24R2015_Attach 2_PPQ.docx

DOCX document 86 KB Posted

Attached to
DoDEA Europe Security Training in Germany, Benelux (Belgium and The Netherlands), and The United Kingdom
Solicitation number
HE1254-24-R-2015
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Present and Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) that is part of the solicitation for the Department of Defense Education Activity (DoDEA) contract opportunity HE1254-24-R-2015 for Bus Driver and Safety Attendant Security Training in Europe and the United Kingdom.

The PPQ must be completed by the offeror and then sent to the offeror's customer to evaluate the contractor's experience managing personnel, providing and reporting training, communication, and overall performance. The customer will provide a rating from Poor/Unsatisfactory to Excellent for each of these four criteria. The completed PPQ must then be returned to the specified DoDEA contract specialists via email. This PPQ is Controlled Unclassified Information related to the source selection for the HE1254-24-R-2015 solicitation, which is for a single or multiple Firm-Fixed Price Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity contracts for Bus Driver and Safety Attendant training services in Europe and the United Kingdom.

View the file

Other files

Show all 21

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) Source Selection Information - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

HE1254-24-R-2015 Attachment 2

PRESENT AND PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

This Questionnaire Pertains to: Bus Driver & Safety Attendant Security Training for the Europe and The United Kingdom

The Offeror must complete the “To be completed by Offeror” section prior to sending the PPQ to the Offeror’s Reference/Customer. The Offeror’s Reference/Customer must complete the PPQ’s evaluation section and return the completed PPQ via e-mail to the attention of:

Department of Defense Education Activity Attn: Contract Specialist: John Butts Contracting Officer: John O Myers III 4800 Mark Center Drive, 5th Floor, Suite #05H02-10 Alexandria, VA 22350 E-Mail: john.butts@dodea.edu E-Mail: john.o.myers@dodea.edu

This information section is to be completed by the Offeror.

Contractor Information:
Firm Name: Click or tap here to enter text.N/CAGE Code: Click or tap here to enter text.
Address: Click or tap here to enter text.Unique Entity ID: Click or tap here to enter text.
Phone Number: Click or tap here to enter text.Email Address: Click or tap here to enter text.
Point of Contact: Click or tap here to enter text.Point of Contact Number: Click or tap here to enter text.

Work Performed as: ☐Prime Contractor ☐Sub Contractor ☐Joint Venture ☐Other (Explain)

Percent of project work performed: Click or tap here to enter text.

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #): Click or tap here to enter text.

Reference Information:
Business Name of Reference:Address: Click or tap here to enter text.

Click or tap here to enter text.

Phone Number: Click or tap here to enter text.Email Address: Click or tap here to enter text.
Point of Contact: Click or tap here to enter text.Point of Contact Number: Click or tap here to enter text.

Contract Number: Click or tap here to enter text. Final Contract Value: Click or tap here to enter text.

Contract Type: ☐Firm Fixed Price ☐Cost Reimbursement ☐Other (Explain)

Period of Performance: Click or tap here to enter text.

Present and Past Performance Questionnaire

Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) Source Selection Information - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

HE1254-24-R-2015 Attachment 2

This evaluation section is to be completed by the Offeror’s customer.

Evaluation KEY: Please use the following abbreviations to assign an applicable rating for questions 1 thru 6 below:

P/U
S
G
VG
E
N
Poor/Unsatisfactory
Satisfactory
Good
Very Good
Excellent
Neutral/N/A
Does not meet minimum acceptable standards in one or more areas; remedial action required in one or more areas; deficiencies in one or more areas which adversely affect overall performance.
Meets or slightly exceeds minimum acceptable standards; adequate results; reportable deficiencies with identifiable, but not substantial, effects on overall performance.
Effective performance; fully responsive to contract requirements; reportable deficiencies, but with little identifiable effect on overall performance.
Very effective performance; fully responsive to contract requirements; contract requirements accomplished in a timely, efficient, and economical manner for the most part; only minor deficiencies with minimal effect on overall performance.
Of exceptional merit; exemplary performance in a timely, efficient, and economical manner; very minor (if any) deficiencies with no adverse effect on overall performance.
No record of relevant past performance or past performance information is not available.

1. How would you rate the Contractor’s experience in appropriately managing their personnel (i.e. Has the Contractor been responsive to deficiencies and performance issues and making timely corrections? Has the Contractor taken a proactive approach when known performance issues may hinder mission requirements?) Comments:

P ☐
S☐
G☐
VG☐
E☐
N☐

2. How would you rate the Contractor’s performance in providing, tracking and reporting required training? Comments:

P ☐
S☐
G☐
VG☐
E☐
N☐

3. How would you rate the Contractor’s communication? Have they communicated issues as necessary to ensure all stakeholders were informed? Comments:

P ☐
S☐
G☐
VG☐
E☐
N☐

4. How would you rate the Contractor’s overall performance? Comments:

P ☐
S☐
G☐
VG☐
E☐
N☐

HE1254-24-R-2015 Attachment 2

HE1254-24-R-2015 Attachment 2Explain any problems and resolutions Brief Description of Effort to include relevancy to the solicitation requirements of the RFP.

Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) Source Selection Information - See FAR 2.101 and 3.1044

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .