Revised_Evaluation_Criteria_0001.pdf
PDF 124 KB Posted
- Attached to
- FDO JANITORIAL SERVICES Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 140L4026Q0005
About this file
This document presents the evaluation criteria for a federal janitorial services contract award decision on a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) basis. The Government will select the responsible offeror whose conforming offer is most advantageous considering price and non-cost factors. Technical acceptability is defined as meeting or exceeding the non-cost evaluation factors.
The evaluation comprises four primary criteria. Technical Approach requires offerors to describe their methodology for performing janitorial services, including a proposed cleaning schedule addressing required service frequencies and locations, staffing and supervision plans, and quality control and inspection procedures. Staffing Qualifications requires offerors to describe their ability to meet background requirements. Past Performance requires submission of at least three references for similar services completed within the last five years, with documentation of project name, location, contract number, period of performance, total cost, agency/entity name, and point of contact information. Offerors without recent or relevant references must submit a statement to that effect to receive a "Neutral" rating; all others will be rated unacceptable. Price evaluation requires submission of an attached price schedule and assessment for reasonableness, with award going to the lowest-priced offeror rated Technically Acceptable under all non-price factors.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Sol_140L4026Q0005_Amd_0001.pdf | ||
| A06_FFO_areas_0001.pdf | ||
| B08_Questions_and_Answers_140L4026Q0005_0001.pdf | ||
| B08_Price_Schedule_with_option_years_140L4026Q0005_0001.pdf | ||
| A06_FFO_plan_0001.pdf | ||
| Sol_140L4026Q0005.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Evaluation Criteria
The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered on a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) basis. Technical acceptability is defined as meeting or exceeding the non-cost evaluation factors. The evaluation factors listed below will be used to select the LPTA offer.
1. Technical Approach
Offerors shall describe their approach to performing the required janitorial services. Evaluation will consider:
• A proposed cleaning schedule that addresses required service frequencies and locations.
• Staffing and supervision plans.
• Quality control and inspection procedures.
2. Staffing Qualifications
Offerors must describe the following:
• Ability to meet background requirements.
3. Past Performance
Provide a list of at least three (3) services of similar in type, complexity, and magnitude, that have been completed within the last five (5) years. Include a brief narrative of the projects to show relevancy to the work described in the attached Statement of Work. It is desirable, but not required, that references be from other Federal Agencies.
Provide past performance references including, at a minimum, the following information:
1. Name of Project
2. Location of Project
3. Contract Number
4. Period of Performance
5. Total cost for Project
6. Name of Agency/Entity
7. Point of Contact for Agency/Entity (including Phone Number and Email Address)
Offerors WITHOUT RECENT OR RELEVANT REFERENCES shall submit a statement to such effect in order to be considered as having "Neutral" Past Performance history. All others will be rated unacceptable for past performance.
4. Price
Offerors must submit the attached price schedule. Price will be evaluated for reasonableness.
Award will be made to the lowest‑priced offeror whose quote is rated Technically Acceptable under all non‑price factors.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .