3 Draft PP Ref List FA520920R0009.pdf
PDF 78 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Multiple Award IDIQ Japan-Wide Furniture
- Solicitation number
- FA520920R0009
About this file
This document contains a past performance reference list template for offerors responding to Solicitation Number FA520920R0009 for a multiple award IDIQ contract to provide furniture to US Government installations and facilities throughout Japan. The scope of work includes office system furniture, executive office and conference furniture, and a variety of housing/dorm furniture. Offerors must provide details on their three most relevant past contracts including company and product information, contract numbers, dollar values, periods of performance, contracting officer references, compliance with contract terms, and any unacceptable performance. Rationale must be included for how the past contracts relate to the scope, magnitude, and complexity of the proposed effort under this IDIQ. The Department of the Air Force Pacific Air Forces is the contracting agency.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 3 Solicitation/RFP No. FA520920R0009
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE LIST
Name of Offeror:
The following Three (3) contracts are the most relevant contracts (similar in scope, size and complexity) performed for US Government agencies, Government of Japan, and Commercial customers performed within the last 5 years of the solicitation release date, or is currently in progress (see Solicitation Provision 52.212-1):
Contract No. 1 (Office Furniture)
(1) Company/Division name
(2) Product/Service
(3) Contracting Agency/Customer
(4) Contract Number
(5) Contract Dollar Value
(6) Period of Performance
(7) Verified, up-to-date name, mailing and e-mail addresses, and telephone number of the contracting officer (Point-of-Contact)
(8) Comments regarding compliance with contract terms and conditions
(9) Comments regarding any known performance deemed unacceptable to the customer, or not in accordance with the contract terms and conditions.
(10) Include rationale supporting your assertion of relevance and identify aspects (scope, magnitude of effort, and complexity) of the contracts deemed relevant and how they relate to the proposed effort.
Contract No. 2 (Executive Office and Conference Furniture)
(1) Company/Division name
(2) Product/Service
(3) Contracting Agency/Customer
(4) Contract Number
(5) Contract Dollar Value
(6) Period of Performance
(7) Verified, up-to-date name, mailing and e-mail addresses, and telephone number of the contracting officer (Point-of-Contact)
(8) Comments regarding compliance with contract terms and conditions
(9) Comments regarding any known performance deemed unacceptable to the customer, or not in accordance with the contract terms and conditions.
(10) Include rationale supporting your assertion of relevance and identify aspects (scope, magnitude of
Contract No. 3 (Housing/Dorm Furniture)
(1) Company/Division name
(2) Product/Service
(3) Contracting Agency/Customer
(4) Contract Number
(5) Contract Dollar Value
(6) Period of Performance
(7) Verified, up-to-date name, mailing and e-mail addresses, and telephone number of the contracting officer (Point-of-Contact)
(8) Comments regarding compliance with contract terms and conditions
(9) Comments regarding any known performance deemed unacceptable to the customer, or not in accordance with the contract terms and conditions.
(10) Include rationale supporting your assertion of relevance and identify aspects (scope, magnitude of
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .