24R2015_Attach 3_Volume II Past Perf.docx
DOCX document 46 KB Posted
- Attached to
- DoDEA Europe Security Training in Germany, Benelux (Belgium and The Netherlands), and The United Kingdom
- Solicitation number
- HE1254-24-R-2015
- Issued by
-
Department of Defense Education Activity
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Volume as part of a federal contract solicitation for Bus Driver & Safety Attendant Security Training for the Europe and The United Kingdom region.
The solicitation, numbered HE1254-24-R-2015, is for Firm-Fixed Price (FFP) and Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contracts to provide bus transportation services and related training. The Past Performance Volume requires offerors to submit at least one recent, relevant, and quality past performance reference for the prime and subcontractors. Relevancy is evaluated based on the scope, magnitude of effort (e.g., number of buses, personnel), and complexity (e.g., managing personnel, providing training, communicating with stakeholders) of the past performance relative to the requirements of this solicitation. Offerors without any past performance must still submit a statement to that effect. The solicitation is open to all interested parties, with the agency (DoDEA) reserving the right to directly solicit local vendors. Responses are due by the proposed due date, and all contractors must have an active SAM registration.
View the file
Other files
Show all 21
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (CUI)
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104
FACTOR 2: PAST PERFORMANCE VOLUME II
Bus Driver & Safety Attendant Security Training for the Europe and The United Kingdom
N/CAGE Code:
Unique Entity ID:
Email Address:
Point of Contact Number:
Company Name:
Address:
Phone Number:
Point of Contact:
HE1254-24-R-2015
Attachment 3
Volume II – Past Performance
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION-SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104
CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (CUI)
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104
Past Performance Volume Instructions
Failure to submit a Past Performance Proposal (Attachment 3) will result in noncompliance. In the event the Offeror does not have any past performance record, the Offeror shall still submit a Past Performance proposal with a statement that past performance is unavailable.
The Offeror shall submit at a minimum of one (1) recent past performance for the prime and one (1) for the subcontractors/teaming contractor (performing as the Prime on that effort) to determine the recency, relevancy, and quality of the Offeror’s performance. To be recent, the effort much be on-going or must have been completed within the last three (3) years by the closing date/time of this solicitation. To be relevant, the Offeror must demonstrate that performance that performance involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires. The relevancy analysis will focus on if the Offeror has provided bus transportation services similar in scope, magnitude of effort and complexities as follows:
Scope: Refers to the type of work performed in the Offeror’s past performance reference when compared to the type of work required in this solicitation. The type of work required is for student transportation services.
Magnitude of Effort: Refers to the size (e.g., currency/dollar amount, personnel, vehicles) of an Offeror’s past performance reference. The Offeror’s past performance reference will be compared to the Government’s estimated amount to perform the work required in the PWS.
Complexity: Refers to the level of complication of an Offeror’s past performance reference. The level of complexity will be compared to the Government’s estimated complexity level. The following factors will be considered for each past performance reference to determine whether each reference is similar in complexity.
1. Appropriately managing personnel (i.e., Responsiveness to deficiencies and performance issues and making timely corrections. Taking a proactive approach when known performance issues may hinder mission requirements).
1. Providing, tracking, and reporting required training.
1. Effectively communicating with all stakeholders. Communicating issues as necessary to ensure all stakeholders were informed.
The Contractor shall follow the format shown in the next page when submitting Volume II – Past Performance.
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104
Volume II – Past Performance Information
The Offeror, shall at a minimum, submit the following for each past performance reference. Do not change the format. Complete and address all areas below:
Reference Information:
| Contract Number: |
| Contract Type: (ex: FFP, IDIQ-FFP, Cost, etc) |
| Contract Period of Performance: (ex: day/month/year – day/month/year) |
| Contract Value: (ex: if 5-year contract, then enter 5-year value) |
| Customer/Agency of Reference: (ex: DoDEA – Kaiserslaughtern Military Community) |
| Customer Address: |
| Customer Point of Contact: |
| Customer Email Address: |
| Customer Contact Number: |
Brief Description of Effort Please provide a brief description of the past performance reference to include the services provided.
Past Performance Relevancy Factors In this section, please indicate how the past performance reference is relevant in scope, magnitude of effort and complexity based on the definitions provided to you in this document and under Factor 2: Past Performance in the solicitation. Please feel free to use additional pages (but not exceeding the page limit) if more than one past performance reference is used.
Scope: Please describe how your past performance reference is relevant in scope.
Magnitude of Effort: Please describe how your past performance reference is relevant in magnitude of effort (e.g. include number of buses/vehicles used, number of personnel (safety attendants, safety aides, contract managers).
Complexity: Please describe how your past performance reference is relevant in complexity.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .