3-RFP2008 - Part F - Evaluation and Method of Award - Final.pdf
PDF 134 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 2008
- Issued by
- Alexandria City, Virginia
About this file
Summary
This is an evaluation and award methodology document for the City of Alexandria, Virginia's Request for Proposals (RFP) for Municipal Fiber Network Operations Center (NOC) Support Services. The RFP seeks qualified Offerors to provide Tier 1 network monitoring and event management support services for the municipal fiber network. The City will evaluate proposals using the competitive negotiation method in accordance with the Virginia Public Procurement Act, with the evaluation process designed to identify the proposal most advantageous to the City. The City reserves the right to conduct discussions, request clarifications, and negotiate with Offerors, as well as to make a single award, multiple awards, partial awards, or no award.
Proposals will be evaluated against nine criteria totaling 100 points: Depth of Understanding and Approach (25 points), Description of Tools and Methods (20 points), Cost Competitiveness (15 points), Company Qualifications and Experience (10 points), Proposed Staff Qualifications and Experience (10 points), Industry Standards and Professional Certifications (5 points), Personnel and Hiring Approach (5 points), References and Past Performance (5 points), and Completeness and Quality of Proposal (5 points). Following initial evaluation, the City may conduct discussions and negotiations with fully qualified Offerors reasonably susceptible of selection, including requests for written or oral clarifications, interviews, presentations, demonstrations, revised proposals, or best-and-final offers. A Notice of Award will be issued to the successful Offeror(s), though issuance does not authorize performance commencement until the contract is fully executed by the City.
View the file
Other files
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
City of Alexandria Request for Proposals
RFP: Municipal Fiber Network Operations Center (NOC) Support Services
RFP No.: 2008
Part F – Evaluation and Method of Award
Part F - Evaluation and Method of Award
This section describes the evaluation factors, evaluation process, and Method of Award applicable to this Request for Proposals (RFP). Proposals will be evaluated using the competitive negotiation method in accordance with the Virginia Public Procurement Act, the requirements of this RFP, and the procedures set forth in this Part F.
The City’s evaluation is intended to identify the Proposal or Proposals that are most advantageous to the City, considering the evaluation factors identified in this RFP and their relative importance.
The City may conduct discussions, request clarifications, and negotiate with Offerors as permitted by law and as described in this Part F.
1. Evaluation Factors
Proposals will be evaluated in accordance with the evaluation criteria set forth in this RFP.
Evaluation factors may include, but are not limited to:
Evaluation Criteria Evaluation Points Depth of Understanding and Approach on the City’s requirements (See section 9.4 of Part E). 25
Industry Standards / Professional Certifications (See section 9.5 of Part E) 5
Description of Tools and Methods Proposed to Be Utilized (See section 9.6 of Part E) 20
Personnel / Hiring Approach (See section 9.7 of Part E) 5 References and Past Performance (See section 9.8 of Part E) 5
Company Qualifications and Experience (See section 9.9 of Part E) 10
Proposed Staff Qualifications and Experience (See section 9.10 of Part E) 10
Cost Competitiveness (EUNA Procurement Bid Table and
9.14 of Part E) 15
Completeness and Quality of Proposal (See section 9 of Part E) 5
2. Evaluation Process
2.1. Competitive Negotiation
2.1.1. The City will evaluate Proposals using the competitive negotiation method in accordance with the Virginia Public Procurement Act and the requirements of this RFP. Proposals will be reviewed to determine whether they are responsive to the requirements of the RFP and whether the Offerors are responsible and qualified to perform the requested services.
RFP: Municipal Fiber Network Operations Center (NOC) Support Services
2.2.1. The City may utilize an evaluation committee or other evaluation process as deemed appropriate to review and evaluate Proposals based on the evaluation factors set forth in this RFP and their relative importance.
2.2. Discussions, Clarifications, and Negotiations
2.1.1. After initial evaluation, the City may conduct discussions and negotiations with those Offerors determined to be fully qualified and reasonably susceptible of being selected for award. Discussions may be conducted for the purpose of clarification, to ensure full understanding of the Offeror’s Proposal, or to facilitate selection of the Proposal that is most advantageous to the City.
2.2.1. As part of the evaluation process, the City may, but is not required to:
2.2.2.1. Request written or oral clarifications of Proposals;
2.2.2.2. Conduct interviews, presentations, or demonstrations;
2.2.2.3. Request revised Proposals or best-and-final offers; or
2.2.2.4. Negotiate scope, approach, staffing, schedule, or pricing.
The City may conduct discussions or negotiations with one or more Offerors concurrently or sequentially, and may discontinue discussions with any Offeror at any time.
2.3. Final Evaluation
Following completion of discussions and negotiations, if any, the City will evaluate final Proposals or best-and-final offers in accordance with the evaluation criteria set forth in this RFP. The City is not obligated to conduct discussions or request revised Proposals and may make an award based on the initial Proposals received, if deemed to be in the best interests of the City.
3. Method of Award
3.1. A Notice of Award will be issued to the successful Offeror(s), and a Solicitation Disposition Letter will be issued to unsuccessful Offerors.
3.2. Issuance of a Notice of Award does not authorize the Contractor to begin performance. Performance may not begin until a Contract has been fully executed by the City and any required authorizations have been issued.
4. Reservation of Rights
The City reserves the right, as permitted by law, to:
4.1. Make a single award, multiple awards, partial awards, or no award at all;
RFP: Municipal Fiber Network Operations Center (NOC) Support Services
4.2. Waive informalities or minor irregularities in Proposals;
4.3. Request clarification of Proposals and conduct discussions or negotiations with one or more Offerors;
4.4. Accept or reject any Proposal, in whole or in part;
4.5. Cancel this Solicitation at any time prior to contract award.
5. Responsibility Determination
Prior to award, the City will determine whether the apparent successful Offeror is responsible in accordance with the requirements of the Solicitation, the Virginia Public Procurement Act, and applicable provisions of the City of Alexandria.
| Part F - Evaluation and Method of Award |
| 1. Evaluation Factors |
| 2. Evaluation Process |
| 2.1. Competitive Negotiation |
| 2.1.1. The City will evaluate Proposals using the competitive negotiation method in accordance with the Virginia Public Procurement Act and the requirements of this RFP. Proposals will be reviewed to determine whether they are responsive to the requir... |
| 2.2.1. The City may utilize an evaluation committee or other evaluation process as deemed appropriate to review and evaluate Proposals based on the evaluation factors set forth in this RFP and their relative importance. |
| 2.2. Discussions, Clarifications, and Negotiations |
| 2.1.1. After initial evaluation, the City may conduct discussions and negotiations with those Offerors determined to be fully qualified and reasonably susceptible of being selected for award. Discussions may be conducted for the purpose of clarificati... |
| 2.2.1. As part of the evaluation process, the City may, but is not required to: |
| 2.2.2.1. Request written or oral clarifications of Proposals; |
| 2.2.2.2. Conduct interviews, presentations, or demonstrations; |
| 2.2.2.3. Request revised Proposals or best-and-final offers; or |
| 2.2.2.4. Negotiate scope, approach, staffing, schedule, or pricing. |
| 2.3. Final Evaluation |
| 3. Method of Award |
| 3.1. A Notice of Award will be issued to the successful Offeror(s), and a Solicitation Disposition Letter will be issued to unsuccessful Offerors. |
| 3.2. Issuance of a Notice of Award does not authorize the Contractor to begin performance. Performance may not begin until a Contract has been fully executed by the City and any required authorizations have been issued. |
| 4. Reservation of Rights |
| 4.1. Make a single award, multiple awards, partial awards, or no award at all; |
| 4.2. Waive informalities or minor irregularities in Proposals; |
| 4.3. Request clarification of Proposals and conduct discussions or negotiations with one or more Offerors; |
| 4.4. Accept or reject any Proposal, in whole or in part; |
| 4.5. Cancel this Solicitation at any time prior to contract award. |
5. Responsibility Determination
| Evaluation Points |
| Evaluation Criteria |
| Depth of Understanding and Approach on the City’s requirements (See section 9.4 of Part E). |
| 25 |
| Industry Standards / Professional Certifications (See section 9.5 of Part E) |
| 5 |
| Description of Tools and Methods Proposed to Be Utilized (See section 9.6 of Part E) |
| 20 |
| 5 |
| Personnel / Hiring Approach (See section 9.7 of Part E) |
| References and Past Performance (See section 9.8 of Part E) |
| 5 |
| Company Qualifications and Experience (See section 9.9 of Part E) |
| 10 |
| Proposed Staff Qualifications and Experience (See section 9.10 of Part E) |
| 10 |
| Cost Competitiveness (EUNA Procurement Bid Table and 9.14 of Part E) |
| 15 |
| Completeness and Quality of Proposal (See section 9 of Part E) |
| 5 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .