2-Vanguard WiFi Switch UPS Installation Score Sheet.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 55 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Wi-Fi/Switch Upgrade and UPS Installation
- Solicitation number
- VAN 2026-01
- Issued by
- Salt Lake County, Utah
About this file
This is an RFP evaluation scoresheet for Vanguard Academy Charter School's Wi-Fi, switch, and UPS installation project (Solicitation #VAN 2026-01). The project encompasses three sites in West Valley City, Utah: the main campus at 2650 Decker Lake Lane (75,000 square feet requiring support for approximately 1,000 wireless devices with peak capacity of 450 devices in large meeting areas), the Lakepoint expansion site at 2835 Decker Lake Drive (requiring support for approximately 150 devices with peak capacity of 100 devices), and the Middle School campus at 2691 Decker Lake Lane (46,000 square feet requiring support for approximately 500 devices with peak capacity of 300 devices in shared cafeteria/meeting space). The project requires a complete redesign and installation of internal Wi-Fi infrastructure, network switches, and uninterruptible power supply (UPS) equipment across all three locations. All work must be completed by August 12, 2026, with bidders required to conduct an onsite walkthrough of facilities and provide a detailed project timeline with clear milestones.
The evaluation process is structured in three stages with a maximum total score of 788 points. Stage 1 comprises mandatory pass/fail requirements including submission of all required documentation, completion of facility walkthroughs, budget change notification certification, timeline submission, and confirmation of ability to meet the August 12, 2026 deadline. Stage 2 contains six scoreable technical criteria weighted at 75 percent of the total evaluation (525 points maximum), covering ability to meet requirements (25 points), compatibility with existing solutions (25 points), solution features and quality alignment (20 points), business impact and integration simplicity (15 points), value-added features and scalability (10 points), and qualifications and prior experience (5 points), with a required minimum threshold of 75 percent or 393.8 points to advance. Stage 3 applies cost evaluation at 25 percent weight (263 points maximum), with the lowest-cost proposer receiving maximum points and other offerors' scores calculated using the formula: Cost Points × (Lowest Proposed Price/Proposed Price).
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1-Vanguard All Buildings - WiFi Switch UPS 2026 RFP.docx.pdf | ||
| 3-Vanguard WiFi Switch UPS Cost Proposal.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Score Sheet
| WiFi Switch UPS Installation |
| SOLICITATION #VAN 2026-01 |
| RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET |
| Score will be assigned as follows: | |
| 0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed du to missing information | |
| Firm Name: | 1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information |
| 2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner | |
| Evaluator: | 3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner |
| 4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them | |
| Date: | 5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP |
| Stage 1: Minimum Mandatory Requirements | RFP Section | Evaluation (Pass/Fail) | |
| 1 | Offeror certifies that the Offeror's proposal contains all required documentation. | RFP | |
| 2 | Offeror must make an appointment with Vanguard to conduct an onsite walkthrough of facilities. | RFP | |
| 3 | Offeror certifies that the Offeror will inform the school of any changes to the budget proposal. | RFP | |
| 4 | Proposal must include a timeline with clear milestones. | RFP | |
| 5 | Offeror certifies that the Offeror can meet the required deadline of completed work by August 12th, 2026. | RFP |
Stage 2: Scoreable Technical Criteria RFP Section Evaluator Score (0-5) Criteria Weight % of Tech Criteria Points Possible Points Earned
| 1 | Technical Category #1 (25 Points): Ability to meet all requirements | RFP | 25 | 23.8% | 125.0 | 0.0 |
| 2 | Technical Category #2 (25 Points): Compatibility with existing solutions | RFP | 25 | 23.8% | 125.0 | 0.0 |
| 3 | Technical Category #3 (20 Points): Proposed solution features clearly align with requested requirements with quality of service and quality solution | RFP | 20 | 19.0% | 100.0 | 0.0 |
| 4 | Technical Category #4 (15 Points): Business impact, simplicity in managing new solution and integration with existing solutions | RFP | 15 | 14.3% | 75.0 | 0.0 |
| 5 | Technical Category #5 (10 Points): Value added, bonus features and scalability | RFP | 10 | 9.5% | 50.0 | 0.0 |
| 6 | Technical Category #6 (5 Points): Qualitifications / Prior Experience | RFP | 5 | 9.5% | 50.0 | 0.0 |
| 100.0% | 525.0 | 0.0 |
| Required Technical Point Threshold | RFP Section | Min Percent | Min Points Required | Points Earned | Percent Earned | Evaluation |
| RFP | 75% | 393.8 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
| Final Stage: Cost | RFP Section | Low Cost Option | Offered Cost | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned | |
| RFP | 25% | 263.0 | 0.0 | ||||
| Cost | |||||||
| The Offeror with the lowest total cost will receive the maximum points of 263 points. Points assigned to each Offeror’s cost proposal will be based on the lowest total cost. The Offeror with the lowest total cost will receive 263 points, or 100% of the total cost points. The formula to compute the points is: Cost Points x (Lowest Proposed Price/Proposed Price). |
| Total Evaluation Points | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned |
| Total Technical Evaluation Points | 75% | 525.0 | 0.0 |
| Total Cost Evaluation Points | 25% | 263.0 | 0.0 |
| Total Evaluation Points | 100% | 788.0 | 0.0 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .