Attachment_D_Forms_to_Return_with_Quote.pdf
PDF 102 KB Posted
- Attached to
- MORA-REPLACE GARAGE DOORS N101 N201
- Solicitation number
- 140P8325Q0052
About this file
This document is a Request for Quote (RFQ) 140P8325Q0051 for replacing garage doors at Mount Rainier National Park. The form is designed for contractors to provide relevant experience and past performance information when submitting a quote. The government seeks to evaluate the offeror's capabilities by reviewing construction projects similar to the current scope of work, with a focus on quality, timeliness, and business relations. Contractors are instructed to list up to ten projects from the past five years, providing details such as project name, location, owner information, project value, construction dates, and a description of their work. The form emphasizes the importance of transparency, particularly in disclosing any past performance issues and the corrective actions taken to address them.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFQ 140P8325Q0051 Replace Garage Doors Mount Rainier National Park
Forms to Return with Quote
Relevant Experience The purpose of this form is for the offeror to list construction projects (preferably performed during the past five (5) years) that are similar to the work described in this solicitation. The number of projects listed shall not exceed ten (10) and shall be numbered consecutively, beginning with the most recent project. Use this form to address your familiarity with the Scope of Work described in the plans and specifications and with the capability criteria described in the Request for Proposal. Include area codes with all telephone numbers. Type or print legibly.
The Government may contact the entities listed herein to obtain past performance reviews of the offeror’s team. Past performance is a measure of the degree to which the Offeror satisfied its customers in the past and complied with federal, state, and local laws and regulations. The past performance of the offeror, key personnel (if applicable), and proposed subcontractors on projects similar in scope and complexity (i.e. relevant to the current project) will be evaluated in the areas of quality, timeliness, and business relations. It is especially important that the offeror disclose instances in which their past performance may be considered by others to be less than fully satisfactory. The offeror should tell their side of the story and describe remedial corrective action that has been taken or will be taken to correct the deficiency. Failure to do so may result in a determination that an offeror has been less than candid with the Government, which could result in an unfavorable assessment of the offeror’s past performance record.
NAME OF CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR:
PROJECT NAME:
Project Location:
Name of Owner:
Address of Owner:
Telephone Number:
Project Value:
Dates of Construction:
DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT AND SCOPE OF OFFEROR’S WORK
PERFORMANCE REMARKS
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .