B09_-_Amendment_Q_A_0001.docx
DOCX document 51 KB Posted
- Attached to
- YELL AUTOMATIC TANK GUAGE REPAIRS
- Solicitation number
- 140P1424Q0113
About this file
This document is a set of Questions and Answers (Q&A) related to Request for Quotes (RFQ) for repairing the fuel tank monitoring system at Yellowstone National Park. The key details are:
The fuel tank is below grade and made of steel. It contains both diesel and gasoline. The Veeder-Root TLS 450+ ATG system is an acceptable alternative to the EVO400 system, as it is compatible with the existing conduit and wiring layout and provides similar operational familiarity for local staff. The existing TLS-350 system is less than 40 feet from the tank, and new conduit can utilize the existing conduit and wiring. No photos of the tank or current system are available, as the tank is below grade. The awarded contractor is responsible for determining compatibility with the current system.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Sol_140P1424Q0113_Amd_0001.pdf | ||
| Sol_140P1424Q0113.pdf | ||
| Attachment_1-_SoW_-_Veeder_Root_East_Replacement.pdf | ||
| Attachment_2_-_WD.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
United States Department of the Interior
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
CONTRACTING OPERATIONS - CENTRAL
1849 C Street NW Washington, DC 20240
In reference to Request for Quotes for: Repair the fuel tank monitoring system.
Questions and Answers for 140P1424Q0113
Question 1 - Is the fuel tank above ground or underground?
Answer 1 - Below grade
Question 2 - What is the material of the tank—fiberglass or steel?
Answer 2 - Steel
Question 3 - What type of product is stored in the tank—gasoline or diesel? (This will determine the appropriate probes and floats.)
Answer 3 - This is a compartment type tank diesel and gasoline.
Question 4 - Would the Veeder-Root TLS 450+ ATG system be an acceptable alternative to the EVO400?
Answer 4 - The awarded contractor is responsible to determine compatibility with the current system. This system is compatible with the existing conduit and wiring layout and provides similar operational familiarity for local staff.
Question 5 - Could you provide pictures of the tank and the current TLS-350 system?
Answer 5 - No the tank is below grade.
Question 6 - How far is the tank from the current TLS-350 system? If new conduit is needed for the EVO400, do you prefer it to be buried underground or run across the ground?
Answer 6 - The system allows for the utilization of the existing conduit and wire (less than 40 feet).
image1.jpg image2.jpg
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .