25RA907 Attch. 2 - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 30 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Fairchild AFB Giant Voice Replacement Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA462025RA907
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for a Giant Voice System replacement project at Fairchild Air Force Base in Washington. The solicitation (FA462025RA907) seeks to Engineer, Design, Furnish, Install, and Test (EDFI&T) a new turn-key system for providing real-time intelligible voice alerts, tone alerts, and music across the base's coverage areas. The questionnaire is designed to evaluate potential contractors' performance across nine key areas including equipment quality, schedule adherence, compliance with installation and safety standards, system integration, project management, responsiveness to issues, security compliance, and overall customer satisfaction.
The document requires completion and submission by 15 July 2025 at 1:00 PM Pacific time, with responses to be emailed to Capt Nicholas Kortis and Mr. Brian Fernandez. The questionnaire is part of the Department of the Air Force Air Mobility Command's procurement process, allowing evaluators to rate contractor performance on a scale from 1 (Unsatisfactory) to 5 (Exceptional) across multiple performance dimensions. Respondents are asked to provide detailed information about their organization, contract details, and specific ratings with accompanying comments to help assess the contractor's capability for the Giant Voice System replacement project.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 25RA907 Amendment 04.pdf | ||
| 25RA907 Amendment 002.pdf | ||
| 25RA907 Amendment 01.pdf | ||
| 25RA907 Amendment 03.pdf | ||
| Amend 002 Attch 2 As-Built Locations.pdf | ||
| Amend 002 Attch 1 - Pictures.pdf | ||
| 25QA907 Amendment 002.pdf | ||
| Amend 002 Attachment 3 - SYS5000 Modulator.pdf | ||
| 25QA907 Amendment 01.pdf | ||
| 25RA907 Attch. 1 - SOW.pdf | ||
| 25RA907 - Combined SynopsisSolicitation.pdf |
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PRESENT/PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Giant Voice System
FAIRCHILD AFB, WA
SOLICITATION NO: FA462025RA907
1. Your assistance is respectfully requested in providing information on the below present/past performance questionnaire. The importance of your opinion cannot be overstated since this survey will measure the present/past performance of each prospective offeror to Engineer, Design, Furnish, Install, and Test (EDFI&T) replacement with a new turn-key Giant Voice System to provide rapidly real-time intelligible voice alert messages, tone alerts, and music for entire coverage areas required at Fairchild AFB, WA.
2. INSTRUCTIONS FORM COMPLETION: Please fill this questionnaire in by hand and scan or complete it electronically and email the results to Capt Nicholas Kortis, at nicholas.kortis.1@us.af.mil and Mr. Brian Fernandez at brian.fernandez.5@us.af.mil.
3. Please direct questions to Capt Nicholas Kortis, at nicholas.kortis.1@us.af.mil and Mr. Brian Fernandez at brian.fernandez.5@us.af.mil participation is greatly appreciated.
4. PLEASE RETURN NO LATER THAN: 15 July 2025, at 1:00 PM (Pacific)
Section A: CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Contractor’s name and address:
a. Point of Contact:
b. Phone #:
c. Contract Number:
d. Project Title:
e. Period of Performance:
SECTION B: RESPONDENT INFORMATION
a. Organization:
Address:
City: State: Zip:
b. Respondent’s Name and Title:
c. Signature:
| d. Commercial Phone #: | DSN Phone (if applicable) #: |
| Fax # | E-Mail: |
e. Contract Type (i.e.: Firm Fixed Price):
f. Award Amount: $ Final Amount: $
FA462025RA907
Attachment 2 - Past Performance Questionnaire
g. What was the job title for this project?
h. Please summarize the scope of work that was to be performed under this contract below:
For any ratings less than satisfactory rating, please provide explanation in Remarks section below.
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Satisfactory |
| Very Good |
| Exceptional |
| Performance does not |
| Performance does not meet |
| Performance meets |
| Performance meets |
| The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective. |
| meet most contractual |
| some contractual |
| contractual |
| contractual requirements |
| requirements and |
| requirements. The |
| requirements. The |
| and exceeds some to the |
| recovery is not likely in |
| contractual performance of |
| contractual performance |
| Government’s benefit. |
| a timely manner. The |
| the element or sub-element |
| of the element or sub- |
| The contractual |
| contractual performance |
| being evaluated reflects a |
| element contains some |
| performance of the |
| of the element or sub- |
| serious problem for which |
| minor problems for |
| element or sub-element |
| element contains a |
| the contractor has not yet |
| which corrective actions |
| being evaluated was |
| serious problem(s) for |
| identified corrective actions. |
| taken by the contractor |
| accomplished with some |
| which the contractor’s |
| The contractor’s proposed |
| appear or were |
| minor problems for |
| corrective actions |
| actions appear only |
| satisfactory |
| which corrective actions |
| appear or were |
| marginally effective or were |
taken by the contractor
| ineffective. |
| not fully implemented. |
was effective.
1. Quality of Equipment and Installation Services
Rate the quality and reliability of the products delivered and services provided, including functionality of the installed system.
1 2 3 4 5
Comments:
2. Adherence to Schedule
To what extent did the contractor complete the project on time, including meeting interim and final milestones?
3. Compliance with Installation and Safety Standards
Rate the contractor’s compliance with installation specifications, safety requirements, and applicable regulations.
4. System Integration and Functional Testing
How effectively did the contractor integrate the system with existing infrastructure and conduct functional testing?
5. Project Management and Coordination
Evaluate the contractor’s ability to manage resources, schedule work, and coordinate with stakeholders (e.g., base personnel).
6. Responsiveness to Issues and Changes
How responsive was the contractor to technical issues, change requests, or unforeseen challenges during the project?
7. Compliance with Security and Access Requirements
Rate the contractor’s ability to comply with security protocols, base access requirements, and personnel vetting procedures.
8. Overall Customer Satisfaction
Overall, how satisfied were you with the contractor’s performance on this project?
9. Likelihood of Future Award
Based on this experience, would you to award to this contractor a similar contract in the future?
Yes No
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .