25-151-G Switchgear at Jessen Substation.pdf
PDF 4 MB Posted
- Attached to
- EWEB RFP 25-151-G Switchgear
- Solicitation number
- S-P00140-00014569
- Issued by
- Lane County, Oregon
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Addendum 2~21.pdf | ||
| Bid-Site-Notice of Intent to Award-All Proposers.pdf | ||
| Addendum 3~16.pdf | ||
| Bid Tab 25-151-G.pdf | ||
| NEARMAP SOLE SOURCE PUBLIC NOTICE~1.pdf | ||
| Addendum 1~28.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Rev 09-24 RFP # 21-151-G
Eugene Water & Electric Board
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
for
Metal Clad Switchgear for Jessen and Willow Creek Substations
RFP No.: 25-151-G Closing Date: Wednesday, September 3, 2025 Time: 2:00 PM PT
Description: The Eugene Water & Electric Board (EWEB) requests proposals from companies interested in providing medium voltage switchgear for its Jessen and Willow Creek Substations, located in Eugene, OR.
Purchasing Contact: Sandra Hahn (541) 685-7163 sandra.hahn@eweb.org
Pre-Proposal Conference: NO
This is a COMPETITIVE SEALED PROCUREMENT.
ELECTRONIC PROPOSALS SUBMITTED VIA THE OREGONBUYS BID SITE ARE REQUIRED. Emailed submittals will not be accepted.
To ensure your submission is received prior to the closing date and time, it is recommended that you begin the submittal process on the OregonBuys website at least 72-hours prior to the closing date and time listed above.
SINGLE POINT OF CONTACT: There will be only one point of contact for the entire Request for Proposal process. The contact point is the EWEB Purchasing Office, and the contact person is the Purchasing Contact listed above, unless otherwise stated. Any questions or issues that may arise regarding the specifications, bidding process, and/or the award process, shall be directed via email to the Purchasing Contact listed above. EWEB’s official response to any questions or requests will be in writing via the Addendum process.
FOR MORE INFORMATION please refer to Part 1 “Instructions to Proposers”
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Description
Legal Advertisement
1 Instructions to Proposers
2 Scope of Work
3 Minimum Qualifications and Requirements
4 Evaluation Process & Contractor Selection
5 Evaluation Criteria
6 Proposal Form
ATTACHMENTS
1 Material Specifications
2 EWEB Standard Drawings
EXHIBITS
1 Sample Contract
LEGAL ADVERTISEMENT
RFP #25-151-G
Metal Clad Switchgear for Jessen and Willow Creek Substations
The Eugene Water & Electric Board (EWEB) requests proposals from companies interested in providing medium voltage switchgear for its Jessen and Willow Creek Substations, located in Eugene, OR.
Proposals shall be submitted on the State of Oregon – OregonBuys website (https://oregonbuys.gov/bso/), before 2:00 pm, September 3, 2025. (Emailed responses will not be accepted.) Proposals will not be accepted after this hour and date.
RFP documents may be obtained by downloading the RFP documents from the State of Oregon's bid site ("OregonBuys"): https://oregonbuys.gov/bso/. (Search for bid # S-P00140-00014569 or “EWEB”. For navigation help, please call 1-855-800-5046.)
All proposals shall be submitted as set forth in Section 1 - Instructions to Proposers. EWEB is not responsible for proposals submitted in any manner, format or to any delivery point other than as required by the Solicitation Document.
No proposal may be withdrawn after the hour set for the opening thereof until the elapse of thirty (30) days from the date and time set for opening.
EWEB reserves the right to waive any or all informalities and irregularities (EWEB Rule 3-0470) and may cancel the Request for Proposals or reject any or all proposals pursuant to EWEB Rule 3-0640.
Date: August 6, 2025
Sandra Hahn, Purchasing Contact https://oregonbuys.gov/bso/
1. INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS
All proposals and contracts are subject to the provisions and requirements of the Oregon Revised Statutes 279A and 279B and EWEB Public Contracting Rules Divisions 1, 2, 3 and 6.
INFORMATION OF RECORD
The official source of information for this project until the Intent to Award is posted is located at the State of Oregon's bid site, located at: https://oregonbuys.gov/bso/. IT IS THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PROPOSER TO
CHECK THE WEBSITE ON A TIMELY BASIS.
PROPOSAL PREPARATION
1.1 PROPOSAL FORMAT AND COST
Proposals shall be typewritten or prepared in ink and shall be submitted electronically, on the form provided in the Request for Proposals. Proposals shall conform to the requirements of the Request for Proposals. All necessary attachments shall be submitted with the proposal and in the required format.
Proposer is responsible for all costs incurred in connection with its Proposal, including, but not limited to, the costs to prepare and submit the Proposal, costs of samples and other supporting materials, costs to participate in demonstrations, and costs associated with protests.
1.2 PROTEST OF SPECIFICATIONS / REQUIREMENTS
A Proposer who believes that the procurement process is contrary to law, or that the solicitation is unnecessarily restrictive in that specifications limit competition arbitrarily, without reasonably promoting the fulfillment of the procurement needs of EWEB, or that the solicitation document is legally flawed in that it contains terms or conditions that are contrary to law, or that the solicitation improperly specifies a brand name as defined in ORS 279B.200, may submit a protest via email to sandra.hahn@eweb.org@eweb.org.
Insert the following in the subject header:
RFP SPECIFICATION PROTEST, RFP #25-151-G
To be considered, protests shall be received no less than 5 business days before the RFP closing date (per
EW-3-0700(2)).
Protest of specifications shall include the reason for protest, any and all evidence and documented factual information that supports Proposer’s protest, and any proposed changes to the requirements. The EWEB Purchasing department shall promptly respond to each written protest, and where appropriate, issue all revisions, substitutions, or clarifications via Addenda to all Proposers. Proposers must exhaust all administrative remedies before seeking judicial review.
1.3 PROPOSER'S PROPOSED TERMS AND CONDITIONS Rule 3-0230(7)(b)
Proposers may include in the Cover Letter of their response, proposed revisions to the contractual terms and conditions in the MS Word Sample Contract (Exhibit 1) and the Scope of Work stated in this RFP document. (Proposer may show proposed changes by using Word Track Changes tool OR providing proposed revisions in cover letter.) Proposers may not protest or make a request to change the entire terms and conditions of the solicitation. For example, you may not seek to replace EWEB’s terms and conditions in whole with your company’s terms and conditions, standard contract, master services agreement, etc.
Terms included with Proposer’s proposal documents will not be considered unless they are listed in the Cover Letter as requested terms to negotiate.
mailto:sandra.hahn@eweb.org@eweb.org
EWEB reserves the right to negotiate the proposed terms and/or conditions with Proposer, and either accept or reject the proposed terms and/or conditions. REQUESTS FOR REVISION OF EWEB CONTRACTUAL
TERMS AND CONDITIONS MAY BE MADE AT TIME OF PROPOSAL SUBMISSION. THERE MAY BE NO
OPPORTUNITY TO DO SO AT A LATER DATE.
NO PROPOSED TERMS OR CONDITIONS SHALL BECOME A PART OF THE AWARDED CONTRACT UNLESS
ACCEPTED BY EWEB AND INCORPORATED INTO THE CONTRACT, IN WRITING.
1.4 SIGNATURE ON PROPOSAL
Proposals shall be signed by an authorized representative of the Proposer. Signature on a proposal certifies that the proposal is made without connection with any person, firm or corporation making a proposal for the same goods and/or services and is in all respects fair and made without collusion or fraud. Signature on a proposal also certifies that the Proposer has read, fully understands, and agrees with all solicitation requirements, terms, and conditions. No consideration will be given to any claim resulting from proposing without fully comprehending all requirements of the Request for Proposals.
Proposers shall only enter information within the proposal document where it is requested or required.
Proposers shall NOT make any alterations to the original solicitation document. Any proposal that has been altered may be rejected.
1.5 CANCELLATION, REJECTION, DELAY OF RFP
Pursuant to Rule 3-0640, EWEB may cancel, reject in whole or in any part of any proposals, without liability incurred by EWEB at any time after issuing an RFP, if EWEB believes it is in EWEB’s interest to do so.
1.6 RESERVED
PROPOSAL SUBMISSION
1.7 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION
(a) OregonBuys Electronic Response
Please be sure to combine all documents into one pdf file before attempting to submit your bid into the OregonBuys bid site.
In order to submit an electronic proposal on the OregonBuys website, Proposer must be registered with OregonBuys and able to submit an electronic proposal. For instructions to register on OregonBuys, visit the following site: OrBuysSupplierRegistrationSteps.pdf (oregon.gov)
If you experience any issues registering, please contact OregonBuys at:
Phone: 1-855-800-5046 Email: support.oregonbuys@das.oregon.gov
When Proposer is submitting their proposal electronically, Proposer should follow the procedures outlined in any of the following:
https://www.oregon.gov/das/ORBuys/Documents/OregonBuys%20Vendor%20Formal%20Solicitation%20R esponse.pdf for electronic submission.
A video presentation on submitting an electronic proposal may be found at: Supplier - Submitting a Quote - Overview (periscopeholdings.com)
Terminology specific to the OregonBuys system may be found at:
https://www.oregon.gov/das/ORBuys/Documents/OrBuysSupplierRegistrationSteps.pdf mailto:support.oregonbuys@das.oregon.gov https://www.oregon.gov/das/ORBuys/Documents/OregonBuys%20Vendor%20Formal%20Solicitation%20Response.pdf https://www.oregon.gov/das/ORBuys/Documents/OregonBuys%20Vendor%20Formal%20Solicitation%20Response.pdf https://www.periscopeholdings.com/courses/suppliersubmittingaquote/#/lessons/-IJ5uftCSaLqTjitSezQGrNh9dTNGqaA https://www.periscopeholdings.com/courses/suppliersubmittingaquote/#/lessons/-IJ5uftCSaLqTjitSezQGrNh9dTNGqaA https://www.oregon.gov/das/ORBuys/Documents/Phase1TerminologyCrosswalk.pdf
Proposals received in a manner other than through the OregonBuys website and/or after the closing date and time will not be considered and will be rejected. EWEB is not responsible for proposals submitted in any manner format or to any delivery point other than as required by the Solicitation document.
(b) REQUIRED PROPOSAL PACKAGE Complete, sign, and return the following documents as RFP response in order of Section number, separated by tabs and identified for easy reference. Failing to include these documents could lead to rejection of Proposal.
• Cover Letter, with:
Contractual Acceptance: Statement accepting ALL terms and conditions contained in this solicitation and the Sample Contract (Exhibit 1). Statement may also include request for negotiation of proposed terms and conditions as allowed per Section 1.4.
Termination for Default: Proposers shall indicate if they have had a contract terminated for default in the last five years. Termination for default is defined as notice to stop performance that was delivered to the Proposer due to the Proposer’s non-performance or poor performance and the issue of performance was either (a) not litigated due to inaction on the part of the Proposer, or (b) litigated and determined that the Proposer was in default.
NOTE: If a Proposer has had a contract terminated for default in this period, then the Proposer shall submit full details including the other party’s name, address and phone number. EWEB will evaluate the facts and may, at its sole discretion, reject the proposal on the grounds of Proposer’s past performance.
• Response to Minimum Qualifications (Section 3)
• Response to All Evaluation Criteria (Section 5)
• Proposal Form (Section 6)
• All posted addenda acknowledged
(c) RESPONSIVENESS / RESPONSIBILTIY A “Responsive” proposal is a proposal that substantially complies with the Request for Proposals instructions and requirements.
A “Responsible” Proposer can demonstrate ability to meet the requirements of the Scope of Work, has the appropriate experience, is legally qualified to do the Work, has the required certifications required, has a satisfactory record of integrity and can meet the other requirements described in
ORS 279B.110(2).
1.8 ADDENDA
Any VERBAL communication cannot and shall not be construed as approval of the acceptability of any deviation to any requirement. All changes to requirements and/or the solicitation documents will be made in the form of Addenda. The Proposer is responsible for ensuring that all Addenda have been downloaded and are acknowledged in their RFP Response.
https://www.oregon.gov/das/ORBuys/Documents/Phase1TerminologyCrosswalk.pdf
All Addenda can be obtained electronically at the state of Oregon's bid site ("OregonBuys"):
https://oregonbuys.gov/bso/.
1.9 PROPOSAL MODIFICATION
If a Proposer wishes to make modifications to a submitted Proposal, Proposer must do so through OregonBuys prior to the Proposal Due Date and Time stated on the Cover Page for this RFP.
1.10 PROPOSAL WITHDRAWALS:
If a Proposer wishes to withdraw a submitted Proposal, Proposer must do so through OregonBuys, using the “Withdraw Quote” button prior to the Proposal Due Date and Time stated on the Cover Page for this RFP.
1.11 EXCEPTIONS
Any exceptions to the requirements of this solicitation MUST be submitted in accordance with Item 1.3
PROTEST OF SPECIFICATIONS / REQUIREMENTS. Exceptions submitted with your proposal, or in any manner other than the process provided herein, may cause your proposal to be ruled non-Responsive and rejected.
1.12 PROPOSAL OPENING: Unless otherwise provided by Law or Rule, proposals received in response to this
Request for Proposals shall be opened at the scheduled closing date and time at the EWEB Purchasing department located at 4200 Roosevelt Blvd, Eugene, Oregon 97402. Enquiring Proposers shall be informed only of the names of Proposers submitting proposals. No other information shall be available at that time.
Award decisions will NOT be made at the opening.
1.13 ALTERNATE PROPOSALS
Proposers may submit more than one proposal. All proposals must comply with the requirements of the RFP except that additional proposals may incorporate, by reference, repetitive information which is provided in the complete proposal.
1.14 PROPRIETARY DATA/PUBLIC RECORD
This Request for Proposal, together with copies of all documents pertaining to the award of a contract, shall be kept by EWEB and made a part of a file or record which shall be open to public inspection. If a proposal contains any information that is considered a trade secret under ORS 192.345(2), each sheet of such information shall be marked with the following legend:
“This data constitutes a trade secret under ORS 192.345(2), and shall not be disclosed, except in accordance with the Oregon Public Records Law, ORS Chapter 192”.
The Oregon Public Records Law exempts from disclosures only bona fide trade secrets, and the exemption from disclosure applies only "unless the public interest requires disclosure in the particular instance" ORS 192.345(2). Therefore, non-disclosure of documents or any portion of a document submitted as part of a proposal may depend upon official or judicial determinations made pursuant to the Public Records Law. The above restriction may not include cost or price information, which shall be open to public inspection.
1.15 SOCIAL EQUITY
EWEB supports the use of Minority, Women, Emerging Small Businesses (M/W/ESB), local businesses, Disadvantaged Business Enterprises and Qualified Rehabilitation Facilities (QRF). EWEB encourages the awarded offeror to use the following voluntary practices to promote open competitive opportunities for disadvantaged businesses as applicable:
a. Access lists of certified minority, women, emerging small business or disadvantaged business enterprises from the Oregon State Office of Minority, Women and Emerging Small Business (OMWESB) by visiting their website at:
https://oregonbuys.gov/bso/
b. Visit the Oregon State Qualified Rehabilitation Facilities Program website to search for Qualified
Rehabilitation Facilities from whom to procure products or services.
SCHEDULE OF EVENTS
1.16 The schedule of events set out herein represent Eugene Water & Electric Board’s best estimate of the schedule that will be followed.
Request for Proposal released August 6, 2025
Last day for EWEB to receive questions from Proposers August 26, 2025
Last day EWEB will post Addenda on Bid Site August 28, 2025
Closing date (last day to submit proposals to EWEB) September 3, 2025
Responses evaluated September 10, 2025
Intent to Award Announcement Posted on Bid Site September 11, 2025
Factory Inspection (optional to EWEB) September 17, 2025
Board Approval October 7, 2025
Contract Award October 9, 2025
ANTICIPATED PROJECT SCHEDULE:
Contractor start design December 2025
Approved Design – release for manufacturing July 2026
Factory Acceptance Testing Jessen Switchgear January 2027
Delivery and Field Assembly of Jessen Switchgear February 2027
Factory Acceptance Testing Willow Creek Switchgear August 2027
Delivery and Field Assembly of Willow Creek Switchgear September 2027
2. SCOPE OF WORK / TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
2.1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION
The Eugene Water & Electric Board (EWEB) requires two (2) lineups of medium voltage, metal clad, switchgear for use in EWEB’s electrical substations.
2.2 CONTRACT START DATE
The contract for this project (“Contract”) will start from the date of award, approximately October 2025.
2.3 PRIMARY DELIVERY DATES OF EUQIPMENT
Delivery of the first line up of switchgear must be delivered between November 1, 2026 and no later than December 31, 2026. The second line up of switchgear should be delivered during Q2 2027.
2.4 SPECIFICATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS SCHEDULE
Metal clad switchgear shall comply with Attachment #1 – Material Specifications and Attachment #2 – EWEB Standard Drawings.
Contractor is responsible for constructing and providing metal clad switchgear in accordance with the specifications. Any deviations from the specifications provided in this Contract shall be requested by Contractor in writing and agreed to by EWEB in the form of an Amendment to this Contract. Any errors, confusion, or alterations in Contractor’s drawings that differ from the material specifications of this Contract shall NOT be considered accepted by EWEB, whether-or-not EWEB signs-off on the drawing, unless an Amendment acknowledging and accepting the change has been executed by EWEB. Contractor is responsible for any and all costs associated with correcting errors that are not built in compliance with the requirements of this Contract, including all freight charges incurred for the return and re-shipment of deficient equipment.
2.5 RESERVED
2.6 EWEB ACCEPTANCE TESTS
Upon receipt, switchgear and accessories will be inspected for damage, shipment completion, and adherence to EWEB’s material specifications.
EWEB will complete on site assembly of the switchgear sections within thirty (30) business days of delivery of the complete switchgear. Switchgear will be accepted after completion of on site assembly and accessory verification including: reconnection of control circuits, bus testing, medium voltage equipment mechanical fit testing, and medium voltage breaker testing.
If EWEB finds goods furnished to be incomplete or not in compliance with the Contract, EWEB, at its sole discretion, may either reject the goods, require Contractor to correct any defects without charge, or reimburse EWEB for costs associated with bringing goods into compliance with the Contract.
2.7 DELIVERY
Delivery shall be made to an energized EWEB Substation in the Eugene, OR area, and/or EWEB’s Operations Center. The specific address will be provided closer to shipment.
Delivery hours: 9:00 A.M.– 3:00 P.M., Monday through Thursday, excluding EWEB observed holidays.
EWEB’s Substation Shop shall be notified a minimum of 14 calendar days before delivery day to coordinate offloading and schedule EWEB Substation Shop crews to be present. Contact information of the Substation Shop contact person(s) will be provided at the time of award of the contract.
2.8 PACKAGING
Contractor shall take care to insure the proper protection from damage of the product and any exposed parts during transit.
2.9 CONTACT PERSON – CONTRACTOR
Contractor shall designate one or more person(s) responsible for Contractor’s work under this contract.
Contractor shall provide to EWEB the names, addresses and telephone numbers of such person(s) and shall keep this information current at all times. The representative shall be thoroughly familiar with the terms and conditions of the contract and shall have the technical knowledge necessary to administrate orders.
3. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS (PASS/FAIL)
Minimum Qualifications (Pass/Fail)
Following are the “Minimum Requirements” that shall be met by all Proposers. Response to this section will be considered on a pass or fail basis. Response to each and all requirements must pass before a proposal will be reviewed and scored by the evaluation team.
Proposers shall respond to each of the Minimum Requirements in writing in a brief and concise manner. EWEB does not pre-qualify Proposers; your proposal must show that your firm meets the requirements. EWEB will attempt to answer questions or clarify the requirements if needed.
PLEASE BE SURE TO RESPOND TO ALL REQUIREMENTS STATED BELOW:
1. Company Information and produce experience:
a. Indicate whether Proposer is a sole proprietor, partnership, LLC, corporation or other (specify).
b. Indicate how many years Proposer has continuously been in business.
c. Manufacturer must have at least 5 years of experience in the manufacture of medium voltage metal clad switchgear. Indicate the number of years Proposer has had experience manufacturing switchgear comparable to that required by the Contract documents.
d. Discuss any other KEY products provided by Proposer besides switchgear.
2. Manufacturing Facility Experience Proposer must provide the location of where product will be assembled/manufactured. Specify the number of years that the facility has been manufacturing switchgear in this location.
3. Related Project Experience
Proposer shall provide references for 3 clients ordering switchgear in the past 5 years similar in nature to the requirements specified and required for this proposal. For each client reference, the following information shall be provided:
a. Name of client
b. Description of switchgear furnished
c. Order due date & actual completion date
d. Original contracted cost and actual cost at time of Final Completion
e. Client contact person who is able to attest for Proposer’s performance, including email address, telephone number, and city/state located in. (This person should be notified by Proposer that EWEB may contact him/her for purposes of checking references.)
4. Termination for Default - Proposers shall indicate if they have had a contract terminated for default in the last five years. Termination for default is defined as notice to stop performance that was delivered to the Proposer due to the Proposer’s non-performance or poor performance and the issue of performance was either (a) not litigated due to inaction on the part of the Proposer, or (b) litigated and determined that the Proposer was in default.
NOTE: If a Proposer has had a contract terminated for default in this period, then the Proposer shall submit full details including the other party’s name, address and phone number. EWEB will evaluate the facts and may, at its sole discretion, reject the proposal on the grounds of proposers past performance.
4. EVALUATION PROCESS & CONTRACTOR SELECTION
EWEB intends to use a Single-Tier evaluation process where award is based on written evaluation response, price, and successful negotiations of contract terms. Interviews will not be held. Further details follow.
The total number of points possible for written proposals is 100.
Points are assigned as follows:
Criteria Total Possible Points
Minimum Qualifications Pass/No Pass only
Product Compliance with Specifications 30 Capability 15 Ability to Meet EWEB Terms and Conditions 15 Pricing 40
TOTAL POSSIBLE SCORE 100
4.1 Review and Acknowledgment of Defective Proposals
Due to limited resources, EWEB generally will not completely review or analyze proposals that on their faces fail to comply with the minimum mandatory requirements of the solicitation documents nor will EWEB generally investigate the references or qualifications of such proposals. Therefore, EWEB will not acknowledge whether or not an unsuccessful proposal was complete, responsive, responsible, sufficient, or lawful in any respect. This is a public solicitation, the processes and procedures which are established and required by Oregon law and EWEB adopted rules. Proposers are advised to strictly follow the process, procedures, and requirements as set forth in the RFP documents and not anticipate or rely on any opportunity to negotiate, beyond such limitations that are identified herein.
4.2 Right of Rejection
Proposers must comply with all of the terms of the RFP, EWEB Rules, and all applicable local, state, and federal laws, administrative rules, and regulations. The Purchasing Contact may reject any proposal that does not comply with all of the material and substantial terms, conditions, and performance requirements of the RFP.
Proposers may not make stipulations or restrict the rights of EWEB. If an Proposer does so, the Purchasing Contact may determine the proposal to be a non-responsive counter-offer and the proposal may be rejected.
The Purchasing Contact may waive minor informalities that:
• do not affect responsiveness,
• are merely a matter of form or format,
• do not change the relative standing or otherwise prejudice other offers,
• do not change the meaning or scope of the RFQ/RFP,
• are trivial, negligible, or immaterial in nature,
• do not reflect a material change in the work, or,
• do not constitute a substantial reservation against a requirement or provision, EWEB reserves the right to refrain from making an award if it determines that to be in its best interest.
A proposal from a debarred or suspended Proposer shall be rejected.
4.3 References
EWEB reserves the right to request and investigate any and all references and the past performance information provided in the proposal with respect to Respondent’s successful performance of similar projects, compliance with specifications and contractual obligations, completion or delivery of a project on schedule, and lawful payment of employees and workers.
EWEB reserves the right to check any and all sources for information and to include sources other than the references provided in the Proposer’s proposal. EWEB may consider information available from any such source including government bodies and regulatory authorities in evaluating respondents, including past experience EWEB has had with the Proposer.
4.4 Responsibility
EWEB reserves the right to investigate and evaluate, at any time prior to award and execution of the Contract, the apparent successful Proposer’s responsibility for performing the Contract, as defined in Rule 3-0500. Submission of a signed proposal shall constitute approval for EWEB to obtain any information EWEB deems necessary to conduct the evaluation. EWEB reserves the right to request additional information or documentation from the successful Proposer prior to award of a contract. Such information may include, but is not limited to, current and recent balance sheets, income statements, cash flow statements, or a performance bond from an acceptable surety. Failure to provide this information will result in the rescission of EWEB’s Intent to Award.
EWEB may postpone the award of the Contract after announcement of the apparent successful Proposer in order to complete its investigation and evaluation. Failure of the apparent successful Proposer to demonstrate responsibility shall render the Proposer non-responsible and shall constitute grounds for rejection of the proposal.
4.5 Clarification of Response
EWEB reserves the right to request clarification of any item in any proposal, or to request additional information necessary to properly evaluate a particular proposal. All requests for clarification and responses shall be in writing.
During the evaluation of Proposals, Proposers must respond to any request for clarification from the Evaluation Committee within 24 hours of request (Monday through Friday). Inability of the Evaluation Committee to reach a Proposer for clarification and/or failure of a Proposer to respond within the time stated may result in rejection of that Proposer’s Proposal.
4.6 Evaluation Process
A single-tiered process will be used for this RFP. Written proposals will be evaluated; scoring and Contract award will be based on Proposers qualifications, experience, and pricing.
Pursuant to Rule 3-0230(14)(d), EWEB may employ methods of Contractor selection that include without limitation:
(A) An award or awards based solely on the ranking of proposals;
(B) Discussions leading to best and final offers, in which EWEB may not disclose private discussions leading to best and final offers;
(C) Discussions leading to best and final offers, in which EWEB may not disclose information derived from proposals submitted by competing Proposers;
(D) Serial negotiations, beginning with the highest ranked Proposer;
(E) Multiple-tiered competition designed to identify, at each level, a class of Proposers that fall within a competitive range or to otherwise eliminate from consideration a class of lower ranked Proposers;
(G) Any combination of methods described in this section.
4.7 Factory Tours
EWEB may opt to visit and inspect the factory of the Finalist, especially if EWEB has never conducted business with them. EWEB reserves the right to forego such inspection if in EWEB’s best interest to do so. If conducted, the final Contract award will be based on a Pass/Fail basis of the inspection.
4.8 Contractor Selection
If a Contract is awarded, EWEB shall award the Contract to the responsible Proposer whose proposal EWEB determines in writing to be the most advantageous to EWEB based on:
a) The evaluation process and evaluation factors described in this Request for Proposals;
b) Any applicable preferences allowed by EWEB Rules, Division 2; and when applicable,
c) The outcome of any negotiations authorized by this Request for Proposals
If this Request for Proposals specifies or authorizes the award of multiple public contracts, EWEB shall award public contracts to the responsible Proposers who qualify for the award of a Contract under the terms of this Request for Proposals.
The firm with the highest total score as a result of written proposal scoring, potential factory inspections, and negotiated terms and pricing will be awarded the Contract
4.9 Notice of Intent to Award
After the completion of the evaluation and final ranking, the Purchasing Contact will issue a written notice of Intent to Award to all Proposers and post on the OregonBuys website. The notice will set out the names and ranks of all Proposers and identify the Contractor selected for award (“Highest Ranked Proposer” or “Finalist”).
4.10 Contract Negotiation
Upon announcement of Intent to Award, EWEB will begin negotiating a Contract with the Highest Ranked Proposer and shall conduct negotiations toward obtaining written agreement on:
a) The Statement of Work;
b) The Contract price as it is affected by negotiating the Statement of Work; and
c) Any other terms and conditions resulting in the final Contract.
A sample contract (Exhibit #1) is attached for Proposer reference.
At any time during discussions or negotiations, EWEB may terminate such discussions or negotiations with the highest-ranked Proposer if it reasonably believes that:
a) The Proposer is not discussing or negotiating in good faith; or
b) Further discussions or negotiations with the Proposer will not result in the parties agreeing to the terms and conditions of a final Contract in a timely manner.
If EWEB terminates negotiations, EWEB may then commence negotiations with the next highest ranked Proposer and continue the process until EWEB has determined to award the Contract to the Proposer with whom it is currently discussing or negotiating. If negotiations with any Proposer does not result in a Contract within a reasonable amount of time, as determined solely by EWEB, EWEB may reject all proposals and cancel the RFP. Nothing in the rule precludes EWEB from proceeding with a new formal solicitation for the same Work described in the RFP that failed to result in a Contract.
4.11 Protests and Judicial Review of Competitive Bidding and Proposals
Pursuant to Rule 3-0740, a bidder or proposer may protest the award of a public contract or a notice of intent to award a public contract, whichever occurs first, if the bidder or proposer is adversely affected because the bidder or proposer would be eligible to be awarded the public contract in the event that the protest were successful; and the reason for the protest is that all higher ranked proposals are nonresponsive; EWEB has failed to conduct the evaluation of proposals in accordance with the criteria or processes described in the solicitation materials; EWEB has abused its discretion in rejecting the protestor’s proposal or proposal as nonresponsive; or EWEB's evaluation of proposals or EWEB's subsequent determination of award is otherwise in violation of EWEB Rules.
Eligible Proposers protesting award shall follow the procedures described herein. Protests that do not follow these procedures will not be considered. This protest procedure constitutes the sole administrative remedy available to Proposers.
a) Protests must be emailed to the Purchasing Contact and received within seven (7) days after the notice of intent to award the Contract has been posted on the bid site. “Protest of RFP XXX-XXX-X” shall be entered in the subject header of the email. The Purchasing Contact will email a reply acknowledging receipt of the notice. EWEB will not consider late protests.
b) All protests must be in writing, signed by the protesting party or an authorized Agent and submitted to the EWEB Purchasing Contact listed on page 1. The protest must state all facts and arguments on which the protesting party is basing the protest.
c) Only protests stipulating an issue of fact concerning a matter of bias, discrimination or conflict of interest, non-compliance with procedures described in the procurement documents, or EWEB policy shall be considered. Protests based on procedural matters will not be considered.
d) EWEB’s Purchasing Supervisor will review the protest and will email the protesting party a written response within three (3) business days of receipt of the written protest to the email provided in Proposer’s proposal. Any written response may be comprised of a determination of the protest, a notice to the protesting party of the need for additional time in which to evaluate the matter, or other notice to the protesting party.
e) If the Purchasing Supervisor’s determination (response) is adverse to the protester, any further appeal of the Purchasing Supervisor’s determination (response) by the party must be submitted via email to EWEB’s General Manager within three (3) business days of issuance of the Purchasing Supervisor’s determination (response).
f) EWEB’s General Manager will review any appeal of the Purchasing Supervisor’s determination and shall email the protesting party a written response within three (3) business days of receipt of written appeal to the email provided in Proposer’s RFP response,
g) If the determination of the General Manager is adverse to the protesting party’s interest, the protesting party may only appeal to EWEB’s Board of Commissioners by filing an emailed notice of appeal to the Board with the General Manager within two (2) business days of issuance of the General Manager’s written determination.
h) The Contract Review Board, in considering the protest, shall review the documentation presented to the Purchasing Supervisor and the General Manager on or before the next regularly scheduled Board Meeting, but in no event shall they be required to review in less than ten (10) business days, and thereafter, base their decision on such material. The Board review will be limited to the evaluation of compliance with EWEB’s policies and procedures, requirements of the RFP and the equal and fair application of EWEB’s contracting rules. The Contract Review Board's determination shall be EWEB's final decision.
An adversely affected or aggrieved Proposer must exhaust all avenues of administrative review procedures and relief before seeking judicial review of EWEB's Contractor selection or Contract award decision.
5. EVALUATION CRITERIA
Instructions - Include in your proposal package a response to the following questions, listing the question first and the response directly beneath. Failure to respond to one or more questions could lower total score or cause the response to be deemed Non-Responsive and rejected.
5.1 Product Compliance with Specifications (30 points possible)
a. Provide requested information and drawings listed in “General Conditions Section 3.0” of Attachment #1 – Material Specifications.
b. Indicate if product is in complete compliance as specified in Material Specifications and Drawings.
If variations exist, indicate the non-complying specification and how it will work with our system.
c. Include information to describe the entire design and fabrication process as applicable, including flow charts, testing forms, cut sheets, and drawings. Documentation provided should show how design, manufacturing, and testing process comply with or are superior to the specification requirements.
d. Indicate whether your company can exactly meet the WARRANTY requirements indicated in the
General Conditions Section 1.0 of Attachment #1-Material Specifications and explain any part of the warranty that your company cannot comply with.
5.2 Capability (15 points possible)
a. Describe the manufacturer’s experience with medium voltage metal clad switchgear design and manufacture of similar units and provide a list of such projects, especially projects in North America
b. State availability of spare parts and service locations in North America for the proposed equipment.
c. Provide a detailed schedule that can be expected for this order, specifying critical milestones following Notice to Proceed including:
a) Number of weeks ARO for first drawings,
b) Number of weeks after return of comments for final drawings,
c) Number of weeks ARO for first line up of switchgear to be delivered
d) Number of weeks ARO for second line up of switchgear to be delivered
d. Provide a detailed discussion of your company’s ability to meet EWEB’s required lead time (see
Exhibit #1 Sample Contract, Attachment A) or your proposed lead time if sooner than EWEB’s.
e. Provide average years of experience for dispatched field technicians in the case of field repair/diagnostics.
5.3 Ability to Meet EWEB Terms and Conditions (15 points possible)
Indicate compliance with the terms in Exhibit #1 - Sample Contract (and its Attachment A – Schedule of Goods.) List any proposed revisions to specific clauses. The maximum number of points are awarded when no proposed revisions are listed or very minimal requests. (Please note that the clauses regarding payment milestones, liability, termination, correction, or indemnification are regarded as especially sensitive/impactful.)
5.4 Pricing Proposals (40 points possible or up to 43 if bonus points are awarded)
a. PRICE PROPOSED – The Total Bid Cost is the evaluated price:
Item Description Quantity Cost per Unit Extended Cost Metal clad switchgear line up with Units as described in Material Spec: UNIT A x 1, UNIT B x 1, UNIT C (single stack) x 6, UNIT D x 1
2000A Medium Voltage Circuit Breaker:
Make: __________________ Model: _____________
1200A Medium Voltage Circuit Breaker:
Make: __________________ Model: _____________
Remote Racking Device
Make: __________________ Model: _____________ 2
Recommended and Requested Spare Parts: see Material Spec, add 1200A circuit breaker x 1, and provide list with costs
LOT
Field Installation Engineer:
Not Required for this bid N/A N/A N/A
Shipping to Eugene, OR
TOTAL BID COST
Total points for cost will be determined according to the following formula:
A = Total Possible points = 40 L = Lowest cost proposed X = Cost being scored B = Awarded Score
Formula: "L" divided by "X" times "A" = "B"
Example: If A = 40 Points, L = $50,000; X = $75,000; then: $50,000 / $75,000 x 40 = 27 points (rounded up.)
PLEASE NOTE THAT THE CONTRACTED COMPANY WILL BE EXPECTED TO CONTRACTUALLY AGREE TO SHIP
DDP (DELIVERED DUTY PAID). PLEASE SUBMIT PRICING ACCORDINGLY.
o Contractor is responsible for the goods until they are delivered to EWEB’s Eugene destination point.
o Contractor is responsible for handling of all shipping and delivery processes, and all aspects of customs clearance process.
o Contractor will bear all shipping and logistics costs, including export and import duties, insurance, and delivery to the final destination.
b. BONUS POINTS - Indicate whether your price will be contractually fixed for the duration of the Contract.
3 bonus will be added to your initial pricing score.
6. PROPOSAL FORM
Proposals should be prepared and organized in a clear and concise manner and must include all information required by this RFP. Separate and clearly identify all sections and include a Table of Contents. Headers and titles should be used to identify required information.
A. PROPOSAL PACKAGE
RETURN THE FOLLOWING WITH YOUR RFP RESPONSE, PER SECTION 1.8(B).
(Failing to include these documents could lead to rejection of Proposal.)
Place a check in front of each item indicating inclusion in your response)
COVER SHEET, with introduction of firm and the following:
o Contractual Acceptance: Statement accepting ALL terms and conditions contained in this solicitation. Statement may include request for negotiation of proposed terms and conditions as allowed per Section 1.8(B).
o Termination for Default: Proposers shall indicate if they have had a contract terminated for default in the last five years. Termination for default is defined as notice to stop performance that was delivered to the Proposer due to the Proposer’s non-performance or poor performance and the issue of performance was either (a) not litigated due to inaction on the part of the Proposer, or (b) litigated and determined that the Proposer was in default.
NOTE: If a Proposer has had a contract terminated for default in this period, then the Proposer shall submit full details including the other party’s name, address and phone number. EWEB will evaluate the facts and may, at its sole discretion, reject the proposal on the grounds of Proposer’s past performance.
RESPONSE TO MINIMUM QUALFICATIONS per Section 3 RESPONSE TO ALL EVALUATION CRITERIA listed in Section 5 PROPOSAL FORM – This Section 6
ALL POSTED ADDENDA ACKNOWLEDGED
ALL DOCUMENTS COMBINED INTO ONE PDF FILE
B. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT OF ADDENDA TO RFP DOCUMENTS:
Proposer acknowledges all Addenda and agrees to be bound by their contents.
Circle each RFP Addendum received: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
Check if not applicable or no Addenda were received: ____
C. MWESB STATUS
EWEB encourages contracting with minority owned, woman owned, and emerging small businesses (MWESB).
The State of Oregon offers a certification process. Indicate below if your business is a MWESB and if so, which categories have been state certified.
MWESB Certified? (Indicate Yes or No) _______
If yes, please indicate which of the following applies: ______________________________
Minority Owned, Woman Owned, Emerging Small Business, or Veteran Owned
D. BIDDER RESIDENCY
ORS 279A.120 states, "For the purposes of awarding a public contract, a contracting agency shall":
(a) Give preference to goods or services that have been manufactured or produced in this state if price, fitness, availability and quality are otherwise equal; and
(b) Add a percent increase to the bid of a nonresident bidder equal to the percent, if any, of the preference given to the bidder in the state in which the bidder resides.
“Resident Bidder” means a bidder that has paid unemployment taxes or income taxes in this state during the 12 calendar months immediately preceding submission of the bid, has a business address in this state and has stated in the bid whether the bidder is a “Resident Bidder” under this paragraph.
“Non-Resident Bidder” means a bidder who is not a “Resident Bidder” as defined above.
a. CHECK ONE: Bidder is a ( ) RESIDENT Bidder ( ) NON-RESIDENT Bidder.
b. If Resident Bidder, enter your Oregon business address: (physical and mailing address)
c. If a Non-Resident Bidder, enter state of residency:
d. If a Non-Resident Bidder, do you or your Company receive, or are you or your Company eligible for any preference in award of contracts with your state’s government or with other governmental bodies in your state?
CHECK ONE: ( ) YES ( ) NO
If YES, state the preference percentage: _________________%
If YES, but not a percentage of bid price, describe the preference:
If YES, state the law or regulation that allows the preference described (legal citation):
E. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR STATUS
The undersigned acknowledges that:
1. Contractor certifies its status as an independent contractor in satisfaction of Oregon law, including ORS 670.600, and shall perform all required Work as an independent contractor. EWEB holds the right (i) to determine the delivery schedule for the Work to be performed and (ii) to evaluate the quality of the completed performance, but EWEB cannot and will not control the means or manner of Contractor’s performance. Contractor is responsible for determining the appropriate means and manner of performing the Work.
2. The parties covenant that Contractor, its sub-contractors, agents, officers and representatives do not qualify as officers, employees, or agents of EWEB as those terms are used in ORS 30.265 nor shall they seek such qualification relating to performance of the Work.
3. Contractor agrees it is responsible for all federal and state taxes or other payments or withholdings applicable to compensation or payments paid to Consultant under this Contract and shall hold EWEB harmless from such financial exposures.
F. RECYCLED PRODUCTS CERTIFICATION OR RESERVED
Bidders shall use recyclable products to the maximum extent economically feasible in the performance of the contract set forth in this document. EWEB shall give preference to goods that are certified to be made from recycled materials if:
(a) The recycled product is available;
(b) The recycled product meets applicable standards;
(c) The recycled product can be substituted for a comparable non-recycled product; and
(d) The recycled product’s costs do not exceed the costs of non-recycled products by more than five percent, or a higher percentage if a written determination is made by EWEB. [2003 c.794 §17]
ORS 279A.010(gg) states “Recycled product” means all materials, goods and supplies, not less than 50 percent of the total weight of which consists of secondary and post-consumer waste with not less than 10 percent of its total weight consisting of post-consumer waste. “Recycled product” includes any product that could have been disposed of as solid waste, having completed its life cycle as a consumer item, but otherwise is refurbished for reuse without substantial alteration of the product’s form.
ORS 279A.010(s) states: “Post-consumer waste” means a finished material that would normally be disposed of as solid waste, having completed its life cycle as a consumer item. “Post-consumer waste” does not include manufacturing waste.
ORS 279A.010(hh) states: “Secondary waste materials” means fragments of products or finished products of a manufacturing process that has converted a virgin resource into a commodity of real economic value.
“Secondary waste materials” includes post-consumer waste. “Secondary waste materials” does not include excess virgin resources of the manufacturing process. For paper, “secondary waste materials” does not include fibrous waste generated during the manufacturing process such as fibers recovered from waste water or trimmings of paper machine rolls, mill broke, wood slabs, chips, sawdust or other wood residue from a manufacturing process.
ORS 279A.010(ff) states: “Recycled PETE” means post-consumer polyethylene terephthalate material.
I, the undersigned duly authorized representative of the Bidder/Proposer, hereby certify that the products, if any, offered in this bid/proposal contain the following minimum percentages:
(NOTE: If product(s) bid contain no recycled materials, then write "0" in space(s) provided)
a) ________% (recycled product as defined in ORS 279A.010(gg));
b) ________% (post consumer waste as defined in ORS 279A..010(s));
c) ________% (secondary waste materials as defined in ORS 279A.010(hh));
d) ________% (recycled PETE product as defined in ORS 279A.010(ff));
Product Name: ___________________________________________________
Bid (line) Item No.: ______
It is the Bidder’s responsibility to provide additional signed copies of the Certification of Compliance for each (bid line) item which contains a different percentage of recycled materials than listed above.
Sustainability Questionnaire
Company Name: ______________________________________ Date: _________
The Supplier Sustainability Questionnaire must be completed and returned with your bid/proposal. This questionnaire is applicable to firms that provide services and/or goods. Responses can be up to 4 pages.
1. What policies or plans are in place to help decrease environmental or social impacts from your supply chain or manufacturer (if company is a distributor) such as decreasing use of toxic or hazardous products, efficient use of natural resources, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, waste reduction, and worker health and safety? Please provide links to documents. How does your company monitor and manage your supply chain with regard to environmental and social issues?
2. What type of sustainable packaging/shipping materials do you use, such as reusable, recycled content, or compostable materials?
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .