19AQMM22R0150_Attachment 4_PPQs.docx
DOCX document 38 KB Posted
- Attached to
- INL Bogota - Mid-Range UAS IDIQ Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 19AQMM22R0150
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire template for a solicitation seeking a single award IDIQ contract for mid-range unmanned aircraft systems and related services to support INL Bogota. The solicitation number is 19AQMM22R0150 and is being issued by the Department of State Office of Acquisition Management. Offerors are required to submit completed past performance questionnaires from references as part of their proposals. The questionnaire collects information on the offeror's contract performance including quality, schedule, cost control, and business relations. It also requests an overall performance rating and commentary. Responses are due by the date specified in the RFP and must be emailed to the contracting officer point of contact. The scope of work involves delivery of mid-range UAS, training, local warranty, maintenance, and other unspecified services. Subcontractor utilization and performance must also be described.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 19AQMM22R0150_0003.pdf | ||
| 19AQMM22R0150_QandAs_20230221.pdf | ||
| 19AQMM22R0150_0002.pdf | ||
| 19AQMM22R0150_Attachment 2 Rev02_Specifications.pdf | ||
| 19AQMM22R0150_QandAs_20230207.pdf | ||
| 19AQMM22R0150_QandAs_20230201.pdf | ||
| 19AQMM22R0150_0001.pdf | ||
| 19AQMM22R0150_Attachment 2 Rev01_Specifications.pdf | ||
| 19AQMM22R0150_Attachment 2A_CONOPs.pdf | ||
| 19AQMM22R0150_Question Template.docx | DOCX document | |
| 19AQMM22R0150_Attachment 2_Specifications.pdf | ||
| 19AQMM22R0150_Attachment 7_Form W14.pdf | ||
| 19AQMM22R0150_Attachment 5_SubK Consent Letter.docx | DOCX document | |
| 19AQMM22R0150_RFP.pdf | ||
| 19AQMM22R0150_Attachment 3_INL Blanket Waivers.pdf | ||
| 19AQMM22R0150_Attachment 6_Pricing Table.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
Show all 16
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
19AQMM22R0150 – ATTACHMENT 4 – 21 OCTOBER 2022
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 AND FAR 3.104
WHEN COMPLETED, FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
ATTACHMENT 4 – 21 OCTOBER 2022
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Offeror Instructions: Complete Transmittal Letter and Section 1 of the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) and send to the assessor(s). Ensure assessor returns a copy of the completed questionnaire to the Department of State POCs identified below prior to the solicitation closing date and time.
Assessor Instructions: Confirm accuracy and completeness of Section 1 of the PPQ. Complete Section 2 of the PPQ and submit Sections 1 and 2 directly to the Contracting Officers. Do not forward a copy of the completed questionnaire to the vendor whose performance you are evaluating. To be considered, the information must be received by the Government prior to the solicitation closing date and time.
INSERT DATE
| TO: | Assessor Name |
| Agency / Organization Name | |
| Address |
| FROM: | Company Name |
| Address |
SUBJECT: Past Performance Questionnaire for (PROGRAM TITLE/DESCRIPTION) concerning contract number (CONTRACT AND ORDER NUMBER (IF APPLICABLE) TO BE EVALUATED). The effort was performed by (SPECIFIC ENTITY THAT PERFORMED THE WORK) under (CAGE code/DUNS#).
1. We are currently responding to the US Department of State’s Request for Proposal (RFP) 19AQMM22R0150 for Group 1 UAS (20 – 60 Miles) and related services. The Government is placing increased emphasis on past performance in order to obtain best value in source selections.
2. We have identified the subject contract as relevant to this acquisition and you as our POC. As such, please take a few moments of your time to fill out the attached questionnaire and forward it directly to the US Department of State. DO NOT RETURN THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO US. The information contained in the completed questionnaire is considered Source Selection Information (See FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104) and may not be released to us.
3. The completed questionnaire (Sections 1 and 2) should be sent directly to the US Department of State not later than (DATE TO BE INSERTED BY OFFEROR). The questionnaires must be emailed to FernandezJM@state.gov.
4. If you have any questions regarding the questionnaire, you may contact Juan M. Fernandez of the US Department of State at (305) 718-4291 or via email at FernandezJM@state.gov. Thank you for your timely assistance.
Sincerely, (TITLE AND NAME OF COMPANY OFFICIAL)
Attachment: Past Performance Questionnaire
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SECTION 1 – TO BE COMPLETED BY OFFEROR
This Past Performance Questionnaire is submitted in response to solicitation 19AQMM22R0150 as part of <insert name of prime offeror> proposal.
1. Company Information: Include name, address, and cage code of company (i.e. offeror, partner, or major subcontractor) for which this reference will be provided.
2. Program Title:
3. Contract Number (including Delivery Order number if applicable):
4. Contract Award Basis: |_| Competitive |_| Non-Competitive
5. Contract Date:
6. Role: |_| Prime Contractor |_| Subcontractor |_| Other: (Specify)
If other than a prime contractor, provide the prime contractor’s name, address, and cage code:
7. Name and Address of Contracting Activity / Customer:
8. Primary Points of Contact: Offeror is responsible for exerting its best efforts to ensure that current information is provided for all individuals. If this is a commercial reference Offeror should change the Title, if appropriate, to commercial equivalents.
| Title |
| Name |
| Phone |
1. PCO
2. ACO
3. COR / CORT
4. Other (Please Specify)
9. Contract Type(s): List all that apply (e.g. FFP, FPIF, CPFF, CPIF, LH, T&M).
10. Contract Value:
a. Awarded Total Contract Value:
(Including all options)
b. Current Total Contract Value:
(Including all options)
c. Explanation for difference between awarded and current contract values:
11. Period of Performance:
a. Current (including all exercised options): MM/DD/YEAR to MM/DD/YEAR
b. Potential (including all options): MM/DD/YEAR to MM/DD/YEAR
12. Place of Performance: List all that apply.
13. Scope of work
a. Describe work performed by the company named in item 1 above:
b. Relevancy:
| Type of Product / Service Provided |
| Brief Description of Effort. Include Brand, Model, and Quantity of Items Delivered. |
|_| Mid-Range UAS
|_| Training
|_| Local Warranty
|_| Local Maintenance
|_| Other (Describe)
USE OF SUBCONTRACTORS / PARTNERS
List the name, address, and UEI number of any subcontractors or partners utilized in performing the above contract reference.
For each subcontractor / partner listed describe the work performed by each.
14. What were key positive attributes about your performance?
15. What were the less than positive attributes and how were these resolved? The offeror is required to clearly demonstrate management actions employed in overcoming problems and the effects of those actions in terms of improvements achieved or problems rectified. Comment on any known performance deemed unacceptable to the customer, or not in accordance with the contract terms and conditions.
16. Has this contract been partially or completely terminated for cause or convenience?
|_| Yes |_| No
If yes, please provide additional details:
17. Are there any pending terminations?
|_| Yes |_| No
If yes, please provide additional details:
SECTION 2 – TO BE COMPLETED BY ASSESSOR
Your feedback is requested by the US Department of State, Office of Acquisition Management. In efforts to expedite receipt of the requested information, the Contracting Officer respectfully requests that you do not mail hard copies. Instead, please e-mail the completed questionnaire (both Section 1 and Section 2) to FernandezJM@state.gov. You may contact Juan M. Fernandez at (202) 255-2328 should you have any questions.
DO NOT RETURN THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO THE OFFEROR. The information contained in the completed questionnaire is considered Source Selection Information (See FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104) and may not be released to the Offeror.
EVALUATED BY:
I, the undersigned, being familiar with the work and the performing organization I’m providing information about, have responded to the best of my knowledge and belief. I understand that a representative of the Department of State may contact me for confirmation of my responses to this questionnaire.
| Name and Title: |
| _____________________________ |
| Organization: |
| _____________________________ |
| Signature: |
| _____________________________ |
| Date: |
| _____________________________ |
1. Is the information completed by the Offeror in Section 1 of this questionnaire complete, current, and accurate?
If no, please explain:
2. Performance Evaluation
Assign a rating to each area based on the ratings guidelines below. Please provide a narrative explanation for any unsatisfactory or exceptional rating.
| EXCEPTIONAL (E) |
| Performance exceeded contractual requirements. |
| SATISFACTORY (S) |
| Performance met contractual requirements. |
| UNSATISFACTORY (U) |
| Performance did not meet contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. |
| NOT APPLICABLE (N/A) |
| Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect. Do not know. |
a. Quality of Services:
| E |
| S |
| U |
| N/A |
1. Performance conformed to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g. commonly accepted technical, professional standards).
2. Contractor provided accurate and complete reports and other documentation.
3. Contractor was proactive in identifying, notifying the Government, and resolving performance issues/concerns.
b. Compliance with Schedule:
| E |
| S |
| U |
| N/A |
1. Contractor delivered products and performed services in a timely manner.
2. Contractor provided contract reports and deliverables on time.
c. Cost Control:
| E |
| S |
| U |
| N/A |
1. Contractor completed performance within the established cost parameters.
2. Contractor invoices were current, accurate, and complete.
3. Contractor actions resulted in cost savings to the Government without sacrificing quality of supplies / services or schedule.
d. Business Relations:
| E |
| S |
| U |
| N/A |
1. Contractor has a history of reasonable and cooperative behavior and effective business relations.
2. Contractor is dedicated to customer satisfaction.
3. Contractor has a history of submitting viable and timely proposals for required contract modifications or delivery orders.
4. Contractor effectively adapts to changes in mission requirements and priorities.
e. Management
| E |
| S |
| U |
| N/A |
1. Contractor effectively managed all subcontractors.
3. Identify the contractor’s overall strengths and weaknesses:
4. Would you have any concerns working with this firm again?
If yes, please explain:
5. Additional information not included above:
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 AND FAR 3.104
WHEN COMPLETED, FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .