3-Offerors Exceptions (1).pdf

PDF 182 KB Posted

Attached to
Telecommunications-Cellular Services
Solicitation number
184-26
Issued by
Fulton County, Georgia

About this file

This is an Offeror's Exceptions form issued by Fulton County Schools (FCS) in Georgia for a Telecommunications-Cellular Services contract solicitation. The document establishes the process and requirements for offerors to formally request exceptions or deviations from the terms and conditions outlined in the RFP. FCS explicitly states it does not intend to modify the standard RFP terms unless necessary to clarify scope of work and technical requirements. Offerors must complete a structured table for each exception, identifying the specific section, paragraph, title, and clause number affected; articulating the exception and its justification; proposing a resolution; and detailing any price or schedule impacts resulting from the requested deviation.

The form serves as a proposal evaluation tool only and will not become part of the executed contract. FCS reserves the right to deem proposals with substantive modifications as nonresponsive and warns that material deviations from RFP terms may result in point deductions and potential delays in contract award. Offerors are advised that failure to accept RFP terms and conditions could result in significant unacceptable delays and proposal rejection. All cells within each exception row must be completed, and the signed form requires identification of the offeror name, FCS RFP number, authorized signature, date, printed name, and title of the signatory.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

OFFEROR’S EXCEPTIONS

The terms and conditions contained in the solicitation comprise the contract proposed by FCS. FCS does not intend to make changes to those terms and conditions, unless necessary to clarify the scope of work and/or technical requirements. Offeror may lose points for substantive modifications proposed by Offeror which materially differ from the RFP terms and are likely to, in the opinion of FCS, require substantial legal negotiations to resolve. In addition, failure to accept the RFP terms and conditions may result in significant unacceptable delays in FCS’ ability to award a contract and may result in an Offeror’s proposal being deemed to be nonresponsive. Nonetheless, if an Offeror must take an exception the Offeror shall provide the requested information for each exception or suggested deviation in the table below. By completing and submitting this form, an Offeror acknowledges that its proposal may be deemed to be nonresponsive at FCS' discretion.

No. Section #, paragraph #, title, clause

Exception Taken and Reason

Proposed Resolution of Exception

Price / Schedule Impact

OFFEROR: (Name of Offeror) FCS RFP No.

By: (Signature) Date:

(Printed name)

(Title)

NOTES:

• All cells within a row must be completed for each exception.

• Section number, paragraph number, title and clause number: Identify section number, paragraph number, title, and clause containing the scope of work and/or technical requirement in issue (e.g., Section – Request for Proposal, Paragraph 5, Technical & Functional Requirements, Subparagraph 5.1.15 "integration with LMS third party systems").

• Exception Taken: Specify exception and reason for exception.

• Proposed Resolution of Exception: Provide proposed resolution of the exception taken.

• Price/Schedule Impact: Identify impact to schedule and price, if exception or deviation is accepted.

THIS FORM IS FOR PROPOSAL EVALUATION ONLY AND WILL NOT BE A PART OF

THE CONTRACT.

Section paragraph title clause1:
Exception Taken and Reason1:
Proposed Resolution of Exception1:
Price Schedule Impact1:
Section paragraph title clause2:
Exception Taken and Reason2:
Proposed Resolution of Exception2:
Price Schedule Impact2:
OFFEROR:
FCS RFP No:
By:
Date:
Printed name:
Title:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .