Section M - Amendment 00001.pdf
PDF 12 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 2008-N-10240
About this file
Attachment to Amendment 00001 - Page 69 to Section M
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment 00001.doc | DOC document | |
| Section K - Amendment 00001.pdf | ||
| Questions and Responses for 8a 5-6-2008.pdf | ||
| Attachment J.02 - SF3881.pdf | ||
| RFTP 003 - Breast Cancer.pdf | ||
| RFTP 001 MedicareCancerAtlas.pdf | ||
| Attachment J.01 - Billing Instructions.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment J.05 - 8a Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan.doc | DOC document | |
| RFTP 002 HPV.pdf | ||
| Attachment J.06 - Non-disclosure Agreement.doc | DOC document | |
| J 10 Section 508 Annual Report.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment J.03 - NIH Contractor Performance report.pdf | ||
| Attachment J.04 - Task Order Evaluation Form.pdf | ||
| RFP1024b.pdf | ||
| RFP10240a.pdf |
Show all 15
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
2008-N-10240 Amendment No. 00001
Section M - Evaluation Factors For Award
M.1 52-216.27 Single or Multiple Awards
The Government may elect to award a single task order contract or to award multiple task order contracts for the same or similar services to two or more sources under this solicitation. The Government anticipates approximately two (2) awards will be made from this solicitation.
(End of Provision)
M.2 Evaluation of Technical Proposals
Technical Proposals will be evaluated on the basis of the following criteria:
Factor Points Scientific and Technical Approach 30 Management Plan and Personnel 25 Corporate Capability/Experience 35 Facilities and Equipment 10 Total 100
M.3 Past Performance Evaluation (Adjectival Rating System) (Jan 2000)
Past performance information will be evaluated on offerors in the competitive range in the following manner:
(a) Each offeror shall be evaluated on its past performance under current and prior contracts. By past performance, the Government means the offeror's record of conforming to specifications and to standards of good workmanship; the contractor's record of forecasting and controlling costs; the offeror's adherence to contract schedules and terms, including the administrative aspects of performance; the offeror's reputation for reasonable and cooperative behavior and commitment to customer satisfaction; and generally, the offeror's business-like concern for the interest of the customer and the degree of quality of deliverables and performance.
(b) Past performance will not be scored, but the Government's conclusions about overall quality of the offeror's past performance will be highly influential in determining the relative merits of the offeror's proposal and in selecting the offeror whose proposal is considered the most advantageous/best value to the Government.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .