Attachment J.04 - Task Order Evaluation Form.pdf
PDF 58 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 2008-N-10240
About this file
Attachment J04 Task Order Evaluation
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment 00001.doc | DOC document | |
| Section K - Amendment 00001.pdf | ||
| Questions and Responses for 8a 5-6-2008.pdf | ||
| Section M - Amendment 00001.pdf | ||
| Attachment J.02 - SF3881.pdf | ||
| RFTP 003 - Breast Cancer.pdf | ||
| RFTP 001 MedicareCancerAtlas.pdf | ||
| Attachment J.01 - Billing Instructions.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment J.05 - 8a Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan.doc | DOC document | |
| RFTP 002 HPV.pdf | ||
| Attachment J.06 - Non-disclosure Agreement.doc | DOC document | |
| J 10 Section 508 Annual Report.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment J.03 - NIH Contractor Performance report.pdf | ||
| RFP1024b.pdf | ||
| RFP10240a.pdf |
Show all 15
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Contractor Evaluation Form
Contractor Performance Evaluation Report This form is to be completed by the Technical Monitor (TM) annually.
If the project exceeds12 months, than evaluations will be done annually and at the end of the performance period. Completed evaluations are to be forwarded to Project Officer and Contracting Officer for review.
1. Contract Number 2. TO Number 3. TO Title
4. TO Award Date 5. TO Completion Date 6. Total Cost 7. TO Type: ____T&M ___FFP
___CPFF
8. A. Prime Contractor
B. Principal Subcontractor(s) (List the prime’s subcontractors that worked on the this TO)
Technical Performance
Factors/Ratings High (4)
Good (3)
Moderate (2)
Low (1)
Not Applicable
(N/A)
1. Completion of major tasks/milestones/ deliverables on schedule.
2. Responsiveness to changes in technical direction.
3. Ability to identify risk factors and alternatives for alleviating risk.
4. Ability to identify and solve problems expeditiously.
5. Ability to employ standard tools/methods (e.g.
standards, commercial products, info. engineering tools.)
Management Performance
(4)
Good (3)
Moderate (2)
Low (1)
Not Applicable
(N/A)
6. Overall communication with the Government.
7. Effectiveness and reliability of Contractor’s Key Personnel.
8. Ability to recruit and maintain qualified personnel.
9. Ability to manage multiple and diverse projects/tasks from planning through execution.
10. Ability to effectively manage subcontractors.
11. Ability to meet goals for use of Small, Small Disadvantaged, and Woman Owned Small Business subcontractors.
(4) Good (3)
Moderate (2)
Low (1)
Not Applicable
(N/A)
12. Ability to accurately estimate and control costs to complete tasks.
13. Overall performance in planning, scheduling, and monitoring.
14. Use of management tools (e.g. cost/schedule, tasks management tools).
Customer Satisfaction
(4)
Good (3)
Moderate (2)
Low (1)
Not Applicable
(N/A)
15. How would you rate the Contractor’s overall technical performance on this contract/order?
16. How would you rate the Contractor’s overall management performance on this contract/order?
17. How would you rate the Contractor’s ability to be cooperative, business-like and concerned with the interests of the customer?
9. Additional Comments:
10. Would you use contractor again? ____Y ____N (Please Explain)
11. List the Major Technical Deliverables delivered during this TO:
Title Description Date Due
Date Rec’d
Date Eval Submitted
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
12. TM Name
13. TM Signature 14. Date
15. PO Name
16. PO Signature 17. Date
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .