3 Exhibit B Past Performance Questionnaire PPQ.pdf

PDF 646 KB Posted

Attached to
Custodial Services Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA448620R0011
Issued by
Department of the Air Force United States Air Forces in Europe - Air Forces Africa

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire for a custodial services contractor. The questionnaire requests ratings and comments on the contractor's quality of work, timeliness, safety practices, and compliance with labor standards and regulations based on a previous contract. Respondents are asked to rate 24 performance criteria on a scale of acceptable or unacceptable and indicate whether the contractor was ever issued a cure notice as well as whether the respondent would award the contractor another contract. General comments are also solicited on the contractor's ability to execute its proposal commitments and whether the respondent would or would not award the contractor a contract today given a choice. The completed questionnaire must be returned no later than July 17, 2020 to two listed email addresses or delivered in person to the 65th Contracting Flight.

The related federal contract opportunity is a solicitation from the Department of the Air Force for custodial services at Lajes Field in Portugal. The contractor will provide all management, tools, equipment and labor to perform cleaning in accordance with the performance work statement, service summary and Air Force common levels of service standards. The contractor must clean in compliance with all applicable laws, regulations and commercial practices.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Show all 14

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Exhibit B

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

A. GENERAL INFORMATION:

The individual most knowledgeable of the contractor’s day-to-day operations should complete this survey. However, this individual is encouraged to supplement his or her knowledge with the judgment of others within his or her organization. Please complete the questionnaire as thoroughly as possible by indicating your ratings and providing comments, wherever applicable. Please print neatly and submit all information in the English language. Follow up phone calls may be conducted by the contracting officer to ensure the accuracy of this questionnaire.

Contractor’s Name: Telephone Number:

Address: Point of Contact:

Project Title and Detailed Description of Work:

Contract Number: Dollar/Euro Amount:

Contract Dates of

Performance:

Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Name of

Respondent:

Title:

Address: Telephone Number:

Email Address:

C. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Please indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by circling or placing an “X” over the appropriate code using the performance evaluation scale below. Ratings are defined as follows:

A U

Acceptable Unacceptable

Based on the offeror’s performance record, the

Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown.

Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the ratings above.

Performance Information: A U 1 Quality of Workmanship

2 Adequacy of the Quality Control Plan

3 Implementation of the Quality Control Plan

4 Storage of materials

5 Adequacy of Submittals

6 Adequacy of Quality Control Testing

7 Adequacy of As Built Drawings

8 Use of Specified Materials

9 Identification and Correction of Deficient Work

Effectiveness of Management/Business Relations

10 Cooperation and Responsiveness

11 Management of Resources/personnel

12 Coordination and Control of Subcontractors (If applicable)

13 Adequacy of Site Cleanup

14 Effectiveness of Job Site Supervision

15 Professional Conduct

16 Review/Resolutions of Subcontractor’s Issues (If applicable)

17 Implementation of Subcontracting Plan (If applicable)

Timeliness of Performance

18 Adequacy of Initial Progress Schedule

19 Adherence to approved Schedule

20 Resolution of Delays

A U

UA

21 Submission of Required Documentation

22 Completion of Punch list Items

23 Submission of Updated and Revised Progress Schedules

24 Warranty Responses

Compliance with Labor Standards

25 Compliance with Labor Laws and Regulations

Compliance with Safety Standards

26 Adequacy of Safety Plan

27 Implementation of Safety Plan

28 Correction of Noted Deficiencies

29 Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”

30 Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”

D. GENERAL COMMENT (Choose one of the following and explain your choice in the remarks)

Given what I know today about the contractor’s ability to execute what he promised in the proposal, I definitely would award to this contractor today given that I had a choice.

probably would might or might not probably would not definitely would not

Remarks:

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please e-mail this completed questionnaire to:

claudia.silva.pt@us.af.mil and 65CONF.LGC.ALL@us.af.mil or hand deliver to 65th Contracting Flight no later than 17 July 2020, 2:00pm, AZOST.

A

A

U

U mailto:tania.cardoso.2.pt@us.af.mil mailto:65CONF.LGC.ALL@us.af.mil 1522714883U Highlight

1522714883U Highlight

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .