Comment Matrix_MSD IDIQ_16 August.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 27 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Request for Information: New Modern Software Delivery Multiple Award IDIQ Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 2024DCCOE005
About this file
This document is a Comment Matrix related to a Request for Information (RFI) for a new Modern Software Development Multiple Award Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract opportunity from the Army Contracting Command - Aberdeen Proving Ground (ACC-APG).
The RFI seeks industry feedback on the proposed contract strategy, initial Statement of Objectives, and targeted questions. Specifically, ACC-APG is requesting suggestions on how to establish a phased source selection process to award an effective and expedited IDIQ contract to qualified contractors for software enablement efforts in support of Army systems. The RFI covers topics such as hosting contractor-provided environments, software/labor requirements, and feedback on the Performance Work Statement and contract line item structure. Responses are due by June 10, 2024, but this is an information gathering exercise and not a solicitation. No award will result from this RFI.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 19
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
General Information
Company Name
UEI Code
Point of Contact
Interest in Bidding
Is your business a small business under NAICS- 541511?
The Government is seeking additional feedback concerning Offeror's hosting their own environment for the Technical Challenge Factor.
Question 1. What are some positive aspects of this approach?
Question 2. What are some negatives of this approach?
Question 3. Would you prefer this approach or using a government provided environment in IL-2?
Question 4. What specific requirements (e.g. software, labor, time, delivery methodology, IDEs, platforms, hosting technologies, etc.) would you recommend to ensure both fairness to all offerors and for the government to adjudicate effectively and efficiently?
RFP FEEDBACK
SECTION PARAGRAPH LINE COMMENT
PWS
SECTION PARAGRAPH LINE COMMENT
LCAT
LCAT Title COMMENT
NAMED RANGES
B.1 B.2 B.3 B.4 B.4.1 B.4.2 B.4.3 B.4.4 B.4.5 B.4.5.1 B.4.5.2 B.5 B.5.1 B.5.2 B.5.3 B.5.4 F.1 F.2 G.1.1 G.1.2 G.1.3 G.1.4 G.1.5 G.2.1 G.2.2 G.3 H.1 H.2 H.3 H.4 H.5 H.6 H.7 H.8 H.9.1 H.9.2 H.9.3 H.9.4 H.9.5 H.9.6 H.10 H.11.1 H.11.2 H.12 H.13 H.14 H.15 H.16 J L.1 L.2 L.3.1 L.3.2 L.3.2.1.1 L.3.2.1.2 L.3.2.1.2 L.3.2.1.3 L.3.2.1.4 L.3.2.2 L.3.2.3 L.3.3.1 L.3.3.2 L.3.3.1 L.3.3.2 L.3.3.2.1 L.3.3.3.2.2 L.3.3.4 L.3.4.1 L.3.4.2 M.1 M.2.1 M.2.2 M.2.3 M.2.4 M.2.5 M.2.5.1 M.2.5.2 M.2.6 M.2.7 M.3
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .