3-Addendum 1 RFSQ-086-25-CW Final.pdf
PDF 91 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- RFSQ-086-25-CW
- Issued by
- Leon County, Florida
About this file
This document is Addendum No. 1 for the City of Tallahassee's Jake Gaither Community Pedestrian and Street Safety (PASS) Project, issued on July 24, 2025. The addendum provides clarifications and modifications to the original Request for Qualifications (RFQ), specifically addressing project reference requirements and sidewalk implementation. The document confirms that bidders must submit project references for ten similar projects, with four of those references from the last five years and the remaining from within the last ten years. For the collector roadways (Springsax, Ridge, and Bragg), the city confirmed its intention to include sidewalks on both sides of these roadways.
The addendum also addresses several additional questions from potential bidders, including page limit restrictions for the Executive Summary (limited to one page), confirmation that liquidated damages will not apply to design professional services, and the city's stance on not modifying the contract's indemnification clause. The document requires bidders to acknowledge the addendum through the Bonfire platform and provides contact information (catrina.wilson@talgov.com or FRS TDD at 771) for any further questions. The addendum serves to provide clarity and consistency for potential respondents to the RFQ for the Jake Gaither Community Pedestrian and Street Safety Project.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
NOTICE TO RESPONDENTS July 24, 2025
ADDENDUM No. 1
DESIGN OF JAKE GAITHER COMMUNITY PEDERSTRAIN AND STREET SAFETY (PASS)
PROJECT
1. This addendum consists of incorporates change and/or clarifications to the above referenced
RFQ only in the manner and to the extent stated herein and shall become part of the resulting contract.
2. Bidder must acknowledge this addendum by accepting the addendum in Bonfire.
3. If you have any questions on this or any related matter, please contact:
E-mail: catrina.wilson@talgov.com or through FRS TDD at 771.
ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS:
Question No. 1 In regard to required project references, the RFQ states, “at least five (10) similar projects: two (4) of which shall be within the last five years and the remaining shall be within the last ten years". Please clarify if the required number of similar projects is five or 10? Is the count of similar projects for the last five years, two or four?
Response Section 2.3.5(A) of the solicitation is hereby replaced with the following:
A. Project references of at least ten (10) similar projects: four (4) of which shall be within the last five years and the remaining shall be within the last ten years
Question No. 2 In the Preproposal Meeting, for the collector roadways (Springsax, Ridge, and Bragg), it was stated that one of the goals was to “Complete the Pedestrian Network for both sides of the roadway”.
Please confirm that it is the City’s intention to include sidewalks on both sides of those roadways.
Response: Yes, sidewalk on both sides mailto:catrina.wilson@talgov.com
Question No. 3 On page 22, the RFSQ requests: “Project references of at least five (10) similar projects: two (4) of which shall be within the last five years and the remaining shall be within the last ten years”.
Please confirm how many Project References are desired, and how many shall be within the last five years.
Response: See response to Question No. 1.
Question No. 4 In lieu of the items requested for Tab 1 Executive Summary, would the City consider extending the page limit to 2 pages?
Response: No, one page is the limit for this tab.
Question No. 5 On page 23, under required Federally Related forms, the RFSQ lists the E-Verify Form twice.
Please confirm that this should be the Tax Delinquency and Felony Conviction Certification Form.
Response: Section 2.3.7 – Tab 6 – Miscellaneous Documents under General Forms Letter (R) should read as follows:
“R - Tax Delinquency and Felony Conviction Certification Form”.
Question No. 6 Will liquidated damages be in play for the services of the design professional under this contract?
Response: No
Question No. 7 Is the City willing to modify the indemnification clause in the contract and
RFP?
Response: No
Question No. 8 Should proposers submit requested exceptions with the proposal or after everyone is ranked?
Response: Please provide clarification on what exceptions are being requested.
End of Addendum No. 1
| ADDENDUM No. 1 |
| design of jake gaither community pederstrain and street safety (pass) project |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .