0001 15BFA025R00000010.pdf

15BFA025R00000010/0001 Page 1 of 8

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 8

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

08/18/2025

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

BFAOCODE

Federal Bureau of Prisons Field Acquisition Office U.S. Armed Forces Reserve Complex 346 Marine Forces Drive Grand Prairie, TX 75051

Hannah Mendenhall hmendenhall@bop.gov

6. ISSUED BY 15B502CODE

Federal Bureau of Prisons FCC Beaumont 5430 Knauth Road Beaumont, TX 77705

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

15BFA025R00000010

CODE FACILITY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, country, state and ZIP Code) (X)

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

07/29/2025

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER

NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X XThe above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods: (a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning ____copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT

ORDER NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return _______ copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Amendment 0001 has been issued to incorporate the following change:

Remove the following language from the Instructions for Preparation of Technical Proposals on page 2 of 7 in RFP-15BFA025R00000010, within Attachment 4 – Submission & Evaluation of Proposals:

“Additionally, each offeror shall complete Attachment 8: Technical Proposal Summary Sheets by Hospital Network, and include such with the offeror's technical proposal.”

An addendum to Attachment 4 – Submission & Evaluation of Proposals is attached.

OFFERS DUE DATE AND ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS REMAIN UNCHANGED. (See continuation sheets, pages 2–8.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

Hannah M Mendenhall Contract Specialist

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR 15C. DATE SIGNED

By (Signature of Contracting Officer)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 16C. DATE SIGNED

Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243 x 1

AMENDMENT 0001/SECTION SF30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION Solicitation Attachment 4: Submission & Evaluation of Proposals FCC Beaumont – Managed Healthcare Services

15BFA025R00000010

Submission of Proposals

Proposals shall be submitted in three separate volumes in accordance with the following requirements.

Volume 1 - Technical Proposal Volume 2 - Past Performance Proposal Volume 3 - Business Proposal

Offerors are required to use the following method when submitting a proposal:

A. Electronic Proposals via e-mail. Offerors shall submit their scanned documents of Volumes 1, 2, and 3 electronically via e-mail to hmendenhall@bop.gov and a carbon copy (cc:) to BOP-ADM-FAO-CMS-S@bop.gov. All documents must be in PDF format.

All documents must be submitted and received within the inboxes of the email addresses listed above by the due date and time set forth in Block 8 of the Standard Form (SF) 1449, page 1 of the solicitation.

B. Offers received after the proposal deadline will be processed pursuant to

FAR 52.212-1(f). It remains the offerors responsibility to ensure ALL DOCUMENTS are in the Government's control (recipient’s inbox to the email addresses identified in paragraph A above) by the proposal due date and time.

C. PLEASE NOTE. The following applies to all electronic submissions:

a. Please refer to FAR 52.212-1(f)(2)(i)(A)(B) and (C). E-mailed proposals will not be received instantly upon transmission. Offerors must factor delivery time when submitting their proposals. As stated in paragraph B above, e-mail proposals must be received within the recipient’s inbox by the proposal due date and time.

b. The Government e-mail system can only receive documents up to 14 megabytes (MB). Therefore, the e-mail with attachments must be less than 14 MB.

D. The offeror is responsible to ensure all electronic documents have good resolution and are LEGIBLE. The PDF file must also be text searchable.

E. Hard copies of proposals will not be accepted.

All potential offerors are advised that this solicitation includes the provision Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors - Commercial Products and Commercial Services (SEP 2023), and the provision at FAR 52.204-7, System for Award Management (NOV 2024), which requires all Contractors doing business with the Federal government to be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) database.

Offerors should include their Unique Entity ID (UEI) number in their offers. The Contracting Officer will verify registration in the SAM database prior to award by entering the potential awardee's UEI number into the SAM database. Failure to complete the registration procedures mailto:hmendenhall@bop.gov mailto:GRA--/FAO-CMS%7E@bop.gov

AMENDMENT 0001/SECTION SF30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION Solicitation Attachment 4: Submission & Evaluation of Proposals

15BFA025R00000010

outlined in the provision noted above may result in elimination from consideration for award.

Instructions for registration in SAM can be found at https://www.sam.gov.

Instructions for Preparation of Technical Proposal

The offeror's technical proposal will be an important consideration in the award of the resulting contract; therefore, it should be specific and complete. The technical proposal shall set forth in detail an offeror's conceptual approach to, and interpretation of the following: stated contract goals; proposed work plan for achieving contract objective; proposed methodology and techniques of performing the contract; and the technical resources, experience and background, as well as unique or specialized skills and expertise of both the offeror and proposed subcontractors.

The offeror's proposal should be prepared simply and economically, providing straight-forward, concise delineation of capabilities to perform satisfactorily for the contract being sought. The technical proposal should therefore be practical, legible, clear, and coherent.

Unnecessarily elaborate brochures or other presentations beyond those sufficient to present a complete and effective response to this solicitation are not desired.

The technical evaluation criteria stated within this solicitation will be used by the technical panel in evaluating proposals; therefore, each technical proposal must contain enough specificity to address each evaluation factor and the terms and conditions of the Performance Work Statement. In order that an evaluation may be accomplished strictly on the merit of the material submitted, the technical proposal shall not refer to pricing data.

In addition, the vendor is required to complete Attachment 9, Vendor Attestation, addressing the security measures they rely upon to secure any DOJ Information and/or DOJ Information Systems for which they come into contact in the course of performing services under contract with DOJ.

Proposals which merely paraphrase the requirements of the Government's Performance Work Statement or parts thereof or use such phrases as "will comply" or "standard techniques will be employed" and/or cut and paste information from a proposed subcontractor's website will not be acceptable. The offeror must submit an explanation of the proposed technical approach in conjunction with the tasks to be performed in achieving the required output.

Instructions for Preparation of Past Performance Proposal

The proposal must describe the experience of the offeror that is relevant to this contract:

• Experience providing managed healthcare services to a diverse Inmate population;

• Experience establishing and maintaining relationships with a large and diverse number of health care providers and/or organizations;

• Experience receiving and disseminating medical records to and from multiple health care providers.

https://www.sam.gov/

AMENDMENT 0001/SECTION SF30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION Solicitation Attachment 4: Submission & Evaluation of Proposals

15BFA025R00000010

The following information shall be included in each Past Performance Proposal:

1. A list of a total of three (3) of the offeror's most recently awarded relevant contracts with a period of performance of at least twelve (12) months. The listing shall include all items listed below:

a. Name of contracting activity;

b. Contract number;

c. Date of Award;

d. Estimated Awarded Amount;

e. Contract Performance Period;

f. Name, Mailing Address, telephone number, fax number, and e-mail address of the Contracting Officer, Program Manager, and Administrative Contracting Officer;

g. Relevancy: Describe the relevance of past or current contracts including Federal, State, and local government and private that are similar in scope, complexity, and requirements to those outlined in this RFP. The discussion should include a comparison of providing healthcare services in community-based inpatient and outpatient facilities, as well as professional services, to an inmate population with a care level similar to that identified in Attachment 6: Medical Classification – Care Level Criteria.

h. Provide any other information the offeror deems important to understand the past performance of the contract, the offeror’s ability to deliver quality medical services, meet schedule/performance requirements, and achieve customer satisfaction.

In accordance with FAR 15.306, offerors may be given an opportunity to address especially unfavorable reports of past performance, and the offeror's response, or lack of, will be taken into consideration. An offeror's opportunity to address reports of negative past performance information could be affected by the Government's entitlement to award without discussions. Offerors would be well served to be aware of possible dissatisfied customers and address expected negative issues in initial proposal submissions. Generally, negative information obtained from references provided by the offeror are considered historical in nature, not subject to change, and not a matter for discussions.

Instructions for Preparation of Business Proposal

An offeror's business proposal shall consist of the following information:

1. Completed Schedule of Items and Subcontract Certification: Attachment 1

2. Completed certification entered onto the provision 52.209-7, Information Regarding

Responsibility Matters, and 52.209-12 Certification Regarding Tax Matters of this solicitation.

3. Completed representations and certifications entered onto the provision at FAR 52.212-3, Offeror Representation and Certifications - Commercial Products and Commercial

AMENDMENT 0001/SECTION SF30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION Solicitation Attachment 4: Submission & Evaluation of Proposals

15BFA025R00000010

Services." (Only if offeror has not completed annual electronic representations and certifications in SAM as specified at FAR 4.1201.

4. A brief explanation of the offeror's management structure as it relates to the performance of services under the contract.

5. A reference at a financial institution with general knowledge of the offeror's financial resources. Please include the name of the individual, name of the financial institution, address, and phone number.

6. Audited and/or certified financial statements (balance sheet, profit and loss statement) for the previous fiscal year.

Freedom of Information Act Notice

The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and its amendments have resulted in an increasing number of requests from outside the Government for copies of contract proposals submitted to Federal agencies. If an offeror's proposal contains information that he/she believes should be withheld from such requestors, under FOIA, on grounds that it is "trade secrets and commercial or financial information obtained from a person and privileged or confidential" [(b)(4) of the FOIA], the offeror should identify all such information so that if the proposal is ever the subject of a FOIA request, the decision to disclose or withhold can be made promptly by the responsible Federal official. If the offeror considers parts of the proposal withholdable under FOIA, the following notice should be placed on the title page:

"Some parts of this document, as identified on individual pages, are considered by the submitter to be privileged or confidential trade secrets or commercial or financial information not subject to mandatory disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act. Material considered privileged or confidential on such grounds is contained on pages ______.”

The offeror should mark each individual item considered privileged or confidential under the FOIA with the following notice:

"The data or information is considered confidential or privileged, and not subject to mandatory disclosure under the FOIA."

All information in the offeror's proposal which is not designated may be subject to automatic public disclosure, if it is requested under FOIA. It must be emphasized that under FOIA no information is automatically exempt from public disclosure. However, no disclosures under FOIA will be made without a careful and exacting evaluation, giving due regard to the need for safeguarding material considered by the submitter to be privileged or confidential. The Department of Justice's policy is to withhold, whenever possible, material that is genuinely privileged or confidential.

Evaluation of Proposals

Evaluation Procedures

Proposals will be evaluated in accordance with the criteria set forth in this solicitation. The results of the proposal evaluation will be used to determine whether an offeror's proposal will be

AMENDMENT 0001/SECTION SF30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION Solicitation Attachment 4: Submission & Evaluation of Proposals

15BFA025R00000010

considered for inclusion within the competitive range for the purpose of discussions. Offerors are hereby notified that the competitive range may be limited to the greatest number of proposals that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly-rated proposals. Offerors are also advised that a contract award may be made without discussions; therefore, the initial proposal should provide the Government with sufficient information to recommend a contract award without discussions and should reflect the offeror's ability to perform at a reasonable price.

Technical Evaluation

The Technical Evaluation Plan will rate each offeror's proposal against technical evaluation criteria. A technical proposal deserving of an outstanding rating shall receive a higher rating than that of a mediocre proposal, as compared to the technical evaluation criteria. The technical evaluation shall be based on the documentation which supports an offeror's ability to perform in accordance with the terms and conditions of this solicitation.

Past Performance Evaluation

Offerors are advised that the Government will utilize information located in the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), and information obtained from the three

(3) references as well as the response from the offeror regarding experience relevant to this contract to evaluate past performance.

If adequate information is available in CPARS, the Government may only use information from CPARS in the past performance evaluation.

The Government will evaluate the offeror’s past performance for the following:

(a) relevancy

(b) quality of services

(c) timeliness of deliverables/adherence to performance schedule

(d) management

(e) utilization of small business and

(f) regulatory compliance

Performance information will be used for both responsibility determinations and as an evaluation factor against which offerors' ratings will be compared in the determination of best value to the Government. Past performance will be rated and the Government's conclusions about the offeror's past performance will be considered in determining the relative merits of the offeror's proposal.

The Government reserves the right to use past performance information obtained from other than the sources identified by the offeror. Information may be utilized from the references listed in the proposal and other relevant references known to the BOP. The Government also reserves the right to disregard a reference as non-relevant if that reference is unable to provide an informative response. The Government reserves the right to review past performance information received by the Contracting Officer following the deadline for receipt of proposals and up to the time of award.

AMENDMENT 0001/SECTION SF30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION Solicitation Attachment 4: Submission & Evaluation of Proposals

15BFA025R00000010

For offerors with no past performance history, the offeror shall state "No Past Performance History Available." In cases where an offeror has no relevant past performance or past performance information is unavailable, the offeror will receive a neutral rating and will not be evaluated either favorably or unfavorably.

Evaluation of past performance will be a subjective assessment based on consideration of facts and circumstances. It will not be on absolute standards of acceptable performance. By evaluating past performance, the Government intends to consider the offeror's record of conforming to specifications and to standards of good workmanship; the offeror's adherence to contract schedules, including administrative aspects of performance; the offeror's reputation for reasonable and cooperative behavior and commitment to customer satisfaction; and generally, the offeror's business-like concern for the interests of the customer. This is a matter of judgment.

Price Evaluation

An objective price evaluation and analysis will be performed on each Offeror's price proposal.

Offerors are requested to submit a separate price proposal for the base period and each individual option period, as specified in this solicitation. The evaluated price will be inclusive of the base year and all option years.

Price proposals will be evaluated to determine which proposal offers the lowest price to the Government. The Offeror providing the lowest manday rate will be considered to be offering the lowest price in that category. The Offeror proposing the highest manday rate will be considered to be offering the highest price in the category.

For the catastrophic limit, the Offeror proposing no catastrophic limit will be considered to be offering the lowest price in this category followed by the Offeror proposing the highest catastrophic limit. The Offeror proposing the lowest catastrophic limit will be considered to be offering highest price in that category.

For catastrophic limit pricing, the Offeror proposing no catastrophic limit will be considered to be offering the lowest price in this category followed by the Offeror proposing the highest discount from the benchmark Medicare rate. The Offeror proposing the highest premium to the benchmark Medicare rate. The Offeror proposing the highest premium to the benchmark Medicare rate will be considered to be offering the highest price in this category.

Offerors must adhere strictly to the pricing methodology required by the solicitation. Offerors who vary their pricing methodology create a situation whereby the Government cannot conduct a comparative evaluation of offers in pricing aspects. Therefore, any Offeror who proposes a pricing methodology in any pricing category which varies from that prescribed (e.g., proposing multiple rates within any category or proposing a differing methodology) will receive no pricing score for each such category.

All Offerors are hereby advised that the successful Offeror’s pricing (to include manday rate, catastrophic limit, and catastrophic limit pricing which includes the discount percentage from or premium percentage to the benchmark Medicare rate) for the base year and all option years is public information, in accordance with FAR 15.503(b)(1)(iv). Accordingly, all successful unit pricing will be released to unsuccessful Offerors with the notification of award as well as to the general public when requested. Any party who objects to the release of their own unit pricing

AMENDMENT 0001/SECTION SF30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION Solicitation Attachment 4: Submission & Evaluation of Proposals

15BFA025R00000010

information, should they be awarded a contract in response to this solicitation, should not submit a proposal in response to this solicitation.

Evaluation Criteria

The Government intends to make a single award to an offeror, pursuant to an affirmative determination of responsibility, whose proposal, conforming to the solicitation, is determined to be in the best interest of the Government, price and other factors considered. In this tradeoff process, non-price factors (when combined) are approximately equal to price. Technical criteria and past performance are of equal value.

Evaluation criteria to be applied to proposals received in response to this solicitation are detailed below. Offerors are advised that should the offeror's proposals be considered approximately the same or equal under non-price factors, price could be paramount in the selection decision.

Technical Criteria

Demonstrated approach to providing an appropriate mix of resources to deliver quality medical care to the Inmates located at the institution, while mitigating the Government's costs and security risks, as measured by the following subfactors, which are of equal importance:

1. Technical approach or methodology to accomplish on-site services;

2. Technical approach or methodology to accomplish off-site services (Community Based);

3. Accreditation status of the proposed contract facility(ies);

4. Enhancements to the basic contract requirements proposed by the offeror which will facilitate institution’s ability to conform to the BOP’s stated mission.

Past Performance Criteria

Subfactors 1 through 6 are listed below and are of equal importance.

1. Quality of services

2. Relevancy

3. Timeliness of deliverables/Adherence to performance schedule

4. Management

5. Utilization of Small Business

6. Regulatory Compliance

Price

Pricing categories are listed below in descending order of importance.

1. Manday Rate

2. Catastrophic Limit

3. Catastrophic Limit Pricing

A proportionate amount of points will be awarded to each offeror below the highest-ranked offeror in each category.