Attachment 2 - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 580 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Pipeline Leadership and Development Training
- Solicitation number
- 2026-R-035
- Issued by
-
United States Senate
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) template issued by the U.S. Senate Sergeant at Arms (SAA) for Solicitation 2026-R-035, which concerns a contract to provide comprehensive leadership training and professional development for SAA Office of Capitol Operation personnel.
The questionnaire is completed by past references—typically government agencies or companies that have previously contracted with an offeror—to evaluate the contractor's performance on relevant prior contracts. Responses must be submitted within five days of receipt to acquisitions@saa.senate.gov, Attn: Tonia Courtney, Senior Procurement and Contracting Specialist. The completed questionnaire is classified as source selection information and protected as procurement sensitive. Section A requires offerors to provide contract identification details including the contractor name, contract/task order number, contract type, project name, period of performance, and brief work description. Section B requires the reference to provide their company/agency name, role in managing the contract, contact information, and involvement timeframe. The questionnaire uses a six-point rating scale (Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory, or Not Applicable) to assess eight performance elements: fulfillment of contract requirements and specifications; schedule adherence; problem identification and corrective action effectiveness; personnel expertise and quality; key personnel selection and retention; overall program management; cost forecasting and management; and overall assessment. The form concludes with yes/no and narrative questions regarding willingness to contract again and additional performance comments.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION
PPQ V3 | May 2022
Attachment - 2
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
The U.S. Senate Sergeant at Arms (SAA) requests information in support of a contract to provide comprehensive leadership training and professional development for SAA, Office of Capitol Operation personnel - Solicitation 2026-R-035.
When complete, the information on this form is SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION and shall be protected as procurement sensitive information. Please complete this questionnaire and send within five (5) days of receipt by email to:
acquisitions@saa.senate.gov Attn: Tonia Courtney Senior Procurement and Contracting Specialist
A. Contract/Project/Task Order Information. Offeror must complete the information below regarding the contract on which the offeror is seeking a past performance reference:
Name of Offeror/Subcontractor: __________________________________________________
Contract/Task Order Number: _____________________________________________________
Contract Type: _________________________________________________________________
Project Name: _________________________________________________________________
Period of Performance: __________________________________________________________
Brief Description of Work:
mailto:acquisitions@saa.senate.gov
Attachment - 2
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION
PPQ V3 | May 2022
B. Reference Information. Reference must complete the information below regarding the contract on which the offeror is seeking a past performance reference:
Company/Agency Name: _________________________________________________________
Name of Person Completing Questionnaire: __________________________________________
Signature of Person Completing Questionnaire: _______________________________________
Your Role in Managing this Contract:_______________________________________________
Your Phone Number: ___________________________________________________________
Your Email Address: ____________________________________________________________
Time Period of Your Involvement with Contractor: ____________________________________
For each question posed below, please identify (highlight or underline) the response code which best reflects your experience with the referenced contract:
EX Exceptional -- Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Company/Agency’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
VG Very Good -- Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Company/Agency’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
S Satisfactory -- Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
MG Marginal -- Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
US Unsatisfactory -- Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
N/A Not Applicable or Not Observed
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION
PPQ V3 | May 2022
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Solicitation 2026-R-035
1. Assess the contractor’s performance fulfilling contract requirements and specifications.
EX VG S MG US N/A
Comments:
2. Assess the ability of the contractor to deliver goods and services according to contract schedules.
EX VG S MG US N/A
Comments:
3. Assess the contractor’s performance in identifying problems and taking corrective actions.
EX VG S MG US N/A
Comments:
4. Assess the overall expertise, knowledge, and quality of assigned contractor personnel.
EX VG S MG US N/A
Comments:
Attachment - 3
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION
PPQ V3 | May 2022
5. Assess the contractor’s performance in selecting, retaining, supporting, and replacing, when necessary, key personnel.
EX VG S MG US N/A
Comments:
6. Assess the effectiveness of the contractor’s overall program management.
EX VG S MG US N/A
Comments:
7. Assess the contractor’s effectiveness in forecasting and managing contractual costs.
EX VG S MG US N/A
Comments:
8. Overall assessment. EX VG S MG US N/A
Comments:
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION
PPQ V3 | May 2022
9. Would you contract with this contractor again? ( ) Yes ( ) No
If no, why not?
10. Please provide any further comments that are pertinent to the contractor’s performance.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .