The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.
135 Santilli Highway, Everett, MA 02148 Main Telephone: (781) 338-3000 TTY: N.E.T. Relay 1-800-439-2370
EVALUATION CRITERIA SCORECARD
Agency Staff use only (This document will be used to evaluate all responses submitted to this Solicitation)
| Name of Bidder: |
| Name of Reviewer(s): |
| Date Reviewed: |
Required Qualifications Criteria (Bidder must receive a “yes” on all the following criteria to move on to the next evaluation section)
| 1 |
| A successful record of providing professional learning, coaching, technical assistance, or implementation support to K–12 districts, educator preparation programs, or state education agencies. |
| Yes |_| |
| No |_| |
| 2 |
| Expertise in mentor training and development through culturally responsive and linguistically sustaining mentorship practices. |
| Yes |_| |
| No |_| |
| 3 |
| Experience designing and delivering high-quality professional learning and coaching through asynchronous, virtual, hybrid, and in-person formats, including the development of reusable training resources. |
| Yes |_| |
| No |_| |
| 4 |
| Experience supporting districts in developing sustainable mentor systems and educator preparation partnerships, including but not limited to apprenticeship implementation, recruitment, clinical placements, and continuous improvement. |
| Yes |_| |
| No |_| |
Scoring rubric:
| Non-Responsive |
| Qualifications is not applicable to request; elements missing / non-responsive to request |
| Unsatisfactory: |
| Little evidence of qualification. Many required elements are missing. |
| Below Average: |
| Evidence of expertise or qualification in some areas is unclear or unsubstantiated by supporting documentation. Some required elements are missing. |
| Average: |
| Application materials are complete and suggest adequate qualifications, providing clear evidence of expertise. |
| Above Average: |
| Application materials are complete and suggest solid qualifications, providing clear and well-documented evidence of expertise. |
| Outstanding: |
| Application materials is complete, suggest exemplary qualifications, providing compelling, clear, and well-documented evidence of expertise. |
Alternate ID: 27TALLB2 COMMBUYS Document #: BD-27-1026-DOE02-DOE01-134176 Non-Responsive 0 pts.
Unsatisfactory 1 pt.
Below Average 2 pts.
Average 3 pts.
Above Average 4 pts.
Outstanding 5 pts.
Points Available (5 x Multiplier) Points Awarded (0 – 5 x Multiplier)
Additional Evaluation Criteria:
| 1 |
| Preferred Qualifications: |
· Experience using participant feedback to adjust and enhance training delivery to meet the needs of a diverse and evolving educator workforce.
· Deep familiarity with the MA Standards for Effective Practice
| 2 |
| Relevant Expertise, Experience, and Outcomes: |
Proposal demonstrates relevant expertise and experience with comparable projects, demonstrated outcomes, and familiarity with K–12 education, educator pathways, or apprenticeship models.
| 3 |
| Mentor Professional Learning and Coaching: |
Quality of the proposed support for new and returning journeyworkers, including group coaching; individual support; strategies for strengthening observation and feedback, reflection, and cultrually responsive mentoring; and alignment with PSTs RTAP goals.
| 4 |
| Modules, Convenings, and District Support: |
Clear and feasible plans for module updates, convenings, site visits, district support, Cohort 2 consultation, and collaboration with DESE.
| 5 |
| Equity and Continuous Improvement: |
Proposal clearly describes how bidder will integrate CLSP, equity, and inclusion into culturally responsive mentoring supports, along with a clear process for collecting feedback and improving services.
| 6 |
| Resumes/CVs and Organizational Capacity: |
Relevant qualifications and experience of assigned staff and the organization’s ability to complete the work successfully.
| 7 |
| Timeline and Project Management: |
A clear, realistic timeline that includes all required FY2027 activities, milestones, and deliverables.
A complete, reasonable, well-aligned, deliverables-based budget that does not exceed $150,000 for FY27 and a proposed budget for FY28 has been provided and reasonable for deliverables.
Comments:
image1.jpeg image2.gif