3-RFP 26-011 Syllabus Software - Cost Proposal.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 18 KB Posted
- Attached to
- RFP# 26-011 Syllabus Software
- Solicitation number
- RFP# 26-011
- Issued by
- Tarrant County, Texas
About this file
This is a cost proposal template for RFP #26-011, a syllabus management software procurement by the Tarrant County College District in Texas. The District seeks to consolidate three existing solutions—Instructor Class Requirements (ICRs), District Master Syllabi (DMS), and Canvas by Instructure—into a single integrated platform. The solution must provide students with consistent class information across registration and learning management systems, enable faculty to input and update section information through one tool, allow academic leaders to ensure compliance with division, department, campus, College, state, and federal requirements, and provide public access to syllabus and faculty information while enabling the College to manage required content.
The cost proposal template requires vendors to provide comprehensive five-year pricing across defined cost categories including software licensing/subscription, hosting/cloud services, implementation and configuration, professional services, data migration, integrations/APIs, training, technical support/maintenance, and other anticipated costs. Vendors must clearly designate each cost as one-time or recurring and specify the years in which costs will be incurred. The template mandates transparency regarding all implementation and ongoing operational costs, anticipated annual price increases, escalation caps, renewal terms, pricing guarantees, and detailed assumptions underlying implementation cost estimates. Vendors are restricted from modifying the cost category structure and may only enter information into designated green cells in the spreadsheet.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Syllabus Mgmt Software Cost Pro
| Cost Category | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | Year 5 | Notes |
| Software licensing/subscription | ||||||
| Hosting / Cloud (if included in base licensing, leave this line blank) | ||||||
| Implementation/configuration (including QA / testing) | ||||||
| Implementation professional services (project and change management, go-live support, post-launch hypercare) | ||||||
| Data migration | ||||||
| Integrations/APIs | ||||||
| Training | ||||||
| Technical support / maintenance | ||||||
| Professional services / customer support / account management | ||||||
| Other costs | ||||||
| Total Cost of Ownership by Year |
| Vendors: Do not add or remove rows or columns. Do not change Cost Category names or text. Only enter information into green cells. |
| Vendors shall provide a complete and transparent cost proposal, including all one-time, recurring, optional, and anticipated future costs associated with implementation and ongoing use of the syllabus management solution. |
| All services and features included in RFP response should be included in cost proposal. |
| Vendors shall clearly identify whether each cost is one-time or recurring and specify the year(s) in which costs will be incurred. |
| In "other costs" vendors shall disclose any costs not specifically identified elsewhere that may reasonably be incurred during implementation, operation, maintenance, renewal, or expansion of the proposed solution. |
| Vendors shall identify any anticipated annual price increases, escalation caps, renewal terms, and pricing guarantees. |
| Vendors shall clearly state assumptions used in developing implementation costs, including institutional responsibilities and required vendor resources. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .