1OR2098 US Courts Medford OR - RLP Amendment 3 - 8.25.23 .pdf

PDF 178 KB Posted Aug 25, 2023

Attached to: (RLP PACKAGE) General Services Administration (GSA) seeks to lease the following space in Medford, OR
Solicitation number: 1OR2098
Issued by: General Services Administration Public Buildings Service Central Office

About this file

Written by GovTribe AI · Dec 21, 2023

This document provides details regarding an amendment to a Request for Lease Proposal (RLP) issued by the General Services Administration (GSA) Public Buildings Service Central Office. The RLP seeks to lease office and related space in Medford, Oregon to house court operations. Changes listed in the amendment include adjusting the delivery date for proposals from August 15th to August 25th, 2023. The RLP specifies the required square footage and outlines requirements for parking, utilities, and lease terms. Interested parties are advised to carefully review the amendment notice for updated submission deadlines and specifications.

View the file

Other files

File	Type	Posted
1OR2098 US Courts Medford OR - RLP Amendment 9 -1 28 25.pdf	PDF	Jan 28, 2025
1OR2098_Exhibit F_Wage Rates_1.10.25.pdf	PDF	Jan 28, 2025
Procurement Summary_8.21.2024.pdf	PDF	Aug 21, 2024
1OR2098 US Courts Medford OR - RLP Amendment 8 -8 21 24.pdf	PDF	Aug 21, 2024
1OR2098 US Courts Medford OR - RLP Amendment 7 - 3 18 2024.pdf	PDF	Mar 19, 2024
1OR2098 US Courts Medford OR - RLP Amendment 6 - 1.11.24.pdf	PDF	Jan 11, 2024
1OR2098 US Courts Medford OR - RLP Amendment 5 -11.2.23.pdf	PDF	Nov 7, 2023
1OR2098 US Courts Medford OR - RLP Amendment 4 - 9.20.23 .pdf	PDF	Sep 20, 2023
1OR2098 US Courts Medford OR - RLP Amendment 2 - 8.11.23 .pdf	PDF	Aug 11, 2023
1OR2098 US Courts Medford OR - RLP Amendment 1 -8.10.23.pdf	PDF	Aug 10, 2023
Ex 8_SF330-21 Resume Format.pdf	PDF	Aug 4, 2023
1OR2098_RLP_ Final 8-4-23.pdf	PDF	Aug 4, 2023
Exhibit 12 Medford DAM August 2023.pptx	PPTX presentation	Aug 4, 2023
Ex F_DOL Wage Determination.pdf	PDF	Aug 4, 2023
Ex D_Security Requirements (FSL Level IV).pdf	PDF	Aug 4, 2023
Ex 4_FPLS Prelease Evaluation Form 12000.pdf	PDF	Aug 4, 2023
Ex 3_GSA 1364 - Proposal to Lease Space.pdf	PDF	Aug 4, 2023
Ex 9_Seismic Forms A - F with Instructions.pdf	PDF	Aug 4, 2023
1OR2098_Ex A_Lease_Final 8-4-23.pdf	PDF	Aug 4, 2023
Sensitive Information Document Request pdf.pdf	PDF	Aug 4, 2023
Ex 2_GSA Form 1217 Lessors Annual Cost Statement.pdf	PDF	Aug 4, 2023
Ex 6_GSAR Representation 552.270-33.pdf	PDF	Aug 4, 2023
Ex 5_FAR 52.204-24 Representation.pdf	PDF	Aug 4, 2023
Ex E_3517B General Clauses - Prelim Injunction.pdf	PDF	Aug 4, 2023
Ex 11_Byte Dance FAR Clause 52.204-27.pdf	PDF	Aug 4, 2023
Ex 1_GSA Form 3516 Solicitation Provisions.pdf	PDF	Aug 4, 2023
Ex 10_Pre NEPA Questionaire.pdf	PDF	Aug 4, 2023

Show all 27

On GovTribe

Work with this file

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

��'()*(+,-./0-1(2+(-30/4/+25-6/7-89':;<=-2>?-1(2+(-@ABC8;3C19';;DDD��&��E�� E�� F(?./0?G-9'7-�

B*HC4202I024J+-87;K-LG-M7;:-L:-2>?-,J(-N/O(0-42I(-?*(-?2,(-/.-'13-6/7-89':;<=-20(-J(0(HP-?(5(,(?-2>?-0(452N(?-QR,J-,JR+- '13-LS(>?S(>,7--TJ2>I(+-20(-5R+,(?-J(0(-./0-N/>O(>R(>N(-2+-./55/Q+-UNJ2>I(+-H/5?(?VW

X �Y� �� Z-<[::[:;:M\

X��]��̂�_��̀ ��a� �"b�_��c� _��d

�� _&��e��$��E�� E&��E�� &��Ef�$�g� hijklmno-6plm 6i7--iq-3prms tuvwxwo

��y�z��z��%%%�c_��d %{ �

Y�� |

�$��EZ}��

Y��

��E� ��Z�� Y��̂~ �� a y��̀� ��{��|!�y�� b a��$��a�� y��̀� ��{�]!��E�� Y�� ] � y��̀�

��E��cy��̀� ��]%d % � y��̀� ��E��Z�bY�� E��|��$�c�� |d�c��E�� E� �� d

�̀��{��%z�%!�� _��E��E��~�� Y��E�� Y�E�� b y��{{��z��̀� ��$��e�� &��̀��E��$�� E� ��Z��E��

�f�

��E�� E�� &�Ef��#�̀� ��̀ ��z��̀�

��E��

�z�b��

�̀�� {��%z�� a�� e��&� ��Z� ��

32+,-3(0./0S2>N(-'(.(0(>N(-TJ(N� M 8M

��b b̂�_��̀ ��b��b��c� _��d

��&��z�� & ��c��dg

�� E�� e� ��E�� &��B(4,(SH(0-::G-:;:M!��g��"!��E��E�_��

�b b̂�_��̀ ��"b�a"b�_�� ̂��b�b|�� baybag

�̀ b̀��}��̂y��_��bg�� a�_bg��

PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE CHECK

General Services Administration

Project 1OR2098 Medford, OR

I. YOU ARE BEING CONTACTED FOR A REFERENCE REGARDING THE

PERFORMANCE OF:

(OFFEROR INSTRUCTIONS: Fill in the name of the Offering Entity. If the reference is for a Key Person on the Development Team, fill in the name of the Offeror AND the Key Personnel. Fill in their role in the referenced project as well as the project identifier (building name, address, and city. See RLP Section 4 for additional instructions.)

II. Project Name:

Project Address:

City and State:

Type of Project:

Square Footage:

III. Name of Company OR Government Agency Employing Reference:

Name and Title of Individual Providing Reference Responses:

Phone Number: email address:

Current Address:

Was this design/build? ____________________

Does the information in II above accurately describe your project, and if not, please explain.

1. What was your role in the project?

2. What was the duration of the project?

3. Please describe the types of services the firm/person provided:

As applicable to the role he or she had on the team, please provide responses to the following questions using a scale of 0 to 10 with zero being the lowest rating and 10 being the highest rating.

9-10 Significantly Exceeded Expectations 7-8 Met and to Some Extent Exceeded Expectations 5-6 Met Expectations 3-4 Did Not Fully Meet Expectations 0-2 Failed to Meet Expectations

III. QUALITY OF BUILDING AND SERVICES

BUILDING

1. a. For the building, how satisfied were you with workmanship, quality of materials used and overall appearance?

Circle one / OR ENTER RATING

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Rating: _ _

b. What could have improved your score?

2. a. For the interior spaces, how satisfied were you with the efficiency of the space and flexibility for future space changes?

SERVICES

3. For the person named above, how satisfied were you with his or her time commitment to the project?

4. For the person named above, how satisfied were you with the quality of his or her project management methods

(or design if the person named above was an architectural designer) and his or her response to unanticipated problems?

IV. COST CONTROL

5. For the person named above, how satisfied were you with his or her commitment to your budget?

6. How satisfied were you with the handling and pricing of change orders?

V. TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE

7. a. How satisfied were you with his or her ability to stay on schedule?

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Rating: __

8. a. How satisfied were you with his or her ability to respond to any of your questions and comments in a timely manner?

VI. BUSINESS RELATIONS

9. a. For the person named above, how satisfied were you with his or her working relationship between the project team members?

10. a. How satisfied were you with his or her problem resolution skills?

11. (Complete this if you are providing a reference for the Offeror only and if the referenced project was a

Government contract requiring a subcontracting plan.) Did the firm meet subcontractor and Small Disadvantaged Business goals and file the required 294’s and 295’s? _______

YES NO

12. Were any claims or mechanics liens filed in connection with this project? _______

If yes, please explain:

13. a. Would you contract with them again? _______

b. What is your overall score for the person named above? _______

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

c. What could have improved your score?

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated Aug 25, 2023.