Attachment_4_Round_1_Q_and_A_0001.pdf
PDF 87 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Nat'l Regstr Documentation, San Juan Islands NHP
- Solicitation number
- 140P8323Q0045
About this file
This document contains questions and answers regarding solicitation number 140P8323Q0045 for a National Register documentation project at San Juan Islands National Historical Park. The solicitation seeks a contractor to expand an existing National Register nomination by adding two archeological districts and including new photographs that meet National Register standards. Some existing photographs may be used if they meet quality requirements. The contractor will utilize existing data and will not be expected to conduct new archeological surveys or complete a cultural landscape report. Eight Coast Salish tribes are currently consulted as tribal partners for the park.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
140P8323Q0045 Amendment 0001 National Register Nomination Package
Attachment 4 Round 1 Q&A (8/24/23) San Juan Islands NHP
The following are questions/answers to supplement the Statement of Work in the solicitation, and in some cases may provide some different information than what is stated in the Statement of
Work. Where there are differences, quoters shall make pen and ink changes in those sections in the Statement of Work with the information provided in this Q and A.
QUESTION 1: Would SAJH be open to nominating English Camp and American Camp as separate historic district/cultural landscapes?
ANSWER: English Camp and American camp were already designated Cultural
Landscapes (NPS 2004). This project is to expand the existing National
Register Nomination and add American Camp and English Camp as
Archeological Districts.
QUESTION 2: The SOW states that the recipient must include digital photographic views of each resource. Would it be possible to use photographs that are already existing as long as the quality is up to National Register Photo Policy?
ANSWER: Some existing photos may be available, but new photos will also be required if existing photos do not meet the policy or do not exist.
QUESTION 3: Can you confirm who the Tribal partners, and are there any Canadian First
Nations who have been consulted?
ANSWER: The park currently consults with eight federally recognized Coast Salish tribes that have traditional associations with the park lands: Lummi
Nation, Swinomish Indian Tribal Community, Samish Indian Nation, Jamestown S’Klallam Tribe, Tulalip Tribes, Stillaguamish Tribe of
Indians, Port Gamble S’Klallam Tribe, and Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe.
If the need arises to consult with Canadian First Nations, the park and the contractor would discuss feasibility.
QUESTION 4: Does SAJH have a ballpark cost in mind for this Project?
ANSWER: Yes
QUESTION 5: Have the new Mitchell Hill and Wescott Bay properties been fully surveyed?
ANSWER: A pedestrian archeological survey of the Wescott Bay property was conducted in 2021. In 2017, archeologists conducted a pedestrian survey of existing trail system corridor in Mitchell Hill, however the areas outside of the trail corridors in Mitchell Hill property have not been surveyed.
140P8323Q0045 Amendment 0001 National Register Nomination Package
Attachment 4 Round 1 Q&A (8/24/23) San Juan Islands NHP
QUESTION 6: Would the park expect the consultant to record new resources?
ANSWER: No, the scope of work for this project is to use existing data to produce a
National Register nomination; Archeological surveys to identify new resources will not be required for this project.
QUESTION 7: Does SAJH anticipate that the consultant would complete a cultural landscape report CLR as the guide to future treatment/use of a cultural landscape?
ANSWER No.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .