3-Attachment D ScoreSheet GermanMarkets.xls
XLS spreadsheet 41 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- TR26-17
- Issued by
- Utah
About this file
This is an evaluation scoresheet for the German Markets (Germany/Austria/Switzerland) Trade and PR Representation contract opportunity issued by the State of Utah Division of Purchasing on behalf of the Governor's Office of Economic Development. The contract seeks a vendor to provide trade and public relations representation services in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland for a five-year term. Prospective vendors must meet mandatory requirements including the ability to travel to the United States, maintain offices or an account manager in the primary market, demonstrate public relations experience in consumer and travel trade media, possess experience in travel trade within a tourism environment, agree to participate in a selection committee interview, and submit proposals not exceeding forty pages or slides.
The evaluation scoresheet establishes a total possible score of 500 points, comprising 350 points for technical criteria and 150 points for interview performance. Technical evaluation categories include public relations experience, consumer awareness experiences, social media experience, travel trade experience, dedicated account manager assignment, Utah and US product knowledge, ability to demonstrate return on investment aligned with Utah Office of Tourism (UOT) mission and goals, and a marketing plan for 2026-2027 promotion in the three target markets with a $150,000 marketing budget. Evaluators assign scores from 0 to 5 across all criteria, with a minimum technical threshold of 70 percent (245 points) required for advancement to the interview phase. The highest-ranking vendor will be selected for contract negotiation at fair and reasonable compensation to be determined; if negotiations fail, the state may proceed with the next highest-ranked vendor. Cost and pricing are excluded from vendor qualifications submissions.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 5-Attachment B SOW GermanMarkets.docx | DOCX document | |
| 1-Claim of Business Confidentiality Updated.pdf.pdf | ||
| 4-Attachment A TermsConditions.docx | DOCX document | |
| 2-Vendor Prerequisites - Part 15.pdf | ||
| 6-Attachment C TechnicalCriteria GermanMarkets.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Score Sheet
| German Markets (Germany/Austria/Switzerland) Trade and PR Representation | ||
| EVALUATION SCORESHEET | ||
| Score will be assigned as follows: | ||
| 0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to missing information | ||
| Firm Name: | 1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information | |
| 2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner | ||
| Evaluator: | 3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner | |
| 4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them | ||
| Date: | 5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP | |
| Minimum Mandatory Requirements | Evaluation (Pass/Fail) | |
| 1 | Offeror must have the ability to travel to the United States |
Offeror must have offices/an account manager based in the primary market Offeror must have public relations experience (consumer and travel trade media) Offeror must have experience working with the travel trade in a tourism environment Offeror must agree to an interview with the selection committee (either in person or virtually) Offeror must submit a proposal that does not exceed the maximum of forty pages/slides
| Scoreable Technical Criteria | Evaluator Score (0-5) | Criteria Weight | % of Tech Criteria | Points Possible | Points | ||||
| Earned | Minimum Required | ||||||||
| 1 | Public Relations Experience | 6.25 | 8.9% | 31.25 | 0.00 | ||||
| 1 | Consumer Awareness Experiences | 6.25 | 8.9% | 31.25 | 0.00 | ||||
| 1 | Social Media Experience | 6.25 | 8.9% | 31.25 | 0.00 | ||||
| 1 | Travel Trade Experience | 6.25 | 8.9% | 31.25 | 0.00 | ||||
| 2 | Dedicated account manager | 8 | 11.4% | 40.00 | 0.00 | ||||
| 2 | Utah and US Product Knowledge | 7 | 10.0% | 35.00 | 0.00 | ||||
| 3 | Ability to demonstrate ROI, UOT mission, and goals | 15 | 21.4% | 75.00 | 0.00 | ||||
| 3 | A marketing plan that includes the promotion of Utah in 2026-2027 in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland, and a marketing budget of $150,000 | 15 | 21.4% | 75.00 | 0.00 | ||||
| 13 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||
| 14 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||
| 15 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||
| 16 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||
| 17 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||
| 18 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||
| 19 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||
| 20 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||
| 21 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||
| 22 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||
| 23 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||
| 100.0% | 350.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||
| Required Technical Point Threshold | Min Percent | Min Points Required | Points Earned | Percent Earned | Evaluation | ||||
| 70% | 245.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0 | |||||
| Scoreable Interview Criteria | Evaluator Score (0-5) | Criteria Weight | % of Tech Criteria | Points Possible | Points | ||||
| Earned | Minimum Required | ||||||||
| 1 | Ability to address questions outlined by the committee and how the proposed plan accomplishes ROI, UOT mission, and goal | 30 | 42.9% | 150.00 | 0.00 | ||||
| 13 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||
| 14 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||
| 15 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||
| 16 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||
| 17 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||
| 18 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||
| 19 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||
| 20 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||
| 21 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||
| 22 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||
| 23 | 0.0% | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||
| 42.9% | 150.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||
| Total Evaluation Points | Points Possible | Points Earned | |||||||
| Total Technical Evaluation Points | 350.0 | 0.0 | |||||||
| Total Interview Points | 150.0 | 0.0 | |||||||
| Total Evaluation Points | 500.0 | 0.0 | |||||||
| Cost will be negotiated with the highest ranking vendor |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .