Attachment_L5_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 192 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 1333ND23QNB190061
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire and details of a related federal contract opportunity. The past performance questionnaire is a template to be completed by an evaluator and contractor regarding a prior design-build contract. It requests information on contract details, performance ratings, and remarks.
The associated federal contract opportunity is a solicitation for a multiple-award IDIQ for large tier two-phase design-build services. The National Institute of Standards and Technology seeks design and construction services including laboratory and infrastructure renovations. The small business set-aside has a NAICS code of 236220 and size standard of $70M. The solicitation is a two-phase qualifications-based process to qualify firms for task order competitions up to $30M each. The IDIQ ceiling is $70M over the maximum life of the contracts. The solicitation and phase one responses are due in January and February 2023 respectively. Phase two will select three firms for site visits prior to final selection.
View the file
Other files
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104
Attachment L5
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104 1
Past Performance Questionnaire
PART A – CONTRACTOR INFORMATION (to be completed by the contractor requesting evaluation prior to mailing)
A. Contractor’s name and address: _____________________________________________________________
B. Contractor’s point of contact: ______________________________________________________________
C. Phone number (with area code): ____________________________________________________________
D. Contract Number: _______________________________________________________________________
E. Project Title: ___________________________________________________________________________
F. Work Type (choose one): ____ Design-Build ____ Construction Only
G. Project Award Amount: $______________________ Final Project Amount: $________________________
H. Contractor performed as the (select one): ____ Prime Contractor ____ Joint Venture ____ Subcontractor
I. List all Major Subcontractors (performed more than 5% of the work):
Name of the Firm Work Performed Subcontract Amount Point of Contact Phone
Designer $
J. Authorization is hereby granted to provide the information requested in PART B of this Questionnaire.
(Signature)
(Name and Title of Authorizing Official) (Date)
PART B – SECTION 1: RESPONDENT INFORMATION (to be completed by the evaluator)
A. Organization’s name: _____________________________________________________ Date: ______________________________
B. Evaluator’s name and title: ___________________________________________________________________________________
C. Evaluator’s contact information (phone and email): ________________________________________________________________
D. Number of years and relationship of evaluator to the subject contract: __________________________________________________
E. Description of Work performed under this project: (Must be Design/Build) _____________________________________________
F. Project Award Date: _____________________________ Original Contract Completion Date (DD/MM/YR)_____________________
Final Contract Completion Date: ___________________ Turnover/Acceptance Date: ______________________________________
Please explain any differences between the Original, Final, and/or Turnover dates: __________________________________________
G. Has a Contract Performance Evaluation been submitted and accepted for the project identified in Part A (yes/no)? _______________
(If YES then a copy of the evaluation may be submitted in lieu of this Questionnaire.)
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104 2
PART B – SECTION 2: PERFORMANCE INFORMATION (Choose the letter on the scale that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OTHER THAN SATISFACTORY
IN THE REMARKS SECTION.)
U M S O N/A
Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory Outstanding Not applicable
Based on the contractor’s performance record, the contractor did not successfully perform the required effort.
Based on the contractor’s performance record, the contractor was somewhat successful in performing the required effort.
Based on the contractor’s performance record the contractor successfully performed the minimum required effort.
Based on the contractor’s performance record the contractor was highly successful in performing the required effort.
No or very limited performance information is available therefore no meaningful rating can be reasonably assigned.
Evaluation Areas
1. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:
Would you have any reservations in awarding another contract to this
Contractor or working with this Contractor on any future contracts?
YES NO N/A
2. QUALITY:
a Contractor provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements U M S O N/A b Contractor provided well researched and clearly identified submittals that matched contract requirements U M S O N/A c Contractor completed all work with good workmanship and in conformance with the specifications U M S O N/A d Contractor corrected deficiencies in a timely manner and pursuant to their quality control plan U M S O N/A
3. TIMELINESS:
a Contractor met established project milestones without excessive revisions U M S O N/A b Contractor provided timely cost/design proposals U M S O N/A c Contractor submitted adequate progress schedules and progress reports as required U M S O N/A d Contractor provided on-time submittals as required U M S O N/A e Contractor provided payrolls for both their employees and their subcontractors employees as required U M S O N/A f Contractor provided timely resolution of all punch list items U M S O N/A
4. RESPONSIVENESS:
a Contractor acted promptly to resolve problems, ensuring compliance with contract requirements and safety regulations U M S O N/A b Contractor was reasonable and cooperated to resolve problems, attended meetings as needed, and maintained communication with the government to keep the project on schedule or minimize delays
U M S O N/A c Contractor identified problems as they occurred; suggested approaches to the problems; displayed initiative to solve problems; and performed as a Team
Member
U M S O N/A d Contractor responded to warranty issues within the time frames specified in the contract U M S O N/A
5. SUBCONTRACTS AND MANAGEMENT:
a Contractor successfully partnered with all stakeholders to meet contract objectives U M S O N/A b Contractor provided experienced/qualified managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements U M S O N/A c Contractor hired quality subcontractors and effectively managed and coordinated their work U M S O N/A d Contractor hired, maintained, and replaced as necessary, qualified personnel and subcontractors/suppliers U M S O N/A e Contractor ensured the project manager had sufficient authority to make decisions and take actions during project performance to keep the project on schedule U M S O N/A f Contractor ensured site superintendent and quality control representative were consistently present on site when work was performed g Contractor paid employees/subcontractors/suppliers as required U M S O N/A
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104 3
6. DESIGN:
a Contractor provided complete, supportable, technically sound designs for the project U M S O N/A b Contractor demonstrated the ability to incorporate user’s requirements into the design U M S O N/A c Contractor completed designs that were constructed in the same manner as they were designed U M S O N/A
7. CHANGE/COST CONTROL:
a Contractor responsive to contract changes and provided accurate, reasonable and supportable cost proposals U M S O N/A b Contractor demonstrated the ability to control costs and/or design projects or modifications within the magnitude specified U M S O N/A c Contractor validated subcontractor cost proposals prior to submission to the
Government
PART B – SECTION 3: REMARKS
1. Customer Satisfaction – Please explain your response to Question 1 above:
2. Quality:
3. Timeliness:
4. Responsiveness:
5. Subcontracts and Management:
6. Design:
7. Change/Cost Control:
PART B – SECTION 4: GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS ONLY
Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? No Yes
If yes, explain the outcome: ______________________________________________________________________________________
Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!
Please return this completed questionnaire to:
Emailing address: U.S. Department of Commerce/National Institute of Standards and Technology
@nist.gov
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .