3-RFP 25-04017 Social Media Management Tool.pdf
PDF 611 KB Posted
- Attached to
- RFP 25-04017 Social Media Management Tool
- Solicitation number
- 25-04017
- Issued by
- Utah
About this file
The document is a Request for Proposals (RFP) from the Utah Transit Authority (UTA) for a social media management tool and associated services. UTA is seeking a comprehensive software solution to analyze, track, manage, and schedule the agency's social media outreach for its Marketing and Communications department. The project is scheduled to start January 1, 2026, with an initial three-year contract term and options for two additional one-year extensions. The RFP (No. 25-04017) has a proposal submission deadline of November 14, 2025, and is structured as a best-value procurement where technical factors will account for 80% of the evaluation and price will constitute 20%.
The procurement is funded locally and has a race-neutral Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) goal. Proposers must have a minimum of three years of experience in social media management tools and be able to provide at least five customer references from similar projects. The selected solution must support multiple social media platforms, provide robust content publishing and scheduling capabilities, offer real-time monitoring and engagement tools, generate comprehensive analytics and reports, ensure compliance and security, and provide training and ongoing support. Proposers will be evaluated on their platform's features, implementation approach, account management strategy, experience, qualifications, and project schedule, with a strong emphasis on technical capabilities and organizational expertise.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 2-Vendor Prerequisites - RFP Agency.pdf | ||
| 4-RFP 25-04017 Social Media Management - Pricing Sheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 1-Claim of Business Confidentiality Updated.pdf.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
UTA IT SOFTWARE AND ASSOCIATED SERVICES SUPPLY AGREEMENT
UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS RFP 25-04017
Cover Sheet
General Information
Project Name Social Media Monitoring & Scheduling Software
Project Description
UTA Marketing and Communications is seeking a social media management tool to analyze, track, manage, and schedule the agency’s social media outreach in support of the department’s strategic communication efforts.
Project Start Date January 1, 2026 for a Term of THREE (3) Years with options for TWO (2) ONE year periods.
Contract Type RFP
Funding Source Local X � State Federal
DBE Goal Race Neutral
Procurement Process Information
RFP No. 25-04017
Contract Administrator
*All correspondence during RFP must be directed through the Contract Administrator.
Rick Wilson
669 West 200 South
Salt Lake City, Utah 84101
(801) 287-3016 rwilson@rideuta.com
Evaluation Criteria:
Technical - Meets or exceeds specifications 40%
• A detailed description of the proposed platform’s features, functionality, and capabilities as they relate to the specifications.
• Information on available support, service levels, and
This is a best-value procurement. UTA will select the team whose proposal is most advantageous to UTA, considering both price and quality/technical factors. The technical factors will account for EIGHTY percent (80%) of the total evaluation. The price will be considered TWENTY percent (20%) of the total evaluation. See Part 2 for more information on proposal content and the rating method.
warranty or maintenance terms.
• A clear explanation of how the proposed solution meets or exceeds UTA’s technical and performance requirements.
• A description of the proposer’s implementation and onboarding process, including project timelines, roles, and responsibilities.
• An overview of the proposer’s ongoing account management, training, and customer support approach.
Experience and Qualifications – 30%
• Proposers shall demonstrate their ability to meet the quality and performance requirements outlined in this RFP, including confirmation of their capacity to meet the proposed implementation and delivery timelines.
• Proposers should provide a minimum of five (5) customer references for projects of similar scope and complexity, preferably with public agencies or organizations of comparable size. Each reference must include the client’s name, organization, address, phone number, and email address, along with a brief description of the services provided.
• Proposers must have a minimum of three (3) years of demonstrated experience in providing social media management tools and related services consistent with the requirements described in this RFP.
Project Schedule 10%
Price 20%
Projected RFP Schedule:
Please refer to Bonfire for updates to all dates and times.
A) Issue Request for Proposals October 31, 2025, 1:00 pm MT
B) Deadline to Submit Questions and Request for Approved Equals or Changes to UTA
November 10, 2025, 2:00 pm MT
C) Last Day for UTA to Issue Addenda and Clarifications November 12, 2025 MT
D) Deadline to Submit Proposals November 14, 2025, 2:00 pm MT
E) Presentations/Interviews/Problem-Solving Exercises(Optional)
TBD if needed
Included as part of this RFP
Part 1 – Project Specific Information
Part 2 – Procurement Process Information
Part 3 – Standard Solicitation Terms
Part 4 – Standard Contract Terms / Sample Contract
Part 5 – Standard Forms plus Federal Forms and Certifications (Appendix I) and Federal Clauses (Appendix II) (If applicable)
Proposal Contents
Page Limit
Cover pages, table of contents, divider tabs, and resumes, the Price Proposal, and required forms do not count toward the page limit.
8 pages
Submittal Instructions
• One (1) electronic copy of the technical proposal and one (1) electronic copy of the price proposal shall be uploaded to Bonfire on or before the deadline referenced above. See Part 3 of this RFP for further instructions.
Required Forms
To be considered responsive, proposals must include the additional forms, declarations, and certifications listed below:
• Signed Proposal Forms and Declarations
• RFP 25-04017 Social Media - Pricing Sheet
Part 1 – Project Specific Information
A. GENERAL OVERVIEW
The Utah Transit Authority (UTA) was incorporated on March 2, 1970, under authority of the Utah Public Transit District Act of 1969 to provide a public mass transportation system for Utah communities.
UTA reserves the right to make an award of all or part of its requirements under this RFQ to multiple Bidders.
A Bidder’s failure to comply with the requirements and instructions of this RFQ may be considered non-responsive.
The Project Manager will oversee any technical aspect of this RFQ and provide guidance as needed.
B. PROJECT GOALS
UTA is soliciting proposals from qualified vendors to provide a comprehensive social media management tool for a contract period of 3 years with options for two 1 (one year options). The selected solution will enable the agency to efficiently manage, schedule, monitor, analyze, and report on its social media activity across multiple platforms in support of strategic communication objectives.
UTA is soliciting proposals from qualified vendors to provide a comprehensive social media management tool. The selected solution will enable the agency to:
1. Efficiently manage, schedule, monitor, analyze, and report on social media activity across multiple platforms in support of strategic communication objectives.
2. Enhance real-time engagement and responsiveness with riders, stakeholders, and the community, ensuring timely and accurate dissemination of service alerts, events, and safety information.
3. Provide advanced social listening and sentiment analysis to monitor public perception, identify trends, and proactively address rider concerns.
4. Streamline internal workflows and approvals, enabling collaboration across communications and customer service teams while reducing errors and delays.
5. Deliver actionable, board-ready analytics and reporting, including customizable dashboards, tagging by campaigns or initiatives, and comparative metrics across platforms to demonstrate the impact of organic social media efforts.
6. Ensure compliance, security, and auditability, including data archiving, role-based permissions, and retention features aligned with public records and regulatory requirements.
7. Support staff training and adoption, providing accessible onboarding, certification resources, and real-time support to maximize platform utilization and continuity of operations.
8. Enable strategic planning and optimization, using platform insights to inform content strategy, optimize publishing times, and measure effectiveness across campaigns and channels.
C. THE UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY’S MANAGEMENT
PHILOSOPHY
UTA continues to provide sustainable transportation systems that help connect communities, through innovation and strategic alliances. In addition, UTA advocates creativity, employee empowerment, and community involvement, to further maintain and promote public transit in efforts to improve the quality of life for its passengers and communities it serves.
D. PREREQUISITES:
• Bidder must include a copy of its W9
• Bidder must have a minimum of five (5) years of experience in similar work outlined in the scope of work of this RFQ.
E. EXPLANATION OF THE PRICE
• All Pricing must be Tax Exempt and based on USD.
• Vendors must provide a clear and detailed pricing proposal, including:
Subscription/licensing costs (monthly, annual, per-user, or per-seat).
One-time setup, training, or onboarding fees.
Optional modules, add-ons, or integration costs.
Renewal and escalation terms.
F. SCOPE OF WORK
The vendor shall provide a social media management platform with the following minimum capabilities:
1. Account & Platform Integration
Support for major platforms (e.g., Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X/Twitter, YouTube).
Role-based access with customizable permissions for staff.
Management of multiple accounts and profiles within a centralized dashboard with an emphasis on collaboration between multiple departments.
2. Content Publishing & Scheduling
Calendar-based scheduling.
Ability to schedule and publish posts across multiple platforms simultaneously.
Workflow tools for draft, review, approval, and publishing.
Functionality to optimize publishing based on platform algorithms and audience activity.
Ability to tag and categorize posts for analytics and campaign tracking.
Campaign-level content planning across multiple channels in one view.
3. Monitoring & Engagement
Real-time monitoring of mentions, hashtags, keywords, and direct messages.
Centralized inbox for managing comments and messages across platforms with customizable filers and tags for streamlined triage.
Social listening tools with sentiment analysis and keyword tracking.
Conversation history and internal notes for seamless team collaboration.
Automated alerts for spikes in mentions or sentiment shifts.
4. Reporting & Analytics
Customizable, exportable reports (Excel, PDF, PowerPoint).
Metrics including engagement, impressions, reach, clicks, follower growth, organic campaign performance, and sentiment.
Comparative analytics across platforms and timeframes.
Benchmarking and KPI measurement capabilities.
Advanced tagging and labeling for granular campaign and content performance reporting.
Clear and comprehensive reporting, presentation-ready reports, and visualizations tailored for the needs of our various departments.
Geo-specific reporting for regional or community-focused engagement.
5. Compliance & Security
Archiving and audit logs of all published content and all inbound and outbound communication.
Secure cloud hosting with data protection standards.
Data retention and export features to meet compliance obligations.
Single sign-on and multi-factor authentication support.
Granular user permissions down to publishing, approving, or viewing content only.
6. Training & Support
Efficient onboarding and staff training (virtual or in-person).
Clear and navigable user interface to facilitate onboarding of new employees.
Ongoing product updates and enhancements.
Self-service knowledge base and tutorials.
Dedicated customer success manager for onboarding and ongoing optimization.
Access to real-time and hands on vendor support via multiple channels (chat, email, phone) with defined response time.
7. Deliverables
The vendor shall provide:
Staff training and onboarding sessions.
Documentation of platform features, workflows, and reporting capabilities.
Ongoing customer support throughout the contract term.
Custom configuration of workflows, approvals, and reporting dashboards tailored to organizational structure.
8. Performance Requirements
The solution will be evaluated on the following performance criteria:
Platform up time and reliability.
Responsiveness and resolution times for customer support.
Accuracy and comprehensiveness of data and analytics.
User adoption and satisfaction.
Compliance with contract and security requirements.
9. Implementation Timeline
Vendors must provide a proposed project plan including:
Estimated implementation and onboarding timeframe.
Milestones for configuration, training, and go-live.
Transition plan for continuity of social media operations.
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
Part 2 – Procurement Process Information
PROPOSAL FORMAT
Proposals must adhere to the following format:
• Proposals should be formatted primarily to 8 ½ by 11 inches. An 11 by 17-inch format may be used for charts, tables, and schedules. No text should be included on the 11 by 17-inch size format except for text that is required for the interpretation of the chart, table, or schedule.
• Proposals should use a minimum of 12-point font.
• If a proposal is submitted in double-sided format, both sides of the page will be counted against the page Limit.
• The proposal must not exceed the page limit shown on the RFP Cover Sheet. The Proposer shall not submit brochures or additional materials. Hyperlinks will be counted toward the page limit unless specified as exempt. At its discretion, UTA will not consider such additional materials in the selection of the successful Proposer.
• The maximum file upload size in Bonfire is 50mb.
Failure to follow the format described above may result in the proposal being deemed non-responsive.
PROPOSAL CONTENT
The proposal should consist of the following sections in the order listed below:
Cover Letter
Explain the interest of the Proposer in the work covered by this RFP and identify the Proposer’s point of contact, including name, address, telephone, and e-mail address. Limit the cover letter to one page.
Technical Proposal (80%) o Meet or exceed Specification(s) (40%)
Proposers shall provide sufficient information to allow UTA to evaluate how their proposed social media management solution meets or exceeds the requirements outlined in this RFP. Please include the following:
• A detailed description of the proposed platform’s features, functionality, and capabilities as they relate to the specifications.
• Information on available support, service levels, and warranty or maintenance terms.
• A clear explanation of how the proposed solution meets or exceeds UTA’s technical and performance requirements.
• A description of the proposer’s implementation and onboarding process, including project timelines, roles, and responsibilities.
• An overview of the proposer’s ongoing account management, training, and customer support approach.
o Experience and Qualifications (30%)
• Proposers shall demonstrate their ability to meet the quality and performance requirements outlined in this RFP, including confirmation of their capacity to meet the proposed implementation and delivery timelines.
• Proposers should provide a minimum of five (5) customer references for projects of similar scope and complexity, preferably with public agencies or organizations of comparable size.
Each reference must include the client’s name, organization, address, phone number, and email address, along with a brief description of the services provided.
• Proposers must have a minimum of three (3) years of demonstrated experience in providing social media management tools and related services consistent with the requirements described in this RFP.
o Project Schedule (10%)
• Proposer’s ability to meet the project schedule and implementation date of December 1, 2025.
Forms
• Signed Proposal Forms and Declarations
• RFP 25-04017 Social Media - Pricing Sheet
Price Proposal (20%)
The price proposal shall be evaluated based on both price and cost realism. Price will be taken at face value, while cost realism will be evaluated based on whether the evaluator believes the Contractor’s price reflects a realistic understanding of the scope of effort and resources required to complete the project. Price proposals shall receive a rating from 0 to 20 based on the combined evaluation of price and cost realism.
Price shall be submitted using the price form provided in part 5 (if applicable) as set forth in the cover sheet. the PRICE FORM MUST BE
UPLOADED IN BONFIRE AS A SEPARATE FILE FROM THE TECHNICAL
PROPOSAL.
WEIGHTING OF EVALUATION CRITERIA
Proposals will be evaluated based on responses to the information requested herein. The Utah Transit Authority may interview one or more firms as part of the evaluation process; however, a decision to award a contract may be based solely upon the submitted proposals.
This is a best-value procurement wherein the award will be made to the responsive and responsible respondent whose proposal is determined to be the most advantageous to UTA, with the evaluation taking into consideration both the technical and pricing factors. In the evaluation, the technical and pricing factors shall be weighted as detailed above:
The Price Proposal must be submitted in a separate file from the technical proposal.
The Technical Proposal must not contain any cost information included in the proposal.
UTA may use the following cost formula: Each proposal will be given a score from 1 to 30 based on both price and cost realism. A proposal with a low price and a high degree of cost realism shall receive a score on the upper end of the scale. A proposal with a high price and a low degree of cost realism shall receive fewer points on the lower end of the scale. To arrive at an overall total score, the price proposal rating will be weighted according to the overall evaluation criteria and combined with the technical evaluation scores.
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
Part 3 – Standard Terms of Solicitation
A. INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS
1. Submission of Proposals.
Proposals must be uploaded to Bonfire by the “Bid Ends” date and time listed on Bonfire. Proposals uploaded after the deadline will be considered non-responsive. It is the responsibility of the Proposer to ensure that its proposal is properly uploaded by the deadline.
Log on to Bonfire at https://utah.bonfirehub.com/portal/?tab=openOpportunities ; if you have already registered, log in and search by Utah Transit Authority or the RFP number.
If you need to create an account, please select “Create Account,” and then you can search UTA or the RFP number identified on the Cover Page. If you need assistance, please email the Utah Supplier Portal Support at https://vendorsupport.gobonfire.com/hc/en-us. Instructions to proposers are included in the RFP documents.
For ease of review, UTA may also request delivery of hard copies of Proposals (see RFP Cover Sheet).
2. Federal Requirements.
If federal funds are being used to finance this project, the Contractor shall also comply with the additional applicable federal terms and conditions listed in Appendix I and submit all applicable certifications, forms and reports listed in Appendix II.
a. UTA eComply Solutions. In addition, where federal funds are being used, the Bidder/Proposer shall submit required labor and subcontractor information to UTA through following portal: https://uta.ecomply.us. The information provided shall include the following:
• Set up and maintain contractor login for all persons inputting information in the system.
• Description of payments received from UTA and payments made to subcontractors of all tiers, including amounts and confirmation of payment.
• All certified payroll must be input into eComply Solutions which may be accomplished either through direct input or importation from the contractor’s accounting system.
• All subcontract award amounts, dates signed, and change orders.
• Certified payroll information shall be uploaded on a weekly basis; all other information shall be uploaded or input no less than monthly.
• The Contractor shall include this clause in all subcontracts and manage and monitor compliance of all subcontractors within the UTA eComply system.
3. Minimum Standards.
This RFP sets forth the minimum requirements that all Proposals must meet. Failure to submit Proposals in accordance with this RFP may render the Proposal unacceptable or non-responsive.
https://utah.bonfirehub.com/portal/?tab=openOpportunities https://vendorsupport.gobonfire.com/hc/en-us https://uta.ecomply.us/
UTA may, in its sole discretion, waive minor irregularities in a Proposal that do not alter the quality or quantity of the information provided.
4. Confidential, Protected, and Public Information
In accordance with Utah Code Section 63G-2-305(6) of the Government Records Access and Management Act (GRAMA) and UTA's Procurement Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs), procurement information related to this procurement will not be made public until after the execution of the Contract with the successful Proposer. Procurement information includes the Proposals submitted by Proposers in response to this RFP, any accompanying documentation, and records maintained by UTA during the procurement process.
UTA will maintain a process to ensure confidentiality for the duration of this procurement. If the Proposer submits information in its Proposal that it believes is "trade secret," the Proposer must follow the procedure set forth in Section 63G-2-309 of GRAMA.
Additionally, for ease of Proposal evaluation, UTA requests that each Proposer also follow the steps identified below:
a) Clearly mark all trade secret information as such in its Proposal at the time the Proposal is submitted and include a cover sheet stating, “DOCUMENT CONTAINS TRADE SECRET INFORMATION,” and identifying each section and page which has been so marked.
b) Include a statement with its Proposal justifying the Proposer’s determination that certain records are trade secret information for each record so defined.
c) In addition to the Proposal uploaded to Bonfire, upload a second copy of the Proposal (as an attachment) that has all the trade secret information deleted, and label this copy of the Proposal “Public Copy.” If a Proposer uploads a Proposal containing no trade secret information, no "Public Copy" needs to be submitted. However, any Proposer that submits a Proposal containing no trade secret information must so certify in a cover letter to its Proposal; and
d) Defend any action seeking release of the records it believes to be trade secret information and indemnify, defend, and hold harmless UTA and the State of Utah and its agents and employees from any judgments awarded against UTA and its agents and employees in favor of the party requesting the records, including any and all costs connected with that defense. This indemnification survives UTA’s cancellation or termination of this procurement or award and subsequent execution of the Contract. In submitting a Proposal, the Proposer agrees that this indemnification survives as long as the trade secret information is in possession of UTA.
All records pertaining to this procurement will become public information after the execution of the Contract, unless such records are identified as trade secret information as specified above. No liability will attach to UTA for the errant release of trade secret information by UTA under any circumstances.
5. Submitting Questions to UTA
Questions and Requests for changes to the RFP must be submitted via the Bonfire Q&A page before the end of the Question and Answer period. UTA’s answers to timely questions will be posted on the Bonfire Q&A page. All communications regarding this RFP should be addressed solely to the Contract Administrator whose name and contact information are listed on the Cover Page of the
RFP.
6. Requests for Approved Equals or Changes
Whenever a brand, manufacturer, or product name is indicated in this RFP, it is included only for the purpose of establishing identification and a general description of the item. Wherever such names appear, the term "or approved equal" is considered to follow.
Requests for Approved Equals must be submitted via Bonfire Q&A page. UTA retains the discretion to withhold approval for one or more requested equals if the magnitude of requested approvals exceeds UTA’s available resources to allow for adequate evaluation in support of a timely procurement.
Any request for an approved equal must be fully supported with technical data, test results, or other pertinent information as evidence that the substitute offered is equal or better than the RFP requirement.
UTA will only assess requests for approved equals if the price of the substitute product is competitive with the price of the product specified in the RFP, as determined by UTA in its sole discretion.
It should be understood that specifying a brand name, components, and/or equipment in this RFP will not relieve the Proposer from its responsibility to provide the product in accordance with the performance warranty and contractual requirements. The Proposer shall notify UTA of any inappropriate brand name, component, and/or equipment that may be called for in this RFP and shall propose a suitable substitute for consideration.
7. Addenda to the Request for Proposals
UTA reserves the right to make changes to the RFP by issuing a written addendum to the RFP which will be posted to Bonfire.
8. Multiple or Alternative Proposals
The submission of multiple or alternative Proposals, except as specifically called for in the RFP, may render all such Proposals non-responsive and may cause the rejection of some or all of such Proposals.
9. Withdrawal of Proposals
A Proposer may withdraw its Proposal from Bonfire before the Proposal due date without prejudice to itself.
10. Cost of Proposals
UTA is not liable for any costs incurred by Proposers in the preparation, presentation, or negotiation of Proposals submitted in response to this RFP.
11. Examination of Request for Proposals
The submission of a Proposal constitutes an acknowledgment upon which UTA may rely that the Proposer: (i) has thoroughly examined and is familiar with the RFP, including the contractual terms in Part 4, (ii) is familiar with any work site identified in the RFP, and (iii) has reviewed and inspected all applicable statutes, regulations, ordinances, and resolutions addressing or relating to the goods and services to be provided hereunder. The failure or neglect of a Proposer to receive or examine such documents, work sites, statutes, regulations, ordinances, or resolutions will in no way relieve the Proposer from any obligations with respect to the Proposer’s Proposal or to any contract awarded pursuant to this RFP. No reduction or modification in the Proposer’s obligations will be allowed based upon a lack of knowledge or misunderstanding of this RFP, work sites, statutes, regulations, ordinances, or resolutions.
12. Firm Offer
Unless otherwise stated in this RFP, submission of a Proposal constitutes an offer to provide the goods or services described in the RFP, for the price set forth in the Proposal. Such offer must be good and firm for a period of ninety (90) days after the Deadline to Submit Proposals.
B. SELECTION PROCESS
1. No Public Opening
This is an RFP and, as such, the Proposals submitted in response to this RFP will not be subject to a public opening.
2. UTA’s Procurement Options
Based on submitted information, UTA may do or take any of the following actions, without limitation:
• Select a Proposer based solely on the written proposals, with or without subsequent negotiations.
• Ask for more information or clarifications before making a selection.
• Use presentations, interviews, or problem-solving exercises before making a selection.
• Under specific circumstances described in the Utah Procurement Code, determine a Competitive Range, conduct Discussions, and/or request Best and Final Offers (BAFO) before making a selection if a material error in the RFP is discovered during the evaluation process, UTA may issue an addendum to all Proposers that have submitted Proposals requesting revised Proposals based upon the corrected RFP.
• Decline to accept any Proposal.
• Re-advertise.
• Cancel the procurement or
• Elect to otherwise procure the needed services in accordance with UTA policy and procedures.
UTA reserves the right to negotiate price, scope, schedule, and other contract terms with the preferred Proposer after a selection is made.
3. Responsibility
UTA will not select a Proposer who is deemed by UTA, in its sole discretion, to lack the ability or responsibility to perform successfully under the terms of the contract. Such determination of responsibility may encompass management, technical, legal, financial matters and cyber security preparedness. Proposers deemed to be not responsible to cyber security risk factors will be notified and may be given an opportunity to remediate.
4. Checking References
UTA reserves the right to contact any reference specifically named by the Proposer in its Proposal or any other additional references as deemed appropriate by UTA, including references suggested by the Proposer's named references or references known to UTA through its own knowledge of the transportation industry.
5. Requests for Clarification
The Proposer shall provide accurate and complete information to UTA. If information is incomplete, contains a clerical error, or is otherwise unclear, UTA may either (i) declare the Proposal non-responsive, (ii) evaluate the Proposal as submitted, or (iii) issue a Request for Clarifications to the Proposer stating the information needed and a date and time by which the information must be provided. If the Proposer does not respond to the Request for Clarifications in a timely manner, or if the Proposer’s response is deemed to be insufficient by UTA, in its sole discretion, then UTA may declare the Proposal non-responsive.
All requests for Clarification will be in writing via Bonfire Q&A page, with responses submitted according to the instructions contained in the request for Clarification. Responses must be limited to answering the specific information requested by UTA.
6. Presentations / Interviews / Problem-Solving Exercises
UTA may utilize presentations, interviews, and/or problem-solving exercises during this procurement if, at the sole discretion of UTA, it is considered to be in UTA's best interest. If UTA determines that presentations and/or interviews and/or problem-solving exercises are in its best interest, UTA will notify all or a short-list of the most highly qualified Proposers of the decision to utilize presentations and/or interviews and/or problem-solving exercises and schedule the presentations and/or interviews and/or problem-solving exercises in such a way as to not unduly delay the procurement process.
UTA reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to conduct multiple rounds of presentations and/or interviews and/or problem-solving exercises, if it deems necessary to do so, with one or more Proposers.
7. Competitive Range
Under specific circumstances described in the Utah Procurement Code, UTA may declare a Competitive Range that includes only those Proposers with a reasonable chance of being selected.
UTA will declare a Competitive Range, if it chooses to do so, after a thorough analysis of the Proposals.
8. Discussions
UTA may, at its sole discretion, conduct written and/or verbal discussions with any of the Proposers in the Competitive Range regarding the content of their Proposal. If discussions are held, they will be held with all Proposers in the Competitive Range.
9. Best and Final Offers
UTA may request Best and Final Offers from responsible offerors:
(a) Only with the approval of the Chief Procurement Officer; and
(b) Only if:
(i) No single proposal adequately addresses all the specifications stated in the
RFP;
(ii) All proposals are unclear or deficient in one or more respects;
(iii) All cost proposals exceed the identified budget
Although UTA reserves the right to issue a request for Proposal revisions (including Best and Final Offers), UTA is under no obligation to do so. UTA may make its selection and award based on the initial Proposals submitted.
If UTA requests Proposal revisions and/or BAFOs, Proposers in the Competitive Range may be informed of and requested and/or allowed to revise their Proposals, including correction of any weaknesses, minor irregularities, errors, and/or deficiencies identified to the Proposers by UTA following initial evaluation of the Proposals. The request for Proposal revisions and/or BAFOs will allow adequate time for the Proposers to revise their Proposals. Upon receipt of the Proposal revisions and/or BAFOs, the evaluation process will be repeated. The process will consider the revised information and re-evaluate and revise ratings as appropriate. Although this RFP allows for Proposal revisions and/or BAFOs, all efforts will be made to make a selection based on initial Proposals. If Discussions are held, UTA will attempt to limit the selection process to a single BAFO following Discussions. If a Proposal revision and/or BAFO is requested of a Proposer, and that
Proposer opts to not submit a Proposal revision and/or BAFO that Proposer's original Proposal or most recent Proposal revision, as appropriate, will be treated as its BAFO.
10. Best Value Determination
This is a Best Value procurement, in which selection of a Proposer is based on a combination of price and qualitative components, as set forth on the RFP Cover Sheet. Accordingly, UTA may not select the Proposal with the lowest price, or the Proposal with the highest qualitative/ technical rating. UTA will select the responsible Proposer whose Proposal is deemed to be the most advantageous to UTA.
11. Negotiations
After selection, but prior to award of the Contract, UTA may, at its sole discretion, either conduct negotiations with the successful Proposer or UTA may choose not to conduct negotiations with the successful Proposer and award the Contract to the successful Proposer based on its written Proposal and any additional information received during Discussions and Proposal revisions and/or BAFOs, if conducted.
If UTA and the selected Proposer are unable to reach an agreement on the scope, contractual terms, and/or price of the Contract, then UTA may, in its sole discretion, negotiate with the next most advantageous Proposer or choose to terminate the procurement in its entirety.
Once negotiations have been terminated with any Proposer, the negotiations may not be reopened with that Proposer under any circumstances.
If UTA receives only one responsive Proposal, UTA reserves the right to negotiate all elements of the Proposal and the Contract with the sole responsive Proposer, including, but not limited to, profit.
12. Notice to Unsuccessful Proposers
Following execution of the Contract between UTA and the successful Proposer, UTA will inform unsuccessful Proposers of the number of Proposals received and the name of the successful Proposer. UTA will attempt to provide this notice promptly after the Contract is executed. However, UTA’s failure to give this notice will not be deemed to affect the validity of the Contract.
13. Debriefs
Upon request from an unsuccessful Proposer, UTA may, but is not required to, provide debriefing information for the sole purpose of discussing, in a limited manner, the strengths and weaknesses of the unsuccessful Proposal.
14. Protests
Protests are governed by the Utah Procurement Code, Utah Code Ann. § 63G-6a-1601 et seq. To be valid, a protest must be in writing and be filed with UTA within the timeframes set forth in Utah Code Ann. § 63G-6a-1602. A protest will be deemed to be filed pursuant to these procedures when actually received by the designated recipient via email to protests@rideuta.com.
All protests must include:
• The name, address, and email address of the protester;
• The appropriate contact person for the protester, to whom all protest correspondence shall be addressed;
• The solicitation or project number; and
• A detailed statement outlining the nature of the protest including, without limitation: (i) the alleged facts and evidence giving rise to the protestor to claim that it has been aggrieved; (ii) the protestor’s standing to protest; and (iii) the legal grounds upon which the protest is based.
mailto:protests@rideuta.com
The Procurement Officer shall make a written determination regarding the protest. An unfavorable determination by the UTA Procurement Officer is eligible for administrative reconsideration by a panel determined by the Chair of the UTA Board of Trustees. A notice of appeal must be delivered by the Protestor within five (5) calendar days of the date of the Procurement Officer’s decision. A notice of appeal addressed as follows:
Chair, UTA Board of Trustees c/o Utah Transit Authority 669 West 200 South Salt Lake City, Utah 84101 Attn: Board Coordinator
CONTAINS TIME-SENSITIVE PROTEST MATERIALS
Any further appeal may only be made pursuant to Utah Code Ann. § 63G-6a-1801 et seq. A protesting entity must exhaust administrative appeals prior to filing a judicial appeal pursuant to Utah Code Ann. § 63G-6a-1801 et seq.
SAMPLE CONTRACT FOR SOCIAL
MEDIA MANAGEMENT TOOL
Part 4 – UTA CONTRACT NO. 25-04017
THIS IT SOFTWARE AND ASSOCIATED SERVICES SUPPLY AGREEMENT (“Contract”) is entered into and made effective as of the date of last signature below. (“Effective Date”) by and between Utah Transit Authority, a public transit district organized under the laws of the State of Utah (”UTA”), and [INSERT NAME OF CONTRACTOR], a [INSERT DESCRIPTION OF ENTITY TYPE] (the ”Contractor”).
RECITALS
WHEREAS, on [INSERT PROPOSAL DUE DATE], UTA received competitive proposals to provide [INSERT DESCRIPTION OF THE SOFTWARE AND ASSOCIATED SERVICES] and (as applicable) all associated hardware, software, tools, installation services, commissioning and testing services, training and documentation (the “Software and Services”) according to the terms, conditions and specifications prepared by UTA in [INSERT RFP NUMBER] (the “RFP”); and
OR,
WHEREAS, UTA desires to award a contract for (INSERT DESCRIPTION OF THE SOFTWARE AND ASSOCIATED SERVICES] to Contractor based on an approved sole source justification; and
WHEREAS, UTA wishes to procure the Software and Services according to the terms, conditions and specifications listed in the RFP (as subsequently amended through negotiation by the parties); and
WHEREAS, the [INSERT NAME AND DATE OF PROPOSAL TO BE INCORPORATED INTO CONTRACT] proposal submitted by the Contractor in response to the RFP (“Contractor’s Proposal) was deemed to be the most advantageous to UTA; and
WHEREAS, Contractor is willing to furnish the Software and Services according to the terms, conditions and specifications of the Contract.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in accordance with the foregoing Recitals, which are incorporated herein by reference, and for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements hereafter set forth, the mutual benefits to the parties to be derived here from, and for other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which the parties acknowledge, it is hereby agreed as follows:
1. SOFTWARE AND ASSOCIATED SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR
Contractor hereby agrees to furnish and deliver the Software and Associated Services in accordance with the Contract as described in PART 1, Section F. SCOPE OF WORK, Items 1-9, (Product Description and Statement of Associated Services) (including performing any installation, testing commissioning and other Services described in the Contract).
2. TERM
This Contract shall commence as of the Effective Date. The Contract shall remain in full force and effect for purchases of Software and Services (made via purchase order or other agreed order method) during a THREE (3) - year period expiring December 31, 2028 UTA may, at its sole election and in its sole discretion, extend the initial term for up to TWO (2) additional one-year option periods, for a total Contract period not to exceed FIVE (5) years. Extension options may be exercised by UTA upon providing Contractor with notice of such election at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the initial term or then-expiring option period (as applicable). The Contract may be further extended if the Contractor and UTA mutually agree to an extension evidenced in writing. The rights and obligations of UTA and Contractor under the Contract shall at all times be subject to and conditioned upon the provisions of the Contract.
3. COMPENSATION AND FEES
UTA shall pay Contractor in accordance with the payment milestones or other terms described in Exhibit B. If Exhibit B does not specify any milestones or other payment provisions, then payment shall be invoiced after the Software have been delivered and the Services have been performed. In no event shall advance payments be made.
4. INCORPORATED DOCUMENTS
a. The following documents hereinafter listed in chronological order, with most recent document taking precedence over any conflicting provisions contained in prior documents (where applicable), are hereby incorporated into the Contract by reference and made a part hereof:
1. The terms and conditions of this Software and Associated Services Supply Agreement (including any exhibits and attachments hereto).
2. UTA's RFP including, without limitation, all attached or incorporated terms, conditions, federal clauses (as applicable), drawings, plans, specifications and standards and other descriptions of the Software and Services;
3. Contractor's Proposal including, without limitation, all federal certifications (as applicable);
b. The above-referenced documents are made as fully a part of the Contract as if hereto attached or herein repeated. The Contract (including the documents listed above) constitute the complete contract between the parties.
c. If this procurement is funded by federal dollars, the mandatory FTA terms and conditions contained at Exhibit C will also apply.
5. ORDER OF PRECEDENCE
The Order of Precedence for this contract is as follows:
- UTA Contract including all attachments and terms and conditions
- UTA Solicitation Terms
- Contractor’s Bid or Proposal including proposed terms or conditions
Any contractor proposed term or condition which is in conflict with a UTA contract or solicitation term or condition will be deemed null and void.
6. LAWS AND REGULATIONS
Contractor and any and all Software and/or Services furnished under the Contract will comply fully with all applicable Federal and State laws and regulations, including those related to safety and environmental protection. Contractor shall also comply with all applicable licensure and certification requirements.
7. INVOICING PROCEDURES
a. Contractor shall submit invoices to UTA’s Project Manager for processing and payment in accordance with Exhibit B. If Exhibit B does not specify invoice instructions, then Contractor shall invoice UTA after delivery of all Software and satisfactory performance of all Services. Invoices shall be provided in the form specified by UTA. Reasonable supporting documentation including cost and pricing data demonstrating Contractor’s entitlement to the requested payment must be submitted with each invoice.
b. Contractor shall invoice UTA after delivery of all Goods and satisfactory performance of all Services. Contractor shall submit invoices to ap@rideuta.com for processing and payment.
In order to timely process invoices, Contractor shall include the following information on each invoice:
i. Contractor Name
ii. Unique Invoice Number
iii. PO Number
iv. Invoice Date
v. Detailed Description of Charges
c. Total Dollar Amount Due UTA shall have the right to disapprove (and withhold from payment) specific line items of each invoice to address non-conforming Goods or Services.
Approval by UTA shall not be unreasonably withheld. UTA shall also have the right to offset (against payments) amounts reasonably reflecting the value of any claim which UTA has against Contractor under the Contract. Payment for all invoice amounts not specifically disapproved or offset by UTA shall be provided to Contractor within thirty (30) calendar days of invoice submittal.
d. UTA shall have the right to disapprove (and withhold from payment) specific line items of each invoice to address non-conforming Software or Services. Approval by UTA shall not be unreasonably withheld. UTA shall also have the right to offset (against payments) amounts mailto:ap@rideuta.com reasonably reflecting the value of any claim which UTA has against Contractor under the Contract. Payment for all invoice amounts not specifically disapproved or offset by UTA shall be provided to Contractor within thirty (30) calendar days of invoice submittal to ap@rideuta.com . Invoices not submitted electronically will shall be paid thirty (30) calendar days from date of receipt by UTA’s accounting department.
e. Invoices must include a unique invoice number, UTA’s Purchase Order number, a description of the Good or Service provided, line-item pricing, total amount due, and must be submitted electronically to ap@rideuta.com.
8. WARRANTY OF SOFTWARE AND SERVICES
a. Contractor warrants that all Software (including hardware, firmware, and/or software products that it licenses) and Services shall conform to the specifications, drawings, standards, samples, and other descriptions made a part of (or incorporated by reference into) the Contract. Contractor further warrants that all Software and Services shall be of the quality specified, or of the best grade if no quality is specified, and, unless otherwise provided in the Contract, will be new, and free from defects in design, materials and workmanship.
b. Contractor warrants that all Software and Services shall be in compliance with applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations including, without limitation, those related to safety and environmental protection.
c. At any time for a period of two (2) years from the date that all Software have been delivered and all Services have been performed in accordance with the Contract, Contractor shall at its own expense promptly repair, replace and/or re-perform any Software or Services that are defective or in any way fail to conform to the Contract requirements.
d. If Contractor fails to promptly make any repair, replacement or re-performance as required herein, UTA may conduct the necessary remedial work at Contractor‘s expense. Contractor cannot void the warranty for repair, replacement or re-performance performed under these circumstances. Provided that such repair, replacement or re-performance is conducted in a reasonable manner and with workmanship and care consistent with industry standards, Contractor shall reimburse UTA for the cost of any warranty repair, replacement or re-performance self-performed by UTA.
e. The foregoing warranties are not intended as a limitation but are in addition to all other express warranties set forth in the Contract and such other warranties as are implied by law, custom, and usage of trade. Contractor (seller) acknowledges that all warranties granted to the buyer by the Uniform Commercial Code of the State of Utah apply to the Contract.
Product liability disclaimers and/or warranty disclaimers from the seller are not applicable to the Contract unless otherwise specified and mutually agreed upon elsewhere in the Contract. In general, Contractor warrants that: (1) the Good will do what the salesperson said it would do, (2) the Good will live up to all specific claims that the manufacturer makes in their advertisements, (3) the Software will be suitable for the ordinary purposes for which such items are used, (4) the Software will be suitable for any special purposes that UTA has relied on Contractor’s skill or judgment to consider when it advised UTA about the Good, (5) the Software have been properly designed and manufactured, and (6) the Software are free of significant defects or unusual problems about which UTA has not been warned. Nothing in this warranty will be construed to limit any rights or remedies UTA may otherwise have under the Contract.
9. OWNERSHIP OF DESIGNS, DRAWINGS, AND WORK PRODUCT
Any deliverables prepared or developed pursuant to the Contract including without limitation drawings, specifications, manuals, calculations, maps, sketches, designs, tracings, notes, reports, data, software, computer programs, models and samples, shall become the property of UTA when prepared, and, together with any documents or information furnished to Contractor and its employees or agents by UTA hereunder, shall be delivered to UTA upon request, and, in any event, upon termination or final acceptance of the Software and Services. UTA shall have full rights and privileges to use and reproduce said items.
To the extent that any deliverables include or incorporate preexisting intellectual property of Contractor, Contractor hereby grants UTA a fully paid, perpetual license to use such intellectual property for UTA’s operation, maintenance, modification, improvement and replacement of UTA’s assets. The scope of the license shall be to the fullest extent necessary to accomplish those purposes, including the right to share same with UTA’s contractors, agent, officers, directors, employees, joint owners, affiliates and contractors.
10. GENERAL INDEMNIFICATION
Contractor shall indemnify, hold harmless and defend UTA, its officers, trustees, agents, and employees (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Indemnitees”) from and against all liabilities, claims, actions, damages, losses, and expenses including without limitation reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs (hereinafter referred to collectively as “claims”) related to bodily injury, including death, or loss or damage to tangible or intangible property caused, or alleged to be caused, in whole or in part, by the acts or omissions of Contractor or any of its owners, officers, directors, agents, employees or subcontractors. This indemnity includes any claim or amount arising out of the failure of such Contractor to conform to federal, state, and local laws and regulations. If an employee of Contractor, a subcontractor, anyone employed directly or indirectly by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable brings a claim against UTA or another Indemnitee, Contractor’s indemnity obligation set forth above will not be limited by any limitation on the amount of damages, compensation or benefits payable under any employee benefit acts, including workers’ compensation or disability acts. The indemnity obligations of Contractor shall not apply to the extent that claims arise out of the sole negligence of UTA or the Indemnitees.
11. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
The insurance requirements herein are minimum requirements for this Contract and in no way limit the indemnity covenants contained in this Contract. The Utah Transit Authority in no way warrants that the minimum limits contained herein are sufficient to protect the Contractor from liabilities that might arise out of the performance of the work under this contract by the Contractor, his agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors and Contractor is free to purchase additional insurance as may be determined necessary.
A. MINIMUM SCOPE AND LIMITS OF INSURANCE: Contractor shall provide coverage with limits of liability not less than those Stated below.
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .