19AQMM26R0012 00001.pdf

Document Number: 19AQMM26R0012 PROCESSED Page 1 of 7

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE RATING

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

01/22/2026

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

AGA__CODE

GLOBAL ACQUISITION (A/GA)

1200 Wilson Blvd, SA-6B

ATTN: A/GA

ARLINGTON, VA 22209

US

Ryan C. Edwards

NAME

TEL.

EdwardsRC@state.gov

EMAIL

6. ISSUED BY GAAMCODE

Maintenance Operations

GA/AM/DMS/FAC/MO

Bureau of Global Acquisitions 1200 Wilson Blvd (SA-06B) Arlington, VA 22209

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

19AQMM26R0012

CODE FACILITY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, country, state and ZIP Code) (X)

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

01/12/2026

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER

NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X XThe above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended, Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods: (a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning __1__copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment your desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT

ORDER NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return _______ copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

The purpose of this amendment is to accomplish the following:

1. Provide responses to questions received.

2. Revised RFP language L-002 Factor 1 from 90 days to 365 days.

3. Revised FAR 52.236-1 to change the percentage from 51% to 35%

4. Increase the Volume I: Technical Volume from 15 pages to 20 pages

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

Meghan E. Klipfel

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR 15C. DATE SIGNED

By (Signature of Contracting Officer)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 16C. DATE SIGNED

01/22/2026

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

Previous edition unusable

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV.

11/2016) Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

CGFS // CGFS

Document Number: 19AQMM26R0012 PROCESSED Page 2 of 7

Table of Contents

Section Description Page Number

I Contract Clauses 52.236-1 Performance of Work by the Contractor (Apr 1984) 52.247-63 Preference for U.S.-Flag Air Carriers (Jan 2025)

L Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors and Respondents L-002 Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors

Document Number: 19AQMM26R0012 PROCESSED Page 3 of 7

Line Item Summary

Solicitation Number:

19AQMM26R0012

Contract Number: Title:

A/DOES Domestic Light DB D-B-B

Date of Solicitation:

01/22/2026

CLIN Funding: Cost:

Base Totals: Original: $0.00

Change: $0.00

Current: $0.00

Original: $0.00

Change: $0.00

Current: $0.00

Exercised Options Totals: Original: $0.00

Change: $0.00

Current: $0.00

Original: $0.00

Change: $0.00

Current: $0.00

Unexercised Options Totals: Original: $0.00

Change: $0.00

Current: $0.00

Original: $0.00

Change: $0.00

Current: $0.00

Base and Options Totals: Original: $0.00

Change: $0.00

Current: $0.00

Original: $0.00

Change: $0.00

Current: $0.00

Section I - Contract Clauses

52.236-1 - Performance of Work by the Contractor (Apr 1984)

The Contractor shall perform on the site, and with its own organization, work equivalent to at least thirty five (35)[insert the appropriate number in words followed by numerals in parentheses] percent of the total amount of work to be performed under the contract. This percentage may be reduced by a supplemental agreement to this contract if, during performing the work, the Contractor requests a reduction and the Contracting Officer determines that the reduction would be to the advantage of the Government.

(End of clause)

52.247-63 - Preference for U.S.-Flag Air Carriers (Jan 2025)

(a) Definitions. As used in this clause--

International air transportation means transportation by air between a place in the United States and a place outside the United States or between two places both of which are outside the United States.

United States means the 50 States, the District of Columbia, and outlying areas.

U.S.-flag air carrier means an entity granted authority to provide air transportation in the form of a certificate of public convenience and necessity under 49 U.S.C. 41102.

(b) U.S. Government-financed international air transportation. 49 U.S.C. 40118, Government-financed air transportation (commonly referred to as the Fly America Act), requires that all Federal agencies and Government contractors and subcontractors use U.S.-flag air carriers for U.S. Government-financed international air transportation of personnel (and their personal effects) or property, to the extent that service by those carriers is available. It requires the General Services Administration to issue regulations that, in the absence of satisfactory proof of the necessity for foreign-flag air transportation, disallow expenditures from funds, appropriated or

Document Number: 19AQMM26R0012 PROCESSED Page 4 of 7 otherwise established for the account of the United States, for international air transportation secured aboard a foreign-flag air carrier if a U.S.-flag air carrier is available to provide such services.

(c) Use of U.S.-flag carriers for international air transportation. If available, the Contractor, in performing work under this contract, shall use U.S.-flag carriers for international air transportation of personnel (and their personal effects) or property.

(d) Statement of unavailability of U.S.-flag air carriers. In the event that the Contractor selects a carrier other than a U.S.-flag air carrier for international air transportation, the Contractor shall include a statement on vouchers involving such transportation essentially as follows:

Statement of Unavailability of U.S.-Flag Air Carriers

International air transportation of persons (and their personal effects) or property by U.S.-flag air carrier was not available or it was necessary to use foreign-flag air carrier service for the following reasons (see section 47.403 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation):

[State reasons]:

N/A

(End of statement)

(e) Subcontracts. The Contractor shall include the substance of this clause, including this paragraph (e), in each subcontract or purchase under this contract that may involve international air transportation.

(End of clause)

Section L - Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors and Respondents

L-002 - Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors

Detailed Proposal Instructions

This section provides detailed instructions for preparing proposals. Offerors are required to submit a Volume I: Technical Proposal and a Volume II: Price Proposal. All proposals are to be e-mailed to Meghan Klipfel at KlipfelME@state.gov and Ryan Edwards at EdwardsRC@state.gov. The Offeror shall state, explain, and justify any deviations, exceptions, or conditional assumptions taken regarding any of the instructions or requirements of this solicitation in the appropriate volume of the offer.

Proposal Format The Volume I: Technical Proposal shall not contain any reference to price beyond the planned compensation plan of employees. The offeror shall also note in both Volumes, the offeror shall identify which zone they intend to submit their proposal for (Zone 1, 2, 3, or NCR). The offeror shall identify in their technical proposal and in their proposal submission email the Zone they are submitting the proposal for. The shall only submit a proposal for one (1) zone.

General Submit all required documentation on sequentially numbered 8-1/2" by 11" fomatted document. All submittals must use Times New Roman type of at least 12-point (10-point text in graphics) with 1” margins and the word document or pdf must be searchable. The technical proposal (Factors 1-3) and the price proposal shall be submitted in separate volumes. The two volumes should include a the cover page containing the offeror's name, point of contact submitting the offer, address, Tax ID, RFP number, and the UEI and CAGE code of the offeror. Resumes are limited to no more than 4 pages and are excluded from the page limit. The written technical proposal shall not exceed 15 20 pages. Landscape orientation may be used for graphics or tables. The technical proposal must address the three (3) evaluation areas: Factor 1: Demonstrated Experience, Factor 2: Technical/Management Approach, and Factor 3: Safety Program. For Factors 1-3 the following adjectival ratings will be used to provide a rating of the offeror's technical solution to meeting the requirements as outlined in Attachment 1 - Statement of Work

Table 1-1

Document Number: 19AQMM26R0012 PROCESSED Page 5 of 7

Rating Description Superior Proposal meets all solicitation requirements, demonstrates a good understanding of the requirements and has features that offer some advantage to the Government. Advantages/strengths generally outweigh any disadvantages/weaknesses.

Acceptable Proposal meets basic solicitation requirements and demonstrates an adequate understanding of the requirements but does not offer significant advantages to the Government over basic RFP requirements. Disadvantages/weaknesses are not significant, unless significant advantages are proposed that outweigh significant disadvantages. Where there were areas of concern, clarifications given by offeror, were acceptable.

Marginal Proposal does not clearly meet all requirements, nor does it demonstrate an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. The proposal has one or more weaknesses which may require correction. Some areas of concern may not have been fully addressed by offeror, leaving some ambiguities.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet requirements and contains one or more deficiencies. Proposal is unawardable without being rewritten.

Technical risk shall be rated using the ratings listed in Table 1-2

Table 1-2 Rating Description Low Has little potential for disruption of schedule, increased cost or degradation of performance. There is a high level of confidence that normal contractor effort and normal Government monitoring will be able to overcome any difficulties.

Moderate Has moderate potential for disruption of schedule, increased cost or degradation of performance. Special contractor emphasis and close Government monitoring will likely be able to overcome difficulties.

High Is likely to cause significant disruption of schedule, increased cost or degradation of performance. Is unlikely to overcome any difficulties, even with special contractor emphasis and close Government monitoring.

Past Performance the following adjectival ratings will be used to provide a rating on the offeror's past performance and the relevance it has on the requirements outlined in Attachment 1 - Statement of Work. The offeror shall provide a copy of Attachment 5 - Past Performance Questionnaire to their prior customers for completion. The customer must directly submit the questionnaire to the CO and CS. Any PPQs included in the offeror's technical volume or sent directly from the offeror to the CO or CS will be removed and not considered for evaluation.

Table 1-3 Past Performance Relevancy Considerations Rating Description Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved comparable scope and magnitude of effort and complexities as this solicitation requires.

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved much of the magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

The past performance information submitted on Attachment 5 - Past Performance Questionnaire will be reviewed to determine the quality and usefulness as it applies to performance confidence assessment.

Table 1-4 Performance Confidence Assessments

Document Number: 19AQMM26R0012 PROCESSED Page 6 of 7

Rating Description Substantial Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. It is unlikely that Government intervention will be needed in order to obtain the required product/service.

Satisfactory Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. Little Government intervention is expected to be needed in order to obtain the required product/service.

Unknown Confidence (Neutral) No recent/relevant performance record is available, or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

Limited Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. Some Government intervention is expected to be needed in order to obtain the required product/service.

No Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, substantial doubt exists that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Factor 1: Demonstrated Experience A detailed description of the relevant project experience. The offeror shall describe the number and scope of similar projects completed in the last five (5) years. The description shall include the project size, scope, complexity, specific challenges faced, and how the offeror overcame the challenges. The offeror shall also include the qualifications and experience of key personnel, including project managers, engineers, and site supervisors. The offeror shall also demonstrate the stability of the firm by including the number of years in business, financial stability, and the capacity to manage and work multiple projects concurrently. The offeror shall provide a copy of the latest financial report. The offeror shall also provide evidence of bonding capability and availability to the value of the proposed price in Section B. Evidence submitted must be dated within no more than 90 365 days before proposal submission. Lastly, the offeror shall highlight any relevant certifications (e.g. LEED, ISO, etc.) to demonstrate a commitment to quality and sustainability.

Factor 2: Technical/Management Approach The offeror shall demonstrate a clarity and depth of understanding of requirements and objectives needed for similar projects. The offeror shall identify the proposed construction techniques, technologies, and innovations being employed for this requirement. This includes how the offeror will approach scheduling, cost control, and quality assurance. The offeror shall identify potential risks and proposed mitigation strategies, including but not limited to, safety protocols and contingency planning. The offeror shall annotate its approach to sustainable construction practices, waste management, and energy efficiency when performing the construction required by Attachment 1 – Statement of Work. Proposals involving joint ventures and/or subcontractors shall clearly state the tasks or work to be performed by each team member and how the prime contractor will ensure Government satisfaction with the team. Proposed lines of responsibility, authority, and communication through which the tasks will be managed, and the procedures that will be used to ensure quality control, cost/performance control, and tracking procedures shall be laid out in the proposal.

If the proposal involves a joint venture the offeror shall also describe the role of both parties in the joint venture and also identify the type and percentage of work assigned to each joint venture member. Organizations that wish to rely upon the experience or financial resources of any other legally related entity or organization, including parent companies, subsidiaries, or other related firms, must do so by way of a JV.

NOTE: Offerors, including any offeror organized as a joint venture, must have an active SAM registration at the time of proposal submission and throughout the procurement process. Any offeror whose registration is not active in SAM at the time of proposal submission will be excluded from the process and their proposals will not be evaluated.

Factor 3: Safety Program The offeror shall demonstrate clearly defined goals for promoting saftey and preventing accidents on site. The offeror shall also demonstrate compliance with regulations and the offeror shall address incident reporting and investigation of safety incidents, including how incidents will be tracked and investigated.

Past Performance Questionnaire

Document Number: 19AQMM26R0012 PROCESSED Page 7 of 7

The offeror shall use Attachment 5 - Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) to be evaluated for this Factor. The PPQ shall only be for similar projects completed within the last five (5) years and for projects in similar size, scope, and complexity. If the offeror fails toprovide a PPQ or does not have Past Performance history, they will be assigned a "Neutral" rating.

Price Evaluation:

The offeror shall provide pricing for all labor categories included on Attachment 2: Section B Pricing Spreadsheet and Attachment 3: Total Evaluated Price. The offeror shall base it's fully burdened labor rates for the followng cities for each zone to ensure a fair evaluation. Zone 1: Blackstone, VA; Zone 2: Charleston, SC; Zone 3: Denver, CO; and NCR: Washington D.C. The fully burdened labor rates will be used only for price analysis at the IDIQ level and the Government will issue the applicable Davis Bacon Act Wage Determination and evaluate prices for each task order request for proposal submission based on the location of the specific project.The offeror shall provide pricing for all labor categories for the proposal to be determined compliant.