13RISK~1.XLS
XLS spreadsheet 35 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Workforce Integration in Conflict Areas
- Opportunity number
- SCAISB-26-CA-002-02242026
- Issued by
-
Department of State US Embassy Islamabad
About this file
This file is a risk assessment template (13RISK~1.XLS) related to the Workforce Integration in Conflict Areas federal grant opportunity administered by the U.S. Department of State's Embassy Islamabad under the Public Diplomacy Programs for Afghanistan and Pakistan (CFDA 19.501).
The grant opportunity seeks to implement a cooperative agreement program building sustainable employment pathways in Balochistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa provinces of Pakistan. The program addresses the correlation between poverty, terrorist recruitment, weak public education systems, and madrassah concentration in these regions while simultaneously developing a trained workforce for U.S. mining and minerals sector companies. Successful proposals must assess graduate skill gaps and employer needs, develop and deliver employment training with local vocational-technical institutions, facilitate graduate placement into internships and jobs, and advocate with provincial and national governments for course replication and scaling. Under CFDA 19.501, recent awards have ranged from approximately $15,000 to $2,400,000 in obligated federal funds with project durations of one to three years, structured primarily as cooperative agreements and project grants. Eligible applicants include non-profit organizations, civil society groups, educational institutions, and both U.S.-based and foreign entities. Recipients must comply with Generally Accepted Government Auditing Standards (GAGAS) per 2 CFR 200, retain federal award records for three years, and demonstrate how resources, capabilities, and experience will achieve stated goals while addressing U.S. foreign policy objectives and public diplomacy priorities.
Risk Assessment and Monitoring Plan
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 06. Detailed DOS Budget Template.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 18. Notional Disbursement Schedule.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Workforce Integration in Conflict Areas NOFO-1.pdf | ||
| 14. Monitoring Plan Template.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 05 - M&E PMP Template.docx | DOCX document | |
| 04. Applicant Organizational Information Sheet.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
<$5k
| Risk Assessment and Monitoring Plan |
| $0 - $4,999 Award |
Recipient Name:
Unique Entity Identifier:
Risk assessment completed by:
Date assessment completed:
| Risk Assessment | |||
| Yes | |||
| No | Question | Answer | |
| Unknown | 1) Has the applicant previously received an award from the Department of State? | FALSE | |
| 2) Is the applicant a well-known entity and/or have a positive reputation? | FALSE | ||
| Low | 3) What is the degree of sensitivity of the topic/theme for the program? | FALSE | |
| Medium | 4) What is the overall degree of risk for the region and/or country (political stability, level of development, corruption, terrorist-financing, inflationary etc.)? | FALSE | |
| High | Overall Risk | Low | 0 |
Past Performance:
Describe any other sources and assessments of past performance information reviewed (for example audits, program and project evaluations, previous award files if applicant had a previous award, monitoring and evaluation reports, previous GOR assessments) and how this information informs this risk assessment:
Please elaborate on any of the above considerations or provide any additional information you wish to highlight that is not captured above regarding the risk assessment of this recipient:
*Press (ALT) + (ENTER) on your keyboard to insert a line space when typing.
Monitoring Plan
Based on the risk level identified above, please list the proposed monitoring activities below. Documentation that monitoring activities have taken place must be filed in the official award file.
*Press (ALT) + (ENTER) on your keyboard to insert a line space when typing.*
Communication (type and frequency):
Event Monitoring (key events, dates):
Reporting required from recipient, if applicable (type and frequency):
Please provide any additional information you wish to highlight that is not captured above regarding the monitoring of this recipient:
*Press (ALT) + (ENTER) on your keyboard to insert a line space when typing.
≥$5k & <$25k
| Risk Assessment and Monitoring Plan |
| $5,000 - $24,999 Award |
Recipient Name:
Unique Entity Identifier:
Risk assessment completed by:
Date assessment completed:
| Risk Assessment | |||
| Yes | |||
| No | Question | Answer | |
| N/A | 1) Does the applicant have an active registration in SAM.gov? (N/A/ for Individual) | FALSE | |
| 1) Has the applicant previously received an award from the Department of State? | FALSE | ||
| Yes | 3) Is the applicant a well-known entity and/or have a positive reputation? | FALSE | |
| No | 4) Does the organization have previous experience conducting similar programs? | FALSE | |
| Unknown | 5) What is the degree of sensitivity of the topic/theme for the program? | FALSE | |
| 6) What is the overall degree of risk for the region and/or country (political stability, level of development, corruption, terrorist-financing, inflationary etc.)? | FALSE | ||
| Low | 7) What is the potential for negative impact on the Mission/Bureau if the program is unsuccessful? | FALSE | |
| Medium | 8) What is the complexity of the program (# of participants/sites)? | FALSE | |
| High | Overall Risk | Low | 0 |
Past Performance:
Describe any other sources and assessments of past performance information reviewed (for example audits, program and project evaluations, previous award files if applicant had a previous award, monitoring and evaluation reports, previous GOR assessments) and how this information informs this risk assessment:
Please elaborate on any of the above considerations or provide any additional information you wish to highlight that is not captured above regarding the risk assessment of this recipient:
*Press (ALT) + (ENTER) on your keyboard to insert a line space when typing.
Monitoring Plan
Based on the risk level identified above, please list the proposed monitoring activities below. Documentation that monitoring activities have taken place must be filed in the official award file.
Pre-Award Site Visit (if applicable):
Communication (type and frequency):
Event Monitoring (key events, dates):
Reporting required from recipient, if applicable (type and frequency):
Site Visit(s) (program and/or financial):
Please provide any additional information you wish to highlight that is not captured above regarding the monitoring of this recipient:
*Press (ALT) + (ENTER) on your keyboard to insert a line space when typing.
≥$25k
| Risk Assessment and Monitoring Plan |
| $25,000+ Award |
Recipient Name:
Unique Entity Identifier:
Risk assessment completed by:
Date assessment completed:
Risk Assessment
| Organizational Risk | Weight 40% | |
| Answers | Question | Answer |
| 1 | Competition: |
(1) Full competition
(2) Limited competition
(3) Sole source 2 Type of Recipient:
(1) U.S. Recipient
(2) Foreign Recipient 3 New Recipient:
The recipient is a first-time recipient that may not be familiar with Department program operation, fiscal management, oversight and reporting practices.
(1) No
(2) Unknown
(3) Yes New Organization or Change in Ownership:
The recipient's date of startup or ownership change was three years or less from today.
(1) No
(2) Unknown
(3) Yes Program History:
(1) Recipient has met program objectives specified in past awards.
(2) Recipient partially met program objectives in prior awards OR is a new recipient.
(3) Recipient failed to meet program objectives in at least one prior award (3).
Reporting History:
(1) Program and financial reports were submitted in a timely and accurate manner.
(2) Routine reports were frequently late and contain some errors OR is a new recipient.
(3) Routine reports reflected significant discrepancies or omissions.
Answers Financial History:
(1) No significant audit findings OR recipient is not required to file an audit.
(2) Minor audit findings with pending corrective action.
(3) Significant audit findings and/or audit findings not resolved in a timely manner or applicant did not file required audit.
1 Staff Size:
(1) Large (13 or more full time employees)
(2) Medium (7-12 full time employees)
(3) Small (1-6 Full time employees) 3 Key Staff Qualifications:
(1) All key staff have one or more years’ experience.
(2) At least half of the key staff have one or more years’ experience.
(3) Key staff have little or no experience.
Multi-site Program:
The recipient is responsible for managing resources at multiple operational sites.
(1) No
(2) Unknown
(3) Yes Use of Subrecipients:
(1) Zero subrecipients
(2) One to two subrecipients
(3) Three or more sub-recipients Complexity of Budget:
(1) The budget is relatively simple in terms of the number of budget categories and line items included.
(2) Budget is moderately complex in terms of budget categories and line items included.
(3) Budget is very complex in terms of budget categories and line items included.
SAM.gov:
The recipient has an active registration in SAM.gov
(1) Yes
(2) No Organizational Total Low 0
Past Performance:
For awards over $250,000, describe any information in the SAM.gov Responsibility/Qualification integrity record (for example, proceedings or other responsibility information) and how this information informs this risk assessment:
Past Performance:
Describe any other sources and assessments of past performance information reviewed (for example audits, program and project evaluations, previous award files if applicant had a previous award, monitoring and evaluation reports, previous GOR assessments) and how this information informs this risk assessment:
Other:
Please elaborate on any of the above considerations or provide any additional information you wish to highlight that is not captured above regarding the risk assessment of this recipient.
*Press (ALT) + (ENTER) on your keyboard to insert a line space when typing.
| Programmatic Risk | Weight 40% |
| Question | Answer |
| New Program: |
The program is being implemented for the first time.
(1) No
(3) Yes Complexity of Program:
(1) Low complexity
(2) Moderate complexity
(3) High complexity Organizational Experience:
(1) Organization has been providing similar activities listed in the award for more than two years.
(2) Organization has been providing similar activities listed in the award for one to two years
(3) Organization has provided similar activities for less than one year.
Potential for Implementation Problems:
(1) Little to no potential for implementation issues.
(2) Some potential for implementation issue.
(3) High potential for significant implementation issues.
Topic or theme of the program :
(1) Project is not sensitive or potentially controversial.
(2) Project is moderately visible, sensitive or controversial.
(3) Project is highly visible, sensitive or potentially controversial.
Amount of Funding:
(1) $99,999 or less
(2) $100,000 - $499,999
(3) $500,000 or more Programmatic Total Low 0
Please elaborate on any of the above considerations or provide any additional information you wish to highlight that is not captured above regarding the risk assessment of this recipient:
*Press (ALT) + (ENTER) on your keyboard to insert a line space when typing.
| Country/Region Specific Risk | Weight 20% |
| Question | Answer |
| Political Environment: |
(1) Relatively stable. The recipient is able to operate with relative ease, and our ability to monitor activities is not hindered.
(2) Somewhat unstable. The country is in a state of relative political instability that could affect recipient performance.
(3) Very unstable. The country is in a state of crisis or upheaval and the recipient is expected to face great difficulty in implementation, and our ability to monitor grant activities is severely limited or impossible.
Number of Countries Where the Project is Implemented:
(1) Single country program.
(2) Program implemented in two countries.
(3) Program implemented in three or more countries.
Program Location:
Program activities occur in a country or area that has a significant known level of financial corruption.
(1) No
(3) Yes Travel:
The Department has issued a Travel Warning for the country or area where the project is implemented.
(1) No
(3) Yes Inflationary or Exchange Rate Risk:
The likelihood of either inflation or exchange rate fluctuations harming project implementation.
(1) Low
(2) Medium
(3) High Criminal Activities/Terrorism:
There are concerns that either recipients, participants, or beneficiaries could be involved in criminal activities such as arms trafficking, terrorism, drug trafficking, or other criminal conduct or that funds could be diverted for these purposes?
(1) No
(3) Yes Country Specific Total Low 0
Please elaborate on any of the above considerations or provide any additional information you wish to highlight that is not captured above regarding the risk assessment of this recipient:
*Press (ALT) + (ENTER) on your keyboard to insert a line space when typing.
| Total | Risk Assessment Summary | Score | |
| 37 | Organizational Total | 0.00 | |
| 18 | Programmatic Total | 0.00 | |
| 18 | Country Specific Total | 0.00 | |
| Weight | Overall Risk | Low | 0.00 |
| 40% | |||
| 40% | Monitoring Plan | ||
| 20% | |||
| Based on the risk level identified above, please list the proposed monitoring activities below. Documentation that monitoring activities have taken place must be filed in the official award file. |
Pre-Award Site Visit (if applicable):
Communication (type and frequency):
Event Monitoring (key events, dates):
Reporting required from recipient, if applicable (type and frequency):
Site Visit(s) (program and/or financial):
Please provide any additional information you wish to highlight that is not captured above regarding the monitoring of this recipient, including other offices that may play a role in monitoring the recipient. For high risk awards, specify any additional award conditions that will be added to the agreement.
*Press (ALT) + (ENTER) on your keyboard to insert a line space when typing.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .