2009_05_12_DPSELICENSEFY09RFR_EvaluationCriteria_AwardInfo.docx
DOCX document 11 KB Posted
- Attached to
- E-Licensing
- Solicitation number
- S116333-vCurrent
- Issued by
- Middlesex County, Suffolk County, Boston City, Chelsea City, Massachusetts
About this file
This document is an Evaluation Criteria and Award Information for a Request for Response (RFR) for the DPS E-LICENSE-FY09 project. The evaluation criteria included the vendor's ability to meet RFR requirements, experience in delivery, installation, training and support of Licensing and Inspection Systems, customer reviews or references, maintenance and support program offered, strength of the proposal, vendor presentations, cost, and compliance with the AMP. The award was granted to System Automation with a high score of 563, while the other two vendor submissions, GL Suite and Versa System, scored 467 and 491 respectively.
The pricing terms, set asides, incumbents, current environment, funding requirements and sources were not provided in this document. However, it does indicate that the DPS E-LICENSE-FY09 RFR project is a state and local contract opportunity.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| ProcurementCalendar_DPS.doc | DOC document | |
| po.doc | DOC document | |
| standard_contract_frm.doc | DOC document | |
| LicenseList_DPS.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Questions_Answers_Forum.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| ampplanform.doc | DOC document | |
| consig.doc | DOC document | |
| consltfm.doc | DOC document | |
| ctc.doc | DOC document | |
| LicensingRFR_DPS.doc | DOC document | |
| w9.doc | DOC document | |
| CostWorksheet_DPS.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| S116333-vCurrent_OD.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| eft_form.doc | DOC document |
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Evaluation Criteria
1. Ability to meet RFR requirements;
1. Experience in delivery, installation, training and support of Licensing and Inspection Systems;
1. Customer reviews or references;
1. Maintenance and support program offered;
1. Strength of proposal, including the organization, quality (e.g. typos, incomplete sentences) and completeness of bidder’s overall proposal;
1. Vendor presentations;
1. Cost; and
1. Compliance with the AMP.
The DPS E-LICENSE-FY09 RFR Award goes to System Automation with a high score of 563.
The other 2 vendor submissions; GL Suite with a score of 467 and Versa System with a score of 491.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .