3-Score Sheet.pdf
PDF 55 KB Posted
- Attached to
- South Sevier High School Auditorium Remodel
- Solicitation number
- SSD26-008
- Issued by
- Tooele County, Utah
About this file
This is an RFP evaluation scoresheet for the South Sevier High School Auditorium Remodel project (SSD26-008) issued by the State of Utah Division of Purchasing in coordination with the Sevier School District. The project involves the construction remodel of the South Sevier High School auditorium, with the contract term extending until project completion. The RFP will result in a single contract award to the responsive and responsible vendor with the highest combined score.
The evaluation scoresheet assigns 100 total points distributed across technical criteria (25 points) and cost proposal (75 points). Technical evaluation criteria include proposed construction schedule (7.5 points, 30% weight), contractor's qualifications and experience with similar projects (10 points, 40% weight), subcontractors list and project cost breakdown (5 points, 20% weight), and references (2.5 points, 10% weight). A minimum technical score of 60 percent (15 points) is required for proposal advancement. Cost points are calculated using a formula where the lowest proposed price receives 100 percent of cost points, and all other proposals receive points proportionally based on their price relative to the lowest bid, with proposals exceeding 200 percent of the lowest price receiving zero cost points.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Score will be assigned as follows:
0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed du to missing information 1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information 2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner 3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner 4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them 5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP
RFP
Section
Evaluation (Pass/Fail)
RFP
Section
Evaluator Score (0-5)
Criteria Weight
% of Tech Criteria
Points Possible Points Earned
Minimum Required
1 1.5 30.0% 7.5 0.0
2 2 40.0% 10.0 0.0
3 1 20.0% 5.0 0.0 4 0.5 10.0% 2.5 0.0 5 0.0% 0.0 0.0 6 0.0% 0.0 0.0 7 0.0% 0.0 0.0 8 0.0% 0.0 0.0 9 0.0% 0.0 0.0
10 0.0% 0.0 0.0 11 0.0% 0.0 0.0 12 0.0% 0.0 0.0 13 0.0% 0.0 0.0 14 0.0% 0.0 0.0 15 0.0% 0.0 0.0 16 0.0% 0.0 0.0 17 0.0% 0.0 0.0 18 0.0% 0.0 0.0 19 0.0% 0.0 0.0 20 0.0% 0.0 0.0 21 0.0% 0.0 0.0 22 0.0% 0.0 0.0 23 0.0% 0.0 0.0
100.0% 25.0 0.0 0.0
RFP
Section
Min Percent
Min Points Required
Points Earned Percent Earned
Evaluation
60% 15.0 0.0 0.0%
RFP
Section
Low Cost Option
Offered Cost
Percent of Total Points Possible
Points Earned
75% 75.0 0.0
Percent of Total
Points Possible
Points Earned
25% 25.0 0.0 75% 75.0 0.0
100% 100.0 0.0
2026 SSD South Sevier High School Auditorium Remodel
SSD26-008
RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET
Firm Name:
Evaluator:
Date:
Minimum Mandatory Requirements
Scoreable Technical Criteria
Proposed Construction Schedule Contractor's qualifications and experience with similar projects
Subcontractors list and Project cost breakdown References
Total Technical Evaluation Points Total Cost Evaluation Points
Total Evaluation Points
Required Technical Point Threshold
Cost
* Purchasing will use the following cost formula: The points assigned to each offerors cost proposal will be based on the lowest proposal price. The offeror with the lowest Proposed Price will receive 100% of the price points. All other offerors will receive a portion of the total cost points based on what percentage higher their Proposed Price is than the Lowest Proposed Price. An offeror whose Proposed Price is more than double (200%) the Lowest Proposed Price will receive no points. The formula to compute the points is: Cost Points x (2- Proposed Price/Lowest Proposed Price).
Total Evaluation Points
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .