2-RFQ 26-43 Vendor Submission Checklist.pdf
PDF 105 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 26-43
- Issued by
- Salt Lake County, Utah
About this file
This is a Vendor Submission Checklist for Request for Qualifications (RFQ) 26-43 issued by Murray City, Utah, in partnership with the Utah Division of Drinking Water (DDW). Murray City is soliciting Statements of Qualifications from qualified engineering firms to conduct a PFAS Evaluation and Source Development Study addressing PFOA contamination detected in the Hyland Well and 500 East Well municipal groundwater sources. The SOQ submission deadline is Monday, November 16, 2026, at 4:00 PM MT, with electronic submissions preferred through the U3P Euna platform. Required SOQ content includes a one-page cover letter, firm and personnel qualifications (1-3 pages), relevant experience addressing PFAS treatment studies and municipal drinking-water work (2-4 pages), project understanding (2-3 pages), technical approach to the Scope of Services (2-6 pages), project management and schedule (1-2 pages), and past performance references (1 page). The total SOQ submission shall not exceed 20 pages, excluding cover page and resumes.
Prospective vendors must submit mandatory certifications including signed State-provided DBE Certification and Debarment Certification forms, completed Attachment D regarding electronic signature authority, and identification of proposed subconsultants without including fees, rates, or dollar amounts. The initial SOQ must contain no pricing, fees, or dollar amounts. The Utah Division of Drinking Water has reserved up to $100,000 in Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) Emerging Contaminants funding under SRF No. 3F4319PE with 100% principal forgiveness, contingent upon DDW receiving a qualifying engineering contract identifying project tasks, timeline, and budget. A Utah-licensed Professional Engineer must be designated as responsible for the work and remain available throughout the project duration.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1-26-43 RFQ Engineering Services-PFAS Evaluation and Source Development Study.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFQ 26-43 | Vendor Submission Checklist
MURRAY CITY, UTAH
RFQ 26-43 Vendor Submission Checklist
Engineering Services - PFAS Evaluation and Source Development Study
RFQ Number 26-43
SOQ Due Monday, November 16, 2026, at 4:00 PM MT
Preferred Submission U3P Euna platform
Purchasing Contact Amandah Maudsley, Purchasing Agent
Use this checklist as a convenience. The RFQ and all attachments control if there is any difference.
1. Before Preparing the SOQ
☐ Review the complete RFQ and all attachments, including the Draft Agreement, DBE Requirements, Debarment Certification, and Attachment D Authority to Sign.
☐ Direct all solicitation questions through the Euna Procurement Q&A process or the Purchasing Agent. Do not contact City elected officials, staff, or evaluators outside the authorized process.
☐ Confirm the firm is eligible for federal award and that neither the firm nor its principals is debarred, suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded.
☐ Confirm a Utah-licensed Professional Engineer will be responsible for the work and available throughout the project.
2. Required SOQ Content
☐ Cover Letter - 1 page; include project title, RFQ number, company name, and contact information.
☐ Firm and Personnel Qualifications - 1 to 3 pages; include organization, licenses, roles, availability, and key staff/subconsultants. Resumes may be placed in an appendix and do not count toward the page limit.
☐ Relevant Experience - 2 to 4 pages; address PFAS treatment studies, groundwater source-development evaluations, municipal drinking-water work, and DWSRF/federal work.
☐ Project Understanding - 2 to 3 pages; address Murray City’s problem, decision context, major uncertainties, regulatory considerations, and data gaps.
☐ Technical Approach - 2 to 6 pages; address the Section 6 Scope of Services, including alternatives comparison and deeper-aquifer feasibility.
☐ Project Management and Schedule - 1 to 2 pages; address task sequence, coordination, quality control, availability, and ability to meet the funding deadline.
☐ Past Performance and References - 1 page; provide three comparable projects, contacts, dates, firm role, and schedule performance.
☐ Conflict disclosures and any requested exceptions to the Draft Agreement.
3. Mandatory Forms and Certifications
☐ Signed State-provided DBE Certification-Signature Page from Attachment B.
☐ Signed State-provided Debarment Certification in Attachment C.
☐ Completed Attachment D - Electronic Signature Authority and Execution Clause, including the authorized contract signer information.
☐ Identify proposed subconsultants and their roles without including fees, rates, or dollar amounts.
☐ Do not submit DBE forms containing fees, rates, or dollar amounts with the SOQ. Complete additional DBE forms only as directed by Murray City/DDW.
4. Format and Pricing Restrictions
☐ SOQ does not exceed 20 pages total, excluding the cover page and resumes.
☐ No pricing, fees, rates, or dollar amounts are included in the initial SOQ.
☐ All required forms and certifications are signed and complete.
☐ Any requested contract exception is expressly identified in the SOQ.
RFQ 26-43 | Vendor Submission Checklist
5. Submission
☐ Submit by Monday, November 16, 2026, at 2:00 PM MT.
☐ Electronic submission: upload through the U3P Euna platform and allow enough time for uploads to finish before the closing time.
☐ If mailing or hand delivering: place the SOQ in a sealed envelope labeled “RFQ 26-43, Engineering Services - PFAS Evaluation and Source Development Study, NAME OF FIRM.”
☐ Mail/hand deliver to: Murray City Corporation, Attn: Amandah Maudsley, Purchasing Agent, 10 East 4800 South, Room 155, Murray, UT 84107.
☐ Verify the complete submission was received before the deadline. Late SOQs will not be accepted.
6. Final Vendor Review
☐ RFQ number 26-43 appears on the cover letter and submission.
☐ Firm contact information is current.
☐ SOQ is organized in the order requested by Section 13.
☐ All attachments/forms required with the SOQ are included.
☐ No prohibited pricing information is included.
☐ Submission is complete and ready before the deadline.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .