEIGHTINGS:
Responsibility determination will be made in accordance with FAR 9.1 Responsible Prospective Contractors.
EVALUATION PROCEDURES
OFFEROR SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS
To determine the size of the Prime or proposed subcontractors, the Government will utilize the size standard associated with the NAICS code applicable to this solicitation (i.e. 237990, $36.5M). This gives small businesses the opportunity to indicate that they will meet small business participation through self-performance, or, in addition to any subcontracting to other small businesses.
In accordance with VAAR 852.215.70, Offerors shall provide the following information by submitting a completed Proposal Attachment, to demonstrate compliance in meeting the Government’s small business participation. Offerors are cautioned that proposed SDVOSB/VOSB subcontractors must be registered and verified in VIP database (http://www.VetBiz.gov) in order to count towards the Veteran specific requirements (a non-CVE verified business could still count towards the general small business requirement).
PROPOSAL ATTACHMENT:
a. Type of Business of Prime Contractor—submitting proposal (Check all applicable boxes):
{ } CVE Verified Veteran Owned Small Business { } CVE Verified Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business
b. Total Dollar Value $
c. Dollar Value of your participation as a Prime Contractor: $
d. Dollar Value and percentage of the total first offer value of subcontractors planned (complete the following tables—add rows to tables as needed):
Proposed Subcontractors:
| Company Name |
| DUNS |
| Socio-economic Status |
| (Sample) Company A |
| 123456789 |
| Verified SDVOSB, VOSB |
SDVOSB/VOSB—includes Prime if Prime is small business:
| Company Name |
| Dollar Value of contract to be performed by Business |
| Percentage value of contract |
| Support Description (describe the applicable area to be supported by the small business) |
| (Sample) Company A |
| $100 |
| 30% |
| Program Management, Change Management, Business and Financial |
| TOTALS |
| $300.33 |
| 100% |
EVALUATION APPROACH
1. SDVOSB/VOSB EVALUATION APPROACH
The SDVOSB/VOSB Plan will be evaluated to determine the proposal acceptability in meeting the Government’s stated small business participation
Work performed directly by a small business prime Contractor will be evaluated as Small Business Participation. This gives small businesses the opportunity to indicate that they will meet small business participation through self-performance, or, in addition to any subcontracting to other small businesses.
Note that the Contractor is required to meet its SDVOSB/VOSB participation percentage consistently each year of contract performance. Accordingly, the percentage commitment applies to the contract.
TECHNICAL EVALUATION RATING SCALES
The evaluation team will utilize the adjectival definitions below to assess each Offeror.
Phase 1 Factor 1 - Past Performance Rating Definitions
Past Performance Evaluation Rating Standard
| Rating |
| Standard |
| Very Low Risk |
| Performance met contract requirements and exceeded many to the Government's benefit. Problems, if any, were negligible and were resolved in a timely and highly effective manner. Performance was very relevant. Excellent probability of success with overall very low degree of risk in meeting Government's requirements. |
| Low Risk |
| Performance met contract requirements. Good quality. Minor problems may have been identified; however, contractor took satisfactory corrective action to resolve where appropriate. Performance was current and very relevant to relevant. Good probability of success with overall low degree of risk in meeting the government's requirements. |
| Average Risk |
| Performance met most contract requirements. Adequate quality. Problems may have been identified; however, contractor usually took adequate corrective action. Performance was current and relevant.-OR- Although performance exceeds expectations and was rated excellent to very good, the projects submitted were relevant to the efforts required by this solicitation. Fair probability of success with an average degree of risk in meeting the government's requirements. |
| Considerable Risk |
| Performance met some contract requirements. Fair quality. Problems may have been identified; however, contractor sometimes took corrective action, but not always to the owner’s satisfaction. Performance was current and generally semi-relevant. Fair probability of success with an overall above average risk in meeting the government’s requirements. |
| High Risk |
| Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. There were problems, some of a somewhat serious to serious nature. Contractor's corrective action was sometimes marginally effective to ineffective. Performance was current to not current and somewhat relevant to not relevant. Probability of success is questionable with an unacceptably high degree of risk in meeting the government’s requirements. |
| Neutral |
| No current and/or not relevant performance record is identifiable upon which to base a meaningful performance risk prediction. Government personnel were unable to identify any relevant Past Performance information for the offeror or key team members/subcontractors or their key personnel. This is neither a negative or positive assessment. Unknown. |
Relevancy Rating Chart
| Adjective |
| Definition |
| Very Relevant |
| Past/present performance efforts involve the magnitude of effort and complexities which are essentially what this solicitation requires |
| Relevant |
| Past/present performance efforts involved less magnitude of effort and/or complexities, including some of what this solicitation requires |
| Somewhat Relevant |
| Past/present performance efforts involved much less magnitude of effort and/or complexities, including some of what this solicitation requires |
| Not Relevant |
| Past/present performance efforts involved none or significantly less magnitude of effort and complexities, of what this solicitation requires |
Factor 2, Factor 3, Factor 4, Factor 5 and All Sub-factors
| Adjective |
| Definition |
| Exceptional |
| The Offeror’s technical competencies exceed many of the requirements identified in the RFP and will greatly benefit the Government. There are only a few minor issues identified with their technical proposal which can be satisfactorily addressed through discussions, if needed. Two or more significant strengths exist and no weaknesses or deficiencies are identified. Very low level of risk associated with selection of this Offeror. |
| Very Good |
| The Offeror’s technical competencies exceed some of the requirements identified in the RFP and will have some benefit for the Government. There are some minor issues identified with their technical proposal which can be satisfactorily addressed through discussions, if needed. There is at least one significant strength exists and no more than one weakness and no deficiencies are identified. Low level of risk associated with selection of this Offeror. |
| Satisfactory |
| The Offeror’s technical competencies meet all of the requirements identified in the RFP. There are some minor and major issues identified with their technical proposal and the Government anticipates the major issues can be satisfactorily addressed through discussions, if needed. There may be both strengths and weaknesses, but the strengths outweigh the weaknesses and any deficiencies are minor and easily corrected. An average level of risk associated with selection of this Offeror. |
| Marginal |
| The Offeror’s technical competencies do not meet some of the requirements identified in the RFP which will adversely impact the Government. There are serious issues identified with their technical proposal and the Government anticipates the issues can possible be satisfactorily addressed through discussions, if needed. Weaknesses outweigh any strength that exist, will be difficult to correct and would require negotiations. Moderate level of risk associated with selection of this Offeror. |
| Unsatisfactory |
| The Offeror’s technical competencies do not meet most of the requirements identified in the RFP and will adversely impact the Government. There are serious issues identified with their technical proposal and the Government anticipates the issues cannot be satisfactorily addressed through discussions, if needed. The proposal has one or more significant weaknesses that will be very difficult and/or impossible to correct. High risk associated with selection of this Offeror. |
PRICE/ RATING DEFINITIONS
Volume II Non-Technical, Price Price: Offerors are advised the Tradeoff process (Reference FAR 15.101-1) shall be used in determining the proposal that is in the best interest of the Government and award may be made to other than the lowest priced offeror or other than the highest technically rated offeror.
| a. The Government reserves the right to make price/technical trade-offs that are in the best interest and advantageous to the Government in accordance with FAR 15.101, Tradeoff. | |
| b. Price will be evaluated on the basis of its price and/or reasonableness, and acceptability to the Government subject to availability of funds. | |
| (i) Price analysis is the process of independently reviewing and evaluating specific elements of each Offeror's proposed price estimate to determine whether the estimated proposed price elements are representative for the work to be performed; reflect a clear understanding of contract requirements and are consistent with the unique methods of performances and materials described in the Offeror's technical proposal. | |
| c. Analysis will be performed using one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price: | |
| (I) Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP. | |
| (iii) Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information. | |
| (iv) Comparison of proposed price within competitive range. | |
| d. Pricing shall be entered onto the Offer Schedule located within the SF1442. |
Definitions:
| 1. | Strength – An aspect of an offeror’s proposal that has merit or exceeds specified performance or capability requirements in a way that will be advantageous to the Government during contract performance. |
| 2. | Weakness – A flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance. |
| 3. | Deficiency – A material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level. |
PRICE RATING DEFINITIONS
Offerors shall provide a detailed price breakdown with prices itemized and totaled according to the corresponding specification section of the work. For General Condition items such as mobilization, etc. that are not specifically described shall be included in Section 01 00 00. The Government will evaluate two aspects of the Offeror’s pricing proposal 1) reasonableness, 2) completeness.
The price evaluation team will utilize the above sub-factors to evaluate the Offerors Volume II Price Proposal. All sub-factors are of equal importance. The Offeror is directed to provide a price breakdown of each CLIN Item by major feature and division of work. The Government will evaluate the breakdown against the IGCE to determine if the proposal for the various CLIN Items is balanced for the work to be performed which indicates that the Offeror understands the project requirements, and is complete in scope.
EVALUATION CRITERIA
Technical qualifications evaluation factor consists of: 1) Past Performance, (2) Relevant Experience, 3) Technical Approach, and (4) Construction/Project Management, (5) Veterans Involvement
FACTOR 1 - PAST PERFORMANCE
Past performance refers to the quality of recent project experience from the owner's perspective (How satisfactory was the Offeror’s performance on a particular recent project, 2012 to 2017). Describe the price and schedule performance including explanations for any price and/or time growth experienced and include the project’s safety record (i.e. number of lost time accidents/days). The Government may utilize PPIRS as a source for past performance data. The Offeror shall provide DUNS numbers for himself and the Offeror's core team members (Prime General Contractor, joint venture, and/or mentor-protégé partner). The focus of the Government's PPIRS query will be for construction projects recently completed or “well underway” within the past 5 years for projects of a similar size (exceeding $20M in construction costs) and complexity. A "well underway" construction project is 50-percent complete at time submission of RFP. The TEB shall consider all available PPIRS data and narrative not necessarily limited to contract amount, number and total value of contract modifications, award date, original and final completion dates, quality of workmanship, completeness of submittals, correction of deficient work; management of the work, subcontractor management, and relations between owner and General Contractor or team.
Offerors and their core team members shall provide a listing of project names (not more than ten) and current points of contact (name, phone number, and email address) so the TEB may contact them directly if need be. As noted above, the projects shall be for construction projects recently completed or “well underway” within the past 5 years and of a similar size (exceeding $20M in construction costs) and complexity. Offerors shall have their project references fill out a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) Form (See attachments) and email them directly to the Contracting Officer on or before the closing date of the RFP. In order for the Government to solicit candid, fair comments, the Government will not release the Interview Forms to the Offeror.
These PPQ ratings shall include the following data: current client contacts, NTP date, completion date, contract award amount, final price, name of contractor submitting PPQ, Offeror's name, and brief description of work performed by submitting contractor. The Offeror may supplement the PPQ with additional information at their discretion.
Offerors are responsible for ensuring that the telephone numbers provided for the owner’s representative provided are accurate and that the representative is aware that the TEB may be contacting them regarding the questionnaire and the Offeror’s past performance.
At the government's discretion, past performance information may be obtained from any other sources available to the Government including but not limited to interviews with Project Managers, Contracting Officers, other VA personnel, local agencies and other outside sources.
The evaluation team will assign one overall rating to the Past Performance factor for each Offeror. The evaluation team will assign an adjectival rating based on the information provided by the references and any other sources. In the case of an Offeror without a record of past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available, the Offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance and will receive a neutral rating. However, the proposal of an Offeror with no past performance history, while rated neutral in past performance, may not represent the most advantageous proposal to the Government. (Total page limit – 5, not including PPQs)
FACTOR 2 – RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
Sub-Factor 2.1, Relevant Team Experience Sub-factor 2.1 holistically evaluates the Offeror, core team members, and major sub-contractors relevant project experience. Does the Offeror have the right team of major sub-contractors on board to successfully deliver the project on-time and within budget? The evaluation will focus on the specialized experience of the team and their specific experience constructing major features typical of a national cemetery including but not limited to administration building/PIC, maintenance complex, committal shelters, physical security measures including access control, intrusion detection, video surveillance, and fire alarm, mass and fine grading, wetlands mitigation, storm water management, pre-placed crypts, columbarium niches and in ground cremains, memorial walls, public assembly area with main flag pole, roadways, utility systems, site furnishings and signage, landscaping and irrigation, and geographic information system (GIS) site integration.
“Relevant” projects are defined as those construction contracts ongoing or completed within the last 5 years with comparable levels of size and complexity (construction value over $20 million and size exceeding 15-acres) to the Phase 3 National Cemetery of the Alleghenies project. Relevance/ complexity aspects include:
· VA/NCA National Cemetery projects
· State/local/private cemetery projects
· Construction/Installation of pre-placed Crypts, Columbarium Niches (NCA Standard), Memorial Walls (NCA Standard), Natural Stone Columbarium Caps, Stone Veneers, Turf Placement and Maintenance, Landscape Placement and Maintenance, Irrigation Systems, Roadwork, Cold Weather Construction, Wetlands/Environmental Remediation or Restoration.
· Building construction, Golf Courses, Regional Parks, Multiple Sport-Fields Complexes, Large Scale Site Developments With Civil Emphasis
Offerors shall complete and submit summaries for up to ten (10) relevant projects. The projects must demonstrate relevant construction experience. A project performed by both the GC and partner that demonstrates relevant construction experience will be counted as one relevant project. Offerors without projects meeting the dollar and/or size thresholds described above should submit the requested information for the most relevant projects regardless of value or size.
Multi-division or regionalized firms should submit projects performed by the division/business segment that would, if selected, perform the construction of the National Cemetery project. Projects performed by other divisions/business segments may be submitted but may be considered less relevant than projects performed by the local division/business segment proposing on this project.
Offerors shall summarize the following information not to exceed two (2) pages for each project. (Total page limit – 20):
· Describe the relevance to the National Cemetery of the Alleghenies project.
· Describe the project team composition (construction firms involved)
· Describe how sustainable design principles were incorporated into the project; indicate to what extent environmental program goals (e.g., Energy Star, Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) were achieved.
· Provide project's Point of Contact (name, title, email, and phone number).
Sub-Factor 2.2, Key Personnel Sub-factor 2.2 evaluates the relevant experience of the Offeror's key personnel. Does the Offeror have the right key personnel in-place to ensure a successful and timely delivery of the project? Offerors shall provide resumes for each key person identified below including their relevant experience for being assigned to this project. Though not required, consider using Resumes of Key Personnel Proposed for presenting this information. (Total page limit – 8)
1) Project Executive
2) Project Manager
3) Project Engineer
4) Construction Superintendent
5) Quality Control Officer
6) Safety Officer
7) LEED Coordinator/Commissioning Agent
8) Qualified Project Scheduler (Resume must indicate scheduling software experience with Primavera P6)
FACTOR 3 - TECHNICAL APPROACH
This factor will be used to determine if the Offeror fully understands the project requirements, complexities, and constraints under which the work will be performed and has developed an acceptable strategy for managing and constructing the project within the given parameters. The Offeror shall demonstrate their ability to manage the contract proactively, schedule and satisfactorily complete the construction, manage project quality control and safety, incorporate procedures and plans for managing subcontractor performance, incorporate innovative techniques and practices, prioritize and address activities, respond to emergency situations/requirements, and identify any assumptions, deviations, or exceptions to the RFP.
The technical approach must clearly indicate how the Offeror would proceed if awarded the contract. The Offeror must provide a detailed description of how the proposed approach will enable the project to be constructed within time and budget, with minimal interference to existing cemetery operations and visitors after Early Turn Over as described in the Construction Documents (300 calendar days from NTP); Pre-Placed Crypt Burial Section 13, and to the highest quality standards worthy of national shrine stature. The Offeror shall demonstrate his capabilities to use various tools, processes, techniques, personnel, and sub-contractors to successfully manage and deliver this project.
· Understanding of the project, work requirements and anticipated challenges (construction)
· Description of critical construction materials & techniques to ensure timely delivery and installation
· Understanding of local conditions such as availability of materials, labor, potential impacts due to weather
· Working in an operational cemetery once the early turnover portion (300 Calendar day from NTP) is delivered,
· Coordination of temporary and permanent utility services.
· Punch List & Final Acceptance
· Training & Project Close Out (Total page limit – 25)
FACTOR 4 – CONSTRUCTION/PROJECT MANAGEMENT:
The Offeror shall demonstrate its ability to manage a project of this magnitude and complexity. The Offeror shall describe its management capabilities and demonstrate that it has the necessary organization, experience, accounting, operational controls, and technical skills (including, as appropriate, such elements as budget and schedule control procedures, quality control measures, and safety programs applicable to materials to be procured and stored or services to be performed by the prospective contractor employees and its subcontractors) to design and build a National Cemetery.
Sub-Factor 4.1, Project Organizational Chart and Narrative:
The Offeror shall provide an Organization Chart and supporting narrative which includes the Offeror’s key personnel as well as major sub-contractors and their key personnel. Offeror shall demonstrate its ability to manage a project of this magnitude and that it has the necessary organization, experience, accounting, operational controls, and technical skills to build a National Cemetery. Clearly describe the prime responsible firm and key personnel as well as the roles and responsibilities of major sub-contractors (Total page limit – 2).
Sub-factor 4.2, Capacity to Perform the Work:
The Offeror and major sub-contractors shall demonstrate they have the resources and capacity to perform the work as required by the contract documents. The narrative shall include their company’s bonding capacity commitment letter (single project and aggregate) and current workload and existing staff utilization. (Total page limit – 4) Sub-factor 4.3, Quality Control Plan:
The Offeror shall describe the team’s quality control approach, corporate systems and capabilities to maintain quality control of the construction. The Offeror shall describe the proposed quality control organization, including the proposed staffing plan. There is no need to submit a detailed quality control plan as the successful Offeror will provide that after award. The Government is interested in demonstrable capabilities to assure control quality and how the Offeror can achieve or exceed the contract’s minimum quality control system requirements. (Total page limit – 2) Sub-factor 4.4, Safety Plan:
Similar to the quality control plan submittal requirement, the Offeror shall describe the team’s approach, systems and/or procedures in-place, and capabilities to maintain a safe work environment and to respond to emergencies that may arise during the course of construction. (Total page limit – 2) Sub-factor 4.5, Schedule:
The Offeror shall submit a proposed Level 3 project schedule in the format of a Gantt chart specific to this acquisition. The schedule’s time frame shall be from Notice to Proceed through Early Turn Over (300 calendar days from NTP), as described in the Construction Documents; Section 14 through Final Acceptance in accordance with the performance period specified in the Standard Form (SF) 1442 and project description. The schedule shall be broken down by Phase and major division of work showing start and completion dates. The major work divisions shall be further broken down in sufficient detail to demonstrate the Offeror understands of the project requirements, critical path, and major milestones. The Offeror shall specify allowances for bad weather, days of the week and hours of operation, and the percentage of contract completion achieved at the end of each month of the contract period. The schedule shall be presented in 11” x 17” format, maximum 6 sheets plus a maximum 1 page (letter size) supporting narrative. (Total page limit – 7)
Factor 5 - Veterans Involvement Veterans Involvement, Submission Requirements:
1. For SDVOSB/VOSB concerns: In order to receive credit under this Factor, an offeror shall submit a statement of compliance that it qualifies as a SDVOSB or VOSB in accordance with VAAR 852.215-70, Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned and…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it.