35919_Final_ Mini_v2.docx

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

A&E and Related Services MINI-RFP/ OregonBuys Bid Solicitation Number :S-73000-00009348 (PCMS Number: 35919) for Work Order Contract (“WOC”) Assignment Under the Bridge and Structures Design & Drafting Support Services Price Agreement (“PA”) series B39691 to B39697 [NOTE: Only Consultants that have been awarded a PA in the above PA series may respond to this Mini-RFP.]

Project Name: I-84 (Westbound) Union Pacific Railroad Bridge (Hood River)

Project Location: Hood River

ODOT Key Number: K21683

DBE Participation Goal: No Goal (see section 1.5.1 for more information)

PROPOSAL SUBMISSION DEADLINE: See “Bid Opening Date” and time for this Mini-RFP in OregonBuys.

Buyer/Single Point of Contact: See “Buyer” for this Mini-RFP in OregonBuys.

Accessibility: The Oregon Department of Transportation is committed to complying with all statutory requirements to ensure that it is providing information that is more accessible to people with disabilities, as required by Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (29 U.S.C. 794d), and 36 C.F.R. 1194 Appendix A. This includes information regarding the solicitation process. Please contact the Single Point of Contact (“SPC”) identified in OregonBuys (see “Buyer”) to request reasonable accommodation for access, due to a disability, to information related to this solicitation, or the solicitation process, or both. Accommodation requests must be received by the SPC 3 business days prior to the Proposal Submission Deadline (see “Bid Opening Date” and time in OregonBuys).

Non-Discrimination Notice: ODOT in accordance with the Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 78 Stat. 252. 42 U.S.C. 2000d to 2000d-4 and Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Department of Transportation, Subtitle A, Office of the Secretary, Part 21, Nondiscrimination in Federally-Assisted programs of the Department of Transportation issued pursuant to such Act, hereby notifies all Bidders that it will affirmatively ensure that all business enterprises will be afforded full opportunity to submit bids in response to this solicitation and will not be discriminated against on the grounds of race, color, or national origin in consideration for an award.

SECTION 0.0 OREGONBUYS, ATTACHMENTS, SOLICITATION SCHEDULE

This Mini-RFP is advertised in OregonBuys (https://oregonbuys.gov/bso/) as a Bid Solicitation, which is open only to registered vendors that have an existing PA with ODOT for the needed Services.

0.1 INFORMATION AND ATTACHMENTS INCORPORATED FROM OREGONBUYS

In addition to the provisions set forth and linked within the Mini-RFP, the Mini-RFP incorporates by this reference the information published on the OregonBuys Bid Solicitation page for this Mini-RFP, including but not limited to:

· The Bid Opening Date and time specified under the Active Bid Solicitation section;

· The Buyer name and contact information specified in the Header Information section;

· Any documents, forms, or other files linked in the Bid Solicitation Attachments section.

0.2 CROSSWALK OF TERMS USED IN OREGONBUYS

Definition of terms used in OregonBuys.

Bid Opening Date means “Closing” as defined in Oregon Administrative Rule (“OAR”) 137-046-0110(6). In OregonBuys it is the deadline for submitting Quotes (Bids, Proposals or other required responses) required for a Bid Solicitation.

Change Order means A formal change to an existing MBPO (i.e., any form of contract; agreement; price agreement or on-call contract, etc.; purchase order; or WOC).

Master Blanket Purchase Order (“MBPO”) means Any form of contract, agreement (i.e. price agreement, on-call contract, etc.), purchase order or WOC.

Quote means Any form of offer submission by vendors (i.e., Bids, Technical Proposals, Price Proposals, or any other type of offer required by a Bid Solicitation or a Mini-RFP).

Vendor means Any form of business entity registered in OregonBuys. Only registered vendors are eligible to submit a Quote and enter into Purchase Orders, MBPOs, or Release Requisitions pursuant to a Bid Solicitation or Mini-RFP advertised in OregonBuys.

0.3 GUIDANCE FOR OREGONBUYS

For quick reference information regarding common questions from vendors when using OregonBuys, see User Guides under “OregonBuys eProcurement System” on the Contracting with ODOT webpage: https://www.oregon.gov/odot/Business/Procurement/Pages/HowTo.aspx.

0.4 SOLICITATION SCHEDULE

· Proposer Question Deadline: 5 business days prior to the Proposal submission deadline.

· Proposal Submission Deadline: See details on front page of this Mini-RFP (see also Section 1.4.6).

Oregon Department of Transportation (“Agency” or “ODOT") is requesting supplemental information regarding specific A&E and Related Services experience relevant to the above referenced public improvement project (the “Project”).

Project Purpose The 70-year-old I-84 (Westbound) Union Pacific Railroad (“UPRR”) Bridge is a curved steel girder bridge in poor condition, with cracks and large temporary patches. Several of the bridge bents, which are part of the bridge supports, do not support the full width of the bridge. Due to the structure’s condition, the bridge cannot be repaired and seismically retrofitted.

The selected Proposer shall work with and support an Agency-led interdisciplinary project team to design a displacement-based seismically-resilient bridge to replace the I-84 UPRR Bridge.

The resulting project from these bridge and structures engineering and drafting support services is intended to be a bridge replacement of the I-84 UPRR Bridge.

Project Objectives Design a new seismically-resilient bridge that:

· Improves earthquake resilience of this lifeline route which allows emergency services to respond after an earthquake;

· Smooths the ride for travelers;

· Provides wider shoulder for emergency use and cyclists; and

· Improves the resiliency of this critical economical and international trade route.

The expected outcome of the WOC is to obtain bridge and structures engineering and drafting support services for the resulting I-84 UPRR Bridge replacement project, including, but not limited to, design services for Design Acceptance Plans (“DAP”), Preliminary Plans, Advance Plans, and Final Plans, Specifications & Estimates (“PS&E”) and meet all key objectives identified within the scope of services set forth in Mini-RFP Attachment B - Statement of Work (the “Services”). Proposers responding to the Mini-RFP do so solely at their expense. Agency is not responsible for any Proposer expenses associated with the Mini-RFP.

The selected Proposer and Agency will negotiate the delivery schedule, costs and final Statement of Work, within the scope of Services set forth below and in Mini-RFP Attachment B – Statement of Work, for inclusion in the final WOC:

A&E and Related Services related to bridge and structures engineering and drafting support, including, but not limited to:

· Bridge quality control checking;

· Bridge load rating;

· Bridge design CAD drafting;

· Design assistance, including but not limited to superstructure and substructure design; and

· Advertisement and construction support, including but not limited to reviewing shop drawings and making plan revisions.

The WOC is anticipated to start within 30 days following notice to proceed and is expected to be completed within 3 years from notice to proceed. Pending successful negotiations, the selected Proposer shall perform its obligations according to the WOC and applicable terms and conditions of the parent PA and exhibits thereto. Agency anticipates the construction budget for this Project will not exceed $500,000.

Funding Source(s):

· FHWA

· State WOC Payment. Payment will be made for completion of, or acceptable monthly progress on, tasks and deliverables in conformance with PA requirements and all applicable standards. The method of compensation will be determined by Agency and may be based on any of the following methods (may include more than 1 method – “Mixed”):

· Cost Plus Fixed-fee, up to a maximum NTE amount;

· Fixed Price for all Services; Fixed Price per Deliverable; Fixed Price per Milestone;

· Time and Materials, up to a maximum NTE amount;

· Price per Unit.

For further information see PA Exhibit B “Compensation”.

Offer Period: A Proposer's Proposal is a firm offer, irrevocable, valid and binding on the Proposer for not less than 180 days following the closing date for this Mini-RFP. Agency may request, either orally or in writing, that Proposer extend the offer period in writing.

Contingent upon Agency need and available funding, Agency may (for up to 9 months following the close of this Mini-RFP), in Agency’s sole discretion, make additional award(s). Agency may select the next ranked responsible Proposer who has submitted a responsive proposal (provided Proposer agrees to an extended offer period, which would cover the balance of the 9 months, if at that time the offer period stated in the paragraph above has expired or soon will expire), issue an intent to award and begin a new selection protest period. If agreement with that Proposer is not reached, Agency may offer award to the next ranked Proposer and so on until agreement is reached or until Agency terminates the process. Agency reserves the right to require confirmation of the qualifications of any Proposer.

Future Work Limitations: (For these purposes, “Affiliate” or “Affiliates” of a consultant means any Person or entity that controls, is controlled by or is under common ownership or control with that consultant.)

· If a consultant is awarded a WOC to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement, Environmental Assessment, Categorical Exclusion or designs and plans/specifications for a project, that consultant and its Affiliates will not be eligible to propose/bid on or enter into a contract to construct that project.

· If a consultant is awarded a WOC to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement, Environmental Assessment or Categorical Exclusion for a project, that consultant and its Affiliates may prepare the designs/plans/specifications for the project or may propose under a separate solicitation to prepare designs/plans/specifications for the project only if Agency concludes that the NEPA document was prepared with objectivity. Agency is not obligated to proceed with final design for any alternative. All reasonable alternatives will be evaluated and given appropriate consideration, and consultant may not proceed with final design until the relevant NEPA decision documents have been issued (e.g., Categorical Exclusion, Finding of No Significant Impact, or Record of Decision).

· If a consultant or an affiliate of consultant enters into a WOC or other contract for the purposes of administering, managing, monitoring, inspecting, evaluating compliance with or otherwise overseeing a public contract, that consultant or an affiliate of that consultant will not be eligible to enter into a public contract that is subject to administration, management, monitoring, inspection, evaluation or oversight by means of the personal services. See ORS 279C.307, and 279C.307(3) regarding possible Agency applications for exceptions.

· If a consultant or any associate of consultant enters into a WOC or other contract with Agency for the purpose of advising or assisting in developing specifications, a scope or statement of work, an invitation to bid, a request for proposals or other solicitation documents and materials related to a given procurement, the consultant may not be eligible to propose/bid on the prospective procurement (based on a case-by-case assessment by Agency).

The “Buyer” identified in OregonBuys for this Mini-RFP is the Agency’s Single Point of Contact for this solicitation. All inquiries regarding this procurement, whether relating to the Mini-RFP process, administration, deadline or award, potential COI issues, or to the intent or technical aspects of the Services must be submitted in writing via e-mail to the Buyer. Failing to follow the foregoing requirements regarding the Buyer/Single Point of Contact for inquiries may result in Proposal rejection by Agency.

All questions must be received on or before the Proposer Question Deadline set forth in Section 0.4.

Question and Answer documents, if any, will be posted on OregonBuys (in the Bid Solicitation “File Attachments” section for this Mini-RFP) to respond to inquiries that Agency determines, in its sole discretion, do not effect changes to this Mini-RFP. Question and Answer documents provide clarifications and interpretations but do not change Mini-RFP requirements.

1.2.2 ADDENDA

Answers to questions Agency receives and that Agency, in its sole discretion, determines are substantive and provide new information, will be issued as official Addenda to this Mini-RFP. When appropriate, as determined by Agency in its sole discretion, revisions, substitutions, or clarifications of the Mini-RFP will be issued as Addenda to this Mini-RFP. Changes or modifications to this Mini-RFP will be binding on Agency only if in the form of written Addenda issued by the Agency. Any Addenda to this Mini-RFP will be published on OregonBuys in the Bid Solicitation Attachments section for this Mini-RFP.

1.3 PUBLIC RECORDS

After the evaluation/selection and negotiation process is complete, Proposals will be open to public inspection in accordance with Oregon Revised Statute (“ORS”) 279C.107. If a Proposal contains any information that may be considered exempt from disclosure under the various grounds specified in Oregon Public Records Law, ORS 192.311 through 192.478, the Proposer must clearly designate the portions of its Proposal that Proposer claims are exempt from disclosure, along with a justification and citation to the authority relied upon. Application of the Oregon Public Records Law shall determine whether any information is actually exempt from disclosure. Identifying the Proposal in whole as exempt from disclosure is not acceptable. If Proposer fails to identify the portions of the Proposal that Proposer claims are exempt from disclosure and the authority used to substantiate that claim, Proposer is deemed to waive any future claim for non-disclosure of that information.

· Items in Section 1.4 marked as “PASS/FAIL” that are incomplete (except for minor informalities), not submitted by Proposal due date and time, or are otherwise not in substantial conformance with the requirement, will be rejected as non-responsive. Proposals must comply with ALL requirements marked as “PASS/FAIL” to be considered for further evaluation.

1.4.2 REQUIRED ITEMS AND SCORING DEDUCTIONS

· Proposals will receive a 2% scoring deduction, based upon the total available points, for each item in Section 1.4 marked as “REQUIRED” that is incomplete (except for minor informalities) or not submitted with the Proposal in substantial conformance of the requirement. Incomplete or missing items must be completed and submitted within 2 business days of e-mail request by Agency (this does not apply to “PASS/FAIL” items which must be submitted by Proposal due date and time). Missing or incomplete items must be delivered via e-mail. In order to provide an appropriate time stamp. Failure to complete and deliver missing or incomplete “REQUIRED” items within 2 business days of request by Agency shall result in Proposal rejection. Time limitations will be based upon the time of the e-mail sent by Agency and the time of the e-mail sent in response to Agency notification. ·

· Proposals not in conformance with the 12-point minimum font requirements for substantive text (including text in tables) and 11-point minimum font size for resumes or Key Staff Resume form (if required) will receive a 3% scoring deduction and will not be sent back to Proposer for correction.

· Scoring deductions are on an average score per Proposal basis and not a deduction per evaluator. For example, if a Proposer received an average score of 92 points from the evaluation committee, a 2% scoring deduction would result in a Proposal score of 90. (Percentage will be rounded to either the lower number if under .5% or to the higher number if .5% or over.)

1.4.3 PROPOSAL

The Proposal must describe how Proposer meets the requirements that are specified in this Mini-RFP as related to the scoring criteria below. Be clear and concise.

The Proposal must include a completed Proposal Cover Sheet using the form Mini-RFP Attachment A - Proposal Cover Sheet (located on the Bid Solicitation “File Attachments” section in OregonBuys), with the “APPROVED” checkbox marked to certify approval. Any cover letters submitted in addition to the required Proposal Cover Sheet will not be forwarded to the evaluation committee.

1.4.6 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION DEADLINE (PASS/FAIL)

Agency will not accept Proposals submitted after the Proposal submission deadline, which is specified as the Bid Opening Date and time for this Mini-RFP in OregonBuys.

1.4.7 SUBMITTAL FILE SIZE AND REQUIRED FORMS (REQUIRED)

The total combined size of all files for Proposal, Coversheet and any forms must not exceed 15 megabytes.

· (REQUIRED) Key Staff Resumes form (using Agency form and minimum 11-point font). Key Staff Resumes form is, available at: https://www.oregon.gov/odot/Business/Procurement/DocsPSK/keystaff.docx.

1.4.8 SUBMITTAL VIA OREGONBUYS

All required submittals must be submitted via OregonBuys (submittals by any other means will be rejected).

When submitting a Proposal (“Quote”) in response to this Mini-RFP:

· Do not enter pricing or any other information in the Item Information section.

· Select the “Confidential” checkbox on the Create Quote page when uploading Proposal and any other files (“Quote”).

1.4.9 FORMAT FOR PROPOSAL AND PAGE LENGTH LIMITATION

The Proposal must be organized in accordance with the list of Scoring Criteria categories in Section 2.2. The Proposal must not exceed 3 pages, excluding Mini-RFP Attachment A (Proposal Cover Sheet), any tabs or indexes, table of contents and “Key Staff Resumes” (if required, including any limitations, in Section 2.2). If a Proposer submits a Proposal exceeding this limit, Agency will consider the pages up to the allowable page limit and discard all subsequent pages. The Proposer may choose how to allocate the number of pages between any sections, within the overall page limit.

One (1) Page is defined as: one side of a single 8-1/2" x 11" page, with 12-point minimum font size for the substantive text (including text in tables) and 11-point minimum font size for resumes or Key Staff Resume form. Any page over this size will be counted as 2 pages. Any page, or partial page, tabs, indexes or table of contents with substantive text, tables, graphics, charts, resumes, etc., will be counted as 1 page.

· The Proposal Cover Sheet, Proposal, Key Staff Resumes must be submitted as a single combined pdf file.

· Conflict of Interest (“COI”) information (see Mini-RFP Attachment A - Proposal Cover Sheet) must be submitted as a separate pdf file.

(REQUIRED) Proposals must use 12-point minimum font size for the substantive text in Proposals (including text in tables). “Key Staff Resumes” (if required) or other resume formats (if required) must use an 11-point minimum font. Proposers may use their discretion for the font size of other materials that do not include substantive text (e.g., headings, graphics, picture or graphics captions, and org charts).

1.4.10 TERMS AND CONDITIONS (PASS/FAIL)

Unless otherwise provided in this Mini-RFP, by submitting a Statement of Proposal (“SOP”), each Proposer agrees to be bound by and comply with the terms and conditions of the Proposer’s existing PA, as amended. Any SOP that is conditioned on Agency’s acceptance of terms and conditions other than those set forth in the existing PA and the requirements specified in this Mini-RFP (as they may be revised by an addendum to this Mini-RFP) will be rejected as non-responsive.

1.4.11 FAILURE OF ELECTRONIC PROCUREMENT SYSTEM OR EMAIL SYSTEM

Per OAR 731-146-0150(4), in the event of a failure of an Electronic Procurement System or email system that interferes with the ability to submit electronic Proposals, to protest, or to otherwise participate in the procurement, Agency may cancel the procurement or may extend the date and time of receipt of electronic Proposals by providing notice of the extension immediately after the Electronic Procurement System becomes available.

The WOC will include Federal funding:

· A DBE participation goal is not being assigned to the proposed WOC (“No-Goal” assignment).

See PA Exhibit E or, for No-Goal WOCs, Exhibit E.1 for:

· information on reporting requirements and how credit toward meeting an assigned DBE participation is determined (for goal and no-goal WOCs), and

· further explanation and description of the DBE program.

Agency will evaluate Proposals in accordance with the Pass/Fail criteria identified in Section 1.4. Proposals meeting those criteria will be forwarded to an evaluation committee of at least 3 members that will independently review, score and rank Proposals according to the Scoring Criteria set forth in Section 2.2.

The outcome of the Evaluation process may, at the Agency’s sole discretion, result in:

Agency reserves the right to reject any or all Proposals and reserves the right to cancel this Mini-RFP at any time if doing either would be in the public interest as determined by Agency. Agency is not liable for any costs a Proposer incurs while preparing or presenting the Proposal or during further evaluation stages. All unreturned Proposals will become property of Agency and part of the public file without obligation to Agency.

2.1.1.2 False or Misleading Statements. Any statements, written or verbal, provided by the Proposer deemed by the Agency to be false or misleading will result in all or portions of the proposal including demonstrations to be rejected and removed from consideration in the evaluation for project award.

2.1.2 INTERVIEWS/FOLLOW-UP QUESTIONS

Agency may conduct interviews/follow-up questions. If interviews/follow-up questions are conducted, the following will apply:

· The number of Proposers selected for interviews/follow-up questions is at the sole discretion of Agency.

· A minimum of 3 evaluators shall score the interviews/follow-up questions;

· Interview/follow-up question scores (up to a maximum of 20 points) will be combined with the other criteria scores to arrive at a total score. The total score will be ranked to determine the apparent successful Proposer.

· Interviews normally require physical attendance at Agency’s offices; however, Agency may elect to conduct interviews via teleconference or video conference. Further details will be included with notification of time and date of interviews, if conducted.

· Evaluation and scoring will be based on one or more of the following criteria:

· Understanding of Requested Services

· Technical Approach

· Proposer’s Relevant Experience

· Proposer’s General Qualifications

2.1.3 REFERENCES (RESERVED)

2.1.4 AGENCY QUESTIONS

Agency may require any clarification it needs to understand the Proposer’s Proposal. Any necessary clarifications or modifications which are in the best interest of the Agency may be made before the Proposer is awarded a WOC, and some or all of the clarifications or modifications may become part of the final WOC.

2.1.5 METHOD OF AWARD

The total scores and selection for tentative WOC assignment will be determined as follows:

· Total Proposal Score = Total of all evaluator scores for a given Proposal, divided by the number of evaluators, minus any SCORING DEDUCTIONS received per Section 1.4.

· Total Interview Score (if conducted) = Total of all evaluator scores for a given interviewee, divided by the number of evaluators.

Final Score = Total Proposal Score plus Total Interview Score (if conducted).

Agency will negotiate the payment amount and methodology with the top ranked Proposer (based on Final Scores). If negotiations are not successful, Agency may terminate negotiations with the top ranked Proposer and may begin negotiations with the next highest ranked Proposer and so on, until successful negotiations are completed or Agency determines that cancellation of this Mini-RFP is in the best interest of the State.

2.2 SCORING CRITERIA

Proposal scoring will be based on the criteria stated in the subsections below.

2.2.1 EVALUATION ITEM 1 – UNDERSTANDING OF REQUESTED SERVICES MAX POINTS: 5

· Provide a brief summary that demonstrates a clear and concise understanding of the scope of work being requested in this Mini-RFP (see Mini-RFP Attachment B - Statement of Work).

2.2.2 EVALUATION ITEM 2 – PROJECT APPROACH MAX POINTS: 5

· Given the Project information provided within this Mini-RFP, describe Proposer’s approach to cost-effectively meet Agency’s deliverables and objectives in the timeline needed. Describe what Proposer believes are the most critical elements of this Project that the design team must address for a successful outcome. Provide an estimate for the percentage of Services that will be performed by the prime consultant versus any subconsultants.

2.2.3 EVALUATION ITEM 3 – COMMUNICATION AND PROJECT TEAM INTEGRATION

MAX POINTS: 35

· Describe Proposer’s experience providing bridge Computer Aided Drafting (“CAD”) Services and other requested Project Services as part of an Agency-led interdisciplinary design team in which all other disciplines utilize Agency staff. Provide a brief description of up to 3 of Proposer’s most recent projects of this type.

· Describe the techniques Proposer will use to ensure timely communication and the effective sharing of information with Agency project teams.

2.2.4 EVALUATION ITEM 4 – GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS MAX POINTS: 50

· Describe Proposer’s experience with designing and/or quality control (“QC”) checking curved steel girder bridges designed in accordance with the AASHTO LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS 9th EDITION by type and location, most comparable to the requested Services.

· Describe Proposer’s experience with displacement-based seismic design according to AASHTO GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS FOR LRFD SEISMIC BRIDGE DESIGN.

· Describe Proposer’s experience with load rating curved steel girder bridges accordance with the ODOT LRFR Manual by type and location, most comparable to the requested Services.

Proposers do not need to provide a written response to this criterion.

The Proposal must be organized in accordance with the list of Scoring Criteria categories in section 2.2. Proposals will be scored by evaluators on the following factors: Proposal format; ease of finding clear, concise responses that correlate with the order of evaluation criteria in this Mini-RFP; and Proposers ability to follow instructions.

Following development of the Statement of Work, the selected Proposer shall submit a detailed Breakdown of Costs (“BOC” or “BOC-NBR”, as applicable, available at https://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/Business/Procurement/Pages/PSK.aspx) with cost information as required in the WOC Assignment and Requirements Exhibit of the PA.

Agency may reject an offer and rescind the Intent to Award notice if Agency determines Proposer is not responsible or if Proposer has liquidated and delinquent debt owed to the State or any department or agency of the State.

2.3.4 CONSULTANT QUALITY PLAN (“CQP”)

A CQP consistent with the requirements of Agency’s “Consultant Quality Plan Guidance” (linked below) must be on file with Agency. The apparent successful Proposer shall provide a CQP for Agency’s review and approval if:

· An approved CQP for the applicable PA is not on file at Agency;

· The CQP on file is not in conformance with the requirements of the current Consultant Quality Plan Guidance linked below;

· The CQP on file is not applicable to the Services required for this Project; or

· There are changes to quality management processes or organizational structure from what is in the approved CQP while the PA is in effect.

If required per the above criteria, submit a new/updated CQP (in PDF format) within 7 calendar days of Intent to Award notice (see instructions and email box for submittal in Section 4.1 of the Consultant Quality Plan Guidance linked below). Agency may rescind the award for any apparent successful Proposer that does not submit an updated CQP, if applicable, in the time requested and may select the next highest ranked firm for award.

The CQP must be developed consistent with requirements of Agency’s “Consultant Quality Plan Guidance” (https://www.oregon.gov/odot/ProjectDel/QAQC/consultantQPguidance.pdf).

A sample CQP template, as referenced in the Consultant Quality Plan Guidance, is available at: https://www.oregon.gov/odot/ProjectDel/QAQC/consultantQPguidance_AppA_2share.docx.

The above documents and other QA/QC guidance can be found on the Quality Plans and Guides webpage at: https://www.oregon.gov/odot/ProjectDel/Pages/Quality-Guides.aspx.

SECTION 3.0 STATEMENT OF WORK (or) SUMMARY of TASKS, DELIVERABLES & SCHEDULE See Mini-RFP Attachment B – Sample Statement of Work and Delivery Schedule for a sample Statement of Work (“SOW”) that is a baseline of tasks and deliverables from which Agency and the successful Proposer will negotiate a complete, final SOW.

Agency reserves the right to modify the SOW as necessary to meet Agency’s needs.

SECTION 4.0 ADDITIONAL STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS

The standards, manuals, directives and other guidance listed below or available on Agency’s webpages shall be incorporated as exhibits into the resulting WOC by this reference with the same force and effect as though fully set forth herein:

· WOC Exhibit B – Acronyms, Definitions, and Terms https://www.oregon.gov/odot/Business/Procurement/DocsSOW/SSOW_Terms_Definitions.docx

· WOC Exhibit C, Section B List – Standards, Links, and Reference Materials https://www.oregon.gov/odot/Business/Procurement/DocsSOW/SSOW_Resources_Links.docx

Mini-RFP Template (01/25/24)