1-IV Cleanroom - Southwest Techncial College - Score Sheet.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 79 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- GJ26-145
- Issued by
- Utah
About this file
This is an RFP evaluation scoresheet for Southwest Technical College's modular IV cleanroom training suite fabrication and installation project. The project requires vendors to design and build a training cleanroom facility consisting of one ante room (gowning area) and one buffer room with a combined footprint of approximately 16 feet in length by 9 feet in width and 8 feet wall height. The facility must include a pass-through box/window between the buffer room and outside wall, and accommodate one 6-foot horizontal laminar air flow hood. This is explicitly a training-only project and must not include ceiling systems, HVAC integration, air pressure systems, HEPA filtration, or ISO classification requirements. Questions from bidders are due by May 20, 2026, with proposal submissions due May 22, 2026, directed to Eliza DeMille at Southwest Technical College.
The evaluation scoresheet assigns points across four primary scoring categories: cost (30% weight, 150 points), design and layout functionality (40% weight, 200 points), installation timeline (30% weight, 150 points), and vendor experience (10% weight, 50 points), for a total of 550 technical points. Cost evaluation will be based on a comparative formula where the lowest bidder receives 100% of cost points, with other bidders receiving proportional points calculated as cost points multiplied by the ratio of the lowest proposed price to their proposed price. Scoring uses a 0-5 scale where 0 indicates failure to address requirements, 1 is poor, 2 is unsatisfactory, 3 is satisfactory, 4 is good, and 5 is excellent. The scoresheet is designated as draft and not subject to GRAMA public records requirements, with instructions that it be returned to the evaluation committee chairperson rather than the Division of Purchasing.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 2-RFP Scope of Work - IV Cleanroom (Eliza 2026).pdf | ||
| 3-RFP - IV Cleanroom Score Sheet (Eliza 2026).pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Score Sheet
IV Cleanroom - Southwest Techncial College
| RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET | |
| DRAFT: This document is intended to be a draft and should not be returned to the Division of Purchasing. Please return this document to the evaluation committee chairperson | |
| This document is not subject to GRAMA pursuant to Utah Administrative Code R33-7-702(2). | |
| Score will be assigned as follows: | |
| 0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed du to missing information | |
| Firm Name: | 1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information |
| 2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner | |
| Evaluator: | 3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner |
| 4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them | |
| Date: | 5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP |
| Minimum Mandatory Requirements | RFP Section | Evaluation (Pass/Fail) | |
| 1 | One Ante Room (gowning area) & One Buffer Room (cleanroom) | ||
| 2 | The combined footprint should be approximately: 16 feet (length) x 9 feet (width), Wall height: 8 feet | ||
| 3 | Pass-through box/window between the buffer room and the outside wall | ||
| 4 | Buffer room space to accommodate: One 6-foot Horizontal Laminar Air Flow Hood | ||
| 5 | This project is for training only, and the following must NOT be included: |
No ceiling system No HVAC integration No air pressure system No HEPA filtration or air-cleaning systems No ISO classification requirements
| Scoreable Technical Criteria | RFP Section | Evaluator Score (0-5) | Criteria Weight | % of Tech Criteria | Points Possible | Points | |||
| Earned | Minimum Required | ||||||||
| 1 | Cost (Primary Factor): |
Total project cost
| Value for scope provided | 30 | 27.3% | 150.00 | 0.00 | ||
| 2 | Design & Layout |
Functionality for teaching Efficient use of space
| Realistic workflow | 40 | 36.4% | 200.00 | 0.00 | ||
| 3 | Installation Timeline: |
Speed of delivery and installation
| Ability to meet program needs | 30 | 27.3% | 150.00 | 0.00 | ||
| 4 | Vendor Experience: |
Relevant project history
| Quality of previous work | 10 | 9.1% | 50.00 | 0.00 | |||||
| 5 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||
| 6 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||
| 7 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||
| 8 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||
| 9 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||
| 10 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||
| 11 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||
| 12 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||
| 13 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||
| 14 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||
| 15 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||
| 16 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||
| 17 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||
| 18 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||
| 19 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||
| 20 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||
| 21 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||
| 22 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||
| 23 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||
| 100.0% | 550 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Required Technical Point Threshold | RFP Section | Min Percent | Min Points Required | Points Earned | Percent Earned | Evaluation |
| 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
| Cost | RFP Section | Low Cost Option | Offered Cost | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned |
| 30% | 236 | 0.0 |
* Purchasing will use the following cost formula: The points assigned to each offerors cost proposal will be based on the lowest proposal price. The offeror with the lowest Proposed Price will receive 100% of the price points. All other offerors will receive a portion of the total cost points based on what percentage higher their Proposed Price is than the Lowest Proposed Price. The formula to compute the points is: Cost Points x (Lowest Proposed Price/Proposed Price).
| Total Evaluation Points | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned |
| Total Technical Evaluation Points | 70% | 550 | 0.0 |
| Total Cost Evaluation Points | 30% | 236 | 0.0 |
| Total Evaluation Points | 100% | 786 | 0.0 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .