B09_Attachment_07_Amendment_01_Comparative_Evaluation_Language_Final_0001.pdf
PDF 134 KB Posted
- Attached to
- BLM WASSUK LOP AND SCATTER 2026
- Solicitation number
- 140L3726Q0092
About this file
This document is Amendment 01 to a federal solicitation for commercial products or services, issued on June 18, 2026, establishing evaluation criteria under FAR Part 12 procedures.
The Government will award a purchase order to the responsible quoter whose quote provides the best value, considering price and other evaluation factors. The evaluation process employs a comparative approach without formal scoring, precise weighting, or adjectival ratings. Quotes will be compared side-by-side using professional business judgment to determine if technical superiority or more favorable terms justify a higher price. The Contracting Officer reserves the right to make no award and may conduct price analysis at any point during evaluation. All timely quotations will be considered. Evaluation factors include: (1) Technical Capability—demonstrated ability to meet Statement of Work specifications through a narrative response not exceeding 5 pages, including understanding of project requirements, organizational and management approach, safety and sustainability considerations, and a completion schedule; (2) Relevant Experience—documentation of at least two jobs completed or ongoing within the past five years where the offeror served as Prime Contractor or Sub-Contractor, with required information including job name, start/end dates, services description, location/size, job owner, owner contact information, and total dollar value; and (3) Price—total evaluated price. Award is not automatically made to the lowest priced quoter.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Amendment 01 06/18/2026
52.212-2 Evaluation—Commercial Products and Commercial Services. (DEVIATION
MAR 2026)
(a) Evaluation factors. The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible Offeror (Quoter) whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors will be used to evaluate offers:
Basis for Award (Comparative Evaluation)
1. General:
The Government will award a purchase order resulting from this solicitation to the responsible quoter whose quote is most advantageous to the Government, price and evaluation factors identified below. This acquisition is being conducted under the Acquisition of Commercial Products and Commercial Services of FAR Part 12.
2. Evaluation Process:
In accordance with FAR 12.203(c)(2) (FAR Overhaul - Part 12 | Acquisition.GOV) the Government will perform a comparative evaluation of quotes. A comparative evaluation is defined as the act of comparing one quote to another in a side-by-side fashion.
• No Formal Scoring: The Government will not use formal evaluation plans, precise weighting, or adjectival scoring (e.g., "Excellent" or "Blue").
• Direct Comparison: IAW FAR 12.203(b), Quotes will be compared against one another to determine which provides the best value. The Government will use their professional business judgment to determine if a quote’s technical superiority or more favorable terms (e.g., faster delivery, longer warranty) justifies a higher price.
• Price Consideration: The Government may make an award to other than the lowest priced quote if it is determined to provide the best value. Award is not automatically made to the quoter submitting the lowest price. The Contracting Officer reserves the right to make no award at all. The Government may conduct a price analysis at any point during the evaluation to assist in determining a best value at a fair and reasonable price.
• Quote Evaluation Approach: IAW FAR 12.203(c) and (c)(1) Quotations evaluated in an efficient and minimally burdensome fashion. Government will consider all quotations or offers that are received timely.
3. Evaluation Factors:
The following factors will be used to evaluate quotes and quotes must first meet the minimum technical requirements to be considered for award:
• Technical Capability: Ability to meet the specifications in the Statement of Work. (narrative response of no longer than 5 pages).
(A) Technical approach narrative must demonstrate the offeror’s understanding of the project requirements, the scope of work, and the contract documents. Identify and address the specific needs and unique requirements for the scope, location, and schedule of this project.
(B) Demonstrate understanding of how to organize, staff, and manage the contract, as well as the means and methods that will be used to accomplish the contract requirements.
(C) Demonstrate an understanding of project requirements for safety, sustainability, energy efficiency and risk management.
(D) Provide a schedule to show how work described in the SOW will be completed within the
Period of Performance.
• Relevant Experience: Provide a list of at least two (2) jobs completed or ongoing, in the past five (5) years in which you acted as a Prime Contractor or Sub-Contractor responsible for providing similar/services.
Each job description must contain the following information:
•The name of job
•The job start and end dates https://www.acquisition.gov/far-overhaul/far-part-deviation-guide/far-overhaul-part-12#FAR_Subpart_12_2
Amendment 01 06/18/2026
•A brief description of services provided and the location/size of the job
•The owner of job
•The owner’s Contact information
•The total dollar value of the job
• Price: Total evaluated price.
(End of provision)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .