Evaluation_Technical_Factors_0003.pdf
PDF 140 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Long Lake HQ and Visitor Center Bldg - ND
- Solicitation number
- 140FC124R0002
About this file
This solicitation document outlines four evaluation factors for a federal contract to construct a new office building and visitor center in North Dakota. Offerors will be evaluated based on their recent relevant experience on similar projects valued over $2.5 million, technical capabilities and ability to deliver the project, past performance references for comparable work in the last five years, and price proposal. Under the technical evaluation, offerors must identify key personnel including a project manager and site superintendent, and submit documentation of their management team, structural engineer, and any subcontractors or specialists. For past performance, offerors must provide a minimum of three and maximum of five references including contact information. Pricing will be evaluated for fairness, reasonableness, and balance. The selected contractor will design and construct a new 5,000 square foot office building, visitor center, and associated site work for the Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service.
View the file
Other files
Show all 26
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Long Lake HQ and Visitor Center Building – Burleigh County, ND SOLICITATION NO. 140FC124R0002
FWS
FACTOR 1 – RECENT RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
Offerors shall be evaluated to determine whether they have performed similar contracts, in terms of scope and price, to the work required within the solicitation. Offerors shall provide the minimum requested project information on at least two (2) relevant projects completed within the last (5) years for the construction of similar projects as stated on Specifications (MAXIMUM 5 PAGES). For a project to be considered, the offeror shall have been the Prime Contractor on it. One of the projects does have to have been done with a Federal Agency to be considered. The contractor shall have experience with construction of commercial buildings similar or exceeding size and scope, Proposal responses exceeding the 5-page maximum shall not be considered.
A project is considered ‘relevant’ if it is similar in terms of scope and price to the work required within the solicitation. To be considered similar in scope, one project shall demonstrate work experience in construction of similar projects as stated on the statement of work and the project shall have a contract value of at least $2,500,000.00 or more.
FACTOR 2 – TECHNICAL CAPABILITIES AND ABILITY TO DELIVER
The offeror shall identify their Technical Capabilities and their Ability to Deliver the project shown in the supporting documents provided at solicitation. Under the Technical Capabilities and Ability to Deliver Factor, the Offeror shall provide documentation for their General Contractor Management Team, Structural Engineer and any Sub-contractors / Specialists if proposing. Documentation submitted may include but will not necessarily be limited to: organizational charts, resumes, professional qualifications, previous collaborations and certifications necessary for satisfactory performance of required services and construction.
a. Identify the following key personnel: Project Manager and Site Superintendent.
b. Identify other key personnel and specialized training.
c. List current and upcoming project commitments of key personnel.
d. Draft work plan identifying proposed sequencing of major work components.
The response on Technical Ability to Deliver is limited to 5 pages Maximum. Proposal responses exceeding the 5-page maximum shall not be considered.
FACTOR 3 – PAST PERFORMANCE
Past performance information is one indicator of an offeror’s ability to perform the contract successfully. The currency and relevance of the information, source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in contractor’s performance shall be considered. This comparative assessment of past performance information is separate from the responsibility determination required under subpart 9.1.
Provide a list of at least three but no more than five references for work similar in scope and size completed by your organization within the last 5 years. References shall include; point of contact, https://www.acquisition.gov/far/part-9#FAR_Subpart_9_1
Long Lake HQ and Visitor Center Building – Burleigh County, ND SOLICITATION NO. 140FC124R0002
FWS
address, telephone number, project title, and contract value. Relevant work should include any work with similar technical requirements in accordance with the specifications and drawings.
FACTOR 4 – PRICE
The price criteria includes the base and bid items in making a determination of overall price fair and reasonableness and if funding is available at the time of award, one or more of the option items listed above. Incomplete bids will not be considered. For option bid item(s) that may not be able to be funded at the time of award, the Government reserves the right to award and incorporate by modification within 30 days of award.
Offeror’s prices for each item within the bid schedule shall represent the best price in response to the solicitation. Prices will be evaluated using price analysis IAW FAR 15.404-1(a)(2) and 15.404-1(b). Prices shall be evaluated to determine fairness, reasonableness and if unbalanced pricing exists.
Unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable total evaluated price, the price of one or more contract line items is significantly over or understated. If price analysis techniques indicate that a proposal is unbalanced, the contracting officer shall consider the risks to the Government associated with the unbalanced pricing. An offer may be rejected if the contracting balance poses an unacceptable risk to the Government (no page limit).
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .