ATTACHMENT 01 AMD 001 ODEIA 24361821R0203.pdf

ATTACHMENT 01 AMD 001 ODEIA 24361821R0203

The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) Office of the Director, Office of Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Accountability (DEIA)

Services associated with Implementation of Executive Order 14035

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) - 24361821R0203

Synopsis / Solicitation: Conformed Copy including Amendment 001 revisions

1. This procurement is a FAR 13.5 procurement. This requirement is being solicited is a combined synopsis/solicitation IAW FAR 13.105(b) and is set-aside for Woman-Owned Small Businesses (WOSB) only

2. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code is 541612 Human Resource Consulting Services; Size Standard $16.5 Million

3. FAR Clauses 52.212-1 through 52.212-5 apply to this procurement and these clauses and all others are located at Attachment 05 of this RFP.

4. The Description of Services is as referenced in Attachment 01, Statement of Objectives.

5. The Government intends to award a single contract resulting from this RFP to the responsible offeror whose offer represents the best value in terms of technical capability and price. All non-price factors are significantly more important than price.

6. Offerors must submit representations and certifications in accordance with the provision at FAR 52.212-3 Offeror Representations and Certifications—Commercial Item. (Accessible at the FAR Site, http://farsite.hill.af.mil).

7. Submit the following documents in response to this RFP in accordance with the proposal preparation and submission section of this RFP.

8. All interested offerors shall submit acknowledgement of this AMENDMENT 001 to Barbara.Hansen@opm.gov and OPMOPODivisionA@opm.gov.

9. Proposals are due August 25, 2021 at 4:00 PM

Proposals shall be submitted via e-mail to: Barbara.Hansen@opm.gov and Division A Mailbox at OPMOPODivisionA@opm.gov Offerors who fail to complete and submit the requirements above may be considered non-responsive.

PROPOSAL PREPARATION AND SUBMISSION

Offeror submissions in response to this FAR 13.5 RFP shall be provided in three (3) volumes. The table below provides the descriptions and page limits for each volume.

Offerors shall provide sufficient information for the Government to determine its level of confidence in the ability of the Offeror to perform the requirements of the RFP based on an assessment of its technical approach, past experience and price.

http://farsite.hill.af.mil/ mailto:Barbara.Hansen@opm.gov mailto:OPMOPODivisionA@opm.gov mailto:Barbara.Hansen@opm.gov mailto:OPMOPODivisionA@opm.gov

The government anticipates selecting the best suited contractor from initial responses without opening discussions. Therefore, contractors are strongly encouraged to submit their best technical solutions and price in response to this RFP.

Please note that there must be no communication with the OPM program office regarding the requirements of the RFP prior to award without the Consent of the Contracting Officer. This restriction also applies to any potential teaming partners and subcontractors. Unauthorized direct program office communication regarding this acquisition could result in disqualification of the offeror for this competitive procurement. All communication during the competitive process shall be directed to:

Barbara.Hansen@opm.gov and/or OPMOPODivisionA@opm.gov.

Formatting instructions: The format of the entire proposal must have margins of no less than 1 inch and font size of no less than 10 points and no greater than 12 points (e.g.

10, 11 or 12 point font is acceptable) to include all attachments. Font of Arial, Times New Roman or Courier shall be used.

Volum e/

Factor

Section Title SOO / RFP Reference Page Limit/

Documents Required

I

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY

Section 1 Cover letter

RFP Page 4

I

Section 2

Subject Matter Expertise (SME)

SOO Paragraphs B, C, D and E

I Section 2 Key Personnel

SOO Paragraph D and E

Key Objectives, Contract Deliverables & Schedule

Guidance, Tools and Resources

SOO Paragraph E.2

1 Section 2 Assess & Identify barriers that lead to inequities in Federal Employment

SOO Paragraph E.3

1 Section 2 Logistics & SME Support

SOO Paragraph E.4 mailto:Barbara.Hansen@opm.gov mailto:OPMOPODivisionA@opm.gov

Management & Staffing Plan

As required by RFP

1 Section 3 Past Experience

I Section 4 Appendices

• PWS

• QASP

• Oral Presentation Slides

• Quality Control Plan (Draft)

• Staffing Plan (Draft) DELETED

• Project Staffing Table

• List of Technical

Assumptions (if any)

• Key Personnel Qualification

Matrix

• Project Management Plan

(Draft)

• Milestone Plan (Draft)

• SOO Paragraph B through I

• RFP

• RFP pages. 4, 5, 6, 7, 11 & 12

• See ‘Section 4 Appendices in Technical Proposal’ section of RFP for remaining bullets

3 - See attachment 04 2 pages or 2 Power

Point Slides Per Project

All remaining page limits are two (2) pages each

II

PRICE

Pricing Spreadsheet and narrative

RFP Instructions Volume II ‘Price’

III

ADMINISTRATIVE

REQUIREMENTS

SAM Registration Current & Active

RFP Instructions Volume III

‘Administrative Requirements’

Affirmative Statement of Section

889 Compliance (Prime & Subs)

RFP Instructions Volume III

‘Administrative Requirements’

Assumptions & Exceptions to the solicitation

If applicable

* Company logos are prohibited with the exception of the Title Page.

Volume I Technical 25 Page Limit; the table above provides estimates for subcategories.

Volumes II and III, None

Cover letter and Appendices are not included in the Technical Volume 25 Page Limit

Volume I, Section 1: Cover Letter shall include:

• Solicitation number and name of the requirement referenced on the first page of this Request for Proposal (RFP);

• Dun & Bradstreet (DUNS) number;

• Name, address, telephone number and e-mail address of the Offeror; to include contractor Point of Contact (POC) authorized to negotiate on behalf of the company

• A statement specifying the extent of agreement with all terms, conditions, and provisions included in the solicitation and agreement to furnish any or all items upon which prices are offered at the price set for each item;

• Period of validity of the offer for no less than 90 days from the RFP due date.

• Names, titles, telephone number and e-mail address of person(s) authorized to negotiate on the Offeror's behalf with the Government in connection with this solicitation; and

• Name, title, and signature of person authorized to sign the proposal.

• All proposals must be submitted via email directly to the Contracting Officer as identified in Section E.1 1-Proposal Submission Deadline as noted above.

Volume I, Section 2: Technical Proposal

The Offeror shall describe its technical approach for meeting the requirements as described in the SOO. This volume includes Oral Presentations as a portion of the proposal submission requirement. There are Government Exchanges that are scheduled as part of the Oral Presentation activities. During these periods, the Government may seek clarifying information. All such conversations between the Offeror and the Government shall be solely for clarifying purposes, and Offerors will not be permitted to change or revise their presentations or proposals during these clarification periods. Oral Presentations and the conversations during the Government Exchanges shall not constitute discussions nor are discussions anticipated under this procurement. The Government will not inform Offerors regarding any positives or negatives identified at any time during or at the conclusion of Oral Presentations.

Technical Capability:

Performance Work Statement (PWS), Performance Standards, Acceptable Quality Levels, and proposed QASP

The Statement of Objectives (SOO), included in RFP as ATTACHMENT 01, provides the Government's overall objectives for this solicitation. Offerors shall use the SOO with other applicable portions of this RFP, as the basis for preparing the PWS, Performance Standards, Acceptable Quality Levels (AQLs), and a proposed QASP for consideration in development of the Government’s plan. The QASP shall crosswalk with the proposed Performance Standards and AQLs.

The Offeror shall ensure all aspects of the SOO are addressed in the PWS. The PWS must be well organized, comprehensive, and fully explain how the Offeror will plan, execute, manage, and monitor all tasks and deliverables, how each task and subtask will be accomplished in the timeframes specified and that all services and deliverables will meet acceptable quality and performance standards identified in the Offeror’s PWS and proposed Government QASP. The offeror shall provide a list of all deliverables with a description of the proposed format of written deliverables, to include major sections and typical length of such deliverables, and submission frequency/date of deliverables.

The Offeror’s PWS, performance standards and AQLs shall be organized in a logical sequence, use numbered paragraphs, and limit each paragraph to a single concept or several closely connected concepts. Offerors are encouraged to write in complete, direct, relatively short sentences, break up long sentences, and avoid stringing long lists into sentences. A sample PWS with sample performance requirements, performance standards, and AQLs can be found on pages 4 and 5 of the sample PWS found at https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/ccap/cc/corhb/Files/PWS-SOO- SOW/Maintain%20the%20Clark%20River%20Channel_PWS.pdf. The Offeror may choose to use the DOD ARRT tool to draft its performance requirements, performance standards, AQLs, deliverables, and proposed QASP. If an Offeror does choose to use the DOD ARRT tool, the Offeror is cautioned to ensure the performance requirements, performance standards, and AQLs are incorporated into the proposed PWS.

If applicable the Offeror shall state any assumptions and/or exceptions in Volume III.

https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/ccap/cc/corhb/Files/PWS-SOO-SOW/Maintain%20the%20Clark%20River%20Channel_PWS.pdf https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/ccap/cc/corhb/Files/PWS-SOO-SOW/Maintain%20the%20Clark%20River%20Channel_PWS.pdf

Oral Presentation.

This portion of the Technical Proposal Volume must be delivered as an oral presentation, supplemented by prepared PowerPoint slides that will serve as written evidence of the proposal. Proposed key personnel are the only personnel allowed to present the Offeror’s oral presentation. The Offeror will have 60 minutes to present to the Government. Following the presentation, the Government will convene for 20 minutes to caucus and develop questions. After the caucus, there will be up to a 30-minute question and answer period. Questions are intended for clarification only.

Offerors may brief only what is included in their slides. Presentations will not be recorded.

The Oral Proposal Presentation included within the Technical Proposal Volume should be specific and complete. Legibility, clarity, and coherence are very important. The Offeror’s responses will be evaluated against the Technical Factors described in the Evaluation Factors and Basis of Award sections. The Offeror shall address its technical solution for meeting or exceeding the proposed minimum performance or capability requirements of the Offeror’s performance requirements.

Offerors shall describe any unique processes or methodology that will be used to meet the SOO requirements including the management and the delivery of services.

This approach shall demonstrate an understanding of the requirements and present a sound and feasible method for accomplishing the requirements of the SOO.

Oral Presentation slides shall have slide numbers and include a presentation cover sheet inclusive of proprietary data markings, presentation team (including a listing of names, positions, and company affiliations for each presenter), and presentation agenda. Slides not presented within the time limit allotted during the Oral Presentation will not be evaluated. The slides submitted for Oral Presentations do not have font or margin restrictions; however, they must be legible to the evaluators when presented. Embedded links and/or documents shall not be included in the slides and all speaker notes shall be removed from oral presentation slides, as they will not be considered part of the proposal submission. All slides shall be in or compatible with Microsoft PowerPoint.

The vendors will be responsible for the technology/platform utilized for the conduct of their company’s oral presentations. The vendor must provide the contracting officer advance notice of their selected method for oral presentation for approval and provide a mutually agreed to time for the Government to test the platform, at least two business days prior to the presentation date. The Government will not be responsible for any costs associated with the technology utilized by the contractor. Presentation date assignments will be based on the receipt date/time of the contractors’ proposal. Contractors will be provided a date and time for execution of assigned oral presentation performance at least 3 business days in advance.

Management and Staffing Approach

The Offeror shall describe their staffing methods, including how their company will recruit, hire, train and retain qualified personnel to meet the requirements of the SOO. The approach shall describe how the Offeror will attract and retain sufficient and qualified personnel to accomplish contract requirements over the life of the contract including ramping up and ramping down based on need.

The staffing narrative shall explain any subcontractors that the Offeror plans to use in delivering the technical approach, if any. Offerors shall specify the specific task(s) they intend to utilize subcontractors for and explain their significance in meeting RFP requirements. Offerors shall provide a justification, and rationale, for the proposed approach. Descriptions must include the, qualifications and certifications for each position, how the position aligns with the contractors’ proposed labor categories, and a cross-reference to the PWS Performance Standards an employee in the labor category would perform. Additionally, the narrative shall include rationale on how the Offeror arrived at the proposed labor categories and labor hours per category.

Volume I, Section 3: Past Experience

The Prime Offeror shall describe experience that demonstrates recent (performed within the past three (3) years) and relevant (similar in size, scope and complexity) experience performing management consulting services involving analysis of Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Accountability (DEIA) in large private sector organizations and/or Federal Agencies.

The Offeror shall provide at least two (2) but not more than four (4) recent and relevant projects. At least two (2) projects shall be as the Prime. Experience from subcontractors may be used IF the subcontractor also provides a Letter of Commitment, signed by a company executive on company letterhead, stating the firm is committed to be a subcontractor, at time of award, on this project for the prime contractor submitting the response to the solicitation. The Government will not review projects submitted in excess of the stated limitation.

Each project submission must include the following:

Contractor Name/Project Name/Contract Number;

Identification if the Offeror was a Prime or a Subcontractor Customer Point of Contact (Phone and E-mail) Project Performance Period (include months/years);

Dollar value of the entire project (Identify Base and Option Years) Dollar value of the part of the project relevant to the requirements of this solicitation (if not different, please state this as so);

Summary of the project including a copy of the Statement of Objectives or Statement of Work Team composition and roles, including any team incentives that were employed;

Narrative clearly articulating how the work is relevant and how it is similar in size, scope and complexity to that of this solicitation including identification of core area(s) of expertise related to this SOO demonstrated in the performance of the project.

Identification of any conflicts that occurred and how those were resolved/mitigated.

Letters of Commitment if for a subcontractor.

Section 4: Appendices in the Technical Proposal

In addition, the following shall be included as Appendices in the Technical Proposal as described in the SOO and in the RFP. These documents will be evaluated as part of the Volume I, Section 4 submission. No additional appendices will be considered other than those listed below. The page limitations for Volume I, Technical are listed on pages 2 through 4 of the RFP ‘Proposal Preparation and Submission’.

1. Performance Work Statement (PWS), to include Performance Standards and AQLs *

2. Slides for Oral Presentation

3. Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) **

4. Quality Control Plan (Draft)

5. Staffing Plan (Draft) Deleted

6. Project Staffing Plan Table

7. List of all Technical Assumptions in a stand-alone document (if any)

8. Key Personnel Qualification Matrix

9. Project Management Plan (Draft)

10. Milestone Plan (Draft)

* Link to PWS format provided ** Template is provided

Volume II, Price

The pricing proposal shall include a completed Pricing Template (Excel spreadsheet) ATTACHMENT 02 and a Word document explaining a breakdown of pricing. Any pricing assumptions should be addressed in the Word document of the vendors pricing proposal and explicitly marked as Assumptions. When applicable, contractors should provide assumptions in a matrix/crosswalk to their proposed PWS. Failure to complete all tabs of the worksheet may result in an Offerors’ submission being considered non-compliant with the requirements of the RFP.

Offerors shall include hourly labor rates and number of hours proposed for every labor category listed under each task and/or sub-task for each potential period of performance.

Pricing shall be based on vendor input of hourly rates and number of hours (based on provided hours per task and/or sub-task).

Offerors may add additional rows for labor categories only as needed on the Pricing Sheet.

Additional Contract Line Item Numbers (CLINs) other than those provided are not allowed. Discounts, if any, shall be identified (if applicable).

Offerors shall provide a total estimated price for each potential period of performance and a total estimated contract price on the Summary Worksheet.

Offerors shall submit pricing based on how the contractor will staff the project as described in its proposed PWS.

Pricing worksheet, Attachment 02: for the total contract ceiling tab, all amounts are auto calculating cells; total contract ceiling will be generated based on entries made in base and option year pricing tabs. If totals within ‘Total Contract Ceiling’ conflict with pricing in base and option years, the Government will consider pricing based on detailed entries per year (i.e. Pricing Base Year, Pricing Option year 1, etc.). Offerors shall confirm the accuracy of all calculations prior to submission.

No Travel expenses are anticipated and therefore no travel CLIN is included.

Volume III, Administrative Requirements

Each Offeror shall provide documentation of:

1. System for Award Management (SAM) Registration (Prime Offeror)

• Must be current and ‘Active’ in SAM

• Must be active / certified in SAM for NAICS 541612

2. Section 889 Compliance (for PRIME Offeror and Subcontractors) ‘Representations Regarding Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services and Equipment’

• Must provide completed certification of compliance for FAR provisions/clauses

52.204-24 and 52.204-26

3. Submission of all Volumes and documentation as required by the RFP.

EVALUATION FACTORS AND BASIS OF AWARD

The Government intends to award a Firm Fixed Price contract to the responsible Offeror whose proposal conforms to the RFP and will be the most advantageous to the Government, price and other non-price criteria considered. The evaluation will be based on a complete assessment of the Offeror’s proposal. The Government may select for award the Offeror whose price is higher, but whose technical proposal is more advantageous to the Government and warrants the additional price.

The Government will not make an award at a significantly higher overall price to achieve only slightly better performance capabilities. In the event two or more proposals are determined not to have any substantial technical differences (i.e., are technically equivalent), price becomes the determining factor and award may be made to the lower priced Offeror. In the event proposals are not technically equal, award may be made to other than the Offeror with the lowest priced proposal, if the Government determines that a price premium is warranted due to technical merit. The Government may also award to other than the highest technically rated proposal, if it determines that a price premium is not warranted.

Communications

The government anticipates selecting the best‐suited contractor from initial responses, without engaging in discussions with contractors. Contractors are strongly encouraged to submit their best technical solutions and price in response to this RFP.

Once the government determines the contractor that is the best‐suited (i.e., the apparent successful contractor), the government reserves the right to communicate with only that contractor to address any remaining issues, if necessary, and finalize a contract award with that contractor. These issues may include technical, management and price. If the parties cannot successfully address any remaining issues, as determined pertinent at the sole discretion of the government, the government reserves the right to communicate with the next best‐suited contractor based on the original analysis and address any remaining issues.

If a best-suited contractor cannot be determined, based on the assessment of each proposal against all evaluation criteria, the contracting officer may enter into discussions.

The Government reserves the right to reject any or all proposals received and/or request clarification or modification of proposals as appropriate.

Evaluation Process

The Government will evaluate proposals solely on the factors specified below. Award will be made to that Offeror whose combination of technical and price proposals represent the best value and is most advantageous to the Government. Proposals shall be evaluated on the following factors:

Phase I: PASS/FAIL

Compliance with ALL Volume III Administrative Requirements = PASS

Non-compliance with ANY of the administrative requirements = FAIL

Phase II: TRADE-OFF

All non-price factors for proposals remaining in the evaluation for Phase II will be rated as:

Acceptable

Good

Outstanding

This phase of the evaluation will include the proposal volume and any appendices required for the specific volume.

Factor 1: TECHNICAL CAPABILITY (includes Oral Presentations and appendices)

Factor 2: PRICE

Factor 3: ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS

Order of Importance

The evaluation of non-priced factors for Phase II evaluation are more important than price. The Government may select for award the Offeror whose price is higher, but whose technical proposal is more advantageous to the Government and warrants the additional price. The Government may award the contract resulting from this RFP without conducting discussions with Offerors; therefore, Offerors are encouraged to provide their most competitive offer with its’ initial proposal submission.

EVALUATION OF

FACTOR 1 - TECHNICAL:

Evaluation of Technical Sub-Factor 1, Technical Capability includes Oral Presentations, Milestone Plan and all Appendices):

The Government will assess its level of confidence that the contractor will successfully perform the requirements based on an assessment of its technical capability to include all applicable appendices for this factor.

The Government will evaluate the extent to which the Offeror’s described Technical

Capabilities meets the requirements of the solicitation, conveys the Offeror’s clear understanding of the requirements, and how well it indicates the probability of success in contract performance of all requirements identified in the SOO.

The Government will evaluate the Offeror's ability to successfully achieve the SOO objectives in the Offeror’s proposed PWS. Additionally, performance standards will be evaluated to determine if the proposed standards and Acceptable Quality Levels (AQL) meet agency's needs, ensure a sound approach is proposed, and meet all requirements stated.

The Offeror’s approach will be evaluated to determine how closely it documents the Offeror’s assumptions and decisions. In addition, the program milestone chart will be evaluated for the lists of core tasks and subtasks and the duration of each. These milestones shall include the timeframes for ramping up and down, preparation, and execution.

The Offeror's approach to quality control, and task performance for delivering the required services, of the stipulated quality will be evaluated. Evaluation will be based on how closely the performance measures demonstrate how the Offeror will monitor performance in each task area, any management tools they will use, how they will ensure quality products/services are delivered, and how they plan to mitigate risk.

Appendices will be evaluated to assess whether the Offeror understands the requirement and indicates a high probability of success in contract performance.

The Government will evaluate the extent to which the Offeror’s described Technical Capability in its oral presentation meets the requirements of the solicitation, conveys the Offeror’s clear understanding of the requirements, and how well it indicates the probability of success in contract performance of the tasks and any associated subtasks listed in the SOO. The offeror’s team dynamics during the oral presentation and the interactive dialog session will also be evaluated. The slides submitted for the oral presentation will be evaluated.

Evaluation of Technical Sub-Factor 2 Management & Staffing Approach

The Government will assess its level of confidence in the Management & Staffing Approach in order to gauge the practicality of the resources proposed to accomplish the requirements of the SOO.

The Government will assess:

- The Offerors’ techniques for acquiring and retaining qualified personnel, in accordance with SOO requirements, over the life of the contract.

- The Offerors’ adaptability and flexibility in fulfilling multiple positions containing varied requirements within the scope of the SOO in a reasonable time, including adequate proposed staffing that possess the minimum qualifications (experience level, education, background, and clearance) to meet the SOO requirements.

- The Offerors’ Key Personnel Qualification Matrix

- The Offerors’ Project Staffing Table

Required submission of the offerors’ identification of Key Personnel Qualification Matrix and Project Staffing Table will be reviewed in conjunction with the Technical and Management Approach to determine if the methodology adequately meets the SOO requirements.

Evaluation of Technical Sub-Factor 3, Past Experience The Government will evaluate whether the Offeror’s corporate experience as the Prime Contractor or Subcontractor provides confidence in the ability to successfully perform the requirements based on an assessment of its recent and relevant experience, along with the quality of the work performed.

Specifically, the Government will evaluate:

- The extent to which the Offeror’s experience is recent (performed within the past three (3) years) and relevant (similar in size, scope and complexity) to this requirement

- The Offeror’s experience performing management consulting services involving analysis of Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Accountability (DEIA) in large private sector organizations and/or Federal Agencies

- The quality of the work performed on all of the Offeror’s experience submissions

- Any past experience/performance experience information provided by the contractor is subject to verification and validation by the Government. The Government reserves the right to contact the government and commercial points of contact provided by the contractor, and any project officials and/or other persons who have been involved in any of the contracts listed by the contractor to verify information about similar experience and to obtain past experience/performance information.

- The government may review evaluation data located in CPARS and any other information available to the Technical Evaluation Panel.

FACTOR 2 – PRICE:

The Government will not assign an adjectival rating, but will evaluate Price with respect to accuracy, completeness, and reasonableness based on information submitted in the price volume.

Accuracy. The Government will assess the accuracy of the proposal, which involves verification that: 1) prices and/or discounts are included, 2) figures are correctly calculated and 3) Accuracy of Offeror’s completed Pricing worksheet (ATTACHMENT 02)

Reasonableness. The Government will evaluate the reasonableness of proposed prices in accordance with FAR 15.404 and may use one or more of the following methods:

1. Comparison to proposed prices in response to the solicitation.

2. Comparison to proposed prices to historical prices paid.

3. Comparison with competitive published price lists.

4. Comparison to proposed prices with the independent Government Cost

Estimate.

5. Comparison of proposed prices with prices obtained through market research for the same or similar items.

6. Analysis of data other than certified cost or pricing data provided by the

Offeror.

Completeness. The Government will evaluate price proposals for completeness by assessing the responsiveness of the proposed price, the level of detail of the Offeror-provided data for all requirements in the SOO and assessing the traceability of prices.

The Government must be able to make a direct correlation from the labor mix provided with the Technical Volumes to the Offeror’s proposed price.

FACTOR 3 – ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS

Will be evaluated in Phase I as ‘Pass’ or ‘Fail’ prior to Phase II evaluation.

NOTE:

The offeror is cautioned that any assumptions and/or exceptions to the solicitation may render the proposal unacceptable and therefore unawardable.

RFP ATTACHMENTS:

ATTACHMENT 01: Statement of Objectives

ATTACHMENT 02: Proposed Pricing Spreadsheet

ATTACHMENT 03: List of Estimated Labor Categories

ATTACHMENT 04: QASP Template

ATTACHMENT 05: OPM and Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Clauses

ATTACHMENT 06: President Biden’s EO 14035 (link below) https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/06/30/2021-14127/diversity-equity-inclusion-and-accessibility-in-the-federal-workforce https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/06/30/2021-14127/diversity-equity-inclusion-and-accessibility-in-the-federal-workforce https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/06/30/2021-14127/diversity-equity-inclusion-and-accessibility-in-the-federal-workforce