191NLE26Q0091 Attach A RFQ SOW INL Haiti Urban Ops.pdf
PDF 322 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 191NLE26Q0091
About this file
Request for Quote Summary: Tactical Operations in Urban Terrain Training
This is a Request for Quote (RFQ) and Statement of Work (SOW) issued by the Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs (INL) under the U.S. Department of State for tactical operations training in Haiti (solicitation number 191NLE26Q0091). The Government seeks a single firm fixed-price contract award to deliver a comprehensive six-week Tactical Operations in Urban Terrain training program to the Haitian National Police (HNP) recruits. The training will be integrated into weeks 9-14 of the HNP's basic recruit curriculum and delivered to three consecutive recruit courses (Courses 37, 38, and 39), each comprising approximately 1,200 recruits organized into six companies of 200 recruits. The vendor must deploy international instructors, project management staff, and language assistants supported by previously trained HNP instructors to deliver six sequential training modules: (1) Weapons Handling and Individual Movement Techniques, (2) Squad-Level Formations and Urban Patrolling, (3) Room Clearance and Defensive Position Fortification, (4) Vehicle Checkpoints and Search Procedures, (5) Pistol Training and Qualification, and (6) Rifle Training and Qualification. Training will include pre- and post-assessments, weekly evaluations, weapons qualification testing, and coordination with HNP leadership through weekly planning meetings and monthly stakeholder sessions.
The solicitation is designated as a Small Business Set Aside under NAICS 541611 (Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services) with a size standard of $24,500,000. The question and answer period closes on Friday, May 29, 2026 at 10:00 A.M. (Washington D.C. time), and proposals must be submitted by Wednesday, June 10, 2026 at 10:00 A.M. (Washington D.C. time). Quotes must remain valid for 90 days from the closing date. The contract period of performance is one year, with training taking place at the Recruit Training Centre (École Nationale de Police) in Port-au-Prince. Vendors must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM.gov) prior to award. The Government will evaluate proposals on a best-value basis considering six factors: (1) Strong In-Country Presence (Haiti), (2) Deployment Timeline (30-day requirement), (3) Training Delivery Approach, (4) Training Team/Staffing Pattern, (5) Past Performance (requiring 2-3 references from the past 36 months), and (6) Cost/Price. Technical proposals (Volume I) are limited to 30 pages and must include detailed approaches for training delivery, in-country experience, deployment timeline, staffing plans with key personnel résumés, and past performance profiles. Cost proposals (Volume II) must provide detailed line-item budgets including personnel labor categories with hourly rates and hours, other direct costs, travel, and indirect cost rates. The Government reserves the right to award without discussions and will not conduct formal debriefings. All training materials, documents, and records become the exclusive property of the U.S. Government, and contractors are bound by strict confidentiality and unauthorized disclosure provisions. The contract price is fixed and will not be subject to adjustment for escalations, currency fluctuations, or contractor estimation errors; the price shall include all direct and indirect costs, profit, shipping, export requirements, and insurance.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Answers 191NLE26Q0091 INL Haiti Urban Tactical.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Questions 191NLE26Q0091.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 191NLE26Q0091 Signed.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
INL/Haiti
191NLE26Q0091
Request for Quote/Statement of Work
Tactical Operations in Urban Terrain Training
LIST OF SECTIONS AND APPENDICES
Section 1 - Solicitation Considerations Section 2 - Submission Information Pertaining to Request for Quote Section 3 - Quote Submission Format and Requirements Section 4 - Statement of Work (SOW) Section 5 - Basis of Award and Evaluation Criteria
Appendix A - Past Performance Profile
(Rest of Page Intentionally Left Blank)
SECTION 1
SOLICITATION CONSIDERATIONS
SYSTEM FOR AWARD MANAGEMENT
This solicitation requires registration with the System for Award Management (SAM) prior to award, pursuant to FAR 4.1102 and other applicable regulations and guidelines. Information can be found at www.sam.gov.
TRADE AGREEMENTS ACT (19 U.S.C. 2512(A)) (TAA)
Pursuant to the Trade Agreements Act (19 U.S.C. 2512(a)) (TAA), Federal acquisitions of supplies may be made only from offerors that shall supply products of an eligible country under any of the free trade agreements entered into pursuant to the TAA. An article is considered a product of a country only if it is wholly a product of that country or if it has been, substantially transformed, in that country into a new and different article of commerce with a name, character, or use distinct from that of the original article(s). Note that any item that is a discreet article as it is sold in commerce, regardless of its ultimate function or use, cannot be considered, substantially transformed, and based solely on its integration into IT or other systems
UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE
The Contractor and its employees shall exercise the utmost discretion concerning all matters relating to their duties and functions. They shall not communicate to any person any information known to them by reason of their performance of services under this contract, which has not been made public, except in the necessary performance of their duties or upon written authorization of the Contracting Officer.
All documents and records (including photographs) generated during the performance of work under this contract shall be for the sole use and become the exclusive property of the U.S Government. Furthermore, no article, book, pamphlet, email, recording, broadcast, speech television appearance, film or photograph concerning any aspect of work performed under this contract shall be published or disseminated through any media without the prior written authorization of the Contracting Officer. These obligations do not cease upon the expiration or termination of this contract. The Contractor shall include the substance of this provision in all contracts of employment and in all subcontracts hereunder.
See FAR 3.104 for additional information.
SECTION 2
SUBMISSION INFORMATION PERTAINING TO REQUEST FOR QUOTE
INFORMATION TO CONTRACTOR
Contractors are reminded that information furnished under this Request for Quote (RFQ) may be subject to disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). Therefore, all items that are confidential to business or that contain trade secrets or proprietary or personnel information shall be clearly marked. Marking of items shall not necessarily preclude disclosure when Department of State (DOS) determines disclosure is warranted by FOIA. However, if such items are not marked, all information contained within the submitted documents shall be deemed releasable.
QUESTIONS CONCERNING THE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
Offerors are warned against contacting any INL personnel other than the Contracting Officer and Contract Specialist prior to award of the Contract resulting from this RFQ. If such contact occurs and found to be prejudicial to competing vendors, the vendor making such contact may be excluded from award consideration.
No information concerning this RFQ shall be provided in response to telephone calls. All such requests shall be submitted in writing via email.
Question and Answer Period Answers to inquiries/questions, if given, shall be provided in writing to all vendors being solicited.
Written questions relating to this RFQ shall be accepted through:
Question and Answer Period:
• 10:00 A.M. (local Washington D.C. time) Friday, May 29, 2026.
Any communications in reference to this RFQ shall cite the reference section title and page number, and directed to the following individual:
Name: Mohan Krishnakumar Title: Contract Specialist E-mail: KrishnakumarM@state.gov
NOTICE OF RFQ CLOSING DATE AND TIME
All offers shall be submitted to the designated Government Representative, via email.
Proposals relating to this RFQ shall be accepted through:
Closing Date and Time:
• 10:00 A.M. (local Washington D.C. time) on the following date: Wednesday, June 10, 2026.
mailto:KrishnakumarM@state.gov
Any communications in reference to this RFQ shall cite the reference section title and page number, and directed to the following individual:
Name: Mohan Krishnakumar Title: Contract Specialist E-mail: KrishnakumarM@state.gov
PERIOD OF ACCEPTANCE OF OFFERS
All Quotes must be valid for 90 days from the closing date for this solicitation. Contractors shall agree, if the proposal is accepted within ninety (90) calendar days (unless a greater period is inserted by the contractor) from the date specified in the solicitation for receipt of proposals, to furnish any or all of the requirements upon which prices are proposed at the price set opposite each item, performed and/or delivered at the designated point(s) within the time specified. No exceptions or qualifications
CONTRACTOR RELATIONSHIPS
The Department of State (DOS) encourages the use of subcontractors. In addition, the Department requires that any potential Organizational Conflict of Interest be identified in the proposal to ensure proper firewalls established prior to award.
MULTIPLE PROPOSALS/ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS
Contractors shall not submit, nor shall the Government accept or evaluate, multiple proposals offering alternative solutions. Contractors shall not submit, nor shall the Government accept or evaluate, multiple solutions within one proposal.
GENERAL REQUIREMENT
This request will fall under NAICS 541611 Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services and is a Small Business Set Aside, size standard $24,500,000.00. The Government contemplates awarding a single award Firm Fixed Price contract to a responsible vendor who best satisfies the Government’s requirement.
No additional sums will be payable due to any escalation in the cost of materials, equipment, or labor, or because of the Contractor’s failure to properly estimate or accurately predict these prices or difficulty of achieving the results required by this contract. Nor will the contract price be adjusted due to fluctuations in the currency exchange rates. The price shall include all direct and indirect costs, profit, shipping/delivery charges, export requirements, and insurance. The price will not be subject to adjustment after award.
mailto:KrishnakumarM@state.gov
SECTION 3
QUOTE SUBMISSION FORMAT AND REQUIREMENTS
INFORMATION AND REQUIREMENTS
In order to receive an award, vendors must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM.gov). All responsible vendors that submit proposals pursuant to the requirements outlined in this document shall be considered by INL.
GOVERNMENT POINT OF ENTRY
This solicitation is posted to SAM.gov.
FORMAT FOR TECHNICAL AND COST/PRICE QUOTATION
File Format Requirements Vendors’ technical proposals / price quotations shall:
• Be viewable in either: Microsoft Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Adobe (as applicable and appropriate).
• Limit the number of pages to no more than thirty (30), 12 Point Font (excluding information on Past Performance, References, and Resumes).
Vendor shall be limited to no more than four (4) separate digital files for a proposal package.
FORMATTING REQUIREMENTS:
Contractors shall submit one electronic copy of Volume I (Technical Quote) and Volume II (Cost/Price Quote). Volume I shall be on a separate electronic file from Volume II. Please refer to Section 5 “Basis of Award and Evaluation Criteria” for award specifics.
Volume I – Technical
• The cover page for this volume must include the company name, the solicitation number, primary POC and company info (UEI, etc).
• TAB A – TRAINING DELIVERY APPROACH: Description of how Offeror will meet the Statement of Work Objectives. Showcase experience conducting urban combat and anti-gang training to mirror the challenges facing Port-au-Prince. Showcase experience training new cadets with minimal to no prior law enforcement experience.
• TAB B – IN-COUNTRY PRESENCE: Description of Offeror’s experience operating in complex security environments. Prefer experience specifically in Haiti.
• TAB C – DEPLOYMENT TIMELINE: Description of Offeror’s timeline for deployment to Haiti and project initiation.
• TAB D – TRAINING TEAM/STAFFING PATTERN:
Provide a Staffing Plan that describes “how” the Offeror will staff the project, including labor categories and number of resources under each labor category. Offeror shall submit résumés for key personnel. The résumé shall include name, education, certification(s), technical skills, and current and relevant professional experience. Describe the roles and responsibilities for the key personnel proposed.
• TAB E – PAST PERFORMANCE:
Offeror shall substantiate that it has recent (within the last 36 months) experience in performing the required work and demonstrate how past and present experience validates that it will provide expected performance and customer satisfaction. Shall provide a minimum of two (2) and a maximum of three (3) Past Performance Contract Profiles (refer to Appendix A - Past Performance Contract Profile) that are directly relevant to the required effort and are of similar size (dollar value), scope (substantially similar services) and complexity (degree of difficulty).
Volume II – Price
• Proposals should include the total costs. A breakout spreadsheet (Excel) should provide a detailed Line Item Budget, including Personnel, Other Direct Costs, Travel, etc. and shall include the indirect costs % rate. Personnel (Labor) rates should detail the Labor Category, Labor rate (hourly), and number of hours.
Proposals that include only the information found in the solicitation (e.g., copied/pasted) will not be considered a complete proposal.
Government reserves the right to disqualify offerors that do not submit all required documentation, otherwise do not comply with the above proposal restrictions, or any other requirements outlined in this document.
SECTION 4
STATEMENT OF WORK (SOW)
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES/INTRODUCTION
The Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs (INL) has undertaken the P4000 program to address the insufficient number of Haitian National Police (HNP) officers and expand their capacity to address the extreme levels of urban violence. To address the escalating threat posed by illegal gangs and support the re-establishment of state security, there is an urgent requirement for the HNP to develop foundation and specialized capabilities including tactical planning, movement and operations, urban policing and command, control and coordination. An enhanced urban operations training program will deliver standardized, high-quality and internationally developed tactical training to HNP recruits to improve their operational effectiveness in complex urban environments, strengthen their ability to counter organized criminal groups, and enable the safe, lawful, and coordinated conduct of security operations.
SCOPE OF WORK
The vendor will deliver a comprehensive six-week Tactical Operations in Urban Terrain training program to augment the INL P4000 Program's support to the HNP. The training will be integrated into the existing HNP recruit curriculum during weeks 9-14 of the basic training course and delivered to three consecutive recruit courses (Courses 37, 38, and 39), with each course comprising approximately 1,200 recruits organized into six companies of 200 recruits each. The vendor shall deploy a training team consisting of project oversight and international instructors, supported by HNP instructors and Language Assistants, to deliver six sequential training modules: (1) Weapons Handling and Individual Movement Techniques; (2) Squad-Level Formations, Urban Patrolling, and Cordon Operations; (3) Room Clearance and Defensive Position Fortification; (4) Vehicle Checkpoints and Search Procedures; (5) Pistol Training and Qualification; and (6) Rifle Training and Qualification.
The vendor shall conduct pre- and post-training assessments, weekly summative evaluations, and weapons qualification testing for all recruits. The vendor shall coordinate closely with HNP leadership and INL representatives through weekly planning meetings and monthly stakeholder coordination sessions, maintain comprehensive safety protocols including Range Action Safety Plans, and provide After Action Reviews and lessons learned documentation following each training rotation. All training delivery shall incorporate human rights awareness, Rules of Engagement, International Humanitarian Law principles, and safeguarding protocols in accordance with Department of State requirements.
The vendor will complete three consecutive recruit courses, with each course comprising approximately 1,200 recruits organized into six companies of 200 recruits during the Period of Performance (one year).
Phase 1: Inception Phase
The vendor will finalize and contextualize the six-week urban operations training curriculum for immediate deployment on Courses 37, 38, and 39. This work shall entail the following:
• Complete all remaining lesson specifications, translate materials into Creole, and adapt practical scenarios to the Haitian operational context.
• Conduct a project kickoff meeting with INL and HNP representatives to review the delivery model, training content, coordination procedures, and operational support requirements.
• Establish weekly coordination mechanisms with École Nationale de Police (ENP) instructors to ensure prerequisite skills alignment between the existing curriculum and the urban operations training modules.
• Finalize selection of HNP instructors from the previously trained Instructor Development Cadre (IDC) and recruit Language Assistants.
• Deploy the project manager and training manager to Port-au-Prince to establish in-country operations, conduct health, safety and security assessments, and prepare for international instructor team arrival.
• Conduct site coordination with HNP to confirm training facility access, range availability, weapons and ammunition allocation, and logistical support arrangements including housing and food service for the training team.
Phase 2: Implementation Phase
The vendor will design a 6-week urban operations program for immediate use on Courses 37, 38 and 39. Vendor will deploy international instructors with extensive and relevant operational and training experience who can deploy rapidly and integrate effectively with HNP personnel and local training structures. Vendor personnel will be supported by pre-identified HNP instructors who have been hand-selected and screened from previous delivery of the HNP IDC in December 2025.
The proposed training intervention is designed to complement and enhance the existing HNP recruit training system by building on foundational policing skills and addressing identified capability gaps linked to the current security environment. It will integrate seamlessly with the existing HNP curriculum, reinforcing core competencies and foundation drills to emphasize basic tactical requirements while introducing standardized, scenario-based urban operations training that prepares recruits for high-risk, gang-affected settings. By aligning with HNP training structures and co-delivering instruction with local HNP trainers, the program strengthens current systems. Weeks 1-8 will be HNP –led training, while weeks 9-14 will be the selected vendor Tactic courses, finally weeks 15-18 will be HNP-led training.
The vendor will deploy international instructors to Port-au-Prince one week prior to the commencement of training for each course iteration. The vendor will deliver the six-week training program according to the following structure:
Week 9 of Tactics 1 Training (Project Week 1): Companies 1-2 conduct Range training;
Companies 3-6 conduct Tactics 1 (Weapons Handling and Individual Movement Techniques);
Week 10 (Project Week 2): Companies 1-2 conduct Range training; Companies 3-6 conduct Tactics 2 (Squad-Level Formations, Urban Patrolling, and Cordon Operations);
Week 11 (Project Week 3): Companies 1-2 conduct Tactics 1; Companies 3-4 conduct Range training; Companies 5-6 conduct Tactics 3 (Room Clearance and Defensive Position Fortification);
Week 12 (Project Week 4): Companies 1-2 conduct Tactics 2; Companies 3-4 conduct Range training; Companies 5-6 conduct Tactics 4 (Vehicle Checkpoints and Search Procedures);
Week 13 (Project Week 5): Companies 1-4 conduct Tactics 3; Companies 5-6 conduct Range training;
Week 14 (Project Week 6): Companies 1-4 conduct Tactics 4; Companies 5-6 conduct Range training.
The vendor will:
• Divide each company into half-companies (Alpha and Bravo) with dedicated international instructor leads, supported by HNP instructors and Language Assistants.
• Administer pre-training assessments (multiple choice questionnaires) to all recruits upon arrival to establish baseline knowledge levels. The vendor will employ phased training methodology to build competency progressively within each training module.
• Conduct weekly summative assessments grading recruits as Highly Competent, Competent, or Not Competent, ensuring prerequisite standards are met before advancement.
• Independently assess pistol and rifle weapons handling skills and administer HNP marksmanship shooting assessments on a pass/fail basis, providing remedial training as required.
• Designate a qualified Range Conducting Officer (RCO) for all live-fire exercises and produce Range Action Safety Plans (RASP) prior to each range period. Assign dedicated Range Safety Supervisors and deliver comprehensive safety briefings to all recruits before practical exercises and live-fire activities. Maintain a Medical Plan for all range operations and brief all recruits on emergency procedures.
• Conduct weekly wash-up sessions with international instructors, HNP trainers, and Language Assistants to review performance, identify issues, and adapt training in real-time.
• Hold weekly coordination and planning meetings with ENP representatives at the conclusion of each training week to provide feedback, discuss key issues, and coordinate the following week's activities and equipment requirements. Facilitate monthly coordination and oversight meetings with ENP commanders and HNP interlocutors, with optional attendance for complementary training initiative stakeholders.
• Complete formal After Action Reviews (AAR) at the end of each training rotation and deployment, led by the Project Director. Conduct lessons learned workshops with INL following each course iteration to measure progress, capture insights, and incorporate improvements into subsequent training cycles.
• Maintain a live project Risk Register and discuss risk status with INL in weekly and monthly meetings. Monitor the security environment continuously through a dedicated Security Manager and adapt training delivery methods as required to ensure safety while maintaining continuity. Implement all safeguarding protocols including mandatory external safeguarding and "do no harm" training for all staff, anonymous reporting mechanisms, confidential victim-first handling procedures, and immediate incident reporting to INL.
Phase 3: Exit Phase
The vendor shall conduct dedicated lessons learned workshops for both HNP and INL stakeholders, ensuring insights are captured, shared, and integrated into future training and operational planning. The vendor shall prepare comprehensive project completion documentation including final After Action Review, training effectiveness analysis based on pre- and post-training assessments, and recommendations for sustained HNP training capacity. The vendor shall transfer all knowledge products and lesson materials to INL and HNP as agreed, including curriculum documentation, training aids, and assessment tools. The vendor shall conduct final stakeholder meetings with HNP leadership to review project outcomes, discuss post-handover requirements, and ensure understanding of timelines for project completion. The vendor shall provide transition support to enable HNP ownership of training processes and independent continuation of training delivery. The vendor shall responsibly close down project activities while maintaining flexibility to pivot, continue, scale, or expand operations as directed by INL.
COURSE CONTENT
Deliverables:
• Marked improvement in knowledge, skills, and abilities measured by a pre- and post-test and trainer observation.
• Provide guidelines and assist in the development of standards for the training knowledge and materials to the HNP.
• HNP units can effectively respond to gang related incidents, public security threats, and emergency situations.
• Safe, disciplined, and lawful handling of service weapons at all times.
• Recruits can operate effectively as part of a squad in urban settings.
REQUIRED REPORTS/DELIVERABLES
Within ten (10) business days of the completion of each course, the vendor will provide to the COR a written report/evaluation of the training providing an overview of the following areas:
• Names and sex of students enrolled in the course;
• Names and sex students completing the course;
• Names of students not completing the course and a reason for each student’s failure to complete the course;
• Pre- and post-test scores;
• Block by block of instruction outline of course as planned and any deviations from planned course material;
• Logistical or coordination problems/issues and suggested solutions to issues noted;
• Legal or existing agency policy that conflicts with best practices;
• Instructor’s assessment of willingness or opposition to implement the material as presented;
• Conflicts between instructional material (as presented) and existing policies/practices used by the organization/students;
• Suggested modifications to existing practices or new policies that should be developed to support internationally accepted best practices, internationally accepted standards, or human rights requirements;
• Suggested equipment or additional specific training necessary to support the continued development of the unit’s capabilities;
• Summary of student critiques of the course, instructors and materials; and
• Attach the curriculum delivered.
A final report shall be submitted to the COR within twenty (20) business days of the conclusion of the final deployment. The report shall include highlights, problems encountered, lessons learned, and detailed information demonstrating the major impact of the program during the entire reporting period; such as success stories, digital photos, quotes, and facts from the conducted trainings. The major impact of the training should be determined by observations and interviews and validated by U.S. Embassy personnel. The final report should also provide any recommended follow-up activities for U.S. Embassy personnel to consider.
STAFFING
The vendor will deploy their training team, comprising of project leadership and international instructors to facilitate training delivery. They will each be supported by an HNP instructor that has been previously trained and selected from the IDC cadre, as well as a local Language Assistant to enable the translation of technical terminology and instructions and administrative training support. The vendor will be responsible for all logistics for its personnel.
TIMETABLE / FREQUENCY
The courses requested under this contract will occur in the following order and subject to change by the COR/CO:
1. Week 1
• Company 1 & 2: Range Training
• Company 3 & 4: Tac 1 (Weapons Handling and Individual Movement Techniques)
• Company 3 & 4: Tac 1 (Weapons Handling and Individual Movement Techniques)
2. Week 2
• Company 1 & 2: Range Training
• Company 3 & 4: Tac 2 (Squad-Level Formations, Urban Patrolling, and Cordon Operations)
• Company 5 & 6: Tac 2 (Squad-Level Formations, Urban Patrolling, and Cordon Operations)
3. Week 3
• Company 1 & 2: Tac 1 (Weapons Handling and Individual Movement Techniques)
• Company 3 & 4: Range Training
• Company 5 & 6: Tac 3 (Room Clearance and Defensive Position Fortification)
4. Week 4
• Company 1 & 2: Tac 2 (Squad-Level Formations, Urban Patrolling, and Cordon Operations)
• Company 3 & 4: Range Training
• Company 5 & 6: Tac 4 (Vehicle Checkpoints and Search Procedures)
5. Week 5
• Company 1 & 2: Tac 3 (Room Clearance and Defensive Position Fortification)
• Company 3 & 4: Tac 3 (Room Clearance and Defensive Position Fortification)
• Company 5 & 6: Tac 4 (Vehicle Checkpoints and Search Procedures)
6. Week 6
• Company 1 & 2: Tac 4 (Vehicle Checkpoints and Search Procedures)
• Company 3 & 4: Tac 4 (Vehicle Checkpoints and Search Procedures)
• Company 5 & 6: Range Training
RESPONSIBILITIES
The HNP will provide the cadets and training facilities. The training location will be at the Recruit Training Centre (Ecole Nationale de Police, ENP) in Port-au-Prince.
INL will work with the HNP to facilitate the adoption of the curriculum used for this training by the HNP in Port-au-Prince to ensure that future officers are learning the same skills developed during this training effort. INL will support the development of a town simulation for Tactical operations in Urban Terrain. INL will also procure and distribute all necessary weapons and ammunition. This includes at least 50 M4 rifles and 50 Glock pistols and expansion of the ranges.
LIFE AND MISSION SUPPORT
Travel and transportation costs for the training team are included as allowable costs under this contract. This includes international flights, per diems for project personnel, hotel accommodations, compound rentals, visa fees, and airport transfers. The vendor will utilize rented armored vehicles to transport project staff from the hotel to the school. The vendor will provide language assistants, office rental, IKAK kits, training supplies, armored vehicle rentals, uniforms for the training team, laptops and mobile phones, HEAT course, trauma bags, first aid kits, and PPE for field staff.
TYPE OF CONTRACT
The Government contemplates awarding a single award Firm Fixed Price contract to a responsible vendor who best satisfies the Government’s requirement. This solicitation seeks proposals to meet its requirements.
No additional sums will be payable due to any escalation in the cost of materials, equipment, or labor, or because of the Contractor’s failure to properly estimate or accurately predict these prices or difficulty of achieving the results required by this contract. Nor will the contract price be adjusted due to fluctuations in the currency exchange rates. The price shall include all direct and indirect costs, profit, shipping/delivery charges, export requirements, and insurance. The price will not be subject to adjustment after award.
PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE
The period of performance will be a one-year period.
PLACE OF PERFORMANCE
Tactical Operations in Urban Terrain training program will take place at the Recruit Training Centre (Ecole Nationale de Police, ENP) in Port-au-Prince.
EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF CONTRACT
This contract shall be effective on the date of the Contracting Officer's signature and shall remain valid until all services have been rendered.
SUPPLIES AND PRICES
The Contractor shall provide to the U.S. Government the services as described in the specifications for the stated Best Value Firm Fixed contract price.
SECTION 5
BASIS OF AWARD AND EVALUATION CRITERIA
BASIS OF AWARD
The Government anticipates issuing a contract to the Vendor whose Quote provides the Best Value to the Government, price, and other factors considered.
The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors; reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary; and reserves the right to eliminate from consideration for award any or all offers at any time prior to award of the contract.
ACQUISITION METHOD
RFO FAR 12.2- Acquisition of Commercial Products and Services; Solicitation, Evaluation, and Award RFO FAR 12.201-1 Simplified procedures
As such, formal debriefings will not be conducted.
EVALUATION FACTORS: BEST VALUE
The Government contemplates the award of a firm fixed price contract to the responsible Offeror whose offer conforms to the requirements of the solicitation and is evaluated as being the most advantageous to the Government, cost or price and other factors considered. The Government will award based on a best value determination and the Government’s best interests. The award will not be automatically determined by numerical calculation or formula relationship between cost or price and technical merit. As technical merit of the offerors’ proposals becomes more equal, the evaluated cost or price may become the determining factor.
The Contracting Officer shall determine what trade-offs between technical merit and cost or price promises the greatest value to the Government, cost or price and other factors considered.
The Department reserves the right to make award without discussion. However, discussions, if held, will be in the form of written questions, to which the offerors will be required to respond.
Evaluation Factors and Methodology
The Technical Evaluation Factors (i.e. non-Cost/Price) will be evaluated using an adjectival (Outstanding, Acceptable, Unacceptable) rating scheme. The Non-Technical Evaluation Factor (i.e. Cost/Price) will be evaluated as detailed in this section. An “Unacceptable” rating in any factor will result in the elimination of an offeror’s proposal from consideration for award.
The following evaluation factors apply to this solicitation and will be used to evaluate the offer:
1. Strong In-Country Presence (Haiti)
2. Deployment Timeline
3. Training Delivery Approach
4. Training Team/Staffing Pattern
5. Past Performance
6. Cost/Price
Evaluation Factor 1: Strong In-Country Presence (Haiti)
The offeror shall be able to demonstrate its capability to offer services in-country and experience operating in complex security environments and navigating logistical travel issues operating within Haiti. There are security and logistical concerns traveling in and out of Haiti. The offeror should have previous experience having personnel travel in and out of country and can plan accordingly.
Evaluation Factor:
Rating Description
Outstanding
Offeror meets all of the following criteria: Demonstrates excellent understanding/experience of working within Haiti and shows exceptional capacity to meet the Government's requirement and that will significantly benefit the Government; has no deficiencies or weaknesses.
Acceptable
Offeror meets all of the following criteria: Demonstrates adequate understanding/experience of working within Haiti; shows capacity to meet the Government’s requirement; has no significant weaknesses and no deficiencies.
Unacceptable
Offeror has one or more of the following deficiencies: Demonstrates shallow or a lack of understanding/experience of working within Haiti; fails to meet minimum requirement; has a major weakness or deficiency which cannot be corrected without major changes to the proposal.
Evaluation Factor 2: Deployment Timeline
The offeror shall be able to demonstrate its ability to deploy and do business with the host government within 30 days of award.
Outstanding Demonstrates ability to exceed the deployment timeline (deploy and perform services in-country and in cooperation with host country within 30 days of award).
Acceptable Demonstrates ability to meet the deployment timeline (deploy and perform services in-country and in cooperation with host country within 30 days of award).
Unacceptable Offeror does not demonstrate adequate understanding of the requirement and/or inability to meet the deployment timelines.
Evaluation Factor 3: Training Delivery Approach
The offeror shall provide a detailed plan showing understanding of the work and showcase experience conducting urban combat and anti-gang training to mirror the challenges facing Port-au-Prince. Showcase experience training new cadets with minimal to no law enforcement experience. Offeror outlines a comprehensive plan in relation to the Statement of Work and demonstrates complete understanding of the work required under the contract.
Outstanding
Demonstrates excellent understanding of requirements; recognizes critical program elements and challenges; offers industry best practices and proactive and innovative solutions; significantly exceeds performance/capability standards; shows exceptional technical expertise/strengths that will significantly benefit the Government; has no deficiencies and weaknesses, if any, are minor weaknesses. Demonstrated exceptional understanding and experience of multiple threats, tactical situations in a foreign environment in support of a US, UN, or NATO mission.
Acceptable
Demonstrates understanding of requirements; meets performance/capability standards; may have strengths; have no significant weaknesses and no deficiencies. Demonstrated good understanding of multiple threats, tactical situations in a foreign environment in support of a US, UN, or NATO mission.
Unacceptable
Demonstrates a shallow or lack of understanding of requirements; fails to meet performance/capability standards; has a major weakness or deficiencies, which cannot be corrected without major changes to the quote. No demonstration of understanding multiple threat, tactical situations in a foreign environment.
Evaluation Factor 4: Training Team/Staffing Pattern
The offeror shall provide personnel that have the right skill sets to successfully perform the tasks identified in the Statement of Work. The Staffing Plan describes “how” the vendor will staff the project, including labor categories and number of resources under each labor category.
Outstanding
Proposed key personnel are highly qualified and all non-key personnel meet the evaluation criteria. Key personnel have a combination of education, supervisory/management experience in law enforcement multiple threat units, and have verifiable relevant experience of eight (8) or more years in multiple threat response training. All proposed non-key personnel possess demonstrated experience in work similar in size, scope, and complexity as that of the required effort and demonstrate education, professional experience, and certification(s) appropriate for the positions proposed. The staffing plan provides a well-structured and efficient organization with appropriate type and quality of skill. Offeror meets or exceed the evaluation criteria in a way beneficial to the Government and demonstrates an approach to this Factor that is superior and beneficial. Proposal offers significant strengths and few if any minor weaknesses. Proposed key personnel have been involved in multiple threat situation training in foreign environments supporting US, UN, or NATO missions.
Acceptable
Proposed key personnel are highly qualified (with a combination of education, supervisory/management experience in law enforcement multiple threat units) and have a history of verifiable experience working in multiple threat training for a period of no less than two (2) years. Most proposed non-key personnel have been involved in multiple threat training in foreign environments supporting UN missions or US, possess relevant experience, and demonstrate education, professional experience, and certification(s) appropriate for the positions proposed. The Staffing Plan provides an adequate staffing organization. May have strengths and weaknesses, if any, are correctable.
Unacceptable
Offeror has one or more of the following deficiencies: Proposed key and/or non-key personnel demonstrate inappropriate or inapplicable qualifications for the positions proposed. Key personnel have not been involved in multiple threat situation training in foreign environments supporting UN, NATO missions, or US. Doubt exists that offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Evaluation Factor 5: Past Performance
Proposal Requirement Instructions:
The offeror shall substantiate (IAW Appendix A) that it has recent experience (within past 36 months) in performing the required work and demonstrate how their past and present experience validates that it will provide expected performance and customer satisfaction.
The offeror shall provide a minimum of two (2) and a maximum of three (3) Past Performance Contract Profiles that are directly relevant to the required effort and are of similar size (dollar value), scope (substantially similar services) and complexity (degree of difficulty). [See Appendix B for Past Performance instructions].
In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available, the offeror will be given a rating of neutral.
Evaluation Criteria
The offeror’s past performance evaluation will examine how the offeror’s past and present experience/performance validates expected performance and customer satisfaction based on the information provided by the offeror’s references and other government sources. The past performance evaluation will examine the offeror’s Past Performance Contract Profiles and the offeror’s actual experiences/performance in work of similar size, scope, and complexity of efforts and actual results achieved during performance.
The Government may consider all information available on the offeror’s experience and past performance. This will include information that is in addition to that which is provided by the offeror. The Government reserves the right to interview the clients identified by the offeror and may interview other clients of whom the Government is aware.
The Government will use the following adjectival ratings to evaluate the Past Performance factor:
Outstanding
Offeror provides three (3) Past Performance Contract Profiles that are directly relevant to the required work and clearly cover the majority of the required work and performed within the last 36 months. Based on the offeror’s past performance, the government has high confidence that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Acceptable
Offeror provides the required minimum of two (2) and a maximum of three
(3) Past Performance Contract Profiles that are directly relevant to the required work and cover the majority of the required work. Based on the offeror’s past performance, the government has some confidence that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Unacceptable Does not meet the criteria for acceptable. Based on the offeror’s past performance, doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Neutral In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available, the offeror will be given a rating of neutral.
Factor 6: Cost/Price
The principal basis for evaluating price as a factor for award under this solicitation will be an evaluation of the reasonableness of the offeror’s respective overall proposed prices. The Government will conduct an evaluation to determine ultimately that the final agreed-to overall price is fair and reasonable.
This structure aligns with the purpose of the evaluation and contract, ensuring a balanced consideration of both technical quality and cost-effectiveness.
APPENDIX A
PAST PERFORMANCE PROFILE
Please provide three Client References.
Please also provide three Past Performance Profiles as a Prime or Subcontractor for similar work.
Reference 1:
Name:
Agency:
Number E-mail:
Reference 2:
Name:
Agency:
Number E-mail:
Reference 3:
Name:
Agency:
Number E-mail:
Past Performance Profile
The offeror(s) shall provide client references capable of documenting the offerors’ performance on similar contracts – similar to the complexity and scope of services of this procurement. The offeror(s) shall submit three references which shall consist of present or past clients within the last 36 months. Client Reference must be as a Prime Contractor.
The offeror(s) shall provide the following information for each client reference:
1. Contract title.
2. Contract number.
3. Total contract value.
4. Contract start date, end date, and any options exercised.
5. Contracting Officer’s name, address, and telephone number.
6. Program Manager’s name, address, and telephone number.
7. A brief description of the attributes of the contract demonstrating the degree of relevance of the scope of work in this acquisition.
8. Percent and type of work performed by subcontractors.
9. Information on problems encountered on the contracts and subcontracts and the corrective actions taken to resolve those problems.
| Evaluation Factor 5: Past Performance |
| Proposal Requirement Instructions: |
| Evaluation Criteria |
| Factor 6: Cost/Price |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .