15. Final 80ARC024R0003 - J.1(b) Att. 7 - Past Performance Relevency Matrix.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 17 KB Posted
- Attached to
- NASA Academic Mission Services 2 (NAMS-2) - Request for Proposal Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 80ARC024R0003
About this file
This document contains templates and instructions for offerors responding to solicitation number 80ARC024R0003 from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Ames Research Center. The templates require offerors to provide the percentage of work for each Performance Work Statement section that will be performed by the prime contractor and up to four major subcontractors. A separate matrix requests offerors identify which past performance references from the prime and major subcontractors involved similar work as outlined in each Performance Work Statement section. Offerors must complete both matrices to demonstrate their proposed work allocation under the contract and relevance of prior experience to the required work.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 19
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Proposed PWS Matrix J.1(b) Attachment 7 - Past Performance Relevancy Matrix
| Proposed Allocation of PWS Requirements by Team Member | |||||||
| State Percentage of Requirements Proposed to be Performed on this Contract for the Offeror and its Major Subcontractor(s) | |||||||
| PWS | |||||||
| Section | PWS | ||||||
| Description | (Insert Company Name of Prime Offeror) | (Insert Company Name of Major Subcontract #1, if proposed) | (Insert Company Name of Major Subcontract #2, if proposed) | (Insert Company Name of Major Subcontract #3, if proposed) | (Insert Company Name of Major Subcontract #4, if proposed) | Total | |
| 5.1 | Phase-In | 0% | |||||
| 3.1 | Core Management | 0% | |||||
| 3.2 | Core Technical Area: Airt Traffic Management (ATM) | 0% | |||||
| 4.1 | Academic Methods | 0% | |||||
| 4.2 | ATM Research Safety and Mission Assurance | 0% | |||||
| 4.3 | Advanced Technology Systems | 0% | |||||
| 4.4 | Nanoelectronics and Devices | 0% | |||||
| 4.5 | Advanced Software for Digital Twin Systems | 0% | |||||
| 4.6 | Quantum Computing Technology | 0% | |||||
| 4.7 | Secure Airspace Architectures | 0% | |||||
| 4.8 | Machine Learning and Data Mining | 0% | |||||
| 4.9 | AAM National Campaign | 0% |
Instructions to Offerors:
The Offeror (Prime Contractor and its Major Subcontractor(s), if proposed) must complete this PWS Requirements Matrix to state its proposed approach for which PWS requirements for this contract will be performed by the Prime Contractor, and its Major Subcontractors, if proposed. For each PWS Section above, state the percentage of work the Prime Contractor and each of its Major Subcontractors, if proposed, will perform on this contract. The percentages assigned to the Prime Contractor and its Major Subcontractor(s), if proposed, should sum to 100% for each PWS Section in Column H. In any instance where the total for a PWS Section is less than 100% in Column H then the Government will conclude that the remaining percentage of work will be performed by the Offeror's subcontracts that do not meet the criteria to classify as a Major Subcontractor. In any instance where the total for a PWS Section is greater than 100% in Column H then the Government will reduce the percentage of work to be performed for that PWS Section for the Prime and each Major Subcontractor by the average percentage over 100% (i.e., (Proposed percentage over 100%/total prime and major subcontracts = amount each prime and major subcontractor proposed to perform). Enter numbers in the green fields only. The template will automatically sum the inputs. The Offeror may add additional columns between current Column E and F if the Offeror has more than 4 Major Subcontractors.
Examples to Offeror to Demonstrate How to Provide Inputs in Matrix:
Example 1 (1 Prime/1 Sub): Prime Contractor is proposed to perform all the work for Section 5.1 Phase-In. Enter "100" in cell D6 and "0" in cells E6 through H6. Cell I6 will display "100%". Example 2 (1 Prime/2 Major Subs): Major Subs are proposed to perform all the work for PWS Section 4.2 ATM Research Safety and Mission Assurance equally. Enter "0" in cell D10, "50" in cell E10, "50" in cell F10, and "0" in cell G10 and H10. Cell I10 will display "100%". Please verify that inputs accurately reflect your proposed breakdown of PWS work before submitting the completed Matrix with the Offerors proposal.
Past Performance Ref Matrix
| Proposed Relevance of Past Performance Contract References in Relations to the Contract PWS Requirements by Team Member (Prime and Major Subcontracors) | |
| Identify which PWS Requirements from this Contract were Performed on Each Past Performance Reference by Team Member (Prime and Major Subcontracors) |
| Performed as a Prime or Subfactor on Past Performance Contract Reference | PWS 5.1 Phase-In | PWS 3.1 Core Management | PWS 3.2 Core Technical Area: Airt Traffic Managemen (ATM)t | PWS 4.1 Academic Methods | PWS 4.2 ATM Research Safety and Mission Assurance | PWS 4.3 Advanced Technology Systems | PWS 4.4 Nanoelectronics and Devices | PWS 4.5 Advanced Software for Digital Twin Systems | PWS 4.6 Quantum Computing Technology | PWS 4.7 Secure Airspace Architectures | PWS 4.8 Machine Learning and Data Mining | PWS 4.9 AAM National Campaign | |
| Prime Offeror Past Performance References: |
(Insert Company Name)
| (Insert Contract Number and Name) |
| (Insert Contract Number and Name) |
| (Insert Contract Number and Name) |
| Major Subcontractor #1 Past Performance References: |
(Insert Company Name)
| (Insert Contract Number and Name) |
| (Insert Contract Number and Name) |
| (Insert Contract Number and Name) |
| Major Subcontractor #2 Past Performance References: |
(Insert Company Name)
| (Insert Contract Number and Name) |
| (Insert Contract Number and Name) |
| (Insert Contract Number and Name) |
| Major Subcontractor #3 Past Performance References: |
(Insert Company Name)
| (Insert Contract Number and Name) |
| (Insert Contract Number and Name) |
| (Insert Contract Number and Name) |
| Major Subcontractor #4 Past Performance References: |
(Insert Company Name)
| (Insert Contract Number and Name) |
| (Insert Contract Number and Name) |
| (Insert Contract Number and Name) |
Instructions to Offerors:
Offerors shall complete this past performance contract reference proposed relevancy matrix. In Column A, for each individual past performance contract reference, provide the name of the Prime Contractor or Major Subcontractor the past performance contract reference applies to. Also, include the contract number and contract name for each past performance contract reference. In Column B, include a “P” or “S” to indicate whether the Prime Offeror or its Major Subcontractor(s) was a Prime Contractor or a Subcontractor for that particular past performance contract reference. For all remaining columns, state an “X” in each column where the individual past performance contract reference included similar experience to the requirements in PWS Section identified in Row 3 of Columns B-L. The Offeror may add additional rows after row 23 if the Offeror has more than 4 Major Subcontractors.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .