S02 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 20 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 15A00024R00000110
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for a federal contract opportunity. The questionnaire is being requested in support of a source selection for the National Laboratory Center (NLC) Guard Booth Replacement/Modernization contract, Solicitation Number 15A00024R00000110. The contract is with the Department of Justice Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives to replace the existing guard booth at the NLC in Beltsville, MD, which has reached the end of its life expectancy. The questionnaire requests information on the contractor's past performance in areas such as quality of products and services, schedule, cost control, and overall assessment. The required response date is August 26, 2024 by 12:00 PM ET. The contract award date, completion date, and contract value are also requested.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
15A00024R00000110 Past Performance Questionnaire
PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Your assistance is requested in support of a source selection.
Please complete this Questionnaire and return it via email to: Catalin Marcel Parfenti (catalin.parfenti@atf.gov) and LaMark Combs (lamark.combs@atf.gov)
Required Response Date: NLT 08/26/2024 12:00 PM ET
When complete, the information on this form is SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION (41 U.S.C. 423) and shall be protected accordingly.
TO BE COMPLETED BY OFFEROR
1a. CONTRACTOR NAME & ADDRESS:
2. CONTRACT NO.:
3. CONTRACT AWARD DATE:
4. COMPLETION DATE:
5. CONTRACT VALUE (with options): $
1b. NAME OF PRIME CONTRACTOR (If this questionnaire is for a team member)
6. TYPE OF CONTRACT:
7. PROJECT TITLE, LOCATION, AND DESCRIPTION (AND TOTAL CONSTRUCTION VALUE AT PROJECT COMPLETION):
Please add a continuation page if additional space necessary.
TO BE COMPLETED BY EVALUATING ORGANIZATION REPRESENTATIVE
8. EVALUATION: a. EVALUATOR'S NAME, POSITION (Project Manager/ COR/ Other) AND ORGANIZATION:
b. EVALUATOR'S PHONE NUMBER: c. MONTHS PERFORMANCE MONITORED BY EVALUATOR:
Please circle the response code for each topic (A – G) that best reflects your experience with this contractor.
| E = Exceptional |
| S = Satisfactory |
| U = Unacceptable |
| G = Very Good |
| M = Marginal |
| N/O = Not Observed |
A. Quality of Products and Services - Assess the contractor’s conformance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g., technical, professional, environmental, or safety and health standards).
E G S M U N/O
B. Performance – Assess the contractor’s performance as the General Contractor or Architect/Engineer as appropriate) for the project.
E G S M U N/O
C. Schedule – Assess the timeliness of contractor against the schedule of activities.
E G S M U N/O
D. Technical Requirements – Assess the contractor’s ability to fulfill the technical requirements of the contract.
E G S M U N/O
E. Cost Control – Assess the contractor’s ability to manage the contract budget and control costs.
E G S M U N/O
F. Customer Satisfaction – Assess the contractor’s responsiveness to customer concerns and “user friendliness”.
E G S M U N/O
G. Overall Assessment.
E G S M U N/O
Comments (for any ratings of E, G, M, or U, please provide some brief comments about strengths & weaknesses you observed in this contractor that help us understand your rating. Feel free to provide additional pages if necessary):
Signature
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .