2 Exhibit A Performance relevancy Questionnaire PRQ.pdf
PDF 342 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Custodial Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA448620R0011
About this file
This document contains a Performance Relevancy Questionnaire template to be completed by offerors. It requests information on up to three past or current contracts demonstrating performance history relevant to the scope, complexity, cost, and client type of the solicited effort. For each example, offerors must provide the company and project names, role (prime or subcontractor), original and final contract values and dates, modifications, description of performed work, subcontractor information, and relevance assessment. A point of contact is also required.
The related federal contract opportunity is a solicitation to provide custodial services at Lajes Field in Portugal. The contractor will be responsible for management, tools, equipment and labor to ensure cleaning tasks are performed in accordance with the Performance Work Statement and Service Summary, which establish minimum frequencies and estimated square footages. All work must comply with applicable Portuguese and U.S. Air Forces in Europe laws, regulations, instructions and practices.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
EXHIBIT A
PERFORMANCE RELEVANCY QUESTIONNAIRE (PRQ)
Provide the following information requested in this format for each of the projects/contracts being described. Prepare at least one (3) of these documents. Contractors should select their projects carefully and provide information that demonstrate the performance history of the contracts that are similar in scope, complexity, and cost magnitude to the present contract’s project drawings and specifications. Projects may be on going, if completed by 70 %, and cannot have been completed 5 years prior to the solicitation issue date. Provide concise comments regarding your performance on the contracts you identify.
A. Offeror (Your Company/Division):
B. Project/Contract Title:
C. Contract Specifics:
1. Description of Effort as ___________Prime or _________Subcontractor
2. Contract Number/Title _____________________
3. Original Contract $/€ Value _____________ Current/Final Contract $/€ Value ____________
4. If amounts in 3 above are different, provide a brief description of the reason:
5. Completion Date:
6. Original Date: ______________ 2. Current Schedule____________________
7. Estimated/Final Completion Date:________________________________
8. Primary cause for Contract Modifications__________________________________
D. Provide a detailed description of the work performed under the contract including, but not limited to your past performance. Note that your description will be evaluated for similarity of the construction methods, particularly similarity in scope, complexity, and cost magnitude of work performed to those required for the proposed effort. The Government may also consider similarity of the client type (i.e. federal government IAW FAR 15.305(a)(2)(ii)).
1. Describe the specific elements of the work performed by your firm.
2. Indicate what elements of work were performed by your major subcontractors and if those same subcontractors will be used on this project. If you intend to use these subcontractors, please list name and principal areas of work they will perform. Indicate if you do not intend on using any of these subcontractors.
3. Describe why you believe the work is very relevant, relevant or somewhat relevant in comparison to the solicited project.
E. Offerors are encouraged to provide information on problems encountered during the referenced effort’s and corrective actions executed.
F. List a point of Contact for Owner/Government agency Contracting Officer and/or inspector;
include a current phone number, an Email address is also desired.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .