2-Vanguard WiFi Switch UPS Installation Score Sheet.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 55 KB Posted

Attached to
Wi-Fi/Switch Upgrade and UPS Installation
Solicitation number
VAN 2026-01
Issued by
Salt Lake County, Utah

About this file

This is an RFP evaluation scoresheet for Vanguard Academy Charter School's Wi-Fi, switch, and UPS installation project (Solicitation #VAN 2026-01). The project encompasses three sites in West Valley City, Utah: the main campus at 2650 Decker Lake Lane (75,000 square feet requiring support for approximately 1,000 wireless devices with peak capacity of 450 devices in large meeting areas), the Lakepoint expansion site at 2835 Decker Lake Drive (requiring support for approximately 150 devices with peak capacity of 100 devices), and the Middle School campus at 2691 Decker Lake Lane (46,000 square feet requiring support for approximately 500 devices with peak capacity of 300 devices in shared cafeteria/meeting space). The project requires a complete redesign and installation of internal Wi-Fi infrastructure, network switches, and uninterruptible power supply (UPS) equipment across all three locations. All work must be completed by August 12, 2026, with bidders required to conduct an onsite walkthrough of facilities and provide a detailed project timeline with clear milestones.

The evaluation process is structured in three stages with a maximum total score of 788 points. Stage 1 comprises mandatory pass/fail requirements including submission of all required documentation, completion of facility walkthroughs, budget change notification certification, timeline submission, and confirmation of ability to meet the August 12, 2026 deadline. Stage 2 contains six scoreable technical criteria weighted at 75 percent of the total evaluation (525 points maximum), covering ability to meet requirements (25 points), compatibility with existing solutions (25 points), solution features and quality alignment (20 points), business impact and integration simplicity (15 points), value-added features and scalability (10 points), and qualifications and prior experience (5 points), with a required minimum threshold of 75 percent or 393.8 points to advance. Stage 3 applies cost evaluation at 25 percent weight (263 points maximum), with the lowest-cost proposer receiving maximum points and other offerors' scores calculated using the formula: Cost Points × (Lowest Proposed Price/Proposed Price).

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Score Sheet

WiFi Switch UPS Installation
SOLICITATION #VAN 2026-01
RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET
Score will be assigned as follows:
0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed du to missing information
Firm Name:1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information
2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner
Evaluator:3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner
4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them
Date:5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP
Stage 1: Minimum Mandatory RequirementsRFP SectionEvaluation (Pass/Fail)
1Offeror certifies that the Offeror's proposal contains all required documentation.RFP
2Offeror must make an appointment with Vanguard to conduct an onsite walkthrough of facilities.RFP
3Offeror certifies that the Offeror will inform the school of any changes to the budget proposal.RFP
4Proposal must include a timeline with clear milestones.RFP
5Offeror certifies that the Offeror can meet the required deadline of completed work by August 12th, 2026.RFP

Stage 2: Scoreable Technical Criteria RFP Section Evaluator Score (0-5) Criteria Weight % of Tech Criteria Points Possible Points Earned

1Technical Category #1 (25 Points): Ability to meet all requirementsRFP2523.8%125.00.0
2Technical Category #2 (25 Points): Compatibility with existing solutionsRFP2523.8%125.00.0
3Technical Category #3 (20 Points): Proposed solution features clearly align with requested requirements with quality of service and quality solutionRFP2019.0%100.00.0
4Technical Category #4 (15 Points): Business impact, simplicity in managing new solution and integration with existing solutionsRFP1514.3%75.00.0
5Technical Category #5 (10 Points): Value added, bonus features and scalabilityRFP109.5%50.00.0
6Technical Category #6 (5 Points): Qualitifications / Prior ExperienceRFP59.5%50.00.0
100.0%525.00.0
Required Technical Point ThresholdRFP SectionMin PercentMin Points RequiredPoints EarnedPercent EarnedEvaluation
RFP75%393.80.00.0%
Final Stage: CostRFP SectionLow Cost OptionOffered CostPercent of TotalPoints PossiblePoints Earned
RFP25%263.00.0
Cost
The Offeror with the lowest total cost will receive the maximum points of 263 points. Points assigned to each Offeror’s cost proposal will be based on the lowest total cost. The Offeror with the lowest total cost will receive 263 points, or 100% of the total cost points. The formula to compute the points is: Cost Points x (Lowest Proposed Price/Proposed Price).
Total Evaluation PointsPercent of TotalPoints PossiblePoints Earned
Total Technical Evaluation Points75%525.00.0
Total Cost Evaluation Points25%263.00.0
Total Evaluation Points100%788.00.0

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .