3-RFP - IV Cleanroom Score Sheet (Eliza 2026).pdf
PDF 3 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- GJ26-145
- Issued by
- Utah
About this file
This is a proposal evaluation score sheet for Southwest Technical College (STECH) in Utah for the GJ26-145 Modular IV Cleanroom Training Suite Fabrication and Installation project. The RFP solicits vendors to design, fabricate, and install a modular IV cleanroom training suite. The evaluation process includes a questions deadline of May 20, 2026, and proposal submissions are due by May 22, 2026, directed to Eliza DeMille at edemille@stech.edu. The evaluation criteria are structured on a 100-point scale with Cost weighted at 40 points, Design & Layout at 30 points, Timeline at 20 points, and Experience at 10 points. Evaluators will score vendors on a scale of 1 to 4, with 4 representing excellent performance exceeding requirements and 1 representing poor performance that does not meet requirements. The score sheet includes sections for evaluators to document strengths, areas for improvement, and questions or concerns regarding each vendor proposal.
The evaluation framework prioritizes cost competitiveness and value, representing the largest weighted component at 40 points, followed by design and layout functionality and workflow considerations. The scoring methodology allows evaluators to assess delivery and installation speed alongside vendor qualifications and relevant experience. Award decisions and contract terms are not specified in this evaluation document and will be determined by STECH following the proposal review process.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 2-RFP Scope of Work - IV Cleanroom (Eliza 2026).pdf | ||
| 1-IV Cleanroom - Southwest Techncial College - Score Sheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
IV Cleanroom RFP – Proposal Evaluation Score Sheet
Project: IV Cleanroom Training Suite Evaluator Name: ____________________ Vendor Name: ____________________ Date: ____________________
Score Description
4 Excellent – Exceeds requirements
3 Good – Meets requirements
2 Fair – Partially meets requirements
1 Poor – Does not meet requirements
Criteria Description Score (1-4) Weighted Points
Cost (40 pts) Overall project cost and value
Design & Layout (30 pts) Functionality and workflow
Timeline (20 pts) Delivery and installation speed
Experience (10 pts) Vendor qualifications
Total Score (out of 100): ____________________
Strengths:
Areas for Improvement:
Questions/Concerns:
Evaluator Signature: ____________________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .