24R2004_SOL_Attachment_2_PPQ.PDF

Present and Past Performance Questionnaire

PRESENT AND PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

This Questionnaire Pertains to: Rota/Sevilla Military Community

The Offeror must complete the “To be completed by Offeror” section prior to sending the PPQ to the

Offeror’s Reference/Customer. The Offeror’s Reference/Customer must complete the PPQ’s evaluation section and return the completed PPQ via e-mail to the attention of:

Department of Defense Education Activity

Attn: Contract Specialist: Ms. Adwoa Essel-Akoli Contracting Officer: Ms. Marcia Lee 4800 Mark Center Drive, 5th Floor, Suite #05H02-10 Alexandria, VA 22350

E-Mail: adwoa.essel-akoli@dodea.edu E-Mail: marcia.lee@dodea.edu

This information section is to be completed by the Offeror.

Contractor Information:

Firm Name: N/CAGE Code:

Address: Unique Entity ID:

Phone Number: Email Address:

Point of Contact: Point of Contact Number:

Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain)

Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

Reference Information:

Business Name of Reference:

Phone Number:

Point of Contact:

Address:

Email Address:

Point of Contact Number:

Contract Number: Final Contract Value:

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):

Period of Performance:

Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) Source Selection Information - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) Source Selection Information - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

This evaluation section is to be completed by the Offeror’s customer.

Evaluation KEY: Please use the following abbreviations to assign an applicable rating for questions 1 thru 6 below:

P/U S G VG E N

Poor/Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Very Good Excellent Neutral/N/A

Does not meet minimum acceptable standards in one or more areas;

remedial action required in one or more areas;

deficiencies in one or more areas which adversely affect overall performance.

Meets or slightly exceeds minimum acceptable standards; adequate results; reportable deficiencies with identifiable, but not substantial, effects on overall performance.

Effective performance; fully responsive to contract requirements;

reportable deficiencies, but with little identifiable effect on overall performance.

Very effective performance; fully responsive to contract requirements; contract requirements accomplished in a timely, efficient, and economical manner for the most part;

only minor deficiencies with minimal effect on overall performance.

Of exceptional merit; exemplary performance in a timely, efficient, and economical manner; very minor (if any) deficiencies with no adverse effect on overall performance.

No record of relevant past performance or past performance information is not available.

1. How would you rate the contractor’s experience with transporting pre-kindergarten through high school grade children from their designated bus stops to and from school in the school districts? Comments: P/U S G VG E N

2. How would you rate the contractor’s experience with transporting a special needs student with a Safety Aide and providing an appropriate vehicle from their designated stop to their school, and vice versa?

Comments:

P/U S G VG E N

3. How would you rate the contractor’s experience in providing Safety Aide and/or Safety Attendant services on the school bus during runs? Comments: P/U S G VG E N

4. How would you rate the contractor’s experience in appropriately managing their personnel and vehicles (i.e., Has the contractor been responsive to deficiencies and performance issues and making timely corrections? Has the Contractor taken a proactive approach when known performance issues may hinder mission requirements?) Comments: P/U S G VG E N

5. How would you rate the contractor’s in responding to incidents and accidents in regards to transporting students on the bus? Comments:

P/U S G VG E N

6. How would you rate the contractor’s performance in maintaining their vehicles in accordance with host nation laws and contractual requirements? Comments: P/U S G VG E N

7. How would you rate the contractor’s performance in providing, tracking, and reporting required training?

Comments:

P/U S G VG E N

Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) Source Selection Information - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

This evaluation section is to be completed by the Offeror’s customer.

Evaluation KEY: Please use the following abbreviations to assign an applicable rating for questions 1 thru 6 below:

P/U S G VG E N

Poor/Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Very Good Excellent Neutral/N/A

Does not meet minimum acceptable standards in one or more areas;

remedial action required in one or more areas;

deficiencies in one or more areas which adversely affect overall performance.

Meets or slightly exceeds minimum acceptable standards; adequate results; reportable deficiencies with identifiable, but not substantial, effects on overall performance.

Effective performance; fully responsive to contract requirements;

reportable deficiencies, but with little identifiable effect on overall performance.

Very effective performance; fully responsive to contract requirements; contract requirements accomplished in a timely, efficient, and economical manner for the most part;

only minor deficiencies with minimal effect on overall performance.

Of exceptional merit; exemplary performance in a timely, efficient, and economical manner; very minor (if any) deficiencies with no adverse effect on overall performance.

No record of relevant past performance or past performance information is not available.

8. How would you rate the contractor’s performance providing timely and accurate reports and other contract deliverables? Comments: Comments: P/U S G VG E N

9. How would you rate the contractor’s communication? Have they communicated issues as necessary to ensure all stakeholders were informed? Comments: P/U S G VG E N

10. How would you rate the Contractor’s overall performance? Comments:

P/U S G VG E N

Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) Source Selection Information - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

Explain any problems and resolutions

Brief Description of Effort to include relevancy to the solicitation requirements of the RFP.

Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) Source Selection Information - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104